OT: Socialize Your Dogs!

Submitted by CRex on
Okay so this a rant / public service announcement. Your call on how much of this post is each of the aforementioned options. Socialize your dogs people and when someone has a mean dog, report it. So in my neighborhood we have, well had, this vicious Akita, beautiful dog but it had the habit of getting loose and attacking other dogs. Roughed up a lab and did about $2,000 in vet bills to a border collie. The owners of the Akita paid the other dogs’ vet bills both times and said they were going to build a better fence, so the none of us reported these attacks to the cops or animal control, because we didn’t want to see a dog put down just because she had crappy owners. Yesterday afternoon the Akita got loose and attacked my next door neighbor’s toddler. The toddler and his mother were outside playing when the Akita came streaking into the yard and went right for the kid. The Akita got a few bites in, then the mother grabbed the toddler. She was holding him in one hand, trying to fend off the dog with the other hand and screaming. My two Malamutes heard this going down and got worked enough that Corin, the male, launched himself through my living room window, and Theodora the female followed. The Akita never heard or saw the Malamutes coming, which was the end of the Akita when Corin got his jaws on it. The toddler and the mother both needed stitches at the ER, but they were discharged on the same day and will ultimately be fine. Corin has some scratches on his face from head butting a window and a cut on his paw. Theodora has a few scratches, but for the most part their heavy fur protected them when they went through the glass. Right now they’re wrestling each other. When my girlfriend is around though, Corin picks up his bandaged paw, limps around on three legs and makes the most pitiful little whimpering sounds you ever heard while looking at her with such sad eyes. He cashed in big time last night, she went to the store, bought him fresh salmon and fed it to while making a big fuss over what a brave dog he is. Then she leaves and he’s back down on 4 paws and running around. So of course we all feel like morons for not reporting the Akita back when it attacked the lab, or even the second time after it got the collie. The best part is, the owners of the Akita are filing a report against me for having “vicious dogs”. The Akita was pretty much killed instantly, Corin got his jaws on its throat, threw it a good ten feet into the air and when it came down he and Theodora literally ripped it apart. Both Corin and Theodora are working dogs. Corin can pull 2,700 lbs by himself and Dora, who is a bit smaller can pull 2,300. The cops pretty much laughed off the claim my Malamutes are vicious, but I’ve already had animal control by today. At the end of the day, if you’re a pet owner, socialize your dogs and train them!

Blazefire

March 5th, 2010 at 3:50 PM ^

Alright, fine. If you say that's the case, then that's the case. But when you started this story, you said they came onto your property and had chased people in the past. If they were more dangerous than that, then you should've emphasized. Furthermore, I've never been to a community where cops aren't MORE than happy to ticket pet owners who are breaking regulations. They love that juicy $200 ticket. If that's not the case where you live, then write the police comissioner and tell him you intend to vote him out next time the election comes up unless the department starts doing their job.

Don

March 5th, 2010 at 4:19 PM ^

"you said they came onto your property and had chased people in the past. If they were more dangerous than that, then you should've emphasized." ??? Any time a dog goes onto someone else's property and chases them, THAT'S ALREADY DANGEROUS. There's no emphasis that's needed. It's bad enough.

anon0

March 5th, 2010 at 3:02 PM ^

ffs, go back and read what you wrote about the dogs prior to this post. Nowhere did you indicate that they terrorized the neighborhood or attacked people. You said you had a bad history with dogs, that these dogs came onto your property after you had told the owners you didn't want them to, and that they have chased people in the past (chasing is not necessarily a violent act)

Blue in Yarmouth

March 5th, 2010 at 3:17 PM ^

I would think the fact that I mentioned shooting rock salt at them might give someone the idea they were up to things they shouldn't have been. I guess I shouldn't take things for granted on the internet but I thought people might know me enough to know I am not a guy who would be shooting dogs for no reason. I was wrong at least on two counts (you and blaze) but it seems that most understood what I was talking about. Sorry for the mixup.

