Kris Jenkins, disruptor of backfields, second of his name [247]

Hello: Kris Jenkins Jr. Comment Count

Ace July 3rd, 2019 at 3:24 PM

Michigan welcomes yet another recent visitor to the 2020 recruiting class, this time defensive lineman Kris Jenkins. Let's go to the tape:

Wait, sorry, wrong Kris Jenkins. That was Senior, an Ypsilanti native who made three All-Pro teams as a massive-yet-nimble DT in a ten-year NFL career after starring at Maryland. Senior's brother, Cullen Jenkins, played at Belleville High alongside his brother, excelled at Central Michigan, and recorded 49 sacks in 14 NFL seasons as a 300-pound DE/DT, most notably with Green Bay.

Kris Jenkins Jr., the prospect in question here, hails from Maryland powerhouse Our Lady of Good Counsel, but the draw of Michigan still held sway over him and his family, per 247's Brian Dohn:

“With the recruitment process, he didn’t want to be leaning toward one school. He really emphasized me picking my school for what fits me best,” Kris Jr. said. “When we went to Michigan (for a visit), it was bringing back memories, and I could see how amazing it was for him just to go to the school where he used to be around as a little kid.

“Being back in that environment, it kind of gave him goosebumps a little bit.”

The younger Jenkins mentioned a number of potential positions he discussed playing at U-M, ranging from 3-4 outside linebacker all the way down to nose tackle, likely depending on whether he fills out more like his dad or his uncle. He's currently listed at 6'4", 239 pounds, but he appears to have plenty of room left to grow. He's plenty versatile on tape, lining up both at DT and on the edge, even playing as a stand-up rusher.

Jenkins is the 21st commit in the class and the third at SDE, though it appears the coaches are looking to bump at least one down to tackle; at first glance, Jenkins seems the most likely candidate to at least be able to swing between the interior and exterior of the line.

GURU RATINGS

Rivals ESPN 247 247 Comp
3*, 5.6 #48 DE,
#21 MD
3*, 78, #49 DE,
#22 MD
3*, 88, #25 SDE,
#17 MD, #515 Ovr
3*, 0.8702, #28 SDE,
#18 MD, #594 Ovr

A little surprising given his family's NFL history and his own production, but Jenkins is a relatively generic three-star to all three sites, with 247 slightly higher on him than the other two. 247, once again, has a monopoly on scouting reports.

[Hit THE JUMP for scouting, video, and the rest.]

SCOUTING

Even in today's recruiting environment, there's shockingly little out there on Jenkins for a big-name player at a football powerhouse. While his state rankings come in between 17th and 22nd on the recruiting services, the locals regard him higher. InsideMDSports (247's Terps outlet) placed him tenth among local prospects to watch in February, when he was just beginning to pick up low- to mid-tier Big Ten offers.

Later that month, 247's area expert, Brian Dohn, dialed his list of ten uncommitted Maryland players to know up to eleven in order to include Jenkins, and provided us with the most substantive scouting report out there:

Kris Jenkins is long, athletic and explosive off the corner, and his talent is worthy of us adding an extra slot to this feature because his recruitment should take off. The 6-foot-3, 230-pound Jenkins has a host of offers, and his visit to Maryland last weekend went well and put the Terps in a good spot. Indiana, Purdue, Kansas, Northwestern, Yale, Michigan State, Iowa, Syracuse and Rutgers are among the other schools to offer Jenkins. He has the ability to play defensive end in a 4-3, although he needs to add weight and strength to do it, and the athleticism to play outside linebacker in a 3-4.

Jenkins provides a decent self-scout, noting that he can be so intent on getting to the quarterback that he occasionally loses his lane defending the run:

“I’d say I’m explosive, I do a good job getting around my man, and I use my speed and strength well to put pressure on the backfield,” Jenkins said. “The biggest thing for me, though, is just containing the run game. Sometimes I’m so focused getting upfield that I can overrun the running back. I need to learn patience. But I’m always working, each and every day. I’m always trying to get better.

My dad, he helps me a lot. He gives me so many pointers and tips and is always pushing me to be better. He knows I can be better and he makes me aware of that. He’ll show my certain techniques and moves and I try to emulate those all the time. Then he just tells me to stay in the zone and keep my mind right. He’s really helped me a lot and I’m grateful to have him around.”

The influence of the elder Jenkins is apparent on Junior's, er, junior tape; he displays some advanced hand technique for a high schooler.

Rivals notes that Jenkins won DL MVP at Penn State's Big Man Challenge last month, but the rest of the article discusses recruiting instead of scouting.

