Unverified Voracity Is Putting Hockey In Arizona Comment Count

Brian

Does anyone ever check anything? No? Okay. This exists.

Michigan needs to have a twitter feed in which they ask everyone if this thing they're about to do is a bad idea.

Speaking of things that exist without being checked that should not exist. Oh man the takes coming out of the Free Press after Frank Clark's dismissal are super super hot:

B2vz0mkCIAAbGXk[1]

The Free Press must have a logic puzzle as part of their hiring process. Anyone who figures it out fails.

This, by the way, this is a great example of the pointless moralizing I was talking about. Seidel doesn't give damn about whether Michigan officially dismissed Clark on Sunday or Monday, he's just complaining to show off how impressively ethical he is. Barry Petchesky just had an excellent piece on how the NFL is using Adrian Peterson to repair The Brand:

3. This is a pure PR play on the part of the NFL, and it's almost too cynical to be believed. The league had been reeling from widespread criticism of its eagerness to co-opt the legal process and its inability to sensitively or sensibly handle morality. Peterson—a black-and-white villain—was a blessing. Maybe a bad man, maybe a man who did bad things, he's a relatively uncomplicated figure, and the NFL was thrilled to have someone to position itself against. The NFL clambered over Peterson to regain the moral high ground it never actually deserved, and is using that platform to shout out, "We are strongly against the beating of children." This is the safest and most defensible position in the world. What we're seeing is the return of the soldiers-and-puppies-and-Pinktober NFL, barely months after the Ray Rice fiasco exposed that as a thin facade. There has been no meaningful change. The league is still beyond reproach, because it cares about the children.

Seidel roundly condemns domestic violence to create the appearance he's a rad dude; the only person served by his column is himself.

Fan appreciation day. At least they're trying. Michigan's announced a bunch of minor fan perks for the Maryland game, including some concession concessions and apparel discounts for season ticket holders. They're also allowing field access. That access is slated to start 30-45 minutes after a 3:30 game that looks likely to feature freezing rain—ain't nobody staying for that.

We've got photos of other stuff. We've been branching out our photos into non-revenue sports. Here's a SOON shot from volleyball's outing against Minnesota:

15748084645_8274b94d01_z

[Bill Rapai]

Rapai also shot a WBB game; Marc-Gregor Campredon shot men's and women's soccer.

As always, mgoblog photos are Creative Commons licensed so you can use them. Just credit the photographer and link back.

Exit Will Muschamp. Florida axed him yesterday, and man the parallels here are eerie: Muschamp had a weird, horseshoe-flavored 11-2 year (his second; Hoke's first) before seemingly excellent recruiting collapsed in a pile of offensive ineptitude too intense to be believed. QBs in Gainesville and Ann Arbor disintegrated into quivering interception machines before our eyes; the defenses generally stood tall despite extremely adverse conditions; both teams mutated football never-before-seen piles of suck, despair, and hilarity.

Today they had a press conference in which Muschamp handled himself ably and everyone swore up and down he was the best dude. Earlier this year Spencer and I had an IM conversation about swapping coaches, and it turns out that's beside the point: Muschamp and Hoke are the same dude.

Spencer eulogizes:

3. There is no limit to the variations of failure here. Muschamp was blown out at home on Homecoming by Mizzou, 42-13, and sniped by a late field goal, completing a 30-27 home collapse against LSU. Alabama could have scored 60 on the Gators, but got bored and politely declined the option in a 42-21 road humiliation. When Florida lined up for a late punt against South Carolina after the Gamecocks had already blocked a game-clinching field goal, the kick was blocked before the ball was ever snapped. Don't ever tell anyone you can't block a ball with your mind; Florida did it, and then handed it to South Carolina with a smile. The confidence in delivering losses was the only constant Florida had left, something it got down to some time after the worst loss in program history: a home defeat by Georgia Southern in 2013.

Did you forget that happened, the low point of lows for an entire era? He did that. Will Muschamp's signature loss of signature losses is him misspelling the word "fart" in spray paint across "The Birth of Venus."  It's an atrocity almost admirable in its accidental, perfect malice. For the record, I think Will would spell it "p-h-a-r-t," because that's the funniest possible misspelling of the word.

