Unverified Voracity Is Nerding Out Comment Count

Brian

31881494001_4b134e44b9_z

[Bryan Fuller]

Orange Bowl grading. The PFF takes will not surprise you:

Michigan’s offense was completely overmatched against the Seminoles’ dominant front-seven, and the Wolverines earned well below-average grades for team run blocking and team pass protection. All five offensive linemen, fullbacks Khalid Hill and Henry Poggi and tight ends Ian Bunting and Tyrone Wheatley all earned below-average run-blocking grades

Woooooof. It is a good thing that Drevno has a track record that allows him to deflect most of that to the previous regime, but even with that track record I can see a bunch of discontent popping up next year when he's (probably) starting a true freshman again. Why does every departing coach at Michigan have to leave a ticking timebomb on the OL? This is three straight:

  • Lloyd Carr's last team dug Alex Mitchell out of retirement so he could get rolled like everyone else against OSU and gave Rich Rodriguez seven scholarship OL.
  • Rich Rod had a recruiting class with one OL, who was medicaled after a year. The next one saw him bring in an OG who quit football a week into fall camp.
  • Hoke at least tried, but his 6-OL class looks like it's petering out into zero starters and the numbers after that were far from sufficient.

All the evidence you need about Hoke's OL recruiting is the projected number of Hoke-era OL who will be starters in Harbaugh year three: one.

Anyway, the defense was terrific. So hooray.

Draft in or out: mostly out. NFL decisions for 2017 Michigan opponents are rolling in. Gentlemen who are headed for the draft:

  • Florida: LB Alex Anzalone, DT Caleb Brantley, CB Teez Tabor, CB Quincy Wilson
  • OSU: WR Noah Brown(?!), RB/WR Curtis Samuel, CB Gareon Conley, S Malik Hooker, LB Raekwon McMillan
  • PSU: WR Chris Godwin, DE Garrett Sickels, LB Nyeem Wartman-White
  • MSU: DT Malik McDowell, S Montae Nicholson
  • Northwestern: LB Anthony Walker
  • Wisconsin: LB TJ Watt, OT Ryan Ramcyzk
  • Indiana: LB Marcus Oliver(?!), RB Devine Redding(!?!)

JT Barrett, Jason Cabinda, and Josey Jewell have announced returns. Michigan got good news from Mason Cole and Maurice Hurst and less good news from Jabrill Peppers; OSU is also expected to lose CB Marshon Lattimore.

31157977034_ecccc11d57_z

[Fuller]

Draft stock, meanwhile. Taco Charlton has cracked a couple of first-round mock drafts to pay attention to. PFF has him 29th:

Charlton was having a strong season then took his game to a new level down the stretch, grading as our No. 4 edge defender from Week 9 through the end of the season. He was strong against the run and disruptive as a pass-rusher, picking up eight sacks, 10 hits and 32 hurries on only 251 rushes, and his two-year production is among the best in the nation.

Meanwhile Todd McShay shot him all the way up to 13th:

Charlton finished the season on a tear, compiling 10 sacks in his final 10 games. He has always had the raw ability, but this season, he showed more consistency and refined technique. Charlton has the ability to be an edge defender in either a 3-4 or 4-3 scheme in the NFL.

He was 26th in late December. Peppers is still 8th to McShay; PFF has him a late first-rounder. Lewis is hanging around the middle of the first round, usually.

Coordinator lockdown. Michigan is going to lose coaches on a regular basis, because Harbaugh. They've set out to lock down their coordinators, though. Don Brown got a five year, $1.5 million deal that is certainly unprecedented for a Michigan assistant coach and may be unprecedented nationwide. I don't think I've ever heard of an assistant getting a five year deal.

Soon after, Tim Drevno got a five year, $1 million deal. Drevno might leave for a head coaching job at some point, but if it's not a P5 gig he'll be taking a paycut.

Rumors that Ty Wheatley might be a candidate at WMU seem to have petered out, FWIW.

Making football more like debate. Nate Silver did things approximately as nerdy as I did in high school, and they even had similar tournament formats:

The solution that debate tournaments devised is something called power-pairing. Power-pairing just means that teams with the same record are paired off against each other, so that a team that starts off the tournament 2-0 will face off against another 2-0 team, for instance. It usually works by drawing the first two rounds of a tournament at random,1 and after that, everything is power-paired.

