Laval Lost Comment Count

Brian

laval-lucas-perry-wide

photo via Jason McMann

In isolation, Laval Lucas-Perry's exit from the basketball program is not a big deal. Last year his offensive rating and effective field goal percentages checked in lower than notable bricklayer Stu Douglass. For perspective, this is what Douglass managed in 2010:

Stu Douglass … had an eFG of 42.7 and an offensive rating of 93.9 with a 15% usage rate. If Stu Douglass was a team, he would be Southern, a 5-25 SWAC team with the same overall eFG%. And those guys have to average 20% usage.

Being less efficient on offense than a guy who is in turn less efficient than a 5-25 SWAC team is quite a trick, and not one that indicates fans are going to spend draft night two years hence punching the wall because you went in the lottery. As departures go, LLP's is more Kelvin Grady than Ekpe Udoh.

Unfortunately, that attempt to dismiss the impact of the departure overlooks one key item: this basketball team actually needed Kelvin Grady. I keep on this like a broken record, but the team's best three-point shooter in 2009 other than the departed CJ Lee was none other than Grady. Whatever deficiencies he had as a player probably wouldn't have kept him off the floor in a year when no one could dribble or find the backboard in three tries. Next year, the basketball program will need Lucas-Perry and won't have him. It would be nice if Michigan's program was the sort that could sustain the loss of a guy like LLP without blinking. It's not.

So LLP's exit does not come in isolation. It comes in the midst of this:

Last year’s off-season was the epitome of stability and optimism. I spent the summer blogging about which national reporter had Michigan in his preseason top 15 and how Michigan was hot on the heels on Casey Prather and Trey Zeigler. This summer is the polar opposite — the news continues to revolve around a mass exodus of bodies out of Ann Arbor. One early entry. Three assistant coaching departures. One dismissal. Just four returning players who have played in a collegiate game.

Add in the crippling transfer of a player already on campus that leaves one position shockingly bereft of experience and talent plus an early entry into a draft that has no interest in the entrant and the basketball program is acquiring a distinct whiff of whatever horrible thing has plagued the football team since Rich Rodriguez took the job. We went into 2009 hoping the football program would mirror the basketball program; we go into 2010 fearing the reverse. Beilein tossed Rodriguez a rope and started pulling him out of the quicksand only to find himself waist-deep in turnover, facing down an almost assuredly lost year spent trying to get a bunch of underclassmen to stop running into each other.

UMHoops calls the above an "ominous sign" and it's hard to disagree. Momentum may be a hugely overrated concept when it comes to individual games, but on a program level it's not. Michigan had an opportunity to establish itself an up-and-coming program last year only to totally blow it on and off the field. Now instead of enduring an understandable bump in the road as the last of the Amaker players give way to Beilein's recruits, the bump is the anomalous NCAA year that establishes nothing. It's a dead cat bounce. Now we've got as much kick as Penn State does over the last decade. Hoorah.

I've previously said that I think Beilein's going to get a fifth year no matter what happens in 2010 and that year six probably requires no more than an upward trajectory from whatever filthy pile of used needles the team spends next offseason in. The dismissal of one role player doesn't change that, but it does add to the pile of foreboding tidings surrounding the team and how likely it ever is to get off the mat and become consistently decent. That was Beilein's promise: consistently decent or better.

If it's hard to see that happening at the moment, it's equally hard to see how a Michigan administration is going to find anyone more likely to pull that off. They aren't going to hire a coach with the tiniest hint of skeeze. Trying to be a basketball power without skeeze when you're an hour an a half away from school with the country's best performance-to-skeeze ratio is almost impossible. And firing the head of the NCAA's basketball ethics committee a couple years after self-administering a stern talking-to for the first time in the history of your football program is going to be a bridge too far for the administration unless they have no other choice. Beilein will be handed every opportunity to get things moving in the right direction.

You can put together a scenario where Smotrycz is Pittsnogle II and Hardaway is a diamond in the rough and a roster pushing 6'6" average height is a tough nut to crack defensively and there's an NIT bid next year and an NCAA bid in 2011 and Brundidge comes in and is Rodney Stuckey and etc etc etc. You'd have to be a little daft to expect it, though. Michigan basketball looks to be stuck in this amazing limbo where there's little expectation of success for the next three years and little recourse despite that.

But have I mentioned Carl Hagelin?

Carl Hagelin of the Michigan Hockey Team plays against Western Michigan University at the Yost Ice Arena on Friday November 14th. Michigan lost the game 2-1. (SAID ALSALAH /Daily) 

Bork? Bork.

Comments

Steve in PA

July 2nd, 2010 at 8:54 AM ^

Stu is a very good #2 and Novak is a #3.  Any other position for either is far from optimal.  I think a lot of Stu's falloff in production last year is from his ballhandling.  He is a catch & shoot player, not one that generates his own shot.

I agree that success will rest mostly on Morris' shoulders.

Blue boy johnson

July 2nd, 2010 at 9:44 AM ^

Currently, I would not describe Stu as a "very good #2", although I think he is capable of becoming one.Stu went to a camp this summer designed to increase his assertiveness on the offensive end and teach him how to best use his skills for scoring.

