Looking at M Football Going Forward - An Outsiders Perspective.

Submitted by jbuch002 on December 3rd, 2019 at 2:14 PM

I'm the Owner/Moderator of a Michigan Football Forum. We have several contributors from other BIG programs. This is from one of them. In it he discusses the problems Jim Harbaugh faces going into 2020 and beyond. The guy is good analytically when it comes to CFB and he knows recruiting cold. Thought his post was worthy of mgoboard comments ........ 

I'll say this about M going forward. I like the coaching staff, mostly. I think Gattis is going to be pretty good. They do some pretty good things to create looks. He knew OSU was going to come out and sit back in zone and take away the run, and they torched it for a half. When OSU changed up and started to go more man with more pressure, he adjusted somewhat to the running game, but he was really constrained by score at that point. I think Don Brown did a nice job schematically this year to deal with glaring deficiencies at certain positions.

NB: I agree with his take on Don Brown. Lots of shit-posts within the CFB blogosphere about his work that are way off. He did some nice work in 2019 with a front 7 that lacked depth and talent at DT and by doing that covered up a depth issue on the back-end. Metellus and Hawkins are good, not elite Ss and you saw why v. osu's receivers....another stark example of osu talent >>> M's.

Recruiting-wise, though, they have to own the problems at DT. They have to own the QB situation (which turned out fine). They're going to have to own the OL situation next year (which, I think is turning into a vintage Warriner "low star/modestly higher production" unit -- good for beating Indiana, not so good for beating OSU).

Player development/recruiting-wise, I think they need to better with their WRs. And I think it's worth noting that HARBAUGH!!! signed a monster class in 2017. It had a fair amount of high end talent and a ton of overall depth. 30 recruits. I think 6 started (with McCaffrey eventually starting in 2020). The 2018 class was light in numbers and talent and the 2019 class is better in numbers but still light on elite talent. The game on the field on Saturday was, in a lot ways, a matchup of OSU's #2 class in 2017 and M's #5 class. And, I guess throw in two transfer QBs.

NB: There is a subsequent post comparing position by position the 2017 recruiting class by 247 ranking. If you didn't think there's a talent gap that was a significant player in the osu/M game last Saturday that really came down to a battle between 2017 classes, trust me there was ..... and I know a lot you who follow recruiting closely know this. This wasn't the whole story but it was part of it. Waaaaay too many errors made and stupid stuff like fucking up the opening EP with frippery, untying shoelaces (Fields) and removing cleats (Dobbins) that if those don't happen this isn't the blow-out that it was.

I'm not going to shit on any specific players, but the only ones on defense that I'd take for OSU are Hutchinson (in the DL rotation for sure), McGrone (probably 2-deep for now, but he'll be good) and Hill (I guess, Thomas, but he's not starting). On offense, I think Bredesen starts and I'd take Runyan for depth at OT. I would also take Nico Collins (he's better than Austin Mack for sure).

Next year is going to be interesting. Let's set aside the transfer portal. With no transfers M loses at least 3 OL and potentially 4 (I don't know what Ruiz will do -- I assume an interior OL will come back). The guys that replace him are not impressive to these eyes. IMO, they'll suffer a big drop-off. They also could lose all of their WRs. And as much as Ronnie Bell looked good, how's he gonna look when he's the only guy you have to worry about? I guess Giles Jackson could develop into a nice multi-purpose weapon. And, I do like their RBs and I do think McCaffrey will be as good or better than Shea.

On defense, you lose some key players, especially in your secondary. If Thomas goes early then that unit is decimated and not likely to recover by 2020. Losing most of their LB corps also hurts (I like McGrone) and it doesn't seem like the cavalry is on its way for DT.

NB: there's a very good board post here, "Yes it sucks, but ......" that fills in some of the blanks on the OL brought up above. I think M will be fine but I agree with the poster on a ceiling of it's productivity with Warriner coaching the OL (and that's not an intended ding on him. He's been a good Harbaugh hire for what ailed M in the past).

My December 2019 take for 2020 M, Team Number 4,592,203 or whatever it is, it's going to be noticeably less talented than the 2019 version. I think that's a very bad look for HARBAUGH!!! in Year 6. I think after 6 years we will still say that the 2016 team -- the team built by HOKE -- was his most talented (and best) team. I think the arc/trend of his recruiting is downward -- he had some very good classes early and now, man, I don't even know. The 2021 in-state class is really good. When I said I'd give him one more year I'd mostly want to see how he does recruiting in 2021. I already know what he can do everywhere else. I want to see if he can reverse the trend and kill it in 2021. He has to get Rocco Spindler. He has to get Donovan Edwards. If he doesn't, then I don't know what to say about him. And OSU is going to come at them hard. Spindler, especially.

