Michigan Monday vs. Indiana

Submitted by StephenRKass on

Michigan Monday is up over at Ohio State website The Ozone. Not as good a read as usual.

LINK:  Wolverines Stopped Hoosiers When It Mattered (But Only Then)

I will cut and paste several points here for those of you who are too lazy to click through. FTR, these cuts are long . . . excerpts are less than a third of the whole article, so go if you want more content.

Overview:

The 307 yards are the most that a Michigan defense has given up since the Buckeyes went for 393 yards in the 2013 game. Other than those two games, however, nobody else has eclipsed the 300-yard mark on the ground against the Wolverines since 2010.
Indiana running back Jordan Howard carried the ball 35 times for 238 yards (6.8 ypc) and two touchdowns. He was stopped for a loss just once in those 35 carries, which gives you an idea of the kind of control that the Hoosiers had at the line of scrimmage. Fortunately for the Michigan defense, the Michigan offense got to play against an Indiana defense that defends the pass about as well as a watermelon defends a sledgehammer.
We’ll get into it more down below, but it was an impressive performance from a quarterback who is just overflowing with confidence right now. That being said, getting too worked up about 440 yards through the air against Indiana is a little like bragging to your wife about how you just destroyed Junior in Trivial Pursuit, and then adding that you’re “not sure what his third-grade teacher is even teaching him at that backwards, hillbilly school.”

When Michigan was on offense:

The Wolverines threw the ball 46 times and ran it 28 times – although one of those “runs” was actually a sack during a pass play. Also, Rudock scrambled a handful of times as well, so basically they tried to throw it about 50 times and tried to run it about 25 times. This all seems very un-Jim-Harbaugh-like, but such is the state of the Michigan offense right now.
Of note, Rudock completed four passes that lost yards: -10 yards to Jake Butt, -7 to Jake Butt, -8 to Jabrill Peppers and -2 to De’Veon Smith. Had those guys dropped those four passes, Rudock would have thrown for 467 yards instead of 440 yards, which is sort of funny.
There are two reasons why Michigan threw the ball so well and so often against Indiana. The first is because Indiana’s pass defense is an abomination. The second reason, however, is because Michigan couldn’t simply line up and run the ball on the Hoosier defense.
All told, the running backs carried the ball 21 times for 77 yards (3.7 ypc) and no scores. Rudock’s 71 yards gained was a life saver for Michigan, as he was 3 for 3 on picking up the first down on third-down carries. Michigan scored 17 points in regulation on those three drives.

When Michigan was on defense:

The Wolverines missed quite a few tackles in this game, and the worst thing about it is that they weren’t misses in space, they were misses in the box. They had players in position who could have kept Jordan Howard from rushing for 238 yards, but they didn’t.
This wasn’t a good game for the linebackers as evidenced by the fact that Indiana ran the ball 55 times and starters Joe Bolden (8) and Desmond Morgan (5) combined for just 13 tackles. Safeties Delano Hill and Jarrod Wilson, meanwhile, each had 10 tackles, and Hill didn’t even get the start.
As I said above, I fully expected the linebackers and safeties to be attacked in the passing game, but Indiana went at them with the running game, which isn’t a good sign for what still lays ahead of the Wolverines.

When Michigan was on special teams:

Michigan has found something with Jourdan Lewis at kickoff return. He averaged 30.3 yards on his three returns with a long of 38 yards. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him go the distance in one of Michigan’s remaining games this season.

What does it all mean?

