OT: Kevin Durant signs with Warriors

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on
News just to broke on Twitter. The era of the Super Teams continues.

2 year deal.

BursleyBaitsBus

July 4th, 2016 at 12:30 PM ^

I'm sure he cares about your opinion. Fact of the matter is OKC and its owner deserve the blame. They could have been dominant if they kept Harden a few years ago. Presti is an amazing GM but their owner kept him from being able to keep that world class core together. Blame Clay Bennett... The writing was on the wall when they got rid of Ibaka.. The one thing that kept them toe to toe with Gsw... Size

kscurrie2

July 4th, 2016 at 12:40 PM ^

Unlike most people, I know people don't care about my opinion. It's a blog and I chose to give it. No the fault is the players including KD. They had the Warriors down 3-1 and blew it. That's not on the owners. Finish the game. They lost the series and should have been in the finals. Harden has been gone for years.

BigBlue02

July 4th, 2016 at 12:58 PM ^

So the Warriors GM knows how to build a championship team, OKC's doesn't, and it is KD who is the coward? Him and Westbrook were not a good fit and they kept trotting the two out as if they were a better team than the Spurs or warriors. Even with KD, OKC still wouldn't have been the favorite to come out of the west, so why on earth would he want to stay there?

kscurrie2

July 4th, 2016 at 1:05 PM ^

For one, I never called him a coward. Did you watch the playoffs? They beat the Spurs, so yes OKC was better. They had GS down 3-1, and lost. That's not the GM fault. OKC blew it. KD was on the floor. He played crappy in the last quarter of every game.

BigBlue02

July 4th, 2016 at 1:36 PM ^

I'm assuming if KD held an hour-long TV event to choose GS then people would dislike him quite a bit more. People dislike LeBron because he bragged about how many championships he was going to win in Miami, didn't win that many, then bolted to Cleveland where he got the coach fired and finally won a championship, which might be his last one in Cleveland. You say OKC blew it and then get mad at KD for leaving...why would he want to stay there? What does he owe them? Last year wasn't the only year they had a good team. He had been with them for 8 years, he is one of the 5 best players in th NBA, and OKC made it to the NBA finals once. I'll ask again, why should he stay there if he doesn't think they will be able to win a championship there?

kscurrie2

July 4th, 2016 at 2:07 PM ^

Let me guess, you are an OKC fan? For one please stop with the "the decision" is why Lebron sucks. Don't agree with it, fine. But he did it left, then won 2 championships. Then beat your warriors. They probably would have beat the Warriors last year if they would have had Irving and Love. To answer your question about why he would stay.. Why did Lebron leave Miami? To do something that no one had done. Lebron has proven that he is the man. He has been to 6 nba finals in a row, with two different teams. Cleveland was in the lottery, then went to the championship the next year the the addition of Lebron. Using your argument, Jordan should have left Chicago too. They won nothing his first 6-7 years. It's not about you owing someone. It's about you taking the easy road to success, or forging your own way. KD chose the easy way. Not saying he is wrong, but people will have more respect for his possible championship had he not joined an all-star team that is overreacting after a finals loss. Plus, KD could have went to the hometown in Washington Wizards.

BigBlue02

July 4th, 2016 at 5:24 PM ^

So. Much. Wrong. I hate OKC. I'm a Pistons fan and I like the Jazz now that I live in Utah. I never said Lebron sucks. He is one of if not the greatest basketball player to have played the game. You comparing Lebron's situation to KD's is ridiculous because of the decision. People will dislike Lebron because he has been forced down the basketball world's throats since he was in high school and he had an hour long special to announce going to Miami, whom was already stacked with Wade and Bosh. Then he went to Cleveland, which had Irving, Thompson, and traded for Love. People don't view Durant the same because he isn't as polarizing as Lebron. He was drafted by OKC (Seattle), they couldn't assemble a team around him to win it, so he left. They aren't comparable at all. Lebron could have easily seen a much more talented, younger team in Cleveland so he went there for the easy championship. And to your point about the Bulls, that's why Jordan is Jordan and no one else is like him. If he would have bailed after 6 years, he wouldn't be Jordan. No one is comparing Durant to him so I'm not sure why you did.

kscurrie2

July 4th, 2016 at 8:04 PM ^

You realize Cleveland was a lottery team the year before Lebron came back? So saying he came back for an easy championship makes no sense. As far as the Bulls, you said OKC hadn't won in 7 years so he had to leave. It took Jordan 6-7 years before he won a championship too. He had to get through Boston, then the Pistons. But he stayed and got better each year, he didn't jump and run to play for the competition. Your saying they could put a team around him? OKC demolished a great Spurs team and had GS down 3-1. How much of a better team could they get?. Not to mention, OKC went to the finals a couple years back. it's not like OKC was a .500 team. They arguably had 2 of the top 5 players in the league, plus a young great coach.

bronxblue

July 4th, 2016 at 4:39 PM ^

Well, they won it 3 times in 4 years and turned that into Kyrie Irving, an out-of-the-league Anthony Bennett, and the trade chip (Andrew Wiggins) who they turned into Kevin Love.  But let's be honest - nobody looked at Irving, Love, Thompson, and JR Smith as some juggernaut in waiting; hell, Irving and Love had never made the playoffs in their careers prior to LeBron showing up.

