Gucci Mane

March 12th, 2020 at 5:27 PM ^

Almost all kids can stay home alone. Just need to be about 7+ or have a sibling who is. Yes it’s gonna suck for the small amount of people with kids in maybe first grade who are right in the edge of needing a baby sitter. But for most people just leave your kids alone and check up on them frequently. 

NittanyFan

March 12th, 2020 at 6:18 PM ^

7????

I can't recall exactly what age when my parents first let me stay home alone - much less for hours at a time - but I know it wasn't even close to 7. 

More like 11 years old for an hour at a time, and 13 years old for 6 hours. 

fatman_do

March 12th, 2020 at 6:34 PM ^

Crap I am old. At 11 I came home close to "dark". We were often about 5 miles from home back when phones were rotary dial. Of course my kids couldn't ride their bikes down the same street I grew up on now with essentially the same amount of traffic 20 years later.

OSUMC Wolverine

March 12th, 2020 at 5:31 PM ^

i live in central ohio and we have been getting updates daily from our childrens school system for a week or better telling us to arrange alternate childcare and for the kids to bring home all supplies every night not knowing when the last day was going to be. tomorrow i assume is to allow teachers a chance to explain to students how any work required during the leave is to be accomplished.

bighouse1979

March 12th, 2020 at 4:01 PM ^

They are still recommending that all schools in Michigan to “not” close.  This will not last long IMO.  The political pressure is gonna win out once the cases are tied to students. 

redhed

March 12th, 2020 at 4:09 PM ^

It stretches further than that.   The summer tourism season in Northern Michigan is going to take a real beating with the coming school closings everywhere.  These kids will need to make up the missed time, and that's going to come during the summer.

BrewCityBlue

March 12th, 2020 at 4:15 PM ^

There are no easy decisions here and this is the biggest conflicting one. Efforts need to be made to accommodate health care workers' children somehow. We can't lose them from anything other than getting sick from treating the masses which we can plan on happening. We will already be short-staffed and training new ppl rapidly to handle the demand. 

Mitch Cumstein

March 12th, 2020 at 4:16 PM ^

What is the end game? I get the “flatten the curve” objective, it’s good and everyone needs to do their part. My question is has anyone defined how flat the curve needs to be specifically, or what the critical mass of people having already been infected and recovered is before society begins to increment back to normalcy (possibly starting with school going back)?  Would be nice to know these targets up front...

NittanyFan

March 12th, 2020 at 4:30 PM ^

The most interesting - BY FAR - part of the Ohio Director of Health's comments is her comments regarding evidence that "at least 1% of all Ohioans are currently carrying CoronaVirus."

That means 117K people!  117,000!  In a state with 5 reported cases.

Now - IF that 117K number is remotely true, it might be a potentially good thing.  Ohio (or America)'s total death rate hasn't increased in any dramatic way in recent days. Now perhaps it will. But if we are currently at 1% we may already be a bit along the x-axis in the "flatten the curve graph."

Maybe the Doctor made a mistake.  But that was a very interesting comment from her.

Mitch Cumstein

March 12th, 2020 at 4:40 PM ^

Good point! I am kind of hoping that a lot more people have it than anyone knows about and the mortality rate is lower than reported (again, my hope, no real evidence)

Do you know if there are any details out there on that 1% number? Like is it back calculated somehow from the different people that are known cases?

NittanyFan

March 12th, 2020 at 4:49 PM ^

I don't want to get too ahead of things - her comment may have been a mistake.

But the various mathematical models (I can't believe I'm pulling out my old Grad School statistics books that covered some of this!) have methods for trying to do those back-calculations.

The thing we need - ASAP - is a serology test that can answer the question "how many people who have not been diagnosed with COVID19 (e.g., show up on a case list) actually did go through an infection, recovered, and then cleared the virus from their system."

Knowing that would really help these models.

SFBlue

March 12th, 2020 at 6:38 PM ^

There aren't any benchmarks we can use. The hardest hit parts of China are still closed off. 

I imagine a big part of the puzzle will be whether those who are exposed develop antibodies that immunize them (in whole or in part) from future exposure. The supply chain effects will continue to ripple, I suspect, for awhile. 

StephenRKass

March 12th, 2020 at 4:30 PM ^

I believe this is going to be uglier than people realize. I really want to be wrong . . . but I wouldn't be shocked at a worldwide death toll in excess of 100,000,000. Here's how that happens. With world population at 7.8 billion, assume 2/3 of the world contracts the disease. If the death rate is 2% (obviously 2 deaths out of 100 who have the disease,) that is more than 100 million deaths. It will be really bad in areas with no hospital and health infrastructure. Flattening the curve allows hospitals not to be overwhelmed. Many hospitals are already close to capacity, with few empty beds. With too rapid a spike in hospitalizations from Covid-19, it will overwhelm the system. Already in Italy, they have been forced to make decisions on who lives and who dies. Health care personnel are breaking down, because there are no breaks, and constant work. Just bad all around.

enlightenedbum

March 12th, 2020 at 5:54 PM ^

It basically depends how well people learn from the countries that are already far along the curve.  If we do well (and aggressively shutting down gatherings is part of that) things should return to normal over the summer.  With a chance of us having to do this shit again in the fall, if past viral epidemics are a model.

PackardRoadBlue

March 12th, 2020 at 4:33 PM ^

I work for one of the larger trucking/transportation companies in the country and our HQ is located in Ohio.  Our company just announced today that they aren’t doing anything to accommodate employees with school age children.  That the attendance policy will remain the same as it always has.  There are going to be a lot of employees losing their jobs because they don’t have anyone to watch their kids during the day now.  This whole thing has turned from a global health issue to a class warfare issue.  The middle class and lower will be decimated by this if something isn’t done on a state of federal level to ease the burden on working families with s children.  Jobs will be lost, homes will be lost, and poverty will rise.  I hope to god other companies in this state and/or country are taking care of their employees better than mine is.  Prayers for all.