This turns out to be a surprisingly elegant solution. It helps to make the matchups relatively even, which not only helps students to learn more but also usually tells you more in determining the best teams. Furthermore, the pairings are somewhat self-correcting. Suppose a good team happens to randomly draw very tough opponents in its first two rounds and gets off to an 0-2 start. They’ll receive some compensation by being paired with easier opponents the rest of the way out — an 0-2 team and then a 1-2 team, and so forth. As another bonus to this system, the best teams are put through the gantlet and really earn their keep. A team that finishes its tournament undefeated or with just one loss will have beaten a lot of very good teams along the way.

They also did this at quiz bowl tournaments. Silver proposes a radical reshaping of Big Ten play in which each team gets three rivalry games, a couple early-season games scheduled by the previous year's standings, and then four "flex" matchups based on current standings. He's honed it fairly well:

  • You know whether you're home or away in the flex weeks.
  • Three rivalry weeks is enough to satisfy anyone.
  • The flex matchups make late season games more meaningful.

An example of the latter point:

In our simulated season, Penn State played (and defeated) Wisconsin, Nebraska and Illinois, a decent group of opponents whom they didn’t play in the actual regular season, but skipped games against mediocre Indiana, Purdue and Rutgers, whom they pointlessly faced in real life.

This site has railed against 14-team conferences and plead for dynamic scheduling since their inception. To me the uptick in meaningful games and much more meaningful result is worth disrupting the hallowed season-ending rivalry weekend, but I understand if that's a bridge too far for you. I'm in, though.

BONUS reminder: this is the best way to do Big Ten basketball scheduling:

19 game conference schedule.

PHASE 1: round robin.
PHASE 2: line is drawn between 7th and 8th teams in the league. Mini-leagues subsequently play round-robin.

That would be killer, man.

Oh man... oh man. Here's this!

I'm trying to think of a less appreciated Tennessee assistant football coach than Mike DeBord.

Still thinking.

Still ... OK, I give up.

This is a guy named John Adams. He is a newspaper columnist engaging in such 1990s classics as "talking down to his readers" and "using points and yards per game," so he's a natural DeBord ally. Hell, he's still using 1990s offenses as benchmarks.

In fact, DeBord proved to be one of Jones' best hires. In his first season, he revived UT's running game, which averaged 223.7 yards per game, second in the SEC. This past season, the Vols averaged 36.4 points and 443.7 yards per game.

In 1997, with senior All-American Peyton Manning at quarterback and offensive guru David Cutcliffe calling the shots, the Vols averaged 34.3 points and 482.8 yards per game.

This will be news to Adams, Debord, and Baby Spice, but it's no longer 1997. Tennessee's offense finished 28th in S&P+, which is almost perfectly mediocre in a metric that adjusts for strength of schedule. There is a reason DeBord moved to Indiana and not up the P5 ladder.

Walker is still extant. Kareem Walker had a rough start but seems to have evened things out:

"I got a 3.0 this semester," Walker said with a smile. "At Michigan. That was like 'wow." That felt good. I worked hard for that.

"(Harbaugh) hasn't seen (the report card) yet, but I told him I about a grade I got (a while back). I had to leave practice one day for a paper and I ended up getting a B+ on that. I told him about that grade. He liked it."

There are going to be a ton of early enrollees and even so the most fascinating guy to hear about and see will probably be Walker. He was brought up unprompted by various people during bowl practices as a guy to watch, and he's a talented dude.

What went down at Minnesota. The abortive boycott after ten players were suspended in the wake of a sexual assault investigation looked terrible, and looked worse after the Title IX report was released. Tracy Claeys got fired in its wake. If you're wondering what those guys were thinking, the Pioneer Press has an extensive interview with DE Gaelin Elmore:

PP: But at any point, when Coyle comes in to explain the suspensions, did anyone think, well, he’s the AD, he knows what he’s doing?

GE: No, because his answers made it seem like he had no idea. And it was like, you’re the AD, you did this; how do you not know enough? That’s when a lot of guys were like, ‘This isn’t right.’ We had no idea. (The suspensions) came out of nowhere. If someone just has a conversation with us before (the suspensions) happen, says, “You know what? This is a Title IX, EOAA investigation, it’s really out of our hands; we’re going to suspend the guys until it’s clear,” we’d have been fine. Or even when it was released to the public, at least tell the public the kids were suspended based on the investigation that has been ongoing since Sept. 2. If that’s said, (the boycott) doesn’t happen. But none of that happened, and our team felt we had no other option.

Bad decisions with low information from the team and a Dave Brandon Classic mismanagement of the public relations from the Minnesota AD. I'm a bit surprised that PJ Fleck decided to jump into that business feet-first, but then again he is crazy.

Let's patch holes in this boat that's already on the bottom. What's worse than not enforcing any of your actual rules? Making up new ones to seem virtuous.

