How much longer will Michigan be able to recruit well without winning?
January 9th, 2010 at 3:14 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:24 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:13 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 8:05 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:15 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:20 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 7:36 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 11:00 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:16 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:21 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:18 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:20 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:24 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:22 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:49 PM ^
2002: 1/10 (21) 2003: 2/11 (17) 2004: 1/12 (22) 2005: 1/10 (23) 2006: 2/9 (19) 2007: 2/5 (20) 2008: 0/17 (24) 2009: 1/13 (22) 2010: 0/5 (24) ***(Commitments to date)So we have 24 commits to date - the same amount as we signed in 2008. Though, you'll see that compared to 2008, the amount of star power is significantly lower in this class. I understand that recruiting lower ranked kids might be part of RichRod's strategy, so maybe it's by design. I also understand that this class isn't done yet - I could easily see us adding Parker and Wilson, thus boosting our ranking. Finally, I also understand that Rivals ranking aren't the end all be all. But in my opinion, the above data does make me stop and think for a moment. I'll off a bright side to those who think I am purposefully being negative (not you, RO) - the 2008 class was a pretty strong one even after you subtract out the four 4*s who are no longer on the team. Therefore, RichRod will have a pretty solid junior class to work with
January 9th, 2010 at 5:49 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 12:10 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:24 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:30 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:33 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 6:01 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:42 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:50 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 6:34 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:52 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:17 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 5:54 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 3:58 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:04 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:29 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:49 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 4:54 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 5:56 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 2:55 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 6:37 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 8:33 PM ^
January 10th, 2010 at 1:57 PM ^
January 9th, 2010 at 11:07 PM ^