OT: John U. Bacon's overtime - my own review.
I just got done with Overtime. I'm posting my own review after doing a search and just seeing one official review. I thought I'd give the 'just a guy' review.
I bought it in the summer and to be honest with all the BPONE going around, and the start of the book, I started it but waited because the first premise of the book is 'Is college football worth it' and it was tough to think about while our offense was struggling. That, and you know what happens at the end of the '18 season.
I picked it up about a week after the Citrus bowl and am glad I did.
He's definitely on the side of Michigan football; but I like how he drills down into specific things that make me feel very good about this program:
- How seriously Michigan takes academics; and how much money and effort they put into it. Is it perfect? No, but there are some damned smart guys on that team.
- He outlines how Gary struggled through his Dyslexia and they worked with him so he could start getting great grades. He was taking general studies but had real classes.
- They talked about Bush really taking his studies seriously. You get the idea it isn't just talk. One of Harbaugh's first things was to have long team study sessions. If these kids want, I'm guessing they can take blow off courses. But if they want they can also get great degrees, or focus under a general studies degree for what they want; and they'll be all set to go on after football. They'll have a degree they can do something with; in particular with Michigan networking.
- How the staff really is concerned with both the players as people and player development. he did a great job interviewing the coaching staff, the players, and the parents.
- The way Harbaugh and his staff handled little things like the recovery of Grant Newsome impressed the hell out of me. One of the things I thought was great was a little vignette about how Higdon was allowed to go back in and carry after a fumble. They gave reasons behind it. I remember people b*tching up a storm about it but the way Higdon talked about it, and how it made him more confident to play better, makes you think that the coaches can have valid reasons for doing things.
- How Harbaugh is constantly willing to change and tweak things. The offensive scheme overhaul is a huge example. The coaches he knew (Warriner for Drev; Gattis for Pep) weren't safe if it meant he thought we could get better. And he was willing to listen to other people (Higdon and Winovich regarding the way they practiced and ate; both of which led to him jettisoning another colleague and getting Ben Herbert as well as getting Abigail O'Conner to help improve nutrition).
- How many of the players really bought in and created a brotherhood. The team may not have been perfect but you really get the idea that the chemistry is healthy here and the guys are bought in to the staff and the system. There is mutual trust. And these guys expect to carry that forward in life.
- HOLY CRAP how much money is spent on these kids for academics and academic support to shoes.
- How real Harbaugh was. In All or Nothing you get the idea he's kind of a dead fish sometimes. But here you see a different perspective both from the interviews of his friends and relatives but also the players.
All in all, a great book; and a nice balm for me from all the BPONE. Yes, things aren't perfect; but they are damned good. Until I see real evidence otherwise it looks like we have a good, talented staff that is working hard to win and has really improved things (he brings up one stat in which we had had one double digit win season in the 11 years prior to Harbaugh). They see that there are issues, and that they aren't there yet, but they are actively working towards getting there. Reading about MSU's issues as they chased relevance in college football in the Detroit News really made me realize how good we have it.
I don't know if I agree with everything. I'm not sure a minor league would fix the issues as much as things like letting players get money from their own endorsements. But he makes a good argument at least.
Oh, and the original question: Is football worth it? The answer was yes. If you have the right coach.
I highly recommend the book.
January 13th, 2020 at 11:57 AM ^
That's a great point. They are going through all that *AND* quite often having to worry about funding tuition.
Those guys have a true love of Michigan football and of the game. I have a tremendous amount of respect for that.
Hiring a guy like that, if you can get him to buy in to your program... man. Gold.
January 13th, 2020 at 4:17 PM ^
I'm sure many of us have found that a CV with D-I college varsity athletics is a pretty good sign for work ethic and time management skills when hiring. Really no matter the sport or success on the field.
