ray ratto tears texas a new one for the herman firing

Submitted by matty blue on January 3rd, 2021 at 11:13 AM

https://defector.com/texas-has-discovered-a-new-level-of-f-u-money/

$, but the money shot:

The rational view is that universities the size of Texas aren’t universities at all but football teams with libraries attached like mobile homes.

is a dead-flat perfect description of the way ohio state, clemson, and alabama treat their football teams.

M-GO-Beek

January 3rd, 2021 at 12:39 PM ^

This is absolutely a false comparison.  It implies that a major university can't do two things at once. It is not like the same people are working on new research facilities and athletic facilities and time woking on one takes away time from the other. Put another way, if a self-funded athletic department (as UM's is in most non-COVID years) detracts from the research mission of the University, then so does having an English department.

mgoblue0970

January 3rd, 2021 at 1:11 PM ^

how does an English department distract from the research mission of the university? 

Completely misses the point...

Let me break it down for you in understandable chunks.

1.  The notion/suggestion being discussed is does sports detract from a university's primary mission.

2.  In turn, @M-GO-Beek cites the fact that M's AD is self-sustaining.  It doesn't take funds from the university which would impact the teaching and/or research aspect.  Heck, the UofM AD even reimburses the university for the cost of aid-in-kind.  One of the few schools in the nation which does that.

So blaming the AD here for getting in the way of the university is not at all accurate.  M can, and should (with our business model and resources), have both.

3.  So @M-GO-Beek suggests that if people are going to take shots at a department which is completely self sustaining, as distracting from the overall mission, then one could make that [ridiculous] argument about ANY department within the university.

Of course an English department does not detract from scholarly pursuits.  In the context of @M-GO-Beek's post, it could be said, insert any department here _________.  They just happened to choose English.

That's a ridiculous takeaway from @M-GO-Beek's post.

 

 

 

Bluesince89

January 3rd, 2021 at 1:38 PM ^

Said another way, even if the English department loses money, or whatever department you want to pick, the research/teaching mission of the English department is always enhanced by having a robust [pick department].  That is not always the same for sports and I think is evidenced by the unique place sports have in the American education system.  Even self-funding ADs can at times prove to be distractions and have negative consequences/result in universities taking image hits.

LDNfan

January 3rd, 2021 at 3:31 PM ^

I don't think anyone sees a 'problem with TRYING to be the best at everything' in this case..but damn is it even possible? No one has done it at CFB...

I think it comes down to this..those Universities that take the greats pride in their Academic reputation struggle to come around to fully embrace the dirty underworld of Championship level CFB. Whereas some are willing to go that route in CBB (Duke, Arizona, etc). I mean it looks like OSU completely sold its soul under Tressel and for the fans and coaches (even through multiple scandals) it has paid off dearly. It seems UM alum and faculty are not willing to go all in to win in CFB and that's a dilemma that no other highly esteemed academic institution has solved either. 

xtramelanin

January 3rd, 2021 at 12:45 PM ^

You do realize that was a non-Michigan booster....30 yrs ago.  Your school has had fired 3 football coaches in disgrace since then. (Yes, Meyer was fired but the parties sought to save face)

FrankTigers2

January 3rd, 2021 at 1:04 PM ^

A non Michigan booster?  Seriously?  
 

And yet, a Michigan coach knew all about a notorious bookie giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to players.  
 

but the tattoos for trophies is so much worse.

 

look deeper homer. 
 

all schools have this stuff go on...and if you think Michigan is on par with University of Chicago with it’s high moral ground, then I seriously have to question your intelligence.  
 

 

mgoblue0970

January 3rd, 2021 at 1:40 PM ^

Temporal concerns aside, and I'm NOT making excuses for the University, but is it possible to police a student-athlete 24/7? 

What could Michigan have done to keep Webber from taking the money? 

This is not Cam Netwon's dad negotiating a transfer fee a la UEFA.  Or explicitly paying Zion Williamson.

...and like XM mentioned in a post, the bill came due for Michigan.  We lost 15 years recovering from that scandal.

xtramelanin

January 3rd, 2021 at 1:22 PM ^

Frank, deal with it. You guys sold your soul to the devil to beat us in football. It worked, but please don’t kid yourself into thinking your school is anything other than academic joke as it relates to athletes. Yes there are a few that are smart, that’s great. Yes some of Michigan‘s kids might not be Phi beta kappa.  The bottom line is you guys are the SEC, congratulations for your success. Remember, the bill will come due at some point.

big john lives on 67

January 3rd, 2021 at 2:43 PM ^

XM, thanks for seeing the correct point here. Michigan will never become an athletic machine with a library attached. That is the true bottom line here. 

