Steve Wiltfong of 247 just CB'd Ambry Thomas to Michigan

Submitted by Maizen on

Big development as many thought he was a Sparty lean.

Some experts say he was the most talented player on Detroit King LAST year, even thought they had LaVert Hill and Donnie Corley.

Leaders And Best

May 23rd, 2016 at 12:26 PM ^

JaRaymond Hall, Josh Ross, Phillip Paea, and Carter Dunaway are current verbal commits.

Michigan is strong crystal ball leaders for  Jaylen Kelly-Powell & Corey Malone-Hatcher. And trending up with Donovan Peoples-Jones & Ambry Thomas.

If they pull one of KJ Hamler, Deron Irving-Bey, or Antjuan Simmons (and a possibly late offer to Donovan Johnson), Michigan could end up with 9 or more. I think the only thing that may keep it from happening is if Michigan cools on some of these prospects with a huge 2016 season.

Leaders And Best

May 23rd, 2016 at 1:03 PM ^

They have offers so I don't think it is a case where Michigan is absolutely not recruiting them. Signing Day is a long time away. Those kids could blow up with a strong senior season or Michigan could change their mind & decide to recruit them harder. Michigan is not going to give up on prospects in their backyard if they want them.

gte896u

May 23rd, 2016 at 2:07 PM ^

Why? The coaches are not likely to be better, and having lived and watched football in FL for a few years, this is one case where the competition isnt likely to be better. The Catholic League is an eternal group of death, and OLSM schedules intensely OOC.

gte896u

May 23rd, 2016 at 6:38 PM ^

the difference is depth. ive seen Dr. Philips in the glory days, Apopka, Edgewater, Venice, Pahokee, Lakeland, Charlotte and a lot of the other powers play in 09 & 10. But ive never seen a team and said "this team would run thru its class in Michigan". The Catholic League is as good as any league in FL, whether Orlando, Tampa, Gulf Coast, Miami, whatever. Same for the OK Red and the OAA division Clarkston is in. The difference is that FL has way more leagues that compete at that level. The practice competition is a point that is flatly true, but outside of that Im unconvinced.

WolvinLA2

May 23rd, 2016 at 7:36 PM ^

Yeah, that's just not true. There are more kids with D1 scholarships at IMG than the OK Red has had in a decade, maybe more. And the Catholic League is nowhere near as good as you think it is, nor is the OOC schedule or the playoff competition. You think the teams OLSM plays in D4 playoffs or whoever class they're in are as good as the FL teams IMG will play? Please.

JonnyHintz

May 23rd, 2016 at 7:41 PM ^

You're WAY off base here. IMG has far higher competition level than OLSM. Just within practice, there's more competition. Not to mention the fact that IMG plays the best high school teams from around the country, OLSM does not. Michigan high school football and Florida high school football are on two completely different levels. Hamler isn't even going to be the best receiver at IMG, let alone the best player. OLSM may schedule "intensely" by Michigan standards, but Cass Tech (best football program in the state) would probably be the 6th or 7th toughest game on IMG's schedule.

mgoblue0970

May 23rd, 2016 at 12:27 PM ^

As the flagship university and program in the state, Michigan should always get the cream of the local crop and compliment with TX, CA, FL, OH. That's what most of the big time programs do. I've been saying this before they joined the B1G, but just imagine what Rutgers could do if they could keep their in state talent.

True Blue Grit

May 23rd, 2016 at 12:37 PM ^

Some years there is a lot more top talent in Michigan than other years.  Harbaugh wants the best talent he can get wherever it may be.  Of course, the good things about in-state guys is they already "get" the rivalry games, have a higher likelihood of committing to U-M being closer to home, and are almost always much more familiar with the program's history and traditions.  

Leaders And Best

May 23rd, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^

People are starting to talk about it like it is some gold mine for talent. The reason people recruit hard there is not just because there is talent there. It is also because the chance of recruiting success there is higher because everyone leaves New Jersey because Rutgers sucks. But I am not sure you can build a power program just off the talent in New Jersey.

Every state school says if we keep our in-state kids at home, we will be a national power. But it just isn't true for most of them. I don't think the talent in New Jersey is that different from Michigan or Illinois, and there is probably more talent in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Maryland/DC (DMV).

