Refs had our back

Submitted by Matte Kudasai on November 25th, 2018 at 12:58 PM

After watching yesterdays game 1 of 2 things is evident:

1.) The refs knew they owed Michigan a favorable disposition after screwing us to holy high hell the last 2 years in this game.

2.) They knew we had a better chance to make the playoffs.

If you don't believe they purposefully try to influence these games, I'd say you were crazy, because as bad as they screwed us the last 2 years, they had our back yesterday.  It was that obvious to me.

JPC

November 25th, 2018 at 1:02 PM ^

I think it was pretty fair, or slightly in our favor. Too bad Harbaugh/Pep were too "man ball" to take advantage of the constant DPI flags by targeting our WRs nonstop. 

Rose Bowl

November 25th, 2018 at 1:02 PM ^

The refs were fair but they didn't have our back.  They bailed out OSU on a bogus PI on 3rd and 17 which switched momentum of the game.

tybert

November 25th, 2018 at 1:03 PM ^

We certainly got a few good calls. Wimbush should have gotten 15 yards and maybe targeting call for the Haskins slide. The only thing missing was a few holds on OSU - they did call at least one, but I recall a guy on the end getting held on the wide open TD pass. 

And the refs didn't cause any of the low throws or dropped passes by Gentry. 

M-Dog

November 26th, 2018 at 12:21 AM ^

After several years, the pattern has been established.  Whether we like it or not.

So maybe it's wise not to have a game plan that's totally predicated on our D-line getting pressure on a QB with a very quick accurate release on top of everything else.

Or at least have a Plan B when that's not working.

 

Goggles Paisano

November 25th, 2018 at 1:03 PM ^

The game seemed fairly officiated and if there was a lean, it was to us.  I had zero issues with the officials.  My conspiracy theory is that the B1G needed Michigan to win to have the best shot at the CFP, so maybe there was a bit of influence there.  

Goggles Paisano

November 25th, 2018 at 1:15 PM ^

And this is why I will forever be pissed about 2016.  We were the better team and we won that game.  It is now only remembered for the spot as everyone forgets how poorly that game was called and biased toward osu.  If we get a fair shake, we win that game, there is no 14 out of 15, haven't won in Columbus since 2000, Harbaugh is 0-4 against OSU narrative.   

Everyone forgets Darboh being tackled on a screen pass, or Grant Perry getting mugged during our possession in OT only to see our defense commit the same foul and get called for it.  Or the Delano hill very questionable PI on a ball thrown over the head of Taco Pants.  Pick up that flag and osu has a 4th and 16 or something with no time outs.  

DHughes5218

November 25th, 2018 at 5:19 PM ^

I think the spot allowed everyone to focus on one call, when the officiating was terrible the entire game. You can argue the spot all day, but there’s no definitive proof either way. I remember Perry being mugged and no flag was thrown. I’m not sure about the Darboh play. There’s no such thing as pass interference behind the line of scrimmage so if it was a screen and he was interfered with behind the line, it’s probably a legal play. There were numerous holds and other no calls that went OSU’s way. Apparently Big Ten officials only care about getting OSU in the playoffs. They may not have hurt us yesterday, but they didn’t help us the way they did OSU two years ago.

Michigan4Life

November 25th, 2018 at 8:05 PM ^

The spot is pretty common in every game and it was magnified because it came on a critical play. Refs have done a bad job of spotting the ball because they're often off which is why I'm not angry about the spot. Plus the review for the spot is nearly impossible to overturn because you need to have an indisputable evidence to overturn it and there isn't to overturn it because it was so damn close.

I thought Michigan had a few favorable spots by the refs yesterday

RobM_24

November 25th, 2018 at 1:06 PM ^

Not sure if the conspiracy theories are real, but we did seem to get favorable calls. And the calls they did make against us, were pretty obvious (the blatant holds and PIs by DBs).

TVG_2.0

November 25th, 2018 at 1:14 PM ^

I remember thinking that in the second quarter. Ultimately won’t be remembered but we definitely got a fair shake. Shame we were too inept to take advantage. 

You Only Live Twice

November 25th, 2018 at 1:19 PM ^

They called stuff on both sides, I had a couple of minor quibbles, and didn't know any of the names, so best case scenario for officiating.  Sadly, it didn't matter.

It's therapeutic to spend time on the board but the leaves are awaiting

ijohnb

November 25th, 2018 at 1:24 PM ^

The refs just called an even game.  It feels like it was “in our favor” because we don’t usually get a fair whistle.  They just called the game even.  Congrats for that, I guess.

SD Larry

November 25th, 2018 at 1:31 PM ^

Officiating was not a factor in this game, unlike the embarrassing debacle in 2016, that every objective observer understood, and I suspect even the OSU players understood before they  proceeded to take their shutout beatdown from Clemson in the playoff.  Yes, I did especially appreciate the legit holding call in the first half vs. OSU as it felt like we had entered a new era.

A2toGVSU

November 25th, 2018 at 2:39 PM ^

A QB running in the open field is not defenseless. A QB who slides is defenseless from the moment he lets his feet go. Furbush should have been flagged for the hit on Haskins when he slid. Not sure if the glancing contact warranted targeting, but it was definitely an unnecessary hit.

Jimmyisgod

November 25th, 2018 at 2:03 PM ^

When OSU got a penalty for an O lineman literally doing nothing down field to one of our players I was laughing my ass off and loving it.  Guy didn't even really push our player slightly after the whistle and they called a P/F.  Though it was great.

Then we probably should have gotten a targeting on Haskins and instead they called a penalty on Urban, I was laughing there too.  The refs finally were going to help us, but I think a makeup call happened right after that.

Overall, I think the refs helped us out some, but it wasn't anything egregious or out of the norm.  Just a chance that the calls favored us overall.

Ajcoss

November 25th, 2018 at 2:05 PM ^

This thread is dumb. Calls went both ways. Win some and lose some, which is what you can ask for. Especially on the road in a big game. Nothing that shouldn’t happen though to call it out, or say we benefited from it.