anon0

March 5th, 2010 at 3:34 PM ^

Fair enough. I'm coming from a position where I don't keep track of individual posters here, and have heard many stories of people with different standards than I when it comes to violent actions against animals. I agree with you taking active measures to prevent violent dogs from harming anyone on your property. OTOH, I've heard firsthand accounts of neighbors threatening to shoot dogs or actually attacking dogs merely for coming onto their property even when the dog is very gentle and not a threat to anyone.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 3:14 PM ^

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you understand what his rights are on his property. That said, how do you propose he keep these dogs off his property when the owners refuse to do something about it? And, as a sidenote: "(chasing is not necessarily a violent act)". Amusingly enough, neither is throwing a baseball at you. The ball in flight is perfectly safe. It's that one time when it smacks you in the face it becomes violent. If you would trust dogs chasing your kids because "it's not necessarily a violent act" then I don't know what to say.

anon0

March 5th, 2010 at 3:31 PM ^

Chasing can be violent and should be a concern. That comment was in the context of knowing these dogs were violent -- if you tell me that a dog chased someone, I won't go ahead and call the dog violent. The last dog I had (RIP) was a shih-tzu that would sometimes chase people because he wanted to be played with, not because he wanted to tear their throat out.

octal9

March 5th, 2010 at 3:28 PM ^

chasing is not necessarily a violent act
Fuck that. The chasing itself might not be violent, but whose to say the dog will stop at chasing? There's no way to tell. Reaching into your jacket when you're surrounded by police with arms drawn is not necessarily a violent act, but I bet a dollar you'll have extra holes in your body before you can pull out your hair comb. It's about context, and in both situations one absolutely must act on the side of safety. If a strange dog is chasing myself or anybody for whom I care, that thing's getting stopped at all costs.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 2:29 PM ^

On that note, pitbulls are not dangerous dogs, but should require specialized licencing requirements to ensure they will be raised properly, because if they're not, they ARE dangerous.
So they aren't dangerous, unless they are? And they will be if they aren't raise properly which requires, in your mind, specialized licensing? Now, given that the average person is a complete moron, I think it's safe to say pitbulls are dangerous dogs.

Zone Left

March 5th, 2010 at 2:58 PM ^

Pit Bulls themselves aren't dangerous. They're actually unusually pre-disposed to please their owners. However, they are a one person dog. How that person treats the Pit Bull and wants them to act will go a long way towards the dog acting in a certain way. If the owner actively rewards kindness, they'll be overly kind to everyone. The real problem is that many Pit Bulls are trained to be "tough" dogs from birth. Some owners will crop their tails and ears (which is typically more like mutiliate) to make them appear tough, and then reward that behavior. On top of that, abusive behavior makes them afraid, and thus more likely to be aggressive. Aggression in dogs is not a confident act. Bottom line, it's the owner/breeder that determines how the dog will act. Pits will go out of there way to act how they perceive their master wants them to.

Blue in Yarmouth

March 5th, 2010 at 3:07 PM ^

Are you a dog pyschologist? I am not joking at all. I am wondering because you have a very well thought out response to that statement and I am wondering about how much stock I can put in it. If you are simply a pet owner and that is your experience it could easily be taken as a one off. If you are a vet or dog pyschologist, more stock would be given. I ask because I knew the family and the dog that attacked me. They were a good family and treated the dog well but he still mauled the hell out me. I realize it could have been for a reason (ie. all the movement and laughter got him excited so it he got a little crazy) but does that really excuse the action and mean he isn't dangerous? I would bet many people that are in jail for rape could use the same defense and say the girls were dancing around in skimpy clothes and it got me feeling a little crazy so I had sex with them despite the fact that they didn't want to.

Blazefire

March 5th, 2010 at 3:47 PM ^

You said before that it got out of its cage. While I'm sure this is not nearly 100% true, my experience has been that dogs kept outside are rarely given much attention/training, and often times not enough food, water, or medical treatment. While they may have been a good family, that doesn't mean they treated their dog right.

