Manuel Excel is deeply skeptical about Wink
https://x.com/colintj/status/1755609482053537930?s=61
For those who don’t know Excel is a much respected football guy on the Twitters. Brian among others follow him.He has been critical of the potential Wink hire from the beginning. So has Spacecoyote another respected football guy.
I remain deeply skeptical of Wink due primarily to opinions of knowledgeable folks like the above.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:02 PM ^
Well fuck if space coyote thinks it's a bad hire I guess we should shut down the program.
February 8th, 2024 at 2:49 PM ^
It’s funny how people respect & trust the opinions of people who know football but not well enough to be employed as a coach more than the opinions of coaches themselves.
February 8th, 2024 at 3:57 PM ^
Maybe Harbaugh's hires since 2018 have spoiled us and Wink might be great, but IMO, to act like hiring decisions among coaches are all well thought best choice moves, and not more likely made because of who knows who, who owes who, and general coaching brotherhood nonsense is just naive.
And many intelligent people with good critical thinking skills can educate themselves with much more informed and accurate opinions than folks directly involved in certain areas of expertise precisely because they have a greater store of other knowledge and are less likely to groupthink. Anyway, do you only take book recommendations from published authors or only listen to movie critics who have produced and directed a film?
February 8th, 2024 at 4:32 PM ^
I don't know. If you read 237 comments on an Athletic article, you'd get 237 opinions, and every single person has serious conviction about why they're right. Harbaugh took 8 years to figure out a formula that worked here, and find coaches who all came together in the right way. And he's considered one of the best coaches in the country. A lot of it is chemistry and timing.
February 9th, 2024 at 7:46 AM ^
You wouldn't get 237 different opinions. There'd be some overlap and some who'd agree with others.
February 9th, 2024 at 12:12 AM ^
I'd trust the football opinions of 95% of posters with over 1,000 mgoblog points over Ward's.
February 9th, 2024 at 7:44 AM ^
I don't trust Montgomery Ward's opinions on football, either.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:04 PM ^
“A mainstay of charts and graphs”
not exactly a ringing endorsement
February 8th, 2024 at 1:07 PM ^
The owner of this blog follows him. 🤷♂️
February 8th, 2024 at 1:14 PM ^
The owner of this blog also follows pitbull, and several accounts dedicated to "dank memes" what tf does that matter?
February 8th, 2024 at 1:16 PM ^
Because, unlike those two, he cites Excel in his schematic breakdowns of games.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:27 PM ^
OK but can you give us a reason why we should give credence to what this guy says?
February 8th, 2024 at 1:43 PM ^
I think that's on the twitter thread - probably transporting the reasons he gives for being skeptical (which are quite detailed and knowledgable, even if you don't know who "Manuel Excel" is) and crediting the originator might have been a better angle to come at this from than "Manuel Excel and Space Coyote don't like him so I don't" - but the fact remains, they do have long threads going through both their perceived positives and negatives and trying to bubble up the things that are unknown to them as outside observers that could sway it either direction.
I guess I'm just saying - the threads are a good read that will make you a more informed fan, even if they are silly twitter handles.
February 8th, 2024 at 2:09 PM ^
I ain’t getting twitter just to read their threads.
Anyone can look at what happened in the past and say that’s what the next story will be. They’re usually wrong. Other than pointing to empirical evidence like excited soyjacks, what actual insight do these guys bring to the table?
February 8th, 2024 at 2:51 PM ^
His reputation and intelligence on the subject matter. Not gospel by any means, but some twitter opinions carry more weight than others, in spite of Elon's effeorts to the contrary.
February 8th, 2024 at 4:00 PM ^
As a general rule, i appreciate skepticism. But it can (and increasingly is, in this social media environment) be used as a bad faith rhetorical tactic. i’m willing to bet that Wink would be in the upper echelon of CFB DCs if he got the job here
February 8th, 2024 at 1:28 PM ^
Damn, Microsoft Excel?? That's some serious business. Very academic.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:44 PM ^
Yeah. If he said Lotus Excel I would have written it off immediately
February 8th, 2024 at 2:33 PM ^
Harbaugh uses Excel for EVERYTHING. I think we found Harbaugh's burner twitter account.
February 8th, 2024 at 6:31 PM ^
Yeah, what's next Word is gonna tell us why he sucks?