So, the State of the Program as I see it is that they are trending a bit down -- if you look at 2016 as the peak, 2018 as 2nd best and 2019 as maybe 3rd (with the excusable valley in 2017). 2020 is going to be worse than 2019 and maybe worse than 2015, and the recruiting trend line doesn't suggest a huge reversal. And, please note -- I took care to describe recruiting in terms of what M has done recently -- my assessment is independent of the previous discussion -- it's measured against what HOKE and HARBAUGH have done, and relative to those best year -- trending down.

NB: I think the "Yes, it sucks but," post that appears on this board gives a rosier but not overly optimistic take on M's 2020 offense. Still, it's really good to have a poster from the outside give M fans an honest take of where he thinks the program is. On recruiting, he thinks Harbaugh has an established track record (and on a downward trend that he has to show he can end/reverse for 2020/21) that is going to make it hard for M to get up on the step with and then keep up with osu and the perennial CFB contenders. If I were in charge and looking at it from 10k feet, I'd be looking around for some top shelf recruiters this off-season. Money cannon.

Maize N' Ute

December 3rd, 2019 at 2:24 PM ^

An OSU guy approves of the things Harbaugh and his staff are doing with some criticism of the roster...

**checks the record of Harbaugh vs OSU**

I'm sure he does approve of the job Harbaugh is doing.

DrMantisToboggan

December 3rd, 2019 at 2:26 PM ^

They're going to have to own the OL situation next year (which, I think is turning into a vintage Warriner "low star/modestly higher production" unit -- good for beating Indiana, not so good for beating OSU).

We signed four 4-star OL last year, including three in the top 180 players nationally, and the fifth-highest-rated OL commit was going to commit to Clemson until we pushed for him. Our starting tackles will both be 4 stars, and the main upperclassmen candidate to take over a OG spot was the #112 recruit in his class.

OL talent is not an issue - the OL will be fine.

Blue Hefner

December 3rd, 2019 at 2:35 PM ^

The DL is another story though. We absolutely, positively need to get some size. These athletic but undersized players we have are fine against the average to good squads. But they will continue to get absolutely blown off the line by teams with monster O-lines and great RBs like Ohio State and Wisconsin.

 

That more than anything else worries me about our future.  

uofmfan_13

December 3rd, 2019 at 2:41 PM ^

Agree.  This poster / "forum owner" lost me on that one.  OL will be fine.  Chuck Filiaga was a highly touted guard-tackle prospect who was an Army All-American bowl participant.  He hasn't really seen field yet.  I am fine with guys waiting 2-3 years on O-line.  That is how it SHOULD be.  We'll be fine there, maybe after some early hiccups.

We need to be taking AT LEAST ONE fat-guy, gap-plugging DT each and every class.  There are PLENTY of them throughout the Midwest and Texas and everywhere.  They don't have to be 5-stars, they can be 3.  That's fine.  But young men with girth and great leverage.  That's it.  I'll take one every single class.  Wisconsin does.  OSU does.  Iowa dang sure does.  We're stupid not to.  We did do such in 2019 and our young men like Hinton will flash even more next season.  But it is outright dumb not to have a big bodied DT in each and every class.  There is NO NEED for "projects" and guys you think you can "grow" into DTs.  

jbuch002

December 3rd, 2019 at 3:36 PM ^

The OP in my post responds:

The only thing I'd take issue with in the comments is their (IMO) exceptionally rosy view of the 2019 OL recruiting class as it relates to 2020 performance. Yes, I know they signed some solid players, but none of them are elite. They're all in the 100 to 300 range. And look, maybe M struck the motherload with those kids, but on average what you're looking at for kids in that ballpark is what Mayfield did this year -- who was in that range and in his 2nd year. That's not bad, but it's not stellar. I expect Mayfield will continue to improve and be a damn good tackle by the time he's done, but he wasn't in 2020. He was meh. So, to be clear, I'm not saying those guys won't be good, but I am saying that I would bet against them being particularly good in 2020. What I would expect to see is 2/3 young kids + 1/2 vets fill in the 3 (or 4) spots. And they'll struggle a little in 2020 and eventually get there by 2021.

And look, I know what Warriner does. But Warriner's 2014 OL had 4 NFL dudes on it. Maybe he gets the M kids there and maybe he gets them there ahead of schedule. I don't know enough about them to say if they are the exception. I'm simply following what I think is the rule -- I wouldn't feel great counting on 2nd year OL unless they're legit elite kids. JMO. There's gonna be a drop off of some note (IMO).

So, yeah, I feel 100% confident with my assessment of the OL. If you want to go starry-eyed on the 2019 class that's fine, but you're probably lucky to get 1 really good year out of that.

DrMantisToboggan

December 3rd, 2019 at 3:51 PM ^

I am not a "recruiting rankings don't matter" guy at all, but have dude go check out the recruiting rankings on Warinner's 2014 OL that had 4 NFL guys on it. That's my comment on Warinner's abilities - he made that line, not the other way around.

Mayfield would have been the 4th highest rated OL in last year's class in the composite btw. The good news is that there is a fairly good chance that no OL from the 2019 class even starts next year. Your line is probably Hayes, Filiaga, Ruiz, Stueber, and Mayfield. If a 2019 OL commit beats any of them out, it's because they are ready earlier than expected.

