Indy Pete - Go Blue

August 13th, 2019 at 3:42 PM ^

 In all seriousness, this type of disrespect for the rivalry could threaten his scholarship status.  They live, eat, sleep, and breathe this rivalry 365 days a year - foolish comments like this are just what we need to get a chink in their armor. 

 I do love that he guarantees that they will win ‘for the rest of this decade’.  A new decade starts in 2020, the year that he arrives. Perhaps he will be prophetic after all; it certainly appears that he will fit in with the academic culture there. 

BuckeyeChuck

August 13th, 2019 at 8:59 PM ^

True, wildback & Indy Pete. He only said that because:

  1. Kids say stoopid things
  2. He hasn't entered the environment yet.

Besides, it's common for kids to say crap, especially when they haven't entered the arena yet. I remember hearing Brandon Smith talk to Sam Webb on signing day saying how the rivalry is about to turn. And Kyle Kalis: "There will be blood."

If the kid truly believes it's not a rivalry, he's in for a rewiring when he gets to experience a taste of it.

CMHCFB

August 13th, 2019 at 11:09 PM ^

Watch the video of Urban addressing this year’s team.  All but goes off on the new enrollees telling them they haven’t done shit and he better never hear them talk negative about the rivalry. Ever.  They better respect the rivalry and Michigan.  They have excellent player and coaches and the way you respect the rivalry is to work on it every day.    These are two high school seniors talking up their new school.  Freshman get humbled quickly and they will get the same speech next spring. 

wolve1972

August 13th, 2019 at 7:44 PM ^

Just went over to the O-Zone and their fans are somewhat pissed. Some are saying that Urban needs to sit down with this kid and explain the rivalry to him.  In all fairness, he's just a recruit who hasn't signed yet. You can bet once his name is on the dotted line someone will sit down and tell him to shut his mouth. 

RXwolverine

August 13th, 2019 at 3:45 PM ^

It’s a bigger problem then just one loser recruit. I have a cousin who’s a big Michigan fan born in 2000. Obviously was too young to see the 2003 game so the only win he’s seen is the 2011 game against Adam Sandler. He’s a sophomore in college for God’s sake. This is a huge recruiting disadvantage that we have to fix and the only way to do that is beat them. 

StirredNotShaken

August 13th, 2019 at 5:07 PM ^

It's amazed me for several years now that the OSU coaching staff is able to keep these kids so focused on UM. If I was an OSU player I'd think exactly like this recruit does and I'd probably roll my eyes at the coaches for being so focused on UM. I'd think it was phony enthusiasm. Meyer was obviously a master at manipulating these kids to have a crazed focus on UM, but he grew up with the 10 year war and coached for OSU when it was  a competitive rivalry. So at least it was genuine for Meyer.  As an outsider to both programs this always seems to be the key cultural edge OSU has over us and it's something that drives me crazy as a fan. 

Will be interesting to see if Day is able to keep that part of the program up at the same level. I realize it's a collective craziness around the program that enables it but Day has to be the one who beats the drum every day. Whether Day is successful at keeping the Michigan hate genuine within the team will be a very underrated component of his success. 

wolverinestuckinEL

August 13th, 2019 at 7:40 PM ^

Losing to then doesn't create a recruiting disadvantage.  Losing 3 games a year to their 1 does.  I grew up during the Cooper tenure, I still realized the importance no matter how often we won.  But they had great teams and great players so he had no problem recruiting despite his terrible record against Michigan.  We need a win this year in the worst way, no doubt.  But year long success plays a bigger role in getting recruits, not that single game.

RedRum

August 13th, 2019 at 3:39 PM ^

they have yellow pant pins for the love of God. We are rent free in their head. I'm walking away.... By the way guys, according to this article i found, water is no longer wet.

RXwolverine

August 13th, 2019 at 3:39 PM ^

I mean a rivalry is one that goes back and forth. Is Minnesota our rival? Ohio state has owned us. Until we beat them again no it is not a rivalry. This will be the year that changes however 

RXwolverine

August 13th, 2019 at 3:50 PM ^

If cooper had stayed longer at osu and struggled then yes I would agree with that. It’s been 19 years!! How can you just pretend that it doesn’t effect a rivalry? Michigan Minnesota used to be a huge rivalry in the 50s and 60s now it’s a joke. They beat us once every 10-15 years. Osu Michigan is getting to that point and that is a scary thought. A rivalry is where each team wins half the games over a 20-30 year stretch. There can be streaks but not consistently favoring one team over the other. Isn’t it sad when the only hd game between Michigan Ohio state is from 2011? I think it’s been one sided long enough. 2019 is OUR year! Go Blue!

Bo Glue

August 13th, 2019 at 5:37 PM ^

First of all, losing would affect a rivalry, not effect it.

Second of all, your arguments are patently ridiculous. Saying Michigan-Ohio State is like Minnesota-Michigan completely ignores the history of the programs involved. We are 58-51 all time vs Ohio State. We are 75-25 all time vs Minnesota.

Equivocating these two rivalries is absurd. Guess what? We have won more than a quarter of our games against the Buckeyes. In fact, we've done more than twice as well as that.

The Barwis Effect

August 15th, 2019 at 5:03 AM ^

RXwolverine speaks the truth which of course is why he’s being negged.  From ‘33 to ‘67, Minnesota actually held a 17-16-2 advantage over U-M. From ‘68 on, Minnesota’s record vs. U-M is 4-41.  

4-41 is not a rivalry.  

If you would have told a Minnesota fan at the conclusion of the1967 game to enjoy your victory and that they would only beat U-M four more times over the course of the next 51 years, they would have laughed you right out of the stadium.

Same thing would have happened after the 2003 victory over Ohio State.  No Michigan fan would have ever believed it if you had told them that they would taste success only once more in the next fifteen years, yet here we are today with a 1-14 record over the past 15 years.

Clearly we still have a ways to go before we get “Minnesota’d“ and this rivalry goes the way of the dodo, but we are certainly on pace for it to happen.  

mGrowOld

August 13th, 2019 at 3:41 PM ^

We are 2-16 against them in our last 18 games.  Honestly, outside of Rutgers & Maryland is there a B1G team with a worse record against OSU this century?

itauditbill

August 13th, 2019 at 3:52 PM ^

So a likely 18 or 19 year old recruit has a memory of 1 U of M victory in his lifetime.. He isn't really wrong. 

I have said this myself.. a rivalry isn't a rivalry if one of the 2 teams doesn't show up... and losing 62-39 and 16 of the last 18 is sorta by definition not showing up. I really hope that changes this year moving forward. 

mGrowOld

August 13th, 2019 at 4:05 PM ^

Elements to winning a football game: player talent, player motivation, coaching, luck & officiating.

MSU has been able to beat us recently because they have had the upper hand in three of the five (player motivation, coaching and luck).

OSU has beaten the brakes off of us this decade because they have all five.

ShadowStorm33

August 13th, 2019 at 4:26 PM ^

Since 2000, here's the record of every B1G team against OSU:

Illinois: 2-13

Indiana: 0-16

Iowa: 2-7

Maryland: 0-5

Michigan: 3-16

Michigan State: 3-12

Minnesota: 1-11

Nebraska: 1-4

Northwestern: 1-10

Penn State: 5-14

Purdue: 5-8

Rutger: 0-5

Wisconsin: 4-11

 

First, this was really painful. But second, I be like damn Purdue, tied for the most wins, and by far the best winning percentage.