February 8th, 2024 at 1:30 PM ^
i guess we'll know who to look to about how we should feel when moore hires a director of football dank memes
February 8th, 2024 at 1:21 PM ^
You are posting BS. SpaceCoyoto has both positive and negative things to say about him. If anything he seems to disagree with this Excel guy.
Wink isn’t all downside. The major benefits is he’s an established play caller and game planner and can own the defensive rooms, which is a major benefit for a first time head coach, especially coming from the O side.
— Space Coyote (@SpaceCoyoteBDS) February 7, 2024
I still don’t like it for schematic and adaptability reasons https://t.co/6onbglXgOf
February 8th, 2024 at 1:24 PM ^
He literally said he doesn’t like it.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:32 PM ^
I said positive and negative. He likes the fact that he is an established guy and can run the defense with no help from Moore. That is a big plus.
February 8th, 2024 at 3:47 PM ^
Being an established guy and being able to run the defense without Moore’s help doesn’t do you any good if he’s an issue from a schematic and adaptability standpoint.
February 8th, 2024 at 6:43 PM ^
So could GERG. You can own the room and take all the responsibility for running a defense and that defense can also still be bad.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:26 PM ^
The owner of this blog is, famously, not exactly a rock of journalistic credibility.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:36 PM ^
why are you here then
February 8th, 2024 at 1:47 PM ^
It's a reference to a New York Times article about the 2007 coaching search. Brian used to have that quote in the sidebar. I'm here because I've always been here.
February 8th, 2024 at 2:14 PM ^
I for one enjoy reading random thoughts that strangers have about Michigan football
February 8th, 2024 at 3:49 PM ^
Wink = VisiCalc
Both were pioneers
February 8th, 2024 at 1:07 PM ^
I may be alone in this, but I just don't understand why UM can't perpetrate a number of criminally conspiratorial acts which force Minter, Elston and Herbert to get back in line. Most of it could likely be accomplished with fraud and blackmail. Isn't this just one of those rare cases where the ends would justify the means?
February 8th, 2024 at 1:23 PM ^
Are we talking about motel rooms with a dead female and a live boy?
Or is that a bit too far?
Shoutout to the late execrable Governor Edwards
February 8th, 2024 at 3:58 PM ^
CJK5K
Allegedly
February 8th, 2024 at 2:08 PM ^
We finally have a poster worth a shit and not just saying "pay them a lot".
I'm in.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:07 PM ^
I read this title and imagined Warde has a spreadsheet with formulas for coaching candidates.
Obviously, consider me one who didn’t know who Manuel Excel was
February 8th, 2024 at 10:42 PM ^
a second cousin of Automatic WordPerfect
February 8th, 2024 at 1:08 PM ^
We get it dude you post this in every thread. Give it a rest..
February 8th, 2024 at 1:11 PM ^
Lie. I don’t post other’s opinions in every thread.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:28 PM ^
Have you considered giving gratitude a try?
February 8th, 2024 at 1:35 PM ^
Sadly true--sometimes you post your own.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:11 PM ^
What does MS Word think?
February 8th, 2024 at 1:20 PM ^
I laughed really hard at this
February 8th, 2024 at 1:34 PM ^
She’ trying to look it from a 30,000 foot view. Arial if you will. She’s been so bold as to say he’ll have an impact if tabbed.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:37 PM ^
me thinks she DOS protest
February 8th, 2024 at 5:31 PM ^
MS Word doesn’t know shit. I’m waiting to hear from WordPerfect.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:12 PM ^
What if Wink uses the same coverages MacDonald and Minter used, but mixed in some of his own flair with it? I see a lot of Don Brown comparisons but Brown's problem was that he never adjusted to anything and there's no way Wink could have survived in the NFL for as long as he did without making schematic adjustments.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:18 PM ^
He doesn’t use coverages like Minter and McDonald do. He is far more aggressive in his use of the blitz than either Minter or McDonald.
February 8th, 2024 at 1:24 PM ^
That's the worry it seems. He blitzes a lot and doesn't use disguised coverages behind it. Feels very much like a Don Brown 2.0 scheme, and that didn't end well for us.
February 9th, 2024 at 11:12 AM ^
How is it a DB scheme? It's not a man scheme per se.