Hensons Mobile…

December 22nd, 2023 at 12:41 PM ^

I truly believe the distraction issue for the players started to have a real impact when the Partridge issue came up

Maryland wasn't our best game, and there are a multitude of reasons for that. One of those reasons could be the distraction was getting to the team. But dropping the lawsuit didn't really make the distraction go away before Maryland.

I could see maybe if Harbaugh had the sense the walls of focus were starting to crack, wanting to minimize distractions for the week of the OSU game. The hearing would have been on the Friday before the Maryland game, and I don't know when that means the decision would have been rendered on the TRO. So it's possible the distraction of "will Harbaugh be allowed to coach?" would have extended throughout the week of Thanksgiving, and Harbaugh just finally decided he wanted to eliminate that.

Not sure I personally think that's how the thought process unfolded for everyone, but it's possible.

93Grad

December 22nd, 2023 at 1:05 PM ^

I'm with you on being upset that we dropped the lawsuit and we still don't know the real reason(s), but here are two possibilities:

1) UofM saw the writing on the wall when the judge essentially denied the emergency TRO request.  It seemed like a signal from the court that it did not see immediate irreparable harm when it punted and set a hearing for Friday afternoon just before the 2nd of the 3 game suspension.  UofM could have seen that as writing on the wall that it was not likely to succeed in getting relief from the Court.

2) While the Partridge thing had no direct bearing on the merits of the case, it was a really bad look, and I could see why it would spook UofM and their lawyers, and make them wonder what other bad facts might be out there if the case kept getting investigated.   

So I get the frustration that we did not fight like hell against the nonsense put out by the Big Ten and the media hacks, the saying that comes to mind is that discretion is the better part of valor.

Ginuvas

December 22nd, 2023 at 2:14 PM ^

I think Michigan backed down for two reasons, but especially #2:

1. They worried that the suspension would just get drawn out longer.

2. Harbaugh saw his friend, Partridge, lose his job over this and realized that only he could put an end to the situation to eliminate the risk of other people being hurt by the collateral damage.

Oregon Wolverine

December 23rd, 2023 at 12:47 PM ^

Add to this list:

3. Litigation is very, very expensive, especially in high stakes, high profile cases w/emotionally invested clients (see my earlier post);

4. Litigation is exceptionally stressful (I’m a litigator, I’ve seen plenty of people crumble, including witnesses, clients, and lawyers.  I love to litigate, but it is incredibly consuming, incredibly stressful); 

5.  Never let a one day story become a two-day story.  Yes, it’s still in the media, but it’s dying.  Litigating dumps jet fuel on the fire.  

MGlobules

December 22nd, 2023 at 11:19 AM ^

So much that may go into this, including a need to show the ACC that they will vigorously pursue their case--might mean millions at settlement time.

Saw yesterday that Sixth Street, the multi-billion dollar investment firm FSU has been been working with, already feels it's at or near the 120 million figure needed to withdraw; FSU says it would recoup that in four years. But this begs the question: Cede up to 45 percent of future revenue to an investment firm, opening the door for Wall Street to own or part-own college Athletic Departments. . . ? Say FSU joins a Big Ten where Michigan and others are obtaining 100 percent of their TV revenue--how far and how quickly does FSU fall behind, anyway?

Meanwhile, if they fall behind by, literally, a billion and more waiting until 2036. . . they may be right that they would never catch up.

As I said, a lot going on. But does demonstrate that some of these calculations, while loose and/or possibly off by country miles, will in the end decide the fate of schools like FSU. . . a very perilous path.

highlow

December 22nd, 2023 at 11:25 AM ^

I know Sixth Street a bit; worked with them in the past.

Shot in the dark, but I could Sixth Street putting down the $120 million as a loan for FSU today so they could leave the ACC now and charge a high interest rate + get a pledge of new conference money.  FSU litigates whether or not they actually owe the $120 but that's just money after the fact.

In the alternative, Sixth Street might "purchase" some FSU rights - media, tickets, advertising, etc - and FSU uses the proceeds to pay down the ACC.   Looks like they've floated that in the past.

MGlobules

December 22nd, 2023 at 8:02 PM ^

The SEC is supposed to want North Carolina and Notre Dame. If this is an arms race--one the B1G is interested in winning against the SEC--then I think there is another path out for FSU. That would be for the B1G teams to collectively contribute x number of dollars annually toward, say, four schools' buyout from the ACC over x period of years (could be quite protracted). With the knowledge that the next media rights contract rewards them still more handsomely, especially if a newly-configured B1G includes (say) ND, FSU, NC, and Clemson. I think that would be the way to get to the number most quickly with the least amount of pain for all concerned. And pull off a bit of a coup.

Surely someone has thought of this possibility.

s1105615

December 22nd, 2023 at 11:28 AM ^

Based on some of the remarks made, I think they’re hoping to get other schools to co-sign onto the suit to strengthen their case.  If they could get the likes of Miami, Clemson, UNC and Virginia to throw their names onto the filing (or file similar suits in their respective states) they could then collectively bargain their exit fees to avoid or lessen the length of the impending court battle.

The FSU lawyer said plainly they’d like to negotiate a settlement, so take that for what it’s worth.

SalvatoreQuattro

December 22nd, 2023 at 11:36 AM ^

I wouldn’t be surprised to see DeSantis do some stuff behind the scenes to help FSU. We know his feelings about Disney. ACC losing FSU would hurt one of their properties(ESPN).

Getting FSU out of this ACC could possibly help him with some state voters.

Not saying I approve or disapprove and I realize that I am walking a thin line in terms of politics. 

leidlein

December 22nd, 2023 at 1:28 PM ^

I understand what they are doing and why they are doing it. But getting screwed by one organization (NCAA CFP Selection Committee) and suing another (ACC) is a.................. bold move to say the least. 

Cue Jason Bateman memes.

Shorty the Bea…

December 22nd, 2023 at 3:50 PM ^

As mentioned before the playoff committee was chaired by the AD at NC State. That was also the school that flipped it's vote to admit Cal and Stanford against the wishes of FSU because NC State is trying to turn the ACC into the Big 12 without letting Oklahoma and Texas leave as much as possible for their own survival. 

That school has been actively trying to damage FSU's brand value to make it harder for them to leave the conference which has only hastened FSU's ire.

Solecismic

December 23rd, 2023 at 2:04 AM ^

Makes you wonder if a Board of Trustees should be required to have a Board of Common Sense.

By the time this is in the courts, the landscape will be entirely different. At some point, probably more sooner than later, major college football will need to split from the NCAA.

This landscape changes every few months.

Right now, I don't see how adding FSU benefits either the Big Ten or the SEC. FSU is going to need a lot of cash to get out of this, and they will also have to take a lesser share of their new conference revenue in order to get in - if they even receive an invitation.

This is not to say that FSU isn't an important brand. It's simply the worst possible time to be considering this type of action. While I get that they're quite angry and have good reason to be angry about the 2023 football playoffs, that's not a good reason to take on this fight that doesn't have a good outcome for them either way.

I don't see what they're trying to achieve here. They are better positioned for the NCAA breakup as the most valuable franchise in the ACC.

We're angry about the Petitti suspension. Channeling that anger to try and move from the Big Ten to the SEC would have been similarly ill-advised.

98xj

December 23rd, 2023 at 8:55 AM ^

I have to believe that FSU has talked to Fox about their landing spot and bringing other schools with them. I don't think ESPN will let the SEC take FSU (certainly not alone), and I don't really see the B1G being that interested in FSU, unless other schools (UNC, GT, UVA) come with them. Perhaps a (temporary) spot in the Big12 until the legal fights end?