OFFERS

Jenkins chose Michigan over his father's alma mater, Maryland. He also showed strong interest in Northwestern. Other offers include Penn State, Virginia Tech, Iowa, Michigan State, Air Force, Indiana, Duke, Kansas, UNC, Purdue, Rutgers, Syracuse, Temple, Vanderbilt, and Yale. Missing the powerhouse tier, though perhaps Michigan got in on him before his recruiting was poised to blow up, and he's got a number of excellent academic schools involved.

HIGH SCHOOL

Michigan plucked former cornerback Blake Countess from Good Counsel, which has produced a long list of top prospects, including current NFL players Stefon Diggs and Kendall Fuller.

STATS

Some solid production, per 247:

The rising senior Kris Jenkins (Good Counsel/Olney, Md.) is coming off a standout year in the WCAC, recording over 70 tackles; 10 sacks; and two blocked kicks.

FAKE 40 TIME

None listed.

VIDEO

Junior highlights:

Sophomore highlights and single-game reels can be found on his Hudl page.

PREDICTION BASED ON FLIMSY EVIDENCE

Jenkins is tough to pin down because so much of his projection depends on how he fills out—and, perhaps, Michigan's positional needs going forward. He could follow the Carlo Kemp path and hulk up to DT-size after a couple of seasons on campus; the coaches may ask him to do so given recent/current recruiting on the interior. Given his apparent edge-rushing skills, they may choose instead to keep him closer to his current weight and utilize him as a defensive end or even stand-up rusher when they go to a three-man line. Regardless, Jenkins should have some valuable positional flexibility, which should help him see the field earlier.

His film leads me to believe he'd be a good anchor with some added strength, though obviously the highlights don't show the times he's blowing past a tackle while a running back shoots through his gap. The team has a lot of anchor-types, however, including two in this class, so working towards three-tech or even a Kemp-like nose (Kemp weighed around 255 when he got to campus) could be his best path to playing time.

UPSHOT FOR THE REST OF THE CLASS

Brian did a whole post on this that still holds up once you mentally add Jenkins and Roman Wilson. Michigan may have to do some roster gymnastics to get the numbers to work out. Hopefully it doesn't delve into icky 'crootin territory.

Comments

Brimley

July 3rd, 2019 at 5:08 PM ^

No, it's a forehanded way of agreeing with you.  If you're pursued by service academies, Ivies, etc. it says a lot about your academic prowess AND character.  I was just pointing out there is a breadth to his offer list.  Plus one, not that you need the points, and a happy fourth to you!

Blau

July 3rd, 2019 at 4:19 PM ^

RE: Icky 'crootin territory/The "Erik Swenson" formula...

I'm actually fine if coaches are giving out conditional offers and accepting commitments as long as staff is up front and honest of their intentions on the recruiting trail. IIRC Swenson was pissed because staff told him really late in recruiting period that he was being processed out of the class.

I think our class is shaping up great but if the team gets hot throughout the season, new and possibly higher-rated players will take notice and who knows what happens then?

 

LKLIII

July 3rd, 2019 at 4:34 PM ^

Definitely a high class problem to have.  Everybody has problems. The goal is to improve the class of the problems you have.


As for Swenson--good for him doing well over at Oklahoma.  I suppose it's a bit of karma.  Like ghosting on somebody you started to date semi-regularly without explanation, then they go on to have a really great relationship with somebody else while the person who ghosted hits a bit of a dry patch.

From all accounts, it sounds like the M staff learned their lesson on that one.  Since then, it seems like they're much better at letting a kid know where they stand during the cycle in a timely fashion so the kid can make adjustments as needed in their own recruitments w/ other teams if a kid starts drifting into "not a take" territory.

Quailman

July 3rd, 2019 at 5:09 PM ^

Is it really "karma", or just things working out? Maybe being processed out of UM's class was the wakeup call Swenson needed to live up to his potential. A lot of the accounts at the time talked about how Swenson wouldn't camp or do some of things the staff hoped. 

LKLIII

July 3rd, 2019 at 4:29 PM ^

LOL.  I was making the same point below, but just took more time to draft my post.  

I think the key is just crystal clear communication so that the kid knows how they are tracking & if he's falling way behind the curve, let him know with plenty of time left in the cycle so he can land on his feet.

 

 

Mgoeffoff

July 3rd, 2019 at 9:08 PM ^

I think our class is shaping up great but if the team gets hot throughout the season, new and possibly higher-rated players will take notice and who knows what happens then?

This is shaping up to be a very good (top 15), but not elite (top 5) class.  I'm OK with that so long as we don't suffer the sort of attrition we have the past several years.  I'm all for the high 4-stars and 5-stars entering the draft after 3 seasons...the Garys, DPJs, Ruizs, Hutchinsons, Charbonnets, McGregors, & Henning's of the world.  But, we can't have the Solomons, Hudsons, Singletons, etc. of the world transferring out and having guys like Samuels and Evans getting kicked off the team.  He have to keep and develop these kids otherwise we are gonna need elite classes to be competitive with OSU.  Everyone else on the schedule we'll be fine against, but no one's gonna be happy until we can beat those guys once in a while.