With reports that Dan Mullen won't be of interest, my main regret about Florida pulling the trigger early is that Spencer got the jump on the one-sentence summation of the last four years:

11. In conclusion: RIP, Big Dumb Will Muschamp Football. In the end, you were too dumb to live and too ugly to mourn.

May Spencer find his Christmas tree stocked with Air Raid coaches, and may Will Muschamp migrate northwards to be Jim Harbaugh's DC.

Now everything will be fixed forever. The NCAA has taken the first and most important step towards being an organization that creates good in this world:

Long national nightmare, etc.

Hockey stuff. I haven't said too much about the hockey team yet; I don't usually during football season because of time constraints and just the fact that I'm not that good at figuring out hockey even now and need some time to get my head around. I'm not much closer after Michigan's meh sweep of American International. Center Ice:

The problems started when the defensive pairings were changed again. The blueline predictably looked disjointed, pinching at the wrong times, getting caught out of position and allowing the Yellow Jackets to get countless odd man rushes on Zach Nagelvoort.

Michigan suffocated AIC by pressuring in the offensive zone for the majority of both games, but when the Yellow Jackets countered they easily found quality scoring chances. When the defense had their way on Saturday cutting down mistakes, Nagelvoort wasn't able to keep the puck out of the net and the Yellow Jackets were able to not just stay in the game, but put Michigan on the ropes early.

AIC is usually so bad that anyone within shouting distance of the tournament sees wins against them excised from their RPI because counting those games would actually lower it. These games were essentially exhibitions against a team much worse than the U18s, and Michigan duly dominated attack time and SOG.

I don't take much positive from it, though. On Friday AIC had three separate 3-on-1s and a half-dozen other odd-man rushes besides; on Saturday they played Michigan almost even through two periods. I'm at a loss to explain Michigan's play. They have piles of talent, certainly enough to scrape through if their back end was making moderate mistakes occasionally instead of enormous ones frequently. That's not the case, and then the offense has lacked incisiveness against anyone better than AIC since… since TJ Hensick left? It's been a long time since Michigan's had a guy like him.

So I don't know. Michigan is really behind the eight ball here, already, playing in a crappy conference with a 2-5 record in games that will actually matter when it's time to find tourney participants. Would Red hang on for that last year when Tech is 10-0(!) and headed for their best season since the 1980s, thus paving the way for Pearson to come back? I don't know, but that's what I'm thinking about now… not getting back to the tourney this year.

At least they're finally fixing the ice infrastructure? Yost's ice has been iffy for years.

Speaking of hockey. Arizona State(?!) announces they will add a D-I program. Like Penn State, they make the leap from ACHA power. ASU is a weird  program to make the leap; there are no West Coast programs. The three Colorado outfits are the only schools even vaguely close. Even so I'd guess the NCHC snaps them up. Arizona State brings a bigger athletic profile than most of their members.

This is one of the benefits of the Big Ten's formation, by the way. That reorganized the western programs into three conferences instead of two. After CHA folded, programs  that were considering hockey had a dubious future as an independent. Now there are spots for another dozen teams, as long as some of them are in the Big Ten.

Buffalo might be next, with Penn State benefactor and new Bills owner Terry Pegula potentially fronting the capital.

You used to know how to do this. Michigan scheduled a home hockey game for a football Saturday. That game is at 3:30. The hockey game is at 7:30. Remind me why I have season tickets again? Is it because I'm dumb? It feels like that's the reason.

Michigan never used to do this. Instead they would have the occasional Sunday matinee. New athletic director please save us. And stop running the ARE YOU FAN ENOUGH commercial for the hockey game the previous athletic director yanked out of our season ticket packages.

Etc.: Ray Taylor's baby has impeccable timing. Approximately 3k unsold seats for Maryland. Michigan catches another personnel break as freshman Maryland WR Juwann Winifree is suspended for Saturday. Old photos. Justin Meram gets a call-up to the Iraq national team. Dilly bar details.

Comments

WestQuad

November 19th, 2014 at 12:29 PM ^

Also, a zero tolerance for domestic violence, or what-have-you is good, but dimissing him from the team does nothing to help him or his girlfriend.  It sends a message to the rest of the team, but I don't think guys that hit women think through the consequences that much.  Does the team do anything after dismissing the player, or do they just wash their hands of the situation?

WestQuad

November 19th, 2014 at 3:45 PM ^

I don't expect them to do anything really.   My obfuscated point is that the Freep guys indignation is stupid.  Dismissing Clark whether immediately after or after getting the facts doesn't solve anything.  I have blind outrage at the reporters blind outrage.

