OT: Nebraska's Schedule for 2011 Bound to Change Now

Submitted by husker4life on

 

Date Opponent Location Time(PST) Media Results
Sat, Sept 10 Fresno State Memorial Stadium TBA    
Sat, Sept 17 Washington Memorial Stadium TBA    
Sat, Sept 24 Wyoming at Laramie, WY TBA    
Sat, Oct 08 Kansas State Memorial Stadium TBA    
Sat, Oct 15 Texas at Austin, TX TBA    
Sat, Oct 22 Oklahoma State Memorial Stadium TBA    
Sat, Oct 29 Missouri at Columbia, MO TBA    
Sat, Nov 05 Iowa State Memorial Stadium TBA    
Sat, Nov 12 Kansas at Lawrence, KS TBA    
Sat, Nov 19 Texas A&M Memorial Stadium TBA    
Nov 25 - 26 Colorado at Boulder, CO TBA    
           

As you all can see this schedule is bound to change now that we have joined you're conference but I wanted to know what a suitable Big Ten schedule for us would be good? Like who we should play in our first year in the conference. I'd love to play you guys and Ohio State in the same year but I don't know what the odds would be of that happening.

MichiganMan2011

July 28th, 2010 at 3:50 PM ^

It all depends on how they draw up the divisions. The better Big Ten football schools lately have been Ohio State, Penn State, and Iowa. I suppose Wisconsin also to a lesser degree. By 2011 Michigan will (hopefully) once again be in a place to do some damage.

husker4life

July 28th, 2010 at 3:55 PM ^

kick the shit out of them in Columbus or beat them here at Memorial. Here's the teams I would like to see placed on the 2011 schedule. Penn State, Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio State, Michigan, Indiana, Northwestern and Purdue.

husker4life

July 28th, 2010 at 4:33 PM ^

on gameday. My father and mother bleed red and cream year in and year out. I've got season tickets again this year so I'm really looking forward to seeing how our season will go and would love to take a home a Big 12 championship before we make our official leave from it. My street though goes crazy on gamedays. People out in red grilling, playing beer pong, corn hole and have their tvs outside so the whole street watches the games together. It's really awesome!

Baldbill

July 28th, 2010 at 3:50 PM ^

I think we need to wait to see what the conference split is like and that will go a long way to determine the schedules. I look forward to playing Nebraska, hope to win some of those also.

Blazefire

July 28th, 2010 at 3:52 PM ^

Whoever the conference sets up as your "rivals", plus however many other Big 10 teams it takes to fill your conference schedule.

Jerk comment concluded, I think we're all very interested to see how the schedule changes shake out since every Big 10 team will have to make changes now.

JeepinBen

July 28th, 2010 at 3:54 PM ^

The Big House, The Shoe, Happy Valley

Those will be good "First time in the conference visits" but I doubt they'll all be in year 1.

My guess is they'll try to get you guys playing your natural geographical rivals right off the bat: Minnesota, Iowa, Wisco, but I dunno who would be home. 

for a good (winnable) schedule hope you get IU, U of I and Northwestern.

On the other hand, had any more guy at the bar problems??? /sarcasm on last sentence only

Section 1

July 28th, 2010 at 4:49 PM ^

Don't you guys play every year?  Are the Cornhuskers playing the Sooners this year?  Is it just on the off chance of a B-12 title game?  Did the Big 12 screw that rivalry up all by themselves, without Big Ten assistance?

Is your gig with Washington a home-and home contract?  I presume so.  That's what they like to do.

And how did you get roped into a game @ the Wyoming Cowboys?  There are more more Nebraska season-ticket holders, than there are people in Laramie!

Once the Cornhuskers are into a regular Big Ten schedule, do you think that NU would get into a long term out-of-conference deal with Oklahoma, a la Michigan-Notre Dame?

husker4life

July 28th, 2010 at 5:09 PM ^

I too am really pissed that we aren't playing them in 2011 and I'm hoping we continue to have them on our schedule in the future because that's just ruining tradtion. And for all I know Big 12 officials may have very well set it up so we don't play them but to me that would make absolutely zero sense. We do play them in 2012.

The Washington series is a two year deal with 2011-2012 why they wanted to set the Huskies up for two years in a row is beyond me. I think they want to play a more wider schedule so that would inculde Pac 10 teams too although I think we'll win both games.

Again back to Oklahoma you're guess is as good as mine on that one but keep in mind we have to go to Austin to play the Longhorns in Texas so that game will be hard enough (although I am truly hoping we demolish them)

For the Wyoming game yeah lol that might as well be a home game for us, which in the end is probably what is going to happen lol.

husker4life

July 28th, 2010 at 5:23 PM ^

To be honest some of college football's best rivalries have lost their momentum. Ohio State vs Michigan no offense at all to Michigan fans on this board but that game has lost a lot of competition. The last Ohio State Michigan game I saw that was amazing to watch and very exciting was the 2006 game when OSU was 1st and Michigan was 2nd. I'm a Husker fan so I don't remember any of the classic OSU Michigan games sadly. Sorry guys lol.

And I agree about the Oklahoma rivalry that now a days it does not mean anything anymore. Back in the days when Nebraska was a powerhouse and strong team this game use to be so amazing to watch but now not so much.

Oh and about the OSU Michigan game, you guys will be back! Just give it time. Who knows! You might upset the Bucks this year. It is "The Game" anything could happen!

Tater

July 28th, 2010 at 7:07 PM ^

...the rivalry is still strong.  Michigan dominated from 1988-2000, going 10-2-1.  OSU has gone 8-1 since 2001.  Usually, the cyclical nature of the rivalry goes a little faster than that, but the streaks have given outsiders an illusion that the rivalry isn't as intense anymore.  However, the games are still as intense on the field as they ever were. 

Now that you will be looking forward to the Big Ten, you may see Michigan/OSU with different eyes this year.  Especially if it turns out, as would be my preference, to be a Michigan "upset for the ages" of previously undefeated OSU. 

UM Indy

July 28th, 2010 at 5:34 PM ^

I'd want as many marquee match-ups as possible.  Might make for a brutal schedule for Nebraska, but you've got to advertise your new product!  Nebraska needs to play as many of the following as possible:  Iowa, Michigan, Ohio St., Penn St. and Wisconsin.

jb5O4

July 28th, 2010 at 7:53 PM ^

Why don't we have the 1997 AP Natl Championship Trophy and the Coaches trophy be the prize for winning when we play each other?

GunnersApe

July 29th, 2010 at 9:10 AM ^

The below schedule is based off of my pure boredom at work and is on the assumption (ass-u-me) of PSU being in the west.

03 SEP: Northern Illinois

10 SEP: Fresno St.

17 SEP: Washington

24 SEP: @ Wyoming

01 OCT: BYE

08 OCT: MINN

15 OCT: @ tOSU (lock your coolers)

22 OCT: ILL

29 OCT: @ PSU

05 NOV: MSU

12 NOV: @ IOWA

19 NOV: @ PUR

26 NOV: WIS

7 home games, if the Big Ten adds the 9th conf. game take away N. ILL and add UM/IND/NW and move the bye week.