One of the buzz words from Tuesday's NCAA recruiting seminar is: IAWP. As part of recruiting reform, the NCAA has proposed during a two-year period before a recruit's anticipated enrollment and a two-year period after the recruit's enrollment, an institution shall not employ individuals associated with a prospect (IAWP) in a non-coaching staff position.

Harbaugh's done this three times, hiring Gwen Bush, Chris Partridge, and Devin Bush Sr. All three of these people are good, and qualified for, the jobs they now have. Meanwhile half the SEC signees are getting paid. What's the point of restricting possibly dubious transactions when you are utterly incapable of enforcing the rules already on the books? Ugh. Amateurism is the worst.

Speaking of, here is a NYT article surveying CFB players on how they spend their stipends:

When the full-cost-of-attendance stipends were approved two years ago, there was worry among some college administrators that athletes would waste the money on frivolous purchases. But Georgia running back Nick Chubb said he saves his money every month, and his teammate Jeb Blazevich said he was surprised to learn how many Bulldogs send the money home to their families as soon as they receive it.

“That blew me away,” said Blazevich, a tight end from Charlotte, N.C. “That’s the thing that got me to love this team so well, just seeing these guys’ heart and sending the stipend home. These guys are good guys, and they want to do well by their family.”

Paternalistic concerns about How The Youth Will Spend Their Money are the worst arguments in favor of the current system. If they waste it all they're no worse off than they are now.

Etc.: What do you have to do to get ejected from a Philly press box? You can find out here. Rumors that Michigan-Florida might get moved to Sunday are unlikely to amount to anything. Spencer on the title game and the Rose Bowl. Smart Football on that power read pitch both teams were running in the championship game.

Comments

wolverine1987

January 11th, 2017 at 3:00 PM ^

Drevno has a good record, that seems like a fact. However, he had not one but two years with these guys, most of whom were highly rated, and at the end of year two they got utterly obliterated by FSU, and did not do much better against OSU. That does not seem like the kind of improvement you would expect--even with average rated lineman, with a great o-line coach. 

Don

January 11th, 2017 at 1:35 PM ^

Pro Football Focus, Jan. 2017: 

Michigan’s offense was completely overmatched against the Seminoles’ dominant front-seven, and the Wolverines earned well below-average grades for team run blocking and team pass protection.

ESPN, January 2004:

"When [Michigan] said, 'We better take care of the corner pressure,' that really heated up the guys inside," Carroll said. "We really could have easily had 12 sacks."

The heads of the offensive linemen turned into Lazy Susans. The rest of them looked a little lazy and a little Susan, too. Michigan gave up 15 sacks all season, but nine on Thursday.

"It was a guessing game," Michigan offensive tackle Tony Pape said. "They usually rushed with their four down guys. This time they didn't. They had a lot of five- and six-man blitzes. It really wasn't the blitzing guy who made the tackles. It was the guys going one-on-one. You don't want to give up nine sacks. That's a terrible statistic."

wile_e8

January 11th, 2017 at 5:42 PM ^

Although there is good news here. In 2004 it was a previously elite O-line being totally confused by new blitz packages, and the coaches having zero answers to deal with it because of the expectation (of the position) that the O-line would give the QB time to make his reads. In 2016, it was members of a previously mediocre O-line being individually overwhelmed by an elite player on the other team, but the coaches were able to scheme around it to a decent number of points. Still not ideal, but more likely to be fixed when they aren't forced to play true freshmen on the line due to lack of better options. Previous track records indicate they are unlikely to have a lack of better options in the future. It's harder to fix underwhelming coaching staffs being totally outschemed, which is why the same damn thing happened again in 2007.

schreibee

January 11th, 2017 at 2:20 PM ^

Well, wouldn't you need to look at the 2008 roster to see what was left to RR?

I do recall Zirbel was a really good LT we lost to career ending injury. His loss caused an unexpected imbalance along the OL that never really got fixed over RR's 3 years.

Hope that's not a preview of Newsome! That would really be a shame!

DeBenedictus & Doernstein iirc were classic late-Lloyd period adds - it came close to signing day and they didn't have enough commits so they tossed out flyer offers to guys with only lower tier offers, Think Dorenstein was a late flip from Illinois?

 

growler4

January 11th, 2017 at 1:53 PM ^

Any proof that "half" or even a sizeable percentage of SEC recruits are getting paid? Or is this just more typical "bagman" complaining?

I may not be an ostrich, but I'm also not in the habit of irresponsibly casting aspersions unless I have the facts to support them.