BursleysFinest

November 19th, 2014 at 12:51 PM ^

1. Given the severity and this was his 2nd chance, it had to be done. 2. Just judging from the care they've shown for the players, would guess that Hoke and other members of the coaching staff would reach out individually to offer their help and support but there would be no official assistance from the Athletic department (again, only a wild guess though).

matty blue

November 19th, 2014 at 12:49 PM ^

the whole thing is beautiful in its slavish, 'brazil'-level adherence to bureaucracy.  'the committee voted" is first - i love the idea of sending around an outlook meeting invitation that includes an agenda with 30 minutes slotted for discussion of the name of the round.  and they can't just start calling it the first round right now, either.  it's going to take 16 months to turn that battleship.

the ncaa is goddamn beautiful.  not even kidding.

Robbie Moore

November 19th, 2014 at 12:52 PM ^

The reason this site is a must read everyday is because I'll get snippets like Brian's take on Seidel and the Free Press. Pointed and dead on. Brian has a pulpit and is not afraid to use it. BRAVO!

robpollard

November 19th, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

I mean, I get it. We're all "depressed" UM not only is bad at football, but has incompetents in adminstrative positions.

But as someone who has spent a good deal of time in waiting rooms at UMHS, they have pamphlets on every topic; they have for years. I'm sure they make these available at other places around campus. To make the pamphlets clear about what they contain, they tend to have simple titles -- "Depression", "Obesity", "Down's Syndrome", etc -- that are easy to see & identify across a room. They all have "The Michigan Difference" at the bottom. Should all these be changed too, so we (apparently) don't think UM causes obesity? If so, how would you change it? With brochures, simpler is better -- you're trying to catch someone's eye.

It clearly is identified as being for a UM medical center at the top; "The Michigan Difference" is UM's long-standing tagline (e.g., that great ad where they have the girl with the robot arm, the little boy in the tub with the surgey scar on his chest) and is used frequently for UMHS to show how they can help you, http://michigandifference.org.

I understand UM has screwed a lot of things up. But I think this out-of-context "ha ha" is undeserved. I can't see how it was a "bad idea."

jmdblue

November 19th, 2014 at 1:31 PM ^

They wouldn't have an obese guy on a pamphlet : OBESE - big guy pic - Michigan difference  It's just terribly clumsy.  Avoiding the stupid is more important than tightness of branding.  What this pamphlet gives us is : DEPRESSION - Sad person pic - Michigan difference.  Could easily have been U of M Center for Depression - pic of sad painting or sculpture or sumpin - Michigan difference.

robpollard

November 19th, 2014 at 2:04 PM ^

How is your pamphlet "better" and less "stupid"? A sculpture makes it seem less real -- a photo is more relatable. And your version still has the word "DEPRESSION" with "The Michigan Difference" on it, which a few people (I guess) seem to think makes it seem like UM causes you to be depressed. So how did you "fix" that?

Besides, the pamphlet doesn't just have what you listed; it has "University of Michigan Depression Center" in numerous places. That's the actual name of where you might go to treat it, which is the point of the brochure: letting students/UM employees know that this resource (the building and the website) exists at U of M. Look at the whole 2-page pamphlet -- it's clear.

BTW: Here's another pamphlet on "Bipolar Disorder" -- same layout. There are two pics which, in a tactful way, shows bipolar disorder often manifests itself in teens, but also can affect older people. And your race doesn't matter. It's all pretty standard; nothing real innovative, but nothing stupid or bad either.

jmdblue

November 19th, 2014 at 2:39 PM ^

and please believe me, I am not discounting the need for medical help/answers for depression.  I just felt, as apparently Brian did, that the pamphlet could have been composed in a different manner.  I'm neither a graphic designer nor a marketing person so my idea was predictably lame, but I'd suggest the immediate impression of the "depression" pamphlet and the "bipolar" pamphlet are completely different.  Go Blue.

Mo Better Blues

November 19th, 2014 at 2:14 PM ^

I'm afraid a lot of people are somehow confusing the criticism of a poorly considered composition that suggests, by its inartful layout, that suffering from depression, writ large, is a unique 'Michigan Differen[tiator]' from the (not being made by anyone, I don't think) criticism that UofM is putting out a pamphlet addressing the serious mental health challenge of depression.

robpollard

November 19th, 2014 at 4:00 PM ^

That has been their slogan for over a decade. It is how they position not just UMHS, but the whole university (i.e., you can go any where to be treated for depression, bipolar disorder or childbirth anxiety. Why should you go here? Because of "The Michigan Difference", i.e., we will do a better job than anyone else.")

