Max Redfield Decommits from USC
Max Redfield has decommitted from USC.
Why is this relevant may you ask? USC's class was full prior to this decommittment....and Redfield for those of you who don't know is a Safety. Therefore there is now a spot for Leon McQuay III in their class. The competition is now on.
http://espn.go.com/college-sports/recruiting/football/story/_/id/859458…
November 5th, 2012 at 12:42 AM ^
Bad News all around. Mcquay now has a spot at USC and it sounds like ND is the leader for Redfield
November 5th, 2012 at 1:04 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 1:06 AM ^
According to his 247sports profile he took an unofficial visit on Sept. 2.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:11 AM ^
So USC has the number 3 safety(a 4 star) according to Rivals decommit and they may just pick up the number 2(a five star) safety to replace him. That class is unreal, it's a shame their coach is terrible.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:22 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 2:19 AM ^
And what is their unfair advantage?
November 5th, 2012 at 2:47 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 3:34 AM ^
I wouldn't call the weather, location, or recent success an unfair advantage, is it an advantage, in most circumstances yes, is it unfair, no.
As for OJ Mayo and Reggie Bush, well if you are going to count that against USC, then I guess the bball team has an unfair advantage thanks to CWebb.
November 5th, 2012 at 7:20 AM ^
The only really unfair advantages USC have are the ones they make unfair by cheating. Having famous actors and musical artists tell recruits how great they are and how they will "help them get into the biz," when they are mediocre performers at best, is a great example.
Also, is there anyone who doesn't believe that USC is one of the top three or four teams in paying players? Reggie Bush was just one of the few whose parents got caught, but I can't imagine there not being a lot more. We've all heard the rumors; we've all seen the last-second "flips."
Other programs give golden handshakes; USC boosters can afford to give houses. If one was stupid enough to make such an easily-traced "contribution," how many are giving "monopoly money" under the table?
Speaking of which, I wonder if they have already given Redfield money? I don't know if I'd want to risk recruiting him now.
November 5th, 2012 at 10:49 AM ^
With respect to alledgely giving Redfield money, I wonder if they did (allegedly), could they get it back, like a quasi-return policy? That would be cool if there were rules like that in rule-breaking moves like paying recruits.
November 5th, 2012 at 2:51 PM ^
That's not an unfair advantage. An unfair advantage is paying players, giving them extra other perks which are not the norm or skirting violations, recruiting improprieties, etc.
The weather, in-state talent, demographic, location, etc. just are what they are.
Aside from recent championship success, UCLA is not much different from USC, in terms of what you've listed (and UCLA's main campus is in a better area than USC, imo). I'm sure UCLA were wishing for some of your so-called unfair advantage.
November 5th, 2012 at 3:22 PM ^
I would consider your opinion to be a fact. I don't feel scared walking around UCLA at night. USC on the other hand is a whole different story.
November 5th, 2012 at 4:04 PM ^
Have you been to SC? If you mean by "better off campus locations" an hour in the car to get to the beach, sure, but USC's immediate off campus locations are, ummm....the opposite of good/sate. To say that the campus is in a shitty shitty neighborhood is an understatement. Funny enough, back in the day, the city of LA offered SC the land where UCLA now sits. USC declined, they wanted to be closer to downtown....EPIC FAIL. While UCLA sits in lovely Westwood, SC is in the middle of the projects. I will agree with you on the weather part. The women..yeah, LA has pretty women, but so do most large cities (Miami, NY, Chicago, San Diego, Seattle, etc etc). Ann Arbor has it's share as well =)
November 5th, 2012 at 1:15 AM ^
hopefully snoop isn't involved in his next usc visit.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:24 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 1:33 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 1:34 AM ^
Sucks, but that's life.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:45 AM ^
I'm starting to feel that way as well. The only reason for any optimism is that he is still scheduled to visit for the Northwestern game.
The most recent articles on Rivals don't mention Michigan at all. I guess we will just have to wait and see what happens after the visit.
November 5th, 2012 at 7:58 AM ^
Were you actually expecting McQuay to end up at UM? I know I wasn't (am not). UM is probably in 3rd or 4th place for McQuay.
Just like last season, UM will likely whiff on the remaining elite targets on their board: Treadwell (Oklahoma or Okie St), McQuay (USC or FSU) and Green (I think he ends up at an ACC school like FSU, VT or Clemson). UM will probably be filling out the remainder of the class with "sleepers" again. Except for the lack of an elte WR, though, I am already perfectly comfortable with UM's class as is.
