Michigan's Myriad Defensive Issues Comment Count

Ace


Not ideal.

It's no secret Michigan's defense hasn't been good this season even by the generally mediocre standard set by previous John Beilein teams. The Wolverines rank 134th nationally in defensive efficiency on KenPom; if that stands, it would be the lowest mark in Beilein's tenure by a healthy margin.

When I first watched the Iowa game, I hoped to find one or two issues I could isolate as the main cause of Michigan's defensive problems. On the first viewing, I identified a couple: Michigan's guards gave up the baseline too often, straining their already sub-par weakside defense. This example came to mind:

This was even worse:

There are two big problems on that play. Walton does a poor job defending the high side screen, allowing his man to turn down the pick and get the baseline. This forces Duncan Robinson to rotate over, which he does—he's improved a lot in that regard—but communication is lacking on the weak side and MAAR isn't in position to contest the corner three.

As the screencap at the top of the post indicates, communication was the other deficiency I noticed right away. When Michigan doubled in the post or switched on a screen, they often ended up with two players guarding one guy off the ball while the other was left alone for a layup. Screencaps are sufficient here; both these plays ended in a layup:

Jarrod Uthoff got a crucial late bucket when Iowa ran a pair of baseline screens and Aubrey Dawkins had no idea who to guard:

Those two issues—dribble penetration opening up weakside threes and blowing rotations off the ball—caught my attention on the first viewing.

Unfortunately, a second pass through the game revealed more problems. A couple Iowa three-pointers I initially believed were caused by the weakside defender were instead the product of poor pick-and-roll defense. Michigan eschewed their normal hard hedge against high screens in favor of a softer, more conservative approach for much of the game, and they didn't execute it well.

On this play, Dawkins gets hung up on the screen too long, which causes a domino effect—Mark Donnal has to wait an extra beat before sinking back into the paint, which forces MAAR to stay on the rolling big instead of getting back to his man in the corner:

On this pick-and-roll, Iowa gets a layup when Walton and Donnal play soft, Mike Gesell has an open passing lane, and the help from Robinson is late and wouldn't have prevented an Adam Woodbury bucket regardless:

One more P&R failure for good measure: when Michigan went back to a hard hedge, Walton doubled Uthoff in the paint instead of guarding Woodbury, who was all alone next to the basket.

Finally, Michigan also had trouble identifying shooters in transition, something Beilein discussed in the postgame presser. On this play, Iowa pushes the pace off a defensive rebound, and the Wolverines initially stymie the attempt to get an easy bucket. Again, a lack of communication comes to the forefront, as Dawkins switches men while Iowa swings the ball around the perimeter, which is news to Donnal:

This is pretty basic stuff that Michigan still can't get right. A couple takeaways from the above:

There's no single fix. There's plenty of stuff that's gone wrong here that doesn't even touch on the lack of a true post presence, which I still believe is the biggest problem with Beilein's defenses. There isn't one defender at the heart of these issues—though Dawkins stands out in a bad way, this goes far beyond him. Getting this defense up to simply mediocre will require fixing multiple areas of deficiency.

But if I had to pick one, it's communication. A lot of these easy baskets result from players not talking to each other. Those screencaps are frustrating and telling.

Long story short, it's tough to see Michigan improving to the point where the defense isn't a liability. We're beyond the midway point and there are myriad problem areas. Players like Robinson and Donnal have progressed during the season from starting points that were frankly bad, but they may have maxed out their defensive potential for this season. Hopefully getting Caris LeVert back—whenever that may be—solves some of the communication problems, but those are also widespread enough that I doubt one man clears them up.

The good news is the offense has plenty of firepower. Michigan is going to have to lean on that for the duration unless they have a team-wide defensive improvement we haven't seen out of a Beilein team during the course of a single season.

Comments

Padog

January 20th, 2016 at 10:31 AM ^

One thing I can think of when it comes to PnR defense is going under the screens. Very few players can really punish you off the dribble like that consistently. Going under the screens would eliminate those times where the big has to wait causing the chain reaction three.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ijohnb

January 20th, 2016 at 10:31 AM ^

that getting Levert back will cause further delay in cohesiveness and communication.  I sincerely hope that Levert is able to return, and "remain returned" as soon as possible.  I also think it would be unfortunate if the team defers to him to much when he does return as it is rounding into form right now and allowing his return to fundamentally change the functionality of the team would me a mistake.  I would like Levert to return as a peice to the puzzle and not the main character with a "supporting cast."

MGlobules

January 20th, 2016 at 10:32 AM ^

SMU remains the lone unbeaten team in the country and Xavier just sustained its first loss. We are not a bad team, and Beilein usually gets around to teaching just the amount of D his teams need to get some key wins in late January, so I remain cool with his approach, style, and achievements to date. But without Caris M's ceiling is pretty damned clear at this point. Hope like hell he is coming back to play.

ak47

January 20th, 2016 at 10:44 AM ^

In what world does Xavier only have one loss?  I mean they are a good team but that is factually innacurate.  We are also the best team SMU has played, they are also a good team but no indication they are elite. 