And again, if you look at the whole brochure (which is only two pages), you'll see there is nothing confusing about it or implying that the "Michigan Difference" in that it causes or contributes to depression, bipolar disorder, etc.

I like Twitter (use it myself) but this is the kind of silly stuff it leads to. I still maintain there was nothing bad or mistaken about this.

mgoblue78

November 19th, 2014 at 1:24 PM ^

It's not correct that hockey would never be scheduled for the same day as a football game.

I attended lots of hockey games at Yost the evening after a football game at Michigan Stadium

But, what didn't happen back then was scheduling a football game at 3:30 the same day as a hockey game.  

“Toe meets leather at 1:05.  If you want to televise it, fine. If you don’t, that’s fine too.”

 

Totally2

November 19th, 2014 at 1:30 PM ^

" . . . the only person served by his column is himself."

Agree, and love you calling him out.

"This, by the way, this is a great example of the pointless moralizing I was talking about."

Nice again. You and some readers may find this evolutionary perspective on morality interesting; it's by Peter DeScioli:

http://www.humansandnature.org/mind---morality---peter-descioli-response-126.php

excerpt: "Second, morality is among the most selfish, coercive, backstabbing, and destructive adaptations that evolution has ever produced in its four billion year history. This shocker comes with a crucial corollary: morality is different from its kinder, gentler, and more ancient doppelganger, altruism. Humans show many forms of altruism and compassion that do not require or depend on the capacity for moral judgment."

and: "Evidence from experiments reveals the mind’s moral algorithms."

and: "In fact, humans are more eager to judge other people than to follow their own moral advice."

 

claire

November 19th, 2014 at 1:42 PM ^

I have no problem with this brochure or any brochure that aims to keep the public healthier. What if this was a brochure for prostate cancer or breast cancer? And is depression any different, as a disease entity, than prostate or breast cancer? Ten yerars ago we didn't talk about depression. Now because of the 'Michigan Difference' we're talking about a significant healthcare issue. You might find it interesting that 40,000 people will take their lives this year inthe US...

CompleteLunacy

November 19th, 2014 at 2:41 PM ^

This literally makes no sense to me.

Do people love criticizing things for the sake of criticism? It's a fucking pamphlet on depression, to advertise for UM's Depression Center.  It's got the word "depression" on it, a picture of a person to make it relatable, and the words "The Michigan Difference" on it. That's it. Let's not think too hard about a pamphlet.

bronxblue

November 19th, 2014 at 2:04 PM ^

It continues to amaze me that there are people who still want to write for newspapers.  Space limitations, severely-reduced markets, semi-stringent editorialization, entrenched seniority, etc. makes it so unappealing, and that's how you have a guy like Seidel (and his ilk) writing this dreck and passing it off as insightful.  

Drbogue

November 19th, 2014 at 2:43 PM ^

I remember most November football games being noon starts at home due to the lights issue. I had season hockey and football tix from 93-02 and there were several Saturdays where we went to both, but I remember having enough time to drink a 40 and eat General Tso's chicken from Oriental Express on Packard before screaming, "Hey goalie, it's your mom... she says, 'You Suck!"

Maybe its just that they have lights now that it doesn't dawn on anybody that it may be a conflict.

ChuckWood

November 19th, 2014 at 3:52 PM ^

Go Devils.  Been going to games for about 10 years.  A lot of ASU students come from the east coast/midwest.  They will be competitive.  

Plus they can pull guys who want to get out of the cold.  

AZ-Blue

November 19th, 2014 at 9:19 PM ^

Believe it or not (most people don't) junior hockey is pretty big down here in AZ.  I frequent a fantastic newer three-rink local public/private arena (my kid's in lessons) and the place is always packed with skaters and usually a junior game going on one or two of the rinks.  I'm not saying it's the powerhouse of the midwest but it's not as cartoonish as people think either, ie Jamaican hockey.  The Phx Coyotes bankrolled a portion of the rink system.  We've got the resources and there are a TON of midwesterners out here and with them, hockey in the gene pool.  A good friend played on ASU's club squad back in the early 90s and follows the push to go D1.  The team's for real.