OwenGoBlue

July 4th, 2016 at 4:55 PM ^

They turned that lottery luck and failure into having three all stars (including having cap room for LeBron via tanking), which up until today would be something referred to as a superteam. The supporting cast was even pretty solid after a few trades and the situation certainly had a better 3-5 year outlook than the capped out and aging squad he left behind in Miami. The KD situation is an absolute first with a perennial MVP candidate joining a 73 win team. Just saying it's not like LeBron went back to Cleveland and won it all with Boobie Gibson & friends. .

bronxblue

July 5th, 2016 at 11:51 AM ^

That's true to an extent.  But it was also a team with only Irving and outside of one season hadn't even sniffed making the playoffs in a really bad East.  And personally I think they would have been better with Wiggins than Love, but that's another point of contention.  But Love is barely an All-Star on that team, and Irving was an All-Star mostly because he jacked a bunch of shots and was the #1 option on some bad teams; his advanced stats weren't great until LeBron and co. showed up.

I agree the Durant move is unprecedented, but LeBron didn't go to a superteam in any way like he did with Miami or Durant with GSW.  Hell, Gasol going to the Spurs is more of a "super team" than Cleveland was before James showed up.

BigBlue02

July 4th, 2016 at 1:48 PM ^

Lol at "rebuild" Cleveland. While he was in Miami, they had 3 top 5 picks including 2 top picks in the draft. They used those 3 picks on Irving, Tristan Thompson, and Wiggins, who they traded for Kevin love. In other words, James came back to Cleveland with 3 starters who were essentially top 5 picks. That isn't rebuilding anything. The rebuilding was already done from tanking after LeBron left

bronxblue

July 4th, 2016 at 4:43 PM ^

Detroit has picked in the top 5 of the NBA draft exactly 3 times in my lifetime (born 1981).  With those picks, the selected Isiah Thomas, Grant Hill, and Darko.  2 out of those 3 were great players (Hill was a fantastic player, probably a HOFer, before his injuries). That isn't bad. 

It's actually sort of amazing that Detroit has been a pretty consistent franchise given how rarely they've been able to "reset" with a transcedant draft player.  Hell, Cleveland has picked in the top-5 6 times in the past 13 years.

Mick53

July 4th, 2016 at 12:20 PM ^

When someone hits free agency in any sport I'm sure they have priorities. His simply seem to include winning a title. That does not make him a coward for the same reason Randy Moss was not a coward for signing with the Patriots, or guys like Hull or Robitille signing with the wings, or guys like Price signing with the Red Sox instead of staying with the Tigers. Just because someone signs with a team that has proven themselves capable of winning it all does not make them a coward, it makes them someone that wants a better chance to win it all.

westwardwolverine

July 4th, 2016 at 12:48 PM ^

I think the difference is Durant was on a team capable of winning a title. OKC was right there last year. Seems crazy he wouldn't try and see it through with Russ at least one more year. 

Wolverwin

July 4th, 2016 at 2:56 PM ^

OKC is not that great of a team. It was a match up issue (size) that helped them take a 3-1 lead against GS, but in the end the better team won. They also benefited from poor officiating in the series against the Spurs (especially at the end of game 5). The Spurs, Warriors and even Clippers have better overall teams.

It sucks for the rest of the league, but he made the perfect choice if he wants to win multiple titles. As much as people bag on LeBron for going to Miami, he also won 2 championships there and made it to 4 straight finals. 

DetroitBlue

July 4th, 2016 at 12:58 PM ^

Playing professional basketball doesn't involve courage or cowardice, or anything of the sort. I don't follow the NBA and don't really know much about KD, but from what I've seen he seems to have a good head on his shoulders. At this point, he's made enough money for his family to be set for generations to come, so why wouldn't he want to improve his chances of winning a title?
Personally, I think it's impressive when elite, multi-millionaire athletes realize that no matter how good they are, that they can't win it all by themselves.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

trueblueintexas

July 4th, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^

So when a guy signs with a bad team for a big contract everyone dogs him for it being all about the money and not winning. Then when a guy signs with a team that has played in the finals the past two years to get a chance to win it's what????? all about the winning and you still dog him??? Man, some people will complain about anything and everything. Sorry you have to live your life where everything is bad.

Badkitty

July 4th, 2016 at 1:47 PM ^

Preach! These elite players, they have ambition. Otherwise they wouldn't have the drive to get where they are. Even though I'm not a fan of Lebron and didn't like "The Decision" one bit, I could understand the drive to win a championship that underlie his decision.