Mayfield didn't end the year "meh", either. He was up and down to start, ended the year looking like the future pro he is. He and Runyan kicked Chase Young's ass last Saturday. Michigan did very few things well against OSU, but the passing game for ~3 quarters was one of them, and that was in large part thanks to Mayfield (and some Runyan) winning against a top 3 draft pick.

Mongo

December 3rd, 2019 at 4:26 PM ^

Agreed.  Most improved position last year may have been OT - both Runyan and Mayfield were pretty darn good if not great against Chase Young (the #1 DE in the country).

Also, I like your picks for OL starters in 2020, assuming Stueber is fully recovered.  And the quality depth behind that is what really stands out ... Carpenter, Rumlan, Jones and Keegan are some big ass high ranked dudes.  Don't count our Honigford and Stewart as well ... those guys are late bloomer types.

Our 2020 OL will be relatively young, but all have been with Coach Ed 2+ years and their development will be outstanding as the season plays out. 

 

CMHCFB

December 3rd, 2019 at 10:35 PM ^

As an OSU guy, the Dr is ? spot on.  Warinner sucked as an OC but was a great Oline coach.  Go look at the 2014 class and the 3 stars he sent to the league as elite Oline players.   The only caveat to that is 1. Zeke running the ball hid some Oline mistakes.  2 As an elite pass blocker, Zeke hid some Oline mistakes.   Those guys made it to the league on their own tho and Warinner gets credit for coaching them up.   Oline blocking at UM is different than the 2014 all zone read Oline blocking at OSU in 2014, but it would be a mistake to say Warinner is less proficient at one than the other. 

lostwages

December 3rd, 2019 at 3:37 PM ^

One of the few times I agree with Spicoli...

I think the O'line is fine, I think some of the issues we had were with the new scheme, and then being a little green at the RB position. Hopefully O'line will continue to improve next year and Charbonnet will turn into Hart/Beast mode.

With that being said, I think the WR and QB struggles fed off themselves, Shae had issues passing at first, WRs lost confidence, then when he was hot hey started dropping balls. Hopefully new blood will solve this next year.

Sideline

December 3rd, 2019 at 2:30 PM ^

Not sure how Recruiting is trending down when the stats show 2019 as a better class than 2017 once you remove the Solomon’s, St. Juste’s, Samuels’, Hudson’s, etc of the class. There were 4, if not more, 4-star caliber players that left from that class. One who would’ve been a valuable DT at a desperately needed position. Downward trending in recruiting is just stupid to claim. OSU is the one trending downward in recruiting going from the 2nd nationally rated class to 14th. <— how stupid does that sound? 

RockinLoud

December 3rd, 2019 at 5:35 PM ^

the most talented and complete team Harbaugh will have is the one he inherited

I'd buy that on defense for sure. Hoke and Mattison put together outstanding talent on Defense. But offense? Eeeeeh, no. The only position on offense that isn't better now, in some cases markedly so, is outside WR, which is about even. 

 

UMxWolverines

December 3rd, 2019 at 3:06 PM ^

You cant compare the classes by removing players from only one. 

The fact of the matter is Harbaugh is not an elite recruiter. And he's going up against two in his own division in Day and Franklin. Maybe it shouldnt be that much of a shock that Franklin has finished ahead of Harbaugh 3 out of 5 years. 

MGoStrength

December 4th, 2019 at 8:04 AM ^

Downward trending in recruiting is just stupid to claim. OSU is the one trending downward in recruiting going from the 2nd nationally rated class to 14th. <— how stupid does that sound? 

Well, they're also currently sporting the #4 class for 2020, so Day has them back on track.  I think the 2019 class was a combination of a small class and the Smith scandal.  Even with their down 2019 class they had 7 guys ranked in the top 150 compared to UM's 5.  They also had 3 5-stars compared to UM's 2.  So, despite their so called down class they still had more elite talent than UM.  UM just had a bunch more guys in 100-300 range, which is good but not elite.

bluinohio

December 3rd, 2019 at 2:30 PM ^

Without going the route of bagmen we'll never recruit like those top 5-6 teams. In that case, we need the best coaches who can take good talent and make them great - like how Beilein did it. The only other issue I see is motivation. Michigan just doesn't bring it like almost every other team I watch.

Maize N' Ute

December 3rd, 2019 at 2:50 PM ^

ssshhhhh....you can't say that here.  We would have no excuses to hand to Harbaugh and this program if we say we're capable of getting get top talent, but in reality, top talent doesn't want to come here because they will never win anything of importance. 

Plus Peppers and Gary were mere 3*'s

jmblue

December 3rd, 2019 at 3:00 PM ^

I get you're - like most of us - unhappy about Saturday.  But don't be that guy.

That guy sits behind me at the stadium.  It is awful.

When you're at a point where you're mocking other fans for not being as pessimistic as you are, it's probably time to take a little break.