Our plane is headed to Baton Rouge

is full of fun, like a cat playing with a ball of yarn. You being the yarn and people over the centuries being the cat.

Logic embraces everything anti-religionists do not: critical thinking, reason, etc.  Anti-Religionists merely ask people to believe what they're told, regardless of the lack of evidence or proof (and, for the record, a guy disparaging book written over thousands of years ago is neither evidence nor proof).

(Just to help you out: It's "books" and it spans more than 2K years and has multiple authors;)

..

It is abundantly clear that he was simply trolling for responses via his posts, and you took the bait. He wins.

If someone said they had faith in the existence of unicorns, their belief ought to be mocked, not respected (unless, of course, they could produce significant evidence that unicorns do exist).  Likewise, we should mock, not respect, the beliefs of people who have nothing to back up those beliefs other than their "faith" that what they believe is true.  Religious proponents have done a terrific job making society believe that religion occupies a special realm where one's religious beliefs deserve total and unquestioned respect merely because those beliefs can be called "religious".  This is utter nonsense.  One's religious beliefs merit just as much scrutiny as any other belief, and if you're offended because someone tells you that you have no basis for believing in your silly little god, that's your problem.  You're the one asserting god's existence, and, therefore, you bear the burden of proving what you believe is true.

Finally, the very idea that athiests are just as dogmatic in their "belief" is full of fail.  Athiests don't have a positive belief like religous people do.  What they "believe" is that there is no god because there is no credible evidence for the existence of god, the same way you likely don't believe in unicorns because there is no credible evidence for the existence of unicorns.  It is an immediately obvious sign you don't know what you're talking about if you assert (implicitly, or otherwise) that athiests' beliefs rely just as much on faith as those of religious people.  On the contrary, the athiest rejects faith entirely and demands real, significant evidence to justify something before they believe in it.