OT: Mack Brown Institutes the "Brady Hoke" Visit Policy

29 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
February 13th, 2013 at 11:08 PM
#1
MilkSteak
MilkSteak's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 456
OT: Mack Brown Institutes the "Brady Hoke" Visit Policy

Looks as though other schools including Texas, Oregon, and Georgia Tech (do they have the recruiting clout to do this?? edit: Talking about GT here) are instituting a similar policy on recruit visits. 

 

Right from the old man's mouth:

"The thing that we will do is we have allowed the kids to commit and still look around the last couple of years -- we're not doing that anymore," Brown said last week on Signing Day. "If you are committed to us, be committed. If you're going to go look, we're going to go look."

"I'm the guy who does his job. You must be the other guy."

 

Top
Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
February 13th, 2013 at 11:13 PM | Hasn't Texas been doing this (Score:3 Normal)
goblue20111
goblue20111's picture
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 1508

Hasn't Texas been doing this for a long time? 

February 13th, 2013 at 11:24 PM | I believe (Score:5 Normal)
WolverineNick
WolverineNick's picture
Joined: 11/05/2010
MGoPoints: 491

The quote in the OP answers your question.

February 13th, 2013 at 11:14 PM | Indiana's coach was on the (Score:2)
Blue Bennie
Blue Bennie's picture
Joined: 03/02/2009
MGoPoints: 137

Indiana's coach was on the radio today in Indianapolis and said basically the same thing.

February 14th, 2013 at 12:06 AM | Who the hell is going to (Score:5 Normal)
yoopergoblue
yoopergoblue's picture
Joined: 02/11/2010
MGoPoints: 1978

Who the hell is going to commit to Indiana with a rule like that?  It works for the big boys but not the little guys.

"They will meet a dastardly fate here for that! There isn't a Michigan Man who wouldn't like go out and scalp those Buckeyes right now."

February 13th, 2013 at 11:24 PM | Coach Brown to Coach Hoke - (Score:5 Normal)
brooktrail
Joined: 05/31/2011
MGoPoints: 441

February 13th, 2013 at 11:25 PM | Why not change the rule and (Score:1 Normal)
LivingInOhioSucks
LivingInOhioSucks's picture
Joined: 10/27/2012
MGoPoints: 118

Why not change the rule and make a player sign his LOI when they commit?

Go Blue

February 13th, 2013 at 11:31 PM | They should do what they do (Score:5 Normal)
Croatian_Blue
Croatian_Blue's picture
Joined: 08/04/2010
MGoPoints: 716

They should do what they do for basketball where they have an early-sigining period.  It really sets the kids who want to be there apart from the more weary recruits and makes the commit obviously more final.

February 13th, 2013 at 11:48 PM | That won't happen!! (Score:1 Normal)
GoBluePhil
Joined: 09/15/2011
MGoPoints: 312

As much as I would like to see an early signing period ESPN would have a fit and the NCAA would listen. ESPN would lose ratings on NSD and it boils down to money. But I would love an early signing period. Take the pressure of coaches and athletes. They do it for basketball and coaches are only looking at 2, 3 or 4 guys. Football coaches are looking at 20, 25, 30 or more.

February 13th, 2013 at 11:58 PM | Actually, ESPN might be all (Score:4 Normal)
Croatian_Blue
Croatian_Blue's picture
Joined: 08/04/2010
MGoPoints: 716

Actually, ESPN might be all for it.  Double the signing days!

But yes, probably won't happen, but it would be better if it did.

February 13th, 2013 at 11:58 PM | nonsense (Score:2)
Mr Miggle
Mr Miggle's picture
Joined: 10/07/2010
MGoPoints: 1602

Although I don't believe ESPN has anything to say about it, one would think they would love two signing days.

Eating is murder.

February 14th, 2013 at 10:05 AM | It's not about ratings. It's (Score:2)
Callahan
Callahan's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1957

It's not about ratings. It's about the programs not wanting to be stuck with LOIs of players that got hurt/didn't perform in their senior years. I don't know what's different about basketball, but for some reason it is. 

February 13th, 2013 at 11:36 PM | Because (Score:4 Normal)
Balrog_of_Morgoth
Balrog_of_Morgoth's picture
Joined: 11/12/2011
MGoPoints: 289

Because unexpected events can still happen. Say a kid commits to a school and then that school fires the head coach (or even a position coach), or the head coach leaves for the NFL. If the kid already signed their LOI, they would not be able to jump ship. Now imagine that a kid commits to an out-of-state school. Then his father gets deathly ill and he decides he'd rather go to school close to home.

If kids were forced to sign their LOI when they commit, then you would see far fewer commitments until signing day, which would be impractical for coaches and players alike.

February 13th, 2013 at 11:59 PM | Ummm, shit like that happens (Score:1)
bacon1431
bacon1431's picture
Joined: 07/26/2008
MGoPoints: 3283

Ummm, shit like that happens in basketball recruiting too. You can get a waiver and the NCAA will release you from the LOI. I don't think you'd see a big drop in commitments. With the new rules re: recruiting, allowing more contact b/w coaches and recruits, I think you'd see plenty of kids sign during an early signing period to end the stressful process. An early signing period is actually practical for everyone. Players that are truly ready to end the process can sign and don't have to worry about hearing from anyone that isn't on the staff they committed to. Coaches also don't have to keep tabs on every single recruit. When they get that early LOI, they can focus on other targets. 