We also have a loss to uconn you conveniently left out, a team with losses to tulsa and temple and all of our losses have come by double digits.  We are a pretty mediocre team this year.  Should be good enough for the ncaa tournament but not challenging for any titles.

jmblue

January 20th, 2016 at 11:08 AM ^

Per the latest AP poll, Michigan has lost to the #5 (Xavier), #8 (SMU), #9 (Iowa), and #22 (Purdue) teams in the country, as well as unranked UConn.  UConn's the only game that could remotely be considered a bad loss, and even they're 13-5 and likely tournament-bound.  There's not too much to criticize in our résumé.  We have a lot to play for.

 

 

 

ijohnb

January 20th, 2016 at 11:38 AM ^

will not be considered a "bad loss."  This next stretch of games is absolutely crucial, as any one of them would be considered bad losses.  If we win the next 4 games and then get either Indiana or State, we may be looking more in the 5-7 seed range for the tournament.  If we win 5 of 6, we would be 18-6, with only one loss coming to a team outside of the Top 25.  Barring an epic collapse from there on out, I think we would be looking at being a first round favorite with a borderline sweet 16 seed.  The one very important thing this team has done is avoid bad losses.

ak47

January 20th, 2016 at 12:07 PM ^

I didn't say we had any bad losses, I said we are a mediocre team.  Slightly above average teams can go off and have a really good game but in general get handled by elite teams (double digit losses to all four of those ranked teams) and beat the teams they should with maybe one or two bad games on the road leading to an annoying defeat.  That is this team.  But like 6th or 7th seed with sweet sixteen ceileing and more likely a second round loss is a perfectly fine season.  I just don't think we are competing for any championships this year.

ak47

January 20th, 2016 at 10:39 AM ^

Its coaching. These issue are all coaching.  These guys are all intelligent, they picked up Beileins offense.  Some of them have pretty elite ahtleticism.  If an athletic smart guy who isn't a coaching problem is playing poorly on defense its probably because he isn't getting coached up well enough. Its been an issue for years and just happens to be worse this year.  Don't know what the fix is, probably trying to steal an assitant from Pitino or something.

iforaneye

January 20th, 2016 at 10:40 AM ^

I really wasn't too upset with most of the d in this game because I knew Iowa would score. That being said I was pretty upset about those times when we tried to double someone and completely messed that up and left an open guy down low for an easy lay-up. I'm pretty sure those open shots when we miscommunicated on the double pretty much add up to the final margin of our loss. Not to say they wouldn't have found another way to score on those posessions, but we could've made it at least a little tougher for them to do so.

jmblue

January 20th, 2016 at 11:11 AM ^

How much are our defensive efficiency ratings dragged down from playing those 300+ RPI teams in December?  They've lowered our SoS quite a bit.

 

Mannix

January 20th, 2016 at 12:12 PM ^

Some M-M D forces ball to baseline with the early help from either ball side help or weak side help. If they're teaching the force (which sometimes it looks as if they are) the help is laughably late or non-existent.

It's one thing to play man, but there must be a clear philosophy within it- we are hedging w quick recovery, we are in the lane if we are two passes away, we are helping early when one pass away, etc.

I don't see clear man principles other than switching screens, hard hedge w rotational help...at times.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ijohnb

January 20th, 2016 at 1:49 PM ^

have been puzzle why a coach that built part of his reputation by way of playing nearly exclusively zone won't play it at all now.  I know that when we apply it in spurts it does not look great but I think it would greatly improve if we did it more.

Tom_McC

January 20th, 2016 at 1:37 PM ^

that is 100% on MAAR...he never got the the level of the ball.  Gesell's 'drive' baseline was not nearly effective enough to warrant that clean of a look.  If MAAR drops to the ball level on the drive, that passing lane dissolves.

BL drive # 2 is again a ball level issue by Irvin and MAAR.  One of the 2 needs to 'help the helper', who was Robinson.  The other helper needs to zone up the 2 players at the top until guys can rotate.  Of course, Walton does a poor job of cutting off the baseline and in reality he needs to send the driver(Clemons) towards the screen.

The 'switching screen' issue is not as cut and dry as it might seem.  Certainly communication is part of it...no question.  But I do know Michigan uses different switching schemes and they probably employ those schemes based on who is setting and who is receiving the screen. Frankly, I think this are just 'coverage busts' more than anything. 

On the baseline screening action where Uthoff gets a clean look...Aubrey over-helps on the inital screen on the right side.  Robinson has this thing covered perfectly. But in over-helping, Uthoff has a 2 or 3 step lead on Dawkins and Donnal is screwed...if he shows, Woodbury has a 2 footer.  So he actaully makes the smart call, protects inside and forces the perimeter shot. Unfortnautely, the guy shooting is the current BT POY.

