Question re Jeremy Jackson's schollie

Submitted by Mlaw2010 on
In different forum posts and today's recruiting roundup, it has been mentioned or suggested that Jeremy Jackson might not receive a scholarship and his dad may just receive a raise equivalent to his tuition. Question (I'm sure I could research it but finals are coming up): Does M not allow for tuition remission for children of their staff. I have a friend who went to NYU for free because his father works there - is there not a similar deal at M?

Blue_Bull_Run

December 3rd, 2009 at 11:00 PM ^

I believe it was I who raised that point. To be clear, I was using it as an example. In my opinion, no recruit should be asked to pay for even a semester of his tuition, unless he was aware of the circumstances during the recruiting process.

West Texas Blue

December 3rd, 2009 at 11:00 PM ^

UM needs money. Alot of it. Public funding through state hasn't been too kind since the state economy is in the dumps. Can't believe out of state tuition is $40K a year now; that's $10K more than what I was paying back in early this decade. Crazy how much tuition has spiked.

The Fifteenth

December 4th, 2009 at 6:16 AM ^

Despite his lack of speed, I think he could thrive here. It seems that Rich Rod values blocking in his outside recievers more than speed (see Latarryl Savoy starting over Stonum on and off throughout the season). I've seen him play twice and I thought that he excelled in that regard (he even lines up as a tight end at times and handles most DE's and OLB's he goes up against). I also think that he could be a great red-zone threat, as he has great hands and knows how to use his size to get open against smaller corners. There's also a chance that he could put on 20-30lbs and become a solid tight end as well. He's big and strong (listed at 6-3, 195), and having a coach as a father, should have a great work ethic as well. *I believe that he recieved his initial offer from Lloyd, and Rich Rod merely honored it.

Magnus

December 4th, 2009 at 6:30 AM ^

No offense, but using Savoy as an example doesn't exactly instill a ton of confidence. I know you're not saying they're the exact same player in every respect, but still... Also, Lloyd couldn't have offered Jeremy Jackson officially. Jackson couldn't have received his offer until September 1, 2008, which was obviously about 9 months after Lloyd had departed.

The Fifteenth

December 4th, 2009 at 7:16 AM ^

I think that we are both more or less in agreement about Jackson's lack of "star" potential. I don't think that he's going to be much more than an average "reciever" (if that). But because I've seen Rich Rod go with blocking over speed at outside reciever (on one occassion, at least), I think that he might have a chance to be a starter in our offense at some point. Most coaches would look at his speed, give him a tight end's number, and tell him to put on some weight, but Rich Rod isn't most coaches. *I think that the source of that Lloyd/Jackson thing was another message board, so I'm not surprised that it wasn't true.