For a' that, an' a' that, 
Our toils obscure an' a' that, 
The rank is but the guinea's stamp, 
The man's the gowd for a' that. 
February 13th, 2013 at 11:56 PM | That would never, and could (Score:0 Overrated)
February 13th, 2013 at 11:34 PM | Texas has the clout to do (Score:-1 Offtopic)
February 13th, 2013 at 11:42 PM | I was referring to GT (Score:2)
MilkSteak
MilkSteak's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 456

I was referring to GT

"I'm the guy who does his job. You must be the other guy."

 

February 13th, 2013 at 11:51 PM | Its hard to win more than 3 (Score:2 Normal)
russale2012
russale2012's picture
Joined: 11/30/2011
MGoPoints: 2647

Its hard to win more than 3 national titles in 4 years, and being in great shape to win your 4th in 5 years next year.



It's been a lot. Its been a roller coaster that for some reason seemed like it would never get good. But you know what? We kept fighting. It's like that old saying goes, "Those Who Stay Will Be Champions." -David Molk

February 13th, 2013 at 11:47 PM | My 2 cents... (Score:2 Normal)
CAwolverine
CAwolverine's picture
Joined: 01/18/2010
MGoPoints: 269

I am totally against this. The NCAA should stipulate a period of time that allows for these kids to take visits without being allowed to commit. How about after August 1st before their senior year starts while also allowing them to take their officials any time they want starting in their Junior year.

February 14th, 2013 at 12:00 AM | Eh (Score:5 Normal)
Kilgore Trout
Kilgore Trout's picture
Joined: 02/20/2009
MGoPoints: 1863

If I understand it right, this is basically what the NCAA already did with signing day. They can visit their senior year and can't make a real commitment until signing day. I don't see how the NCAA can regulate someone telling a coach or reporter that they're going to a certain school.

February 14th, 2013 at 12:01 AM | NCAA can't really institute (Score:5 Normal)
bacon1431
bacon1431's picture
Joined: 07/26/2008
MGoPoints: 3283

NCAA can't really institute policies on verbal commitments. There's no way to regulate that. 

For a' that, an' a' that, 
Our toils obscure an' a' that, 
The rank is but the guinea's stamp, 
The man's the gowd for a' that. 
February 14th, 2013 at 12:11 AM | Commitments (Score:1)
cm2010
Joined: 07/19/2010
MGoPoints: 211

Commitments are unofficial, it's only a verbal promise. The NCAA has no ability to prevent kids from verbally promising anything to anyone, let alone a coach. The NCAA can control how much coaches talk to players, but not what they say.

EDIT: beat to the punch

February 14th, 2013 at 1:06 AM | I am guessing Mack Brown was (Score:4 Normal)
BrownJuggernaut
BrownJuggernaut's picture
Joined: 10/02/2010
MGoPoints: 2790

I am guessing Mack Brown was sick of seeing kids bail. Texas had four kids that decommitted, including Ricky Seals-Jones who ended up at Texas A&M. I'd be a unhappy too, if I was Mack Brown.

Avatar is a reference to this. Go Blue!

February 14th, 2013 at 6:43 AM | I am still perplexed as to (Score:4 Normal)
wolverineswag
Joined: 03/12/2012
MGoPoints: 144

I am still perplexed as to how Texas is still committed to Mack Brown.

"Fortune leaves always some door open."

February 14th, 2013 at 8:10 AM | Well (Score:0 Overrated)
February 14th, 2013 at 9:53 AM | Or he's a guy who pulled the (Score:4 Insightful)
GoBlueInNYC
GoBlueInNYC's picture
Joined: 03/23/2010
MGoPoints: 5822

Or he's a guy who pulled the program out of the cutter in the '90s and has actually racked up a great legacy at Texas (134-44 record, just shy of 80%, with a national title and two conference titles - Compare that to Carr, who had a winning percentage in the 75% range, with one national title and five conference titles). He's had one bad season (5-7) and two mediocre seasons (8-5, 9-4) lately, which is the worst three year stretch in his tenure. With the relatively recent changes at the coordinator level, Texas will probably continue to claw their way back up to the upper echelon.

I get that Longhorn fans want him gone and I have no real interest in seeing him stick around, but it's no mystery why UT has held on to him.

I am this close to going all Dark Blue in here.

February 14th, 2013 at 9:44 AM | ESPN Article On The Policy... (Score:2)
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 8729

ESPN's Recruiting Nation had an interesting piece here - LINK

I found this passage striking, and really, true:

"Really, it's up to the kids to determine the fate of these no-visit policies, because for the only time in their amateur careers, they hold the cards. Once a recruit signs that letter of intent, the college essentially owns him."

That's what sort of leads me to think that a program like Texas that is faltering some suddenly instituting such a policy seems more like it comes from shaken confidence in the Texas brand than from anything else.

They actually talk to Dan Samuelson in this article, and he talks some about his own experience and ultimately coming to Michigan and how despite having decommitted from Pittsburgh and, of course, Nebraska, he believes he did the right thing in the end.

 

 

 

"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."

Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3

February 14th, 2013 at 3:08 PM | Would be cool if the rule was (Score:1)
Wolverine Devotee
Wolverine Devotee's picture
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: -9994437

Would be cool if the rule was the Hoke Way. 

When the ADept sells special jerseys and gear, you'll see my picture next to the targeted customer crowd. A sheep.....but a Blue one.....

Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.