The nutty Michigan coverage isn't so much about Harbaugh as it is a signal to the Big Ten that Fox wants to party.
- Member for
- 4 years 27 weeks
|1 year 29 weeks ago||Coach Nuss & Staffing Decisions||
Perhaps what Brady Hoke told Coach Nuss was that he could not come in and restaff the offensive coaches . . . . .
until he had spent at least one season getting to know them and evaluate them.
|2 years 43 weeks ago||Heresy?||
I think the offense would be better if DG stayed at quarterback and Denard moved to a slot receiver/"man of all purposes" position?
I ask that because the passing offense seemed to work better under DG, plus the backs will take handoffs going downhill, instead of that "veer" system which has the running back going sideways.
|2 years 43 weeks ago||One Player||
This is the problem with building a team through recruitment that over-relies on one player. Because of this over-reliance on Denard, we run an ofense where the running back is running sideways for a handoff. The running back should go sideways for a pitchout sweep, but for inside the tackles, quickness and power are key elements so the running back should be powering downhill.
I als think the ND interceptions did a lot of damage to our passing attack, so guess where defenses are focusing?
We are running our backs sidesways into a defense that is looking for just that. If the D linemen hold their own, the linebackers fill the gaps and ..... that's it, folks.
I know I am not a coaching/tactics guru, so this is just my simplistic view.
|2 years 44 weeks ago||Offense Problem||
The offensive running game seems to be built around:
running the back sideways, and
Denard countering North-South
The problem with that is that it seems to be designed around the Q-back.
Why do you want your running back running sideways?
If Denard is injured,
a sideways running back is not much of a threat with a backup quarterback in the game.
Build a solid offense, make the players play to that, not one built around a single player.
That is the way the M defense is developing.
|3 years 40 weeks ago||Michigan will be||
. . . . . . Businesslke.
That says it all.
|3 years 40 weeks ago||Can't suceed because||
He won't get Greg Mattison back.
DEFENSE wins championships. Greg is a builder of championship defenses.
|3 years 40 weeks ago||Buckeyes||
That's typical behavior for those cretins. Expect no less when you go there. They will throw full beer cans at old women in Michigan colors. They wil slash the tires of car with MI plates. It's a war.
|3 years 40 weeks ago||OHIO Fans||
Are so anal and childish, also rude and inconsiderate. Completely obsessed.
|3 years 40 weeks ago||ManBall Part 78||
Do you not believe in heaters on the sidelines?
“Um … I don’t know. I mean, if they had heaters on the sideline, they’d build them into the sideline, right?”
|3 years 41 weeks ago||Great Quote||
It’s a finishing game.”
Translation: We will finish Ohio.
|3 years 41 weeks ago||Great Interviewer||
Everybody knows about the losing streak. How much does that hang over your psyche?
“To be honest with you, I haven’t talked about that at all with our team, and I probably won’t. We’ve got educated young men. They’re here at a great university, and I think me telling them that would probably insult them and their intelligence.”
How smooth to the radioheads, and complimentary to the players.
|4 years 10 weeks ago||Coaches who "Get It"||
Don't forget DC Greg Mattison. He gets it. Big time.
|4 years 11 weeks ago||Defense 2011||
Trust in Greg Mattison. He knows how to build. Whatever happens in 2011 will be an improvement. As will 2012. As will 2013. Reach for the stars . . . . . . .
|4 years 13 weeks ago||Michigan's Response||
Drop your pants and prepare for a tatoo.
|4 years 13 weeks ago||This Fall||
A comment: "I think that one of the biggest if not thee biggest improvement for this coming Fall will be the play of our special teams units especially our kicking game."
Remember that Brady Hoke has an excellent reputation for developing teams that are very solid in the basics. Tackling, fielding punts, kicking field goals, punt coverage, . . . etc.
Special teams SHOULD show a significant improvement this year.
|4 years 13 weeks ago||TP||
Give it a rest!!!!!
We are so lucky to have gotten Denard Robinson.
|4 years 13 weeks ago||Hoke & Mattison||
They only need to be themselves. No negative recruiting.
The Michigan traditiona and excellent academics will do just fine in the recruiting arena. We need . . . .