Blau

July 3rd, 2019 at 11:32 PM ^

Two words: Transfer Portal

We are now in the age of transferring at the drop of a hat. Attrition has been happening regularly for years but now players have a public outlet, on top of social media, to inform other suitors of their intentions. I’ll wish most players the best of luck and each situation is unique but we shouldn’t act like these kids are so disenfranchised for something they signed up for.

The team, the team, the team.

Mgoeffoff

July 4th, 2019 at 12:58 AM ^

I think there has to be more to it than that.  I can see that QBs like Peters or other highly rated kids where it doesn't look they are going to be first string ever and/or until their senior year.  They want to play and have a chance at the NFL.  But, guys like Hudson, Solomon, & Singleton were all projected to be significant contributors in 2019 and left anyways.  IMO that means either they didn't get along with the coaching staff or the players or were homesick.  Homesick is whatever, but the other two are not a good sign.  

LKLIII

July 3rd, 2019 at 4:25 PM ^

RE: "Icky 'Crootin Territory".....

Five or ten years ago when Alabama was massively over-signing, I hated the aggressive roster management that they did.  (Forcing grey shirts, processing guys out if they weren't in the 2 deep after their 2nd year, forcing guys to "medically" retire when their greatest sin was not being in the 2 deep, etc).  Harbaugh started doing a much less aggressive version of this roster management back in 2015/2016. So I was pretty OK with most of his moves compared to what Saban was doing. 

As time passes, I've become even more OK with it because of changed regulatory circumstances. 

I'm sure there are other developments too, but the biggest one that comes to mind is the NCAA being more permissive in their transfer rules.  As the student-athlete transfer market becomes more fluid with fewer consequences when kids transfer (having to sit out less frequently, the 2 year grad transfer rule if a kid red-shirted, etc), I think teams doing more of an "up or out" roster management starts to look--if not totally fair--at least less "icky" or objectionable.

For me, the other factor (almost impossible to measure) is *how* coaching staffs manage their scholarship/roster numbers. Namely, certain coaching staffs chronically over-promise & under deliver.  (James Franklin comes to mind).  Rainbows & unicorns when the kid is a recruit, then the kid gets hit with this brutal reality & treated like a slab of meat once on campus. 

I think the more the staff is straightforward with a kid, (letting him know his prospects for current playing time/pecking order, playing at a certain position, his prospects for upside growth/what he needs to do to get there, how the staff plans to recruit in the very near future at his position, etc.), then the more fair it is. To that end, there's lots to dislike about Dabo & how he runs Clemson.  But I thought how he handled the Trevor Lawrence/Kelly Bryant situation back in 2018 was classy.  IIRC, he let Bryant know what was up *before* some key transfer deadline.  IIRC, Swinney could have strung along the kid with false promisses, but he didn't.  A few days later, Bryant announced he was going to transfer.


Same transparency thing holds true for kids who are still recruits or verbal committments who haven't yet signed their LOIs.  I guess it's the "Erik Swenson Lesson."  Let a kid into the class, but if there are benchmarks or caveats, the staff needs to let that kid know *in writing* & very clearly what those are & also give the kid somewhat regular updates as to how that kid is tracking on those.  If the kid is really falling behind the tracking, the kid needs to know by October of their senior year so there is still enough time for the kid to land on his feet at another school.  If the staff does that & the kid still doesn't take measures to line up a solid back-up plan for himself, then that's on the kid at that point.

 

 

 

Broken Brilliance

July 3rd, 2019 at 5:11 PM ^

I know it's the hip thing for front seven types to wear numbers less than 20 but it doesn't feel right to see a Jenkins wear anything other than 77. Do it for your dad, Kris.

DeepBlueC

July 3rd, 2019 at 9:47 PM ^

Kemp has taken 4 years to add 25 lbs, and he’s still too small to be a championship level 3 tech. If Jenkins follows the same course, he’ll be a tweener without a real position for his whole career. 

Time to stop recruiting DEs hoping that they’ll eventually move inside and start recruiting some actual DTs. 

Arb lover

July 4th, 2019 at 5:31 PM ^

The recruiting breakdowns you all do are fabulous. What a service for the mich community (and hopefully fewer Maizen tweets at recruits).

Just a point of order though, does it make sense to just list notable offers. I know state offered. They throw it out and see what sticks, like that guy from college who got turned down a dozen times every Friday night. I'm looking for either a powerhouse, a local program who probably got the first scoop, or a program  that looks for academically gifted players.

The only time I really would be interested to know whether state or Western or central offered a guy is if we got an under the radar type that the minor Michigan programs haven't done the legwork to even find. (A testiment to our coaching staff).