Ali G Bomaye

January 11th, 2017 at 2:10 PM ^

The dynamic scheduling proposal for B1G football is workable, but would cause havoc with ticketing and travel for fans.

The dynamic scheduling proposal for B1G basketball, on the other hand, is prima facie stupid. Forcing the top and bottom half of the league to play round robins in the second half of the season heavily incentivizes teams to be at the top of the bottom half, rather than the bottom of the top half. For instance, if a team is 6-6 in conference play with one game left in the first round robin, it probably behooves them to throw that game and slide into the 8th spot, so that they play the bottom half of the league. If you assume that it takes a 10-9 B1G record to make the tournament, it's definitely easier to go 4-2 against the bottom half of the league than it is to go 3-3 against the top half of the league. Winning the 13th game would only hurt your chances.

Alton

January 11th, 2017 at 2:21 PM ^

You would want the more difficult schedule, period.  Going 5-1 against the bottom half of the conference would likely be no better for your RPI than going 1-5 against the top half. 

If you are on the bubble, you would want the schedule that would give you the better chance of making the tournament, which is the more difficult schedule.  What 6-6 team wouldn't want home games against 3 of the top 6 teams in the league down the homestretch?  It's a lot better than road games against 3 of the worst 6 teams in the league.

Mr Miggle

January 11th, 2017 at 3:11 PM ^

5-1 in the bottom half will be a lot better that 1-5 in the top, for one. Either we will send teams from the bottom half into the NCAAs or this sytem would lead to us getting fewer bids.

I'm afraid that would be the unintended result of adopting this system. We'll end up with teams in the top half with losing conference records. Teams relegated to the bottom half will get passed over even with adequate resumes due to the stigma of being there. It wouldn't matter if we were sending 3-4 teams a year to the tournament. We've been sending at least half of our teams there most years.

Rufus X

January 11th, 2017 at 2:52 PM ^

Brian has several oddly irrelevant obsessions, but Mike DeBord has to be the oddest. Who cares about Mike DeBord?  Or even more to the point, who cares about some backwater beat writer's support of him?  The irony of criticizing someone from the distant past for living in the distanter past is hard to ignore...  Time to move on, man.

AlwaysBlue

January 11th, 2017 at 3:08 PM ^

continue to blame Hoke for the bad and praise Harbaugh for the good. It's not that the OL observation isn't correct...but it seems to me that there should be a bit of concern.

ScruffyTheJanitor

January 11th, 2017 at 3:19 PM ^

Considering that Harbaugh had to play a Freshman this year. The only other offensive linemen on the team that weren't Hoke Players were Newsome, Runyan (both committed under Hoke, If I remember), and Ulizio (who was a project).

Its clear that the seniors (Magnuson, Kalis, Bredeson) were all decidedly Meh players even AFTER getting coached up for two years in this system. In two years, when you have all-Harbuagh guys, then you can criticize them for the turmoil. 

Bando Calrissian

January 11th, 2017 at 3:36 PM ^

Brian, I'm with you on the IAWP thing with the exception of Gwen Bush. Was there a demonstrated need for a "Team Mom" position paid in the six-figures? What makes Gwen Bush more qualified than anyone else, and would she have gotten that job if her son wasn't a recruit/student athlete?

I'm generally on board with most everything Harbaugh does, but that's always hit me as not just a little shady, particularly considering how she stepped in it on Twitter soon after she took the job. Maybe she does provide a service or use inside the program, but it's still... Weird.

trustBlue

January 11th, 2017 at 7:27 PM ^

Isnt the joke that Harbaugh only pursed Wayne Lyons to get his mom (Gwen Bush)?

Lyons never saw the field much at Michigan, but by all account Gwen has been a huge asset to for recruting and for the players in general.  Her name always seems to come up in recruiting and reports were that she played a huge role in the recruitment of Ambry Thomas, DPJ, and Najee Harris among others.

Bill22

January 12th, 2017 at 6:30 PM ^

Yeah, if you follow recruiting I don't think there is any way you can question the value of Gwen Bush at the point. When we get into these high profile recruiting battles i.e. Gary, Solomon, Najee, her name always comes up as someone who is helping to solidify family relationships. She is a huge asset behind the scenes.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Ty Butterfield

January 11th, 2017 at 3:46 PM ^

At this point I would cut off a pinky finger for an O-line that could impose their will on the other team. At some point you can't blame the previous staff. That can only last for so long.

Mr Miggle

January 11th, 2017 at 4:39 PM ^

doesn't come back. Overall there will be a lot of interesting battles between players we've seen and those we haven't.  In the backfield it will mostly be those we haven't seen vs those we've barely seen