January 13th, 2020 at 10:36 AM ^
Thanks for the post. I received this for my birthday in September hours before we nearly shit the bed against Army. As a result I really had no appetite for reading it and they way the rest of the season played out didn't help. I've enjoyed Bacon's previous books and knew I'd come around to opening it up and this may be the kick in the pants I needed to finally crack it open
January 13th, 2020 at 10:53 AM ^
There are some good stories in there but at the end of the day everything Bacon writes should be taken with a huge grain of salt. The guy is given access to a curated version of behind the scenes and knows if he writes anything overly critical he will likely not get access again. The stories are interesting, the overall takeaway that Michigan is generally doing things the "right way" and is good is meaningless just like all the off season hyping Sam Webb gets spoon fed as part of his access.
January 13th, 2020 at 10:56 AM ^
I guess I disagree. Sure he's a fan, and you really have to take that into consideration. But he's taught at multiple universities and considers himself a journalist. IIRC he didn't pull punches when the program was more dysfunctional in the past.
January 13th, 2020 at 11:12 AM ^
His previous book was published after Brandon and Hoke were fired. I think Bacon is a good writer. Its just part of understanding the business and where to find value, Bacon's books have a lot of value, they also aren't going to say if players are getting paid or if there are players cheating in classes in a systematic way etc. There is a reason those stories rarely if every truly come out in a formal way despite everyone knowing about it at programs across the country. So the individual stories are interesting, the overall takeaways and lack of certain potential negatives don't hold a ton of water.
January 13th, 2020 at 11:22 AM ^
Knowing Bacon personally I can assure you he puts his journalistic integrity above anything else. His writing angered Dave Brandon so much that Brandon took away Bacon's press pass. If you are arguing that the University of Michigan shepherds positive information his way, and tries to hide the negative, then perhaps that is true. But I promise his writing is an accurate representation of what he uncovers and he looks for it all. If there are unsightly things happening at the University, he would think publicizing them would help in ultimately resolving the issue at hand, and would publish it accordingly.
January 13th, 2020 at 12:02 PM ^
His writing angered Dave Brandon so much that Brandon took away Bacon's press pass.
Plus one for Bacon. What a douche award for Brandon.
He came up to Traverse City for the national writers series. I really wish I was able to see him then.
January 13th, 2020 at 12:07 PM ^
From everything I've read about him I got that impression (for what that is worth). There is kind of a 'meta' love for the University that makes some want to whistle blow to keep it clean, not cover it up to make it look clean, and that's a good thing. That's what led him to fail kids who started. I think the same for some of the beat writers who are PITA's. Yes, maybe we occasionally get 'stretch gate' and that sucks. But hopefully they'll also uncover a Nasser before they become a Nasser.
At this point with all those books I doubt JUB would be hurt if the University cut him off. Especially if he exposed a big story.
January 13th, 2020 at 11:07 AM ^
Just out of curiosity, who is the OSU version of Bacon? It'd be interesting to compare the inside perspectives of the two programs.
January 13th, 2020 at 12:43 PM ^
Does OSU really need "life championship" books like this when they win B1G Championships every year?
January 13th, 2020 at 11:18 AM ^
It's time for JUB to go all in on the expose' of OSU recruiting misdeeds. I'm surprised no Michigan journos have done more to uncover some dirt and get it out there. It shouldn't be that hard given the number of former and current Michigan players that were recruited by both teams.
January 13th, 2020 at 11:23 AM ^
Don't hold your breath. A Michigan guy exposing Ohio State would look just like that - bias! Need an Ohio State beat writer to put journalistic integrity first for that to happen effectively.
January 13th, 2020 at 11:55 AM ^
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." -- Upton Sinclair.
January 13th, 2020 at 12:26 PM ^
Bacon is unable to to stay true to journalism when it comes to Michigan athletics.
For instance, last week while on with Sam Webb, he and Webb were discussing the possibility of Juwan Howard putting together another Fab Five class. They then went onto gush about the Fab Five, but at the same time lamenting how few kids today could name all of the members.
Within minutes, they transitioned into a conversation about Roy Williams at UNC. Bacon commented that he couldn’t stand the guy (nor can I) and how dirty his program is (agreed).
How could anyone go from discussing the Fab Five with such glee and with no mention of the scandal, into judging any other programs ethics?
He’s a great publicist when it comes to Michigan, but by no means a journalist.