November 5th, 2012 at 9:08 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 10:31 AM ^
Hope so on Treadwell, but there hasn't been a ton of positive news for Michigan recruiting lately. Think this class closes out with a wimper rather than the bang many of us were hoping for about 6 months ago.
But don't get me wrong, its still a really good class though. Lots of guys to be excited about.
November 5th, 2012 at 10:41 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 12:20 PM ^
I'd much prefer a gut feeling from Sam Webb. Unless, of course, you are Sam.
November 5th, 2012 at 2:04 PM ^
Big fan of breakfast sausage, and chicken or turkey sausage is AOK. But the rest of the day belongs to burgers.
November 5th, 2012 at 9:48 AM ^
Green just tweeted the other day that Miami is back in the mix as well. I think both he and McQuay are real long shots, and wouldn't be surprised at all to see Treadwell wind up elsewhere.
November 5th, 2012 at 10:40 AM ^
I get that last year's class didn't close strongly (forgetting for the moment that it was a top 15 class), but the pessimism of posts like this are idiculous. I agree that McQuay is a longshot but I don't see any reason to think that Michigan isn't close/leads for Treadwell and Green.
Treadwell has maintainted throughout that he loves Michigan and I haven't seen any analyst that doesn't think that we're in the lead. As for Green, the only school that you mention that is even a finalist is Va. Tech. The schools that appear to be the closest to Michigan among his favorites-- Auburn and Tennessee-- are having terrible seasons.
Now, maybe none of these guys will end up in Ann Arbor, but to say that we'll "likely whiff" on those targets just isn't in line with the current reality of the situation.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:39 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 1:56 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 2:22 AM ^
Makes me wonder how Monte Kiffin was so revered in the NFL...
November 5th, 2012 at 8:20 AM ^
a pretty good team. Certainly the most prolific offense of this period in football history. I would like to see them beat AL.
November 5th, 2012 at 9:34 AM ^
Oregon is a damn machine, of course, but USC has given up 29 to Syracuse, 28 to Utah, and 39 to AZ and our old friend down there, which indicates that their defense isn't performing as well it should, given its talent.
November 5th, 2012 at 2:24 AM ^
Whatever happened to Monte Kiffin and his great defenses?
Mattison >>>>>>> Monte Kiffin
November 5th, 2012 at 4:13 AM ^
We can pray that McQuay watched that Defense play 2 hand touch against Oregon. Maybe he wants to play for a DC that can actually coach up a unit and prepare it for the next level
November 5th, 2012 at 8:15 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 9:22 AM ^
Actually, I think our D would have fared better than USCs. USC clearly has a talent advantage but the defensive scheme was terrible. Oregon was getting 10 yards a pop running the ball it seemed. Our line and linebacks would have fared better than that IMO. Our secondary might have had issues I will give you that.
November 5th, 2012 at 10:34 AM ^
Getting 10 yards a pop is kind of what Oregon does though. They go fast, fast, fast, and then before you know it, they've popped off a 50yd play. We're still thin on depth on defense (as is USC) and that would eventually cause problems for us.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:54 PM ^
People in LA are getting restless and impatient with the USC defense. There are people saying that Lane should fire his dad because his schemes are outdated.
November 5th, 2012 at 9:34 AM ^
including Oregon, Alabama, LSU....decidedly not ND...that are playing an entirely different game than everyone else. I firmly believe we will be there by 2014 or 2015 depending on QB development, but for now those teams would (and in Alabama's case did) make us look bad.
November 5th, 2012 at 9:48 AM ^
With that said, I would take Mattison as well.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:39 PM ^
Technically true, but Monte is still on staff and many SC fans think he's still calling the shots on D.
November 5th, 2012 at 1:55 PM ^
This is true. Many people say that Orgeron as a DC is just a title and Monte is still calling the plays.
November 5th, 2012 at 10:23 AM ^
Quack attack obliterated them.
I REALLY am anticipating a Bama v. Oregon matchup. I think Bama shuts down Oregon on the strength of their front 7 on D, and heavy heavy doses of the Bama O-line with Lacy being pounded down their throats.
With our recruiting classes, I'm hoping our offensive lines of the future turn into Alabama's. Could not be more impressed with their starting five.
November 5th, 2012 at 2:01 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 2:10 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 7:40 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 8:53 AM ^
November 5th, 2012 at 12:37 PM ^
Rumor has it - jk
November 5th, 2012 at 4:10 PM ^
Don't hate, Don't hate
November 5th, 2012 at 10:38 AM ^
I wouldn't be surprised to see Goodman jump at the chance to commit. Assuming he's still allowed to that is. Kiffin may try and hold out for McQuay. USC can definitely be choosey at this point.