Stu will never be a guy to take the ball to the rim on a regular basis, but if he perfects the pull up jumper in the 10-15 foot range, he can be a very effective scorer on the college level. In short, Stu is capable of much more than "catch and shoot", and Belien (I believe), is intending to bring that out of Stu.

CWoodson

July 2nd, 2010 at 9:31 AM ^

What's crazy is that if it really isn't "about" LLP, then it's "about" missing out on two recruits (one of whom was going to play for his dad no matter what) and having one crappy season.  I'm sure someone smarter than I can explain why that dooms us to mediocrity for the next three years.

jblaze

July 2nd, 2010 at 10:14 AM ^

Just four returning players who have played in a collegiate game.

That quote pretty much sums up the trouble, combined with a new coaching staff. Also, maybe Morris will be good, but other than him, there isn't anyone that can drive to the hoop and create shots. It's generally not a recipe for success, especially in the B10, where there are 3-5 very good teams.

CWoodson

July 2nd, 2010 at 10:30 AM ^

If your point is that we will likely be awful next year, I would tend to agree with you.  But this team wasn't going to come back with more than 5 players either way - Manny was leaving no matter where the program was at.  That fifth player was not very good, and now he's gone.  I don't understand why this has any deep meaning beyond next season.

Beilein's recruiting is already exceeding the expectations of most.  I'll agree moving forward it hinges largely on who he can pull in with Brundidge, and he needs to get a big-time player.  But Morris and Metrics are the real thing, and the rest will come as we move forward.

I'm not at all accusing you of this, but it seems like some % of Michigan fans WANT things to be terrible forever, to the point that they're inventing doom-and-gloom scenarios years in advance with next-to-no information or logic backing them up.  I don't know how it got to this point, but this just generally sucks.

vegasjeff

July 1st, 2010 at 10:10 PM ^

Have faith in Beilein's system. The Big Ten is a tough conference, yet Michigan made the tourney two years ago and is a solid member of the second tier of the conference. MSU, OSU, Wisconsin and Purdue have been and look to be solid for the near future, but Michigan can improve into that tier with steady progress and you never know when those top programs nosedive, not that it is likely. Michigan already ranks with Illinois and Minnesota and is ahead of Penn State, Iowa, Indiana, NW and, soon, Nebraska.

Bando Calrissian

July 2nd, 2010 at 9:30 AM ^

I'm convinced Michigan Basketball is just meant to get my hopes up only to unexpectedly burn me every single time.  That's just how it is.  I went to Fab Five games.  Everything since then has been Maize and Blue Balls.

Yet I still come back for more.  And will this time, too.

trueblueintexas

July 2nd, 2010 at 10:44 AM ^

In watching LLP's game, the biggest thing the team will miss is his athleticism, especially on defense.  I know people will claim defense wasn't his strength last year.  That said, based on the actual U of M press release, it sounds as if he had to be dismissed from the team.  If a player is not living up to the expectations of the team, giving up a little defense is not worth keeping him around.  I think it is a class act to let him finish his degree under scholarship.  More than just LLP's specific situation, this is an example of the little things that have an impact on recruiting.  From now on, here is living proof that Beilein's focus is on getting his players a degree.

PeteM

July 2nd, 2010 at 2:18 PM ^

I'm a Beilein fan, but I wonder if our perceptions of Beilein and Rodriguez are backwards.

On Rodriguez, I think most fans think that he's a hardass kind of the guy cares about winning more than image, or anything else.  To his detractors, he's a hick from the sticks who wants to bring in kids who don't belong at Michigan, and doesn't have what it takes to represent Michigan.  To his supporters, he's an offensive genius who brings more intensity and innovation to the program, and who cares what the "old blues" think.

By contrast, Beilein is widely seen as nice, understated guy who fits the Michigan culture perfectly, but maybe to low key.

The reality is that Beilein forced a higher percentage of Amaker's guys off the team (K'len Morris, Reid Baker, Jarrett Smith, etc.), has fired 2 coaches, and is still kicking guys off the team 3 years in.  On the other hand, most of the football team has stayed intact and the coaching staff has seen one (major) change. 

Based on recent events, you could argue that Beilein's more brutal in enforcing his will than RichRod.

On next year, I think that this will be a real test.  These are all Beilein's guys.  It won't be a great team, but with Smotrycz, Morris, Novak, Mclimans, Hardaway etc. he'll have some talent.  I don't expect the tournament, but if Beilein's MO is that he can win with his guys he should be able to get this team to around 14-15 wins.

champswest

July 2nd, 2010 at 9:44 PM ^

with a team that lacked chemistry.  JB now has all players that he recruited.  Guys that wanted to come here and play for him in his system.  I will take that over disgruntled players any day.  Now he is taking them overseas to get some experience and some bonding.  I can't wait to see how they play together.  I think that we will be a little like Indiana the past couple of years...inexperienced, but talented and willing to play all out all of the time.  The IU fans love that team and will eventually be rewarded as they grow and mature.  I expect the same for us.