P&R D 3 isn't THAT bad...Dawkins could do better getting over the ball screen.  But that is a decently guarded 3 point shot, IMO.

P&R D 1 is all MAAR...that should be a charge.  I know he's got Uthoff but the spacing by Iowa isn't great and he needs to force Woodbury to make a decision...go score or pass.  Instead he has an uncontested 0 footer.

Overall, I think communication is an issue, but I don't think it's THE issue.  Communication will only help insofar as guys are reasonably is the correct positions and understand their jobs fully. Like JB says, there are guys who are still in tape delay on D and that is biggest thing that needs improving. Understanding better basic defensive principles and knowing the gameplan are paramount right now.

jackfl33

January 20th, 2016 at 4:18 PM ^

This is the best breakdown on here. The scheme is designed "no middle", so the baseline drives aren't a killer. It's the reaction to that penetration where people are getting beat.

All of these buckets boil down to rotations, and the fact is that Michigan is just rotating too much. Hedging screens creates rotations that the "ICE"ing or "down"ing of PnR's don't. That's why ICEing is favored by programs like OSU and basically all pro teams. And on simple baseline drives from a non-scorer like Gessel, MAAR jumps to the ball instead to leaving him to a contested shot at the rim. We also have a tendency to switch every time two people are in the same area. Just switching and rotating on everything.

Communication is a big issue, but rotating right is hard, and when you ask the kids to do it 2-3 times a possession, breakdowns are inevitable.

jackfl33

January 20th, 2016 at 4:19 PM ^

This is the best breakdown on here. The scheme is designed "no middle", so the baseline drives aren't a killer. It's the reaction to that penetration where people are getting beat.

All of these buckets boil down to rotations, and the fact is that Michigan is just rotating too much. Hedging screens creates rotations that the "ICE"ing or "down"ing of PnR's don't. That's why ICEing is favored by programs like OSU and basically all pro teams. And on simple baseline drives from a non-scorer like Gessel, MAAR jumps to the ball instead to leaving him to a contested shot at the rim. We also have a tendency to switch every time two people are in the same area. Just switching and rotating on everything.

Communication is a big issue, but rotating right is hard, and when you ask the kids to do it 2-3 times a possession, breakdowns are inevitable.

trueblueintexas

January 20th, 2016 at 1:40 PM ^

I mentioned these issues in the Purdue game recap and it doesn't surprise me they keep going.

In the history of basketball, against all types of defense, there is one rule you have to achieve. Stop Dribble Penetration. It's kind of like Mike Tyson's quote "everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth". Every defensive scheme looks good until dribble penetration happens. Something will always fall apart. 

On the screen issues, in all examples, the guard got stuck with his wieght on the wrong foot and behind the screen. That will always open up the baseline. Especially against a team like Iowa that has more spot up shooters vs. shoooting off the dribble, why would you let yourself get caught in that position? 

I don't like picking on him, but in one-on-one situations, Walton repeatedly gets beat off the dribble. 

Beilein's insistence on running Irvin at the four almost gaurantees there will be help needed anytime the offense runs through his matchup. All it takes is one pass and the defense is scrambling to find their match up. 

The point is, as Ace stated, there is a large combination of things creating these issues on a large majority of plays. That usually is not solved simply through coaching up through the course of a season. 

Tom_McC

January 20th, 2016 at 1:55 PM ^

I don't expect to see a huge jump in Def Eff ratings but I feel it's more than possible to see players like MAAR, Dawkins, DJ, Donnal, etc make a jump.  Experience is huge wrt defense, IMO. Game to game matchups can be a little confusing for younger players and what worked vs Purdue, might not work vs Iowa and what works vs Minnesota might not work vs Maryland.  

Like I said in my post above...there is some processing issues with some guys.  They just aren't as quick to react as they need to be.  That is primarily fixed through experience. I think they are making some strides.  Getting Caris back should help as you add an experienced defender to the mix.

We've seen Robinson and Donnal show improvement, there is no reason that we can't see others make similar progressions.

jsquigg

January 20th, 2016 at 2:49 PM ^

I understand that Coach B doesn't want to foul, but I don't understand why they don't pick a defense and just drill it non-stop.  Just devote 90% of your practice to 2-3 zone and the other 10% for 1-3-1 or whatever.  The 2-3 assignments are easier to understand than whatever the hell he keeps trying with his man to man defense and at worst you occasionally get bombed by a team that can shoot, but it mitigates their weakness inside.  I recall hearing one of the assistants is a man to man guy, but this version of man defense simply isn't working.  They don't pressure the ball, they don't play denial defense, and then you add the issues they're dealing with and the low quality in defense isn't surprising.  I would have thought they'd at least give the 2-3 more of a shot awhile ago, but when they do run it it's obvious they don't practice it much, which is a shame since it's easy to teach even though it does require effort to run well.