Student-athletes with character, integrity and intelligence.
Exactly the opposite of characters like TP.
|4 years 14 weeks ago||SI Article||
I wonder if OSU traded Tressel's head for the SI article, and the article wil be withheld/not printed??? It may have had so many ugly facts that OSU wanted the NCAA to do their own digging.
|4 years 14 weeks ago||On Memorial Day||
Buckeye nuts, roasting on an open fire . . .
|4 years 14 weeks ago||JT||
Haven't we all noticed how a vacuum attracts dirt and debris?
JT and OSU live in a moral vacuum, and they reap as they have sowed.
Even Kirk Herbstreit can't surivive it.
|4 years 14 weeks ago||Denard's Productivity||
Denard sat on the bench his first year. Denard was B1G player of the year his second year.
That demonstrates a tremendous rate of growth, development and maturity.
So I have no fear of Denard falering. If his demonstrated growth rate continues, he will make a lot of great and key plays, while spreading the ball around for more offensive productivity.
A better offense with an improving quarterback. An improving defense. Almost all the starters returning. There's a lot to like about this upcoming season.
|4 years 16 weeks ago||What's the Problem?||
Tosu can distribute and sell their pants.
Just give out Brown Underwear.
|4 years 17 weeks ago||Denard and New Offense||
What Mandel forgets is how much progress Denard made his Sophomore year. He began as an adequate starter and ended up Big Ten POY.
Asuming this demonstrates Denard's tremendous ability to grow and develop, then in 2011 he will start as barely the pro-set starter and end the season @#$%^&*() whoa.a.a.a.a.a.a. turning out the lights on some really good teams. Do not think Denard will be in the Fall where he is now in the Spring. He will develop handsomely and be great. That's my belief.
|4 years 24 weeks ago||From BB to FB||
If Bruce Pearl gets fired for what he did, what might happen to Sir Teflon Sweatervest who lied many many times over an issue of far greater significance than "who attended my barbeque...".
|4 years 24 weeks ago||2 Ways||
|4 years 25 weeks ago||NCAA Response to LiarGate||
Slow . . . . . . . . . slow . . . . . . the slower, the better . . . . . . for the NCAA inquiry.
OSU needs to stew for at least 7 months, after which it will be very tender and juicy.
A NCAA ruling in early October 2011 would be just fine.
|4 years 25 weeks ago||Defense||
Very very physical, aggressive defense.
A defense that, when somebody comes out on that field, they know their in a war."
The other point of pride is having excellent technique.
-----------WAR!!!!!! on defense-----------
|4 years 25 weeks ago||D & D||
D (Denard): If he progresses this year anywhere near his improvement from Freshman to Sophomore year (backup to Offensive Player fo the Year), then there is no reason to worry. He needs to stay healthy for the second half of the season, when the going gets tough and the games get bigger. T Pryor can dominate with his mouth, but Denard dominates with his performance, his attitude, his heart, and . . . that smile.
D (Defense): Can only get better. The only question is by how much. If there was a lot of "misutilization" and under-coaching from the prior staff, then Greg Mattison will have a significant impact, since he obviously understands how to coach and run a defense. It would be just a giant kick in the @#$%^#$%@ to see MM and WC clean some clocks next year.
|4 years 26 weeks ago||Oversigning||
Yes, those SEC coaches will defend oversigning, because they are protecting "The System" and their meat-market-win-at-all-costs attitude. Hell, who wants a walk on? Load up on the prime stuff! Values? Who needs values?
However, if there is some concern for the student athlete, as in "we want you to be a scholar-athlete, not just prime beef on the hoof" . . . .. then the Big 10 approach is more civiized, humane, and meaningful.
|4 years 27 weeks ago||Respect?||
This BB team plays with intensity, has a good transition game, can play good defense, and handles the ball well. As they improve, they will get the respect. Yes there isn't much of it available now, but that is due to past performance rather than where they are now. They are also a young team, and need to learn some of the basic lessons of college ball (make your free throws!!!) before getting the media attention. I think tht if they had beaten Wisconsin, tonight's ESPN coverage would have been different.