MichiganExile

March 5th, 2010 at 5:01 PM ^

is absolutely right. I volunteered at an animal shelter through the entirety of undergrad. If there is one dog that runs the gamut of dispositions it is the pitbull. This is because of their high drive to please their owner which is probably more powerful in the pitbull than any other dog. They generally pair with one person and will do anything to please him or her. This can be great or awful. In my time at the shelter I saw pitbulls do just about everything. They could be the sweetest dog in the world and the second you met the owner you realized why (generally because the owner was very friendly and nice). I saw one family come in to pick up their pitbull that had gotten out and their 3 year old climbed on the dog's back and rode it around the shelter. I also saw pitbulls that you literally had to throw food into their cage because you couldn't get near them and the owner that came to collect the dog was almost invariably a prick or some punk kid. The pitbull will become the dog you want it to because it wants to please its owner so much. They also have an extremely high protective drive. I have a pitbull and that dog loves EVERYONE. However, I once went out in the middle of the night to pick something up for my wife and when I came back in the house I was hooded up and it was dark. The dog came rushing out of her room, growling and snarling and charged me. I told her to stop and she recognized my voice and sat immediately. As soon as I turned on the light she rolled over and wanted to petted on her stomach. Sweetest dog in the world but don't mess with her family. That said, dogs are still animals and every animal still has the potential to be set off. No one knows for sure when dogs were domesticated but you need to realize evolutionarily they are not very far removed from wolves. There is no excuse for you being attacked. It pains me to say it but the second my dog bites a person unprovoked she's getting put down. Statistics show a dog that bites once is more likely to bite again and the second she showed that propensity to bite I would have no choice.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 5:21 PM ^

The pitbull will become the dog you want it to because it wants to please its owner so much. They also have an extremely high protective drive. I have a pitbull and that dog loves EVERYONE. However, I once went out in the middle of the night to pick something up for my wife and when I came back in the house I was hooded up and it was dark. The dog came rushing out of her room, growling and snarling and charged me. I told her to stop and she recognized my voice and sat immediately. As soon as I turned on the light she rolled over and wanted to petted on her stomach. Sweetest dog in the world but don't mess with her family.
Damn good thing you didn't have laryngitis or something. You just kind of proved why pitbulls are incredibly dangerous.

MichiganExile

March 5th, 2010 at 5:27 PM ^

That's one way to look at it and I'm not saying you are wrong to do so. I like to look at it as someone just came into my house while my wife was asleep, the dog didn't recognize him and didn't like it. My dog knows there are two people that belong in my house at night and she thought I wasn't one of them. Besides whose to say a lab wouldn't have behaved the same way? Most dogs are pretty dang protective of their owners.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 6:51 PM ^

However, I once went out in the middle of the night to pick something up for my wife and when I came back in the house I was hooded up and it was dark. The dog came rushing out of her room, growling and snarling and charged me. I told her to stop and she recognized my voice and sat immediately.
Couple points to address. One, that's nice if the dogs "knows" two people belong in the house at night. Since you were gone, there was only one person in the house, ergo your dog should "know" that one person is missing. Now, when the door opened, before the dog has a chance to even SEE you, it's already growling and snarling and charging you. Therefore, it has nothing to do with what the dog "knows" about who should be there, but all about whether or not the dog is surprised. Second, "hooded up and it was dark" draws a really nice allusion to someone breaking into your home at night. However, as I pointed out, the dog already was flipping its shit before it saw the hood. The dog was switched to kill BEFORE IT RECOGNIZED YOU, REGARDLESS OF HOW IT FINALLY RECOGNIZED YOU! So you have a dog that is willing to attack to kill in a situation where it is surprised and does not recognize the person that surprised it. I'm totally cool with you owning this dog. Provided you keep it firmly secured in your own house and don't let it out. Because, honestly, the health and well-being of others shouldn't be dependent on your dog's critical reasoning skills.

