Minority POV: anyone tiny bit concerned OSU lost?
So I switched off the OSU game when Samuel put them up 19-7, convinced the game was over at that point, started watching a movie, then promptly fell asleep. Woke up to the shockng news of the PSU win. Now, while I'm always happy for a MSU/OSU loss, in this instance I admit to a little concern/disappointment, for two feelingsball, (not rational reasons I admit) reasons:
1- An undefeated matchup of both us and OSU for the game would be a giant national story, with huge buildup and insane hype. Now, if things stay the same and we're unbeaten and they have one loss that's still a really big game, but a tiny bit less
2- Isn't a one loss OSU team that has already been upset actually a more dangerous team to play at home in the Game than an undefeated OSU team?
I can see the responses to this view already, and they are all legit, no argument. Am I alone in this?
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:20 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:20 AM ^
Just win baby.
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:20 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:24 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:57 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:24 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:25 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:29 AM ^
Only thing I learned is that OSU is very vulnerable in bad weather games....I'm rooting for sleet/hail/snow in Coloumbus come game time.
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:30 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:31 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:31 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:36 AM ^
But if you care about the psychological side of this -- now our players KNOW OSU can be beat. Bit of the mystique and aura is gone.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:31 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:32 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:32 AM ^
After they lost, I said to my wife, "now they're going to be angry." Kinda like MSU for them last year... Except this year we are a much better football team. We are in good shape for the showdown in Columbus, but cannot take anything for granted.
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:33 AM ^
I'm at a point where I really don't care about storylines. We haven't won the Big Ten since 2004. That drought needs to end and I'm perfectly fine taking the path of least resistance. I'd love to see OSU lose again and allow us to clinch the title before the trip down there.
October 23rd, 2016 at 5:05 PM ^
...if OSU went into that game 6-5?
My capacity for Schadenfreude is infinite and I cannot be the only one.
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:34 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:35 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:37 AM ^
...all of this talk about how it might really be better if OSU had won last night is complete nonesense.
Since arriving at OSU, Meyer had lost just 4 total games, and just 1 Big Ten regular season game, before last night.
The best possible thing that could have happened for Michigan football is Jim Harbaugh.
The second best thing would be OSU starting to consistently lose 2 to 4 games per year going forward.
If OSU's 'down' year is a one loss year (with that loss being to Michigan), it becomes very hard for M to reclaim its position as the best football program in the Big Ten, which it was from late in the Woody Hayes era until the early 2000s, when Tressel arived at OSU.
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:37 AM ^
am thinking that maybe osu just isn't that good. Oklahoma stinks, they blew out BG, Tulsa, and Rutgers but struggled with IU, Wiscy, and PSU. Wiscy was their best performence so far but they got outplayed and Wisconsin plays everyone close because their offense is not good. I think we are 2-3 touchdowns better than them right now.
October 23rd, 2016 at 4:34 PM ^
You do have a point. A lot of their mystique was based on based on crushing Oklahoma in Norman. That just does not happen in a normal year.
But this year, it's looking like that win was not the big deal we all thought it was at the time.
Take away that game and you have Ohio State winning big over 3 terrible opponents and struggling with 3 non-terrible opponents.
If you struggle with all your opponents that are not terrible, maybe you are not really the second best team in the nation. At some point, you are what your record says you are.
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:41 AM ^
This is two weeks in a row where the OSU defense has looked anything but impregnable against an offense inferior to Michigan's, and the offense has sputtered against a defense that's solid but doesn't look to be at Michigan's level. Heck, maybe you throw in the contest against a game but at the end of the day still thoroughly mediocre Indiana team.
Unlike their loss to Sparty last year, which really looked like an aberration, I think this is just the OSU team this year: still very good, but no longer elite and not at all unbeatable. Michigan will need to be on point to leave Columbus with a win, but on paper, resume to resume, Michigan is a better team right now.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:44 AM ^
They lost to a team we beat 49-10. Hard no.
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:49 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:55 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:16 AM ^
The Big Ten wasn't that good a few years ago when OSU won the title. They didn't need us or anyone in the conference to be any good. And the conference is much better now than it was then.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 10:59 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:01 AM ^
I guess if the concern stems from them now having some extra motivation coming into The Game, then I can see where that might enter into it perhaps, but I will say that I enjoy that - for the time being - the road to winning the Big Ten East runs through Ann Arbor. The fact that OSU lost to a team that we beat handily is much more a source of chuckles for me at the moment.
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:04 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:08 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:09 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:12 AM ^
that anyone here is skeered on behalf of the team. The servers have enough trouble as it is!
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:14 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:42 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:14 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:25 AM ^
They're more or less in the same position right now that they were in before last night. Win out and they're in.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:38 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:26 AM ^
is the certainty by Finebaum and the other analysts that once OSU beats Michigan, they are right back in the playoffs. Are my maize and blue glasses so thick that I see an a very efficient and diverse offense with a ton of weapons and the best Michigan defense I have ever witnessed, but the smart people on TV see something less?
I do have to give it to the B1G network analysts as the exception who finally see Michigan's defense as the best in the country except for possibly Alabama.
I watched a very beatable OSU squad the last several weeks with which we match up very well.
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:27 AM ^
Michigan is not a team that had to resort to finding a grad transfer to run the offense because QB recruiting and development was in disarray prior to Jim's arrival. There is no waiting and hoping for the QB to clean things up and start hitting deep throws. This isn't the first season under a new regime. The team is older, wiser and more focused. They now talk like they belong, because they do. This team does not let obviously inferior teams hang around (MSU, Minnesota, Indiana). Last year's defense was very good, this year's defense is GREAT. Maybe all-time great, time will tell. Last year's team didn't know what success felt like or what it took to get there... This team does.
The Game will be The Game regardless. It's a toss up where the better prepared and more mistake free team will likely come away with the win. Discarding the RichRod era game due to the obvious rebuild/square peg, round hole of it all... Even in the late Carr years and the Hoke years, those games were usually close and winnable despite OSU having the better season, talent and coaching. Last year's margin of victory was an anomaly. Not the norm when the teams have similar records, talent and coaching ability... But I remain confident because Team 137 is special, AND Zeke Elliot, Joey Bosa, Braxton Miller & Jalen Marshall aren't walking through that door.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:31 AM ^
In any event, I actually was looking forward to a 1-2 battle of the undefeatedes. Now I am worried this makes them even hungrier even though I know in the real world it is going to be a battle either way. Hope our guys stay focused the rest of the way. Lots of traps left!
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:37 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:39 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 12:23 PM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:41 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:51 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 23rd, 2016 at 2:15 PM ^
After we lost to OSU, there was a lot of talk about us still getting into the championship game. Had the current playoff system been in place then, we might very well have been in there with OSU, Florida and LSU, since we were ranked third. In these cases, all else being equal, a more powerful OSU team (by whatever metric is being used), benefits Michigan.
October 23rd, 2016 at 2:27 PM ^
after losing 24-21 on Nov 30 to Florida St. A certain team had helped keep the road to the NC game open for them on Nov 23 that year.
October 23rd, 2016 at 11:59 AM ^
October 23rd, 2016 at 12:24 PM ^
Tiny consolation prize if your scenario pans out - possible Rose Bowl opponent would be Utah (assuming UW makes the playoffs). I would love to get revenge on them.
Of course, I'm all in for the playoffs.