Michigan closing bars and restaurants

Submitted by The Mad Hatter on March 16th, 2020 at 9:07 AM

All bars and restaurants are to be closed by 3pm today.  They're still allowed to offer carryout and delivery service, although I'm not sure how that works with booze.

We're now up to 53 confirmed cases, including a "young person".  It sure would be nice to know what school they went to.

Stay safe out there.

The Mad Hatter

March 16th, 2020 at 9:18 AM ^

Whitmer implied that it was someone in the K-12 age range, stressing the importance of closing schools.

My 8 year old spent the month of Feb teetering on the brink of hospitalization with pneumonia, after testing negative for the flu and strep.  In retrospect, it's entirely possible that he had coronavirus.  And if he did, "mild cases" suck ass.  He was sick as fuck.

And started coughing again last night.

Sopwith

March 16th, 2020 at 11:51 AM ^

Repeat infections with coronaviruses are not unknown (I found publications on this phenomenon back as far as 1990). They are an unusual family of viruses because of their unusually high mutation rate (I don't want to get into the weeds, but the way they replicate is a little different from most viruses). The immune response they generate isn't always the classical memory-lymphocyte generating infection you'll see with routine infections.

But generally, given that you'd have to be pretty unlucky to get exposed twice, re-infections should be few and far in between (they've had a few re-infections in Japan, for example, but those are media reports and I always take science reporting in mass media with plenty of salt).

teldar

March 16th, 2020 at 10:10 AM ^

I would say Corona virus was not likely unless you were in China. There were many wide spread cases of community acquired pneumonia this year here in Columbus. I would be surprised if it were not the same at least across the Midwest. Community acquired pneumonia is typically difficult to treat and at least moderately severe.

The Mad Hatter

March 16th, 2020 at 10:35 AM ^

He has asthma and has had pneumonia a few times, even as a baby (which was terrifying).  I only suggested it because I think there has been widespread community transmission for months now.  My doctor speculated that this thing circulated for half a year in China before they even knew what it was.

Mitch Cumstein

March 16th, 2020 at 9:23 AM ^

Well that’s an interesting straw-man. I don’t recall anyone ever saying “we shouldn’t close schools bc I don’t think kids can get this virus and kids never spread germs...”.  The main counterpoint to closing schools was around gaps in childcare and long-term educational impact (an entire nation of kids K-12 are essentially losing 1-5% of their pre-grad education).

WRT childcare, let’s see the call-in rate at the medical facilities today. If they’re >25% we really need to think about the balance of these decisions. Granted if this really gets bad, having 25% of the workforce healthy and ready to step up might be good. 

1VaBlue1

March 16th, 2020 at 11:48 AM ^

"Also, COVID19 is a stupid name."

Right?  I was thinking the same thing!  I mean, we have Spanish Flu, Swine Flu, Bird (Aviary) Flu, SARS, MERS...  Why the hell couldn't someone have come up with something better than COVID-19.  How lame.  As a result, nobody calls it that - everyone still says 'coronavirus'!  Coronathis, Coronathat!!

Perhaps, in protest of such a rotten name, this is why the CDC chose to not use the already developed, tested, and fielded test kits, complete with its already ramped up supply chain running full bore?

jmblue

March 16th, 2020 at 1:11 PM ^

I'm not an epidemiologist but I believe the general tendency is for viruses to mutate into something less lethal, rather than more.  Viruses that kill their host at high rates (like Ebola) can be contained relatively easily.  It's the relatively mild viruses that really propagate.   

This may well come back next winter but I think the bigger danger is that our 1) health systems are still compromised from the initial outbreak and 2) that we get a sense of complacency over the summer and don't respond to renewed calls for social distancing, if they happen.

champswest

March 16th, 2020 at 9:13 AM ^

Isn’t the young person the MSU student?

This is the correct move by the governor. Probably should have been done Friday. 

‘We all need to hunker down for a few weeks and flatten out this curve. 

The internet is still open, so our lives aren’t altered all that much.

1VaBlue1

March 16th, 2020 at 11:54 AM ^

That's what the House bill was supposed to do - give money to the people that need it (hourly workers laid off; small businesses).  But Trump wanted a payroll tax cut (which only helps out those that keep their jobs), so the two sides had to hash out the differences.  I'm not sure that was going to be enough, in any case...

champswest

March 16th, 2020 at 9:29 AM ^

Yeah, it sucks that they are going to lose pay for 2 or 3 weeks, but their income was probably going to be reduced anyway due to less traffic. Owners will be able to reduce expenses by being closed and this helps keep staff free from exposure. 

‘We are all going to have pain, but this issue requires a national effort. Ask your grandparents what sacrifices they had to make during WWII.

Brian Griese

March 16th, 2020 at 9:41 AM ^

Interesting thought on WW2. I’ve brought up from time to time with people my age (I’m 31) what would happen if people our age had to make WW2 sacrifices and what the reaction would be. Thankfully, a draft into a very bloody war isn’t happening but I have imagine if this continues into June rationing may be on the table. 

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

March 16th, 2020 at 9:41 AM ^

Assuming they weren't actually in the service, they had gas rationing and victory gardens and less sugar and what have you.  Lifestyle changes that were inconvenient, occasionally painful but that they did put up with.  But what they didn't have was a government telling them they're not allowed to earn a living.  Part of the reason they were good with the rationing was that it was infinitely preferable to the Depression.

I agree their income was going to be reduced, but that's not the same thing as just straight up zero income for weeks, if not months.

jmblue

March 16th, 2020 at 1:52 PM ^

Realistically, this virus was going to cripple our economy once it hit our shores.  (Even if it hadn't hit our shores we were probably headed for recession due to its impact on China and other countries.) 

You can't have a functional economy during a pandemic of this scale.  If we let it run its course, it's going to drown our health system and lead to massive deaths of all kinds of causes (not only COVID-19, but all other serious conditions due to lack of proper treatment).  If that is going on you can't just go to work as usual and expect your usual stream of customers to show up.   In fact, you'd probably be shutting down and locking your inventory to prevent looting in the social breakdown that probably would occur. 

JPC

March 16th, 2020 at 9:16 AM ^

I think all states are going to go this way. NY bars, clubs, and restaurants are apparently all full, while my university has all faculty working from home under strict quarantine procedures. 
 

the local college seniors just don’t want to go home. 

ijohnb

March 16th, 2020 at 9:27 AM ^

Good short term move.  But let's do everything we can to get those back up and running as soon as possible.  Good to see a robust response, and let's all hope that everybody is back to work ASAP.  We got this.

ijohnb

March 16th, 2020 at 9:43 AM ^

I'm not changing anything, man.  I am here hoping everybody makes common sense moves and avoids unreasonable panic. 

You keep on going through thread to thread spreading your panic, though.  Keep instilling that in the back of people's minds that there is no escape and we are all doomed to death.  I am sure everybody appreciates your perspective, very helpful.