It means that maybe Michigan fans shouldn’t have reveled in Michigan State constantly talking about their injuries because now the Wolverines are seeing what happens when an area like the defensive line thins out more than a team can handle.
I still think these next two weeks could turn out perfectly fine for Michigan because Penn State’s offense isn’t all that tricky and the Buckeyes seem to be addicted to slow starts this season. But what happens in the fourth quarter when the Wolverines are tired on defense? Will they be able to put up a stop? They were this time around, albeit against an Indiana team that has the intimidation value of a puppy on a birthday card.
But it also means that maybe Michigan can throw the ball around on teams that don’t happen to possess the worst pass defenses in the nation. The protection needs to hold up, as does Rudock’s confidence, but with receivers like Jehu Chesson, Jake Butt, Amara Darboh (provided he actually catches the ball), and Jabrill Peppers, there is definitely something to work with here.
It has been a pretty memorable year for the Wolverines, but exactly how this season is judged will be determined in these next two games. And it can go either way.

WichitanWolverine

November 18th, 2015 at 6:26 PM ^

No mention of our missed FG, which was huge, or the ridiculous number of penalties. The team had very little focus, but still won an evening road game against a dangerous opponent. Moving on.

ST3

November 18th, 2015 at 6:53 PM ^

Rudock goes for 440 yards (granted, OT-aided) against Indiana while Cardale threw for only 245. Indiana's pass defense is the NCAA's worst, averaging 341 yards given up per game. Hmmm, Rudock went for 100 more than IU's average while Cardale went for 100 less. Lucky for them, Barrett has taken over the starting role, if he can avoid the breathalyzers for the next couple weeks.

LSAClassOf2000

November 18th, 2015 at 7:03 PM ^

Right now, though, after three below-average performances in their last four games, it is going to be tough for them to get the momentum back that they once had. But that doesn’t mean they are ever going to stop trying. They could finish 0-2, 1-1, or 2-0, and in all three scenarios none of it is going to be easy for the opponents.

By the numbers, the current chances of us going 1-1 sit around 41% or so using Massey, so that's the most likely scenario, but the larger point of this final paragraph is significant in that it is being noticed by rivals - this team does not quit, even if it looks...not good on various series. We do put up a fight. 

elhead

November 18th, 2015 at 7:41 PM ^

These keep coming out late. Maybe there's a new baby in the family and he's just overworked, but I have to wonder whether he just has a harder time writing about the Wolverines than has been the case the past few years that I've been reading.

He feels the need now to qualify everything that he says. That's a change from before. Additionally, he's just plain missing stuff. Had nothing to say about Sypniewski's sub-par performance, though he may have been helped with that a little had the news about him playing with a 103 degree fever come out a bit earlier.

The Buckeye fanbase is concerned. They know that, even under the previous coaching regime, these games have been competitive ever since Meyer took over there. One difference they have to be noticing is that this team manages to pull out games at the end. That's been Meyer's trademark at OSU and insofar that it has provided them the edge it may no longer be the factor that it was in recent years.

Former_DC_Buck

November 19th, 2015 at 11:46 AM ^

Thrillogy, about the last three games of our season last year.  He has also been doing some promo work for it this week, so that might be part of the reason for the delay.  A lot of his stuff has been late this year, so it isn't just Michigan Monday.  And he stoppped writing his Gamewatch articles, which were a smeowhat snarky recap of his notes as he watched the game.  He would talk about the other media people and at away games the food in the press box, but also go over his reactions as the game was going on.  

I've noticed a lot of the feedack on his MM columns here depends on by how much Michigan, won their game, if they did.  Now, I have my own biases, so maybe I am seeing them differently, but they have looked pretty consistent across the course of the season.  It is the reaction that has been more in flux. 

UESWolverine

November 18th, 2015 at 7:55 PM ^

Am I crazy to think that this game would not have been so close had it been played earlier in the season? IU definitely would've had a lot more than 2 punts in the game since they were just going for it on every fourth down early in the game.

No way PSU or OSU go for it on each 4th down the way IU did. IU had nothing to lose, PSU and OSU have too much on the line.

UMForLife

November 18th, 2015 at 7:53 PM ^

I am 100% confident that he wrote a similar article about OSU's performance against Indiana's backup and added a little bit more insult (I mean, objective opinions) in there because it was Indiana's backup. /s