MichiganExile

March 5th, 2010 at 7:43 PM ^

Well your free to your opinion. You seem to have decided my dog is a man-killing beast despite never meeting her or me. I related to you the only story where my dog has shown any indication it would attack a person. That's not your fault though. You only know what I have just written of my dog. I have plenty of stories where I have allowed contractors or plumbers in my house that never had a problem with the dog despite her never having met them before and myself, my wife, or my wife and myself being gone. I also said my dog loves EVERYONE. She is extremely friendly to every person or dog she has ever met. I've owned 5 dogs and never received near as many compliments on any of the others' dispositions as I have this one. A few things I don't really understand about your point of view.
Since you were gone, there was only one person in the house, ergo your dog should "know" that one person is missing.
I don't think dogs are the critical thinkers you seem to be giving them credit for. Dogs like all animals are mostly instincts. It was not normal for someone to be coming in the house silently at night dressed the way I was in the dark. I doubt most dogs would just "know" that I was gone and therefore assume it was me. They would "know" something was not right and come to investigate with authority. I have no doubt in my mind if the lights are on and I come in making a little more noise my dog isn't surprised and doesn't respond that way.
The dog was switched to kill BEFORE IT RECOGNIZED YOU, REGARDLESS OF HOW IT FINALLY RECOGNIZED YOU!
Why do you assume she was going to kill? She was close enough (just about 2-3 feet away from me) to lunge at my throat or sensitive areas long before she recognized my voice but she didn't. She may have intended on biting, she may have intended on killing, she may have intended on giving a fake charge. You are free to assume the worst, I'm not going to do that. Also, since I think this seems to be where you are hung up, the dog did see me before she growled and charged; she can see the front door from her dog bed. My wife is paranoid and she puts the dog bed in line-of-sight from the front door. My first post did not paint a proper picture for you. Mea culpa. For your peace of mind though, my dog is never let outside off leash unless we are in a dog park or we are home and she is out back (entirely fenced in by the way).

chunkums

March 5th, 2010 at 3:36 PM ^

It is my understanding that Pits are by nature a very emotional breed. This means they are extremely affectionate towards their owners, but also swings the other way at times. I personally would never buy one, knowing that the reputation they have exists for a reason.

TIMMMAAY

March 9th, 2010 at 4:54 PM ^

You know you don't actually have to do that. I know you sign a form agreeing to do it, and to pay a penalty if you don't, but they never check. I don't like getting my dogs cut, so I've never done it, and never had a problem.

Fat Mike

March 5th, 2010 at 2:27 PM ^

We've had two pure bred boxers now, an all white one who I loved so dearly but died of cancer, and now a brown one who is just a menace. Both of them when puppies would get anything and tear it up, climb up onto tables and counter tops to get food, or plastic bags, pens whatever. The white one we had first, her name was gidget, was trained a lot quicker. We bought the sour apple spray for the wood because she would chew window sills and chair legs. That worked very well. We ended up taking her to puppy training at she was much better afterwards. When she died we were all devasted. We had her for about 6 years and after she was a year and a half to two years old, she was absolutely wonderful. I think my parents were lonely, especially my mom, without a dog because we had one for so long, that they rushed into buying a new on to quickly. We wanted to go with an all brown one because gidget had so many problems when was young. We bought one at seven weeks which we had to return because when we took her to the vet she had a heart murmur. I told my parents to wait another couple weeks or so, but they immediately got another one at only six weeks old who we named daisy (not my choice). She was a pain from the get go. She would nip at you, again rip up eveything that she could get her paws on, chewed up the wood more than gidget, we sprayed the bitter apple and she would lick it off. If had no affect on her. We didn't take her to the puppy training classes, we take her to the dog park and she would run around with other dogs for a couple of minutes and then just bark at them until we left. We take her walks and she pulls and the leash. Dverytime she sees anybody she jumps on them, scratching them. She's two years old now and still acts this way. She us not aggressive in anyway she just gets in trouble a lot. I guess what I'm asking is if anybody else has had these problems with there dog and what they did to train them.

maineandblue

March 5th, 2010 at 7:07 PM ^

"We didn't take her to the puppy training classes" You just figured out the answer to your own question. Take your dog to training classes, the more the better. It's probably not too late, but the longer you wait, the harder it will be to correct the problems. Dogs need to be trained and socialized, the sooner the better.