Michigan, as an organization designed by and comprised of women and men, will never be perfect. And we have made mistakes and will also in the future. But that does not mean that we should stop striving for the ideal in this instance. 

The knee jerk reaction of many to point to past failings when the desire is expressed to pursue the ideal belies the guilt of other institutions that they try to deny or hide in pursuit of other goals.  In this regard, there is a chasm between Michigan and OSU, not millimeters. 
 

 

mgoblue0970

January 3rd, 2021 at 1:48 PM ^

By NCAA definition we are all boosters.

I'm not going to speak for others, but for me, yes, Ed Martin was a booster. 

Was Ed Martin on the University's payroll a la SEC?  No.  That's where I draw the line. 

I have also been very outspoken about the Fab 5 scandal, to the tune of a couple of thousand negative points.

FrankTigers2

January 3rd, 2021 at 2:14 PM ^

We must all be honest that there is a level of impropriety in almost every program.  
 

if someone can draw a line in the sand and say that at a certain level, it is not acceptable, I applaud you. 
 

most fans, however, draw that line a millimeter above where their program is.  

xtramelanin

January 3rd, 2021 at 2:36 PM ^

i think i remember you having the occasional non-trolling post so i will appeal to that.   today if you had said something like, 'my school is winning like crazy, but yeah, we're the SEC of the B10' and then hypothesized that michigan might have some dirt under our skirt your reception here might be much different.  your team is at maximum cheat which is what makes you trolling here (without your confession of same) such a waste of your time.   

and the best you have today is a 30 yr old scandal in a different sport.  come on.  do guys at michigan get a $100 handshake sometimes?  i don't know for certain but i'd bet they do.  but that is like comparing small arms fire (us) to nuclear warfare (ohio).  

 

Navy Wolverine

January 3rd, 2021 at 11:26 AM ^

Maizenbrew had an article bashing the current state of college football coach buyouts.

https://www.maizenbrew.com/2021/1/2/22210520/college-football-coach-buyouts-tom-herman-texas-longhorns-steve-sarkisian-alabama-malzahn

The mains gist is while Tom Herman gets paid $15M to not coach and his staff an additional $9M, 273 athletic department staff members received temporary salary reductions, 11 staff members furloughed, 35 staff members laid off, and they terminated 35 vacant positions. 

Granted most, if not all, of that money comes from boosters but that is still a whole lot of cash.

East German Judge

January 3rd, 2021 at 12:18 PM ^

They already have, but this is their "fun money" or "I buy what I like money", and they want to see wins, B12 titles and don't give a damn that professor Smith get a 5% raise vs. the regular 2%.

And since it is their money, they have every right to spend as they see fit, just like Stephen Ross and Al Glick and Nicki and J. Ira Harris have done.  I sure as hell wouldn't want a university telling me where I should allocate my GIFT to them. 

Navy Wolverine

January 3rd, 2021 at 12:07 PM ^

No but it does seem pretty absurd to pay one person $15M (plus $9M for another 8-9 people) not to work when the rest of the entire athletic department (over 300 people) are getting crushed. Especially when you consider they fired a guy who just won their bowl game and they are replacing him with someone who has a worse career record and questionable off-the-field history.

mgoblue0970

January 3rd, 2021 at 1:20 PM ^

Tearing one aside, Michfan777 is right though.  I mean this forum has already gone down the road of looking down their noses at "online U"...

...even though Michigan (even before COVID) DOES THE EXACT SAME THING!

So yeah, academic puffery is a thing among this (toxic) fanbase.  Heck, it was WD's go to shtick vis-a-vis with Ohio State before he got banned.

Blue Vet

January 3rd, 2021 at 12:37 PM ^

Not only that, interest in good academics and good athletics aren't mutually exclusive.  A Nobel laureate might enjoy watching volleyball. A star soccer player may enjoy reading about advances in microbiology. A leading economics scholar may be fiercely devoted to baseball. A champion wrestler may love reading James Baldwin.

As for the athletic department, specific complaints may or may not be accurate, but overall Michigan teams excel. UM usually comes in high in the Director's Cup ranking, and that's without Stanford's boost of country-club sports.

1408

January 3rd, 2021 at 12:03 PM ^

I could be wrong but I think that he would have been retained had he handled the "Eyes of Texas" controversy differently.  A lot of old school money down there seemed upset with his approach whereas I actually think he was brave.

MgoHillbilly

January 3rd, 2021 at 12:11 PM ^

I don't get the mobile home bit. That's all some people can afford and it's certainly better than wasting money on rent for some people. Maybe I just missed the point.