Jeff Meyer in consideration for Liberty U HC opening

Submitted by ypsituckyboy on

Per various outlets, Michigan basketball assistant Jeff Meyer is in the mix for the Liberty University head coach position. He was the head man at LU for 16 years before being fired in 1997. It's probably worth noting that LU is a private Christian school and would probably be looking for an experienced coach who is also an Evangelical Christian (which Meyer is).

This would be a huge loss for Michigan. Aside from his coaching prowess, Meyer is the probably the best recruiter on Beilein's staff. He was the lead man on many of UM's highly rated recruits, including top 5 player Mitch McGary.

As a preemptive reminder - there is a no politics/religion rule.

 

jmblue

March 21st, 2015 at 2:49 PM ^

If that was it, why didn't Crean confront Meyer after any of the previous games we played against them?  Meyer came here in 2010.  "You wrecked out program!" happened in March 2013.

Crean's outburst came not long after Zak Irvin picked Michigan.  Meyer was his lead recruiter.

 

OccaM

March 21st, 2015 at 2:53 PM ^

I always assumed it was b/c Crean finally got IU back on track in 2013 with Zeller n co, and we just happened to be ranked #1 and lost to them at Assembly Hall. Meyer just happened to be on our coaching staff and Crean took it out on him due to being on the staff that buried IU which Crean dug IU out of somewhat. 

SAMgO

March 21st, 2015 at 1:45 PM ^

Liberty is such an affront to what a modern university should be. I'd be ashamed to represent the place. Interracial dating wasn't even allowed till the mid to late 90's.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Jon06

March 21st, 2015 at 1:52 PM ^

Liberty is the one that nearly lost its tax-exempt status for banning a student group associated with a major political party from reserving campus spaces, etc., and that requires its biology department to teach young earth creationism. It's a fake school, but (unlike Bob Jones) at least possibly less racist than Ole Miss.

ypsituckyboy

March 21st, 2015 at 1:59 PM ^

Kinda similar to how the University of Michigan was going to force InterVarsity off-campus for requiring its leadership to be ::gasp:: Christian. 

I've now violated my own admonition. Oh well.

umumum

March 21st, 2015 at 4:33 PM ^

Are you really comparing Michigan with Liberty?  On any level.   I passed commenting my first time I was on this thread, but you have chosen to engage on the issue.  This isn't just a religious school; its Jerry Falwell's school--akin to Pat Robertson's Regent University.

Now on point, if Meyer is interested in being a head coach again, this may likely be his best opportunity (at his age).  On the other hand, being an assistant in our program may well be a better gig.

Trader Jack

March 21st, 2015 at 2:30 PM ^

Why does forcing its biology department to teach young earth creationism make Liberty a fake school? If you know that's what they teach and you don't want to learn about it, you can just go somewhere else.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

OccaM

March 21st, 2015 at 2:47 PM ^

It undermines its credibility big time. If I'm a science student taking biology, I expect to be taught biology not creationism. Is that hard to understand? 

If I want to be taught creationism, I'll take a course on Christianity or w/e religion's form of origin story I'm curious about. 

As I said before, it's Liberty U for crying out loud. 

Trader Jack

March 21st, 2015 at 5:14 PM ^

Are you implying that no person with intellect would choose to believe in Creationism and/or want to learn more about it? Because certainly, based on the number of intelligent Christians there are in the world, you're wrong about that.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Honk if Ufer M…

March 22nd, 2015 at 1:57 AM ^

If someone truly believes in Jesus as god or son of god and in the alleged miracles he performed then no, they are not intelligent. So if that's what you mean by intelligent Christians then there is no such thing. I can prove this logically.

Some people who've never thought deeply about their beliefs or questioned them can have their eyes opened by the simple logic of why it's absurd to believe. Others whose only response to logic is blind and unfounded believe are beyond reaching.

If by Christian, you include people who believe in the core teachings/philosophy of life and how to treat each other, of the almost assuredly fictional character of Jesus, without believing the hokus pokus or beleiving because of the myths of hokus pokus, then intelligent Christians do exist.

The worst of the worst are those that believe because of the alleged hokus pokus and out of fear of punishment but they actually abhor everything about what the alleged Jesus actually stood for and preached and taught. That makes up the vast majority of American self proclaimed Christians.

I'm an athiest or anti-thiest but I'm much more of a Christian than most who claim to be.

People who share the thinking and feeling of Jesus would be killed by most "Christians" and most American's if they had the chance, if they didn't actually think it was the real Jesus. They'd call him a communist, a socialist, a dirty libral, a hippy, a terrorist, and worst of all, anti Amuracan!

DrewGOBLUE

March 22nd, 2015 at 7:41 AM ^

It's a bit ironic how unsubstantiated your own claims are when making the determination that anybody who has faith in a god is an unintelligent, narrow-minded person. In fact, your statement that Jesus was "an almost assuredly fictional character" is very misguided in its own right, considering you'll probably never find a religious studies professor anywhere that will tell you he did not exist.

But at the end of the day, most people aren't well versed enough in the history, philosophy, evolutionary biology, physics and other various academic disciplines that could be drawn upon to truly make an exceptional, compelling case for being a devout Christian or fervent atheist. And that's why it's almost always best to just drown out the folks who feel the need insist that their stance on religion is the correct one.