mgoblue0970

May 12th, 2016 at 5:36 PM ^

My most recent flight I was on a CRJ, window seat, dude next to me had his fat rolls spilling over the arm rest. 15 minutes into the flight, he fell asleep on my shoulder -- I elbowed that fat fuck in the ribs with everything I had and he didn't even notice. The person in front of me decided to recline their seat all the way into my chest. Your definition of sexy is vastly different than mine apparently.

Don

May 12th, 2016 at 12:34 PM ^

but I expect that shooting people at 700mph in a tube from LA to San Fran will be a reality right about at the same time I finally get my rocket backpack and atomic-powered personal helicopter.

Medic

May 12th, 2016 at 2:07 PM ^

Unfortunately they've already stated that they won't actually be building any Hyperloops here due to regulations. Testing only here.

Some other country will get the privledge of having the first one. 

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

May 12th, 2016 at 4:53 PM ^

I'm sorry, but I think this thing is a monument to human stupidity.

"Hey, I have an idea for a transportation medium on a track that has to be almost perfectly flat, straight, and smooth and could have catastrophic results with even the smallest bump or jostle."

"Great.  Put it on that massive fault line over there."

From an engineering proof-of-concept standpoint, something like Chicago to Milwaukee would work better, but then Elon would have less access to the government funding that tends to prop up most of his ventures.

expatriate

May 12th, 2016 at 9:32 PM ^

Even if it could only be used for cargo, that's a tremendous relief. Right now passenger trains share the rails with freight, which is the primary obstacle to high-speed rail- brand new lines would have to be laid, not just upgrading current lines. If freight were to be replaced along certain lines then the passenger trains could become proper high-speed rail. 

 

I hope the engineering challenges are overcome, they may be numerous but great things always have huge scientific obstacles.