Noahdb

March 5th, 2010 at 3:16 PM ^

The overwhelming majority of people who own a purebred dog would probably be better with just a rescue mutt from the pound (please note all of the qualifying statements in there). MOST people just want a companion. They don't want a dog to actually go out and herd sheep, pull a sled, guard a junkyard, bring back a duck, or hunt a fox. They just want a pup that they can scritch on the head and hang out with. It's insane that we allow breeds like dobies, pits, and rotties be bred the way they are, sold the way they are, and raised and treated the way they are. Those are three working breeds that have long, distinguished histories and have absolutely been destroyed by wreckless ***ktard nitwits that ought to have a pair of bolt cutters taken to their own balls.

Clarence Beeks

March 5th, 2010 at 4:44 PM ^

Yeah man, someone else should totally tell you what kind of dog you can and can't have... As for "long, distinguished histories", you do realize that the Doberman wasn't developed until around 1900, right? In fact, something like 75% of the currently recognized dog breeds have been developed since the mid-1800s.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 4:53 PM ^

That's not at all what he's saying and you know it. There are regulations to buying a gun, which only kills if a human actively aims and pulls the trigger. There are no regulations on buying a dog, which, as we've heard from some stories, are less controllable (because they are actual living creatures) and just as capable of causing harm. Google results for "golden retriever attacks": 443,000 Google results for "doberman attacks": 2,780,000

Clarence Beeks

March 5th, 2010 at 5:25 PM ^

"That's not at all what he's saying and you know it." No, I don't. And neither do you. When you preface your comments with an ignorant comment stating that only a small percentage of people have any business having a purebred dog and then make a blanket statement regarding the breeding and ownership of specific dog breeds, the conclusion that I reached from what he said is perfectly fine. If that's not what he meant then he's free to say that, but you have no idea whether that's what he meant or not. "There are regulations to buying a gun," Not for much longer.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 5:25 PM ^

If a democratic president with a democratic majority decides to remove gun buying regulations then I don't really know what to say. And regardless, I'm sure most people agree that basic regulations should exist for buying a gun. So either way, you're avoiding my rebuttal to your statement.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 5:35 PM ^

To reply to your edit I restate his opening statement: "(please note all of the qualifying statements in there). " As for the Supreme Court, reviewing a ban on handguns, which does seem to violate the 2nd amendment, it not the same as reviewing whether background checks during gun purchase is unconstitutional. You know that.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 5:47 PM ^

""There are regulations to buying a gun," Not for much longer." Oh, ok then. Because IF the Supreme Court overturns the ban and then IF the Supreme Court hears a challenge to ALL regulations and then IF the Supreme Court rules gun regulations are unconstitutional - this all equates to "Not for much longer" to you?

Clarence Beeks

March 5th, 2010 at 6:45 PM ^

If that's how you'd like to interpret what I said, then sure, but in reality, the poster that I was responding to wasn't talking about regulation, and I wasn't responding to regulation; he/she was talking about prohibitions, as was I. You're the one that jumped to regulation. Two different things.

ShockFX

March 5th, 2010 at 6:54 PM ^

"It's insane that we allow breeds like dobies, pits, and rotties be bred the way they are, sold the way they are, and raised and treated the way they are." I'm pretty sure he's not saying anything about prohibition, but I suppose it's not conclusive.

Noahdb

March 5th, 2010 at 3:39 PM ^

I have an Aussie Shepherd mix with a VERY strong chase instinct. Anything with wheels, she's going to chase. Bikes, cars, baby carriages...anything. If you're a cat, she's going to chase you. If you're a little kid and you're running around and squealing, she's going to chase you. She won't come close enough to do anything other than stand 10 feet away and bark like crazy. If you try to touch her, she'll run away. But that's probably of very little comfort if you don't know my dog when she comes tearing after you. That's why she's kept inside, is always walked on a leash and never allowed around little kids. I can totally understand why people would be freaked out by a dog chasing them...especially if they had a history of being attacked.