NBA careers don't last forever. Kevin Durant has pretty much achieved everything except for a championship. Why do people criticizing him for wanting to get a ring?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Mr. Yost

July 4th, 2016 at 12:10 PM ^

Like Broussard has been saying...Durant's simply not as polarizing at LeBron. LeBron gets compared to Jordan. Durant is "just" a HOFer - but not best ever type hype.

There will be some...especially early, but it'll go away. I think the majority of people will be more like "ugh, that's weak/wack/a bitch move" and kind of think less of KD. People HATED LeBron, like HATE. 

In the end, I really think he should've signed with OKC for one more year, then left for Golden State win or lose next year if that's what he wanted to do. Russ is probably leaving next year, the cap goes up again, just ride it out one more time...then leave after next year.

Mr. Yost

July 4th, 2016 at 12:23 PM ^

That's why this is different...simply because KD is NOT LeBron. LeBron's status, stature, etc. is what KILLED him. He was supposed to be Jordan and the perception was that he had to go get help. That he was leaving and cheating the system.

KD may be doing the same thing, but plain and simple, no one ever thought the same of KD. His expectations aren't as high and the reaction can't be nearly as bad.

It just looks like a pussy move because he's going to the team that knocked him out. LeBron went and made a team, but the Heat didn't own the Cavs. LeBron looked like he was running from expectations where Durant looks like he's running from competition. LeBron, by himself, no Westbrook, no Adams, no Waiters, accomplished WAY more in Cleveland the first time around than Durant has.

Anyway, I just think people will think that they're different. LeBron was hated because he wasn't the Jordan that he media and everyone made him out to be before he went to the Heat. The Chosen One. King James. Etc.

Durant won't be hated...he, in my eyes, will just be looked at like a pussy for doing this. Especially after Golden State just knocked them off after he was up 3-1.

jethro34

July 4th, 2016 at 12:04 PM ^

Beyond the obvious reasons of it being a pipe dream (top free agents don't feel any draw to Auburn Hills, not enough cap space), don't forget he HATES Reggie Jackson. Wonder where Westbrook will end up next year. Replace Tony Parker?

Leaders and Best 21

July 4th, 2016 at 12:09 PM ^

The NBA is going to implode on itself with these "super teams". There is literally no point in watching an NBA game unless your team is the Cavs, Warriors, or Spurs. Everyone else pack your bags and go home, you have no chance.

In the NFL, there are MAYBE 5 teams out of 32 that have NO CHANCE. Everyone else can AT LEAST make a case, even tho some cases are stronger. Even the lions can make a case. That is why football is the most popular sport in the country.

Mr. Yost

July 4th, 2016 at 12:13 PM ^

The NBA Finals was the most watched in years.

The NBA is not going anywhere...quit being a little girl about it. This is GREAT for business...they will be talked about and watched each and every week. And if they go up against the Cavs, there will be even MORE people that watch those finals than this year.

Stop it with all that bullshit. Kevin Durant isn't stopping people from watching the NBA if they already watched. The same goes for the NFL...concussions are going to make people stop watching. Yeah right, people love sports and their sports teams. Nobody gives a damn no matter how reactionary your feelings may be.

stephenrjking

July 4th, 2016 at 12:27 PM ^

I think things are more mixed than this. The last two years have been fantastic for the NBA, but I think a lot of that has been due to things that this signing contradicts. 1. Several teams have been capable of winning it all. At least 3 from the west and the Cavs. That has made the playoffs compelling. 2. Lebron's move to the Cavs made them a good underdog story, given the city's well-publicized drought. 3. The Warriors were a blast to watch. 4. The Warriors were a blast to watch and were not a free agent superteam. It's easy to root for a group of guys who mostly played for the same team for their entire careers. It was easy for people to root for Curry, a nice guy who plays a fun game and does crazy stuff on the court. Now, with KD, the Warriors become a lot like everyone else. Curry probably doesn't score as much, and there is really only one favorite to win the title. I think they're less likable now and more polarizing; how much remains to be seen. But if they endure, say, a 3-game losing streak, the knives will come out. I think the NBA as a product would have been better served with KD in a place like Boston (or Detroit, naturally), giving the Cavs a legitimate rival in the East.

Mr. Yost

July 4th, 2016 at 1:43 PM ^

NBA fans are NBA fans is my point.

It's a pretty polarizing league. You're either a fan or you're not and for those that aren't...having a balanced league is going to make them watch. But huge storylines WILL make them watch (like Game 7).

Hockey is the same way. Hockey fans are hockey fans, period. People who don't watch hockey aren't watching because it may be a balanced league. They're going to wait until there's a huge storyline in the playoffs before they tune in.

It's not like football. NBA and NHL fans are who they are for the most part. I really don't think that many people are going to stop watching the NBA because Kevin Durant went to the Warriors and not a team in the East. It just may mean they won't watch the Celtics or the Heat and they would've if he joined one of those teams.

This team is going to be a rock show. It's going to be just like they were this year when they were chasing history. There will be plenty of eye balls on the TVs and butts in seats whenever they come to your town.