January 13th, 2020 at 1:26 PM ^
How could anyone go from discussing the Fab Five with such glee and with no mention of the scandal, into judging any other programs ethics?
My guess... and it's a very liberal guess -- much like your consideration of Bacon's integrity, is the difference between the Fab 5 and Roy Williams is Williams runs a dirty program.
I don't think Fisher was ever dirty to that degree.
Fisher told the players to stay away from Martin. There wasn't a soul in A2 who didn't know about Martin. Webber, et al., took the money anyway.
The atheltic department posted flyers in the facilities with pictures of Martin on it and a caption of do not associate with this man. Webber took the money anyway.
It's reasonable to expect a *program* to not cheat. It's not reasonable to police players 24/7.
January 13th, 2020 at 8:54 PM ^
Fisher told the players to stay away from Martin.
That didn't happen until around 1997. Prior to then Fish did little to keep Martin away.
January 13th, 2020 at 6:35 PM ^
Because the Fab 5 scandal was over 20 years ago has no impact on the program now. Conversely, the Roy Williams quotes are recent and discuss issues with a team today (it also potentially impacts us with regards to recruiting today). In short, the Roy Williams stuff is more impactful and relevant.
January 13th, 2020 at 8:55 PM ^
"Fab 5 scandal"? Only one of the Fab 5 was involved.
January 13th, 2020 at 12:29 PM ^
Until I see real evidence otherwise it looks like we have a good, talented staff that is working hard to win and has really improved things (he brings up one stat in which we had had one double digit win season in the 11 years prior to Harbaugh).
I'd prefer the staff spends more time on game prep and recruiting than academics. Maybe it doesn't have to take away from one to go to the other. But, JH et. al is still vastly unorganized and underperforming when it comes to recruiting compared to OSU.
January 13th, 2020 at 3:20 PM ^
I certainly would like to see him improve with recruiting vs. OSU. But I don't want to see the emphasis on academics wane. In the end I really want to see these players graduate with every opportunity to do well in the real world *without* football.
January 13th, 2020 at 3:32 PM ^
Just finished this book last week. Have to agree that JUB comes across a little like a fan boy in parts. Overall didn't think it was as good as some of his others. Also, if you think UM is going to start moving more in the direction of paying the players as some do, it ain't gonna happen. Very obvious in the book that Harbaugh favors academics first and the administration backs him all the way.
January 13th, 2020 at 7:19 PM ^
sorry but what does bpone stand for?????
January 13th, 2020 at 8:42 PM ^
I had to ask not too long ago too...
(B)lack (P)it (O)f (N)egative (E)xpectations.
I guess it's an abbreviation for being chronically pessimistic/not being able to enjoy nice things.
January 14th, 2020 at 3:20 AM ^
thank you for the explanation
January 14th, 2020 at 1:00 PM ^
Thanks for the review. I also just finished the book, a Christmas present this year. One of the topics that seems to get a lot of play in the book and on this board is academic requirements.
Dudek and Harbaugh are quoted about creating a list of xx # of targets for a recruiting class of say 150 players, they then go through a process of winnowing the list until the get their class. What is not known is, who is not on the original target list? And for what reason? Academic fit? Cultural fit? Geography challenge? (southern player who will not leave) Compliance risk? (i.e. expects $). If we are excluding players for these reasons, then what do we know about our head to head recruiting success against the top teams? Where we are going after the same athletes? If we have a smaller pool of top tier athletes, that means we have to out-execute on those targets that are a "fit."
The other debate then is our recruiting strategy; limiting the target list to our "fit". Is our recruiting approach the correct one for The University of Michigan, and not just the football program? As a two time grad, married to a Michigan grad and with two kids who graduated from Michigan (and one accepted who did not go - we don't talk to him anymore...) I prefer to protect our integrity and ensure we have a somewhat balanced approach to athletics and education for the young men that matriculate. If that means 10-3 and 9-4, so be it.
I hope that the NIL NCAA ruling will allow an above the board approach to leveling the playing field when it comes to recruiting. I know, hope is not a strategy.