 

Ali G Bomaye

May 23rd, 2016 at 12:58 PM ^

I don't think anyone is saying it's Florida or Texas.  Although NJ has produced occasional top-end studs like Peppers or Gary over the last few years, it's roughly comparable to Michigan overall if you look at the 247 composites over the last few years.  For Michigan's purpose, only about the top 10 guys in each state matter, and the 10th-rated guy in both NJ and MI averages around a 0.87 or 0.88 on 247.

The key is that we're not building a power program just off the talent in New Jersey. We're also recruiting Michigan hard (obviously) and pulling guys from a bunch of other states.  But as you said, the key is that there's no local program that is competitive for the top guys, so it's a "free" state.  The 5th-best guy in NJ might only be as good as the 10th-best in OH or the 15th-best in FL, but we probably have a better chance at getting the NJ guy because he didn't grow up with a local power dominating the sports news.  So maybe dominating NJ recruiting, adding 75% of the top recruits in MI, and pulling a few select players from OH, FL, TX, and CA, will result in a talent base equal to the programs located in big, football-crazy states.

Farnn

May 23rd, 2016 at 1:07 PM ^

If Michigan can add NJ to it's recruiting base, it gives them as large a hometown footprint as OSU has with the state of Ohio.  Obviously not the same as having years of dominance and a state without any other major football powers, but getting a base of 20 top 400 players who enter the process looking favorably upon your program certainly helps level the playing field.

mgoblue0970

May 23rd, 2016 at 1:29 PM ^

I'm certainly not saying that. Just "what Rutgers could do if". And I'm absolutely NOT jumping on the Peppers and Gary bandwagon. New Jersey has produced more than its fair share of talent that Rutgers cannot keep. For whatever reason... If the state sucks or not is not my debate. I don't live there so don't know. Same could be said of the Buffs. Michigan gets one or two studs from Colorado every couple of years. Why CU is not better is a travesty -- great campus, great school, lots of things to do, pretty co-eds from SoCal and Phoenix... they're idiots for not doing better.

Rabbit21

May 23rd, 2016 at 1:41 PM ^

Over the past ten years New Jersey players account for about 40 Power 5 signees a year, Michigan accounts for about 30 Power five signees per year, whereas Illinois accounts for about 43 signees per year.  So is New Jersey recruiting the be-all, end-all? Absolutely not, but it does have a decent base of talent with little in-state competition and is an important supplement if Michigan can develop a consistent presence there.  Besides having a reliable recruiting base in a state similar to Michigan is an important advantage and can be a useful counter-weight to OSU's lockdown of Ohio.

yerocwarc

May 23rd, 2016 at 1:08 PM ^

There are a few way's to look at it but try this breakdown from 2015 list of top NFL producers by state for one.  Only Rutgers, Maryland and OSU have no major comptetition from other state Big 5 programs.  Many of these states have multiple power 5 schools as well as multiple non-P5 programs.   Divide the talent by in state comp any way you like and New Jersey compares favorably to any state save Ohio.

http://usatodayhss.com/2015/which-state-city-and-high-school-has-the-most-current-nfl-players

mgoblue0970

May 23rd, 2016 at 6:36 PM ^

My bad... Mark Ingram Just using that as an example of a school which fills its needs first from home and then compliments from elsewhere. Sorry about the name mix up.

JonnyHintz

May 23rd, 2016 at 7:52 PM ^

To be fair, most other big time programs live in a more fertile recruiting area than Michigan. Michigan normally produces 5-6 top prospects every year. You have to recruit nationally to be a top program in Michigan. Even with MSU's success, they recruit nationally (albeit with under the radar guys)

BlueinOK

May 23rd, 2016 at 12:16 PM ^

Sounds like Thomas and JKP had a great weekend. Add those two with Woods and the fast-rising St-Juste and the secondary class looks very, very good. 

getsome

May 23rd, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^

thomas is no doubt the best DB prospect of that group, at least in my opinion.  and likely the best athlete as well though all 3 are nice prospects.  im not big on comparisons and all that but hes got a chance to be pretty good