blueandmaizeballs

November 7th, 2022 at 6:33 AM ^

Speech to text didn't quite get my description the best.     Anyways just was wondering if this has any merit behind it?   He put a 7 on it which is pretty high for this.   

I posted this because I thought it was a WTF moment not that I think MSU is going to get him and I follow recruiting and haven't heard anything else and wanted to know if anyone else heard anything. That was it and wanted to see if anyone else heard anything as I don't know why Moore would go to MSU   Guess I am confused why I am getting all the negs?   Anyways I have learned posting on here we have some bad fans and very negative people.  

Communist Football

November 7th, 2022 at 8:31 AM ^

Allen Trieu (chief of 247 Midwest recruiting) said the following in the comment thread:

At present, with King in the playoffs, I think that’s Dante’s primary focus. Last time I talked to him, he was planning to enroll early at Oregon but that was before the Edmundson news.

IMO - once King is out of the playoffs, we’ll get a better read on where things stand.

Bo Edmundson is the 3* Lake Travis TX QB (where Baker Mayfield played) who recently decommitted from MSU

CityOfKlompton

November 7th, 2022 at 10:27 AM ^

He was also in the portal for literally one day. There was most definitely an agreement in place before he entered. That doesn't mean a bunch of money changed hands. However, Walker was certainly tampered with, and I don't think Walker/MSU was a unique case. This is happening everywhere. Welcome to the new college football landscape.

Vote_Crisler_1937

November 7th, 2022 at 11:44 AM ^

my source on that is an in person event many of us MGoBlog supporters attended in the summer of 2021. So stop accusing me of making anything up. And it wasn’t just Walker specifically, it was a lot of recruits and transfers being paid to come to MSU. 
 

The exact comparison I was told is that Mel Tucker is paying a lot more than even Chris Partridge was known to pay higher ranked players at various points in his career. If anyone in charge of this site wants to come on and back me up that they heard that too, then great, and if not oh well. I know what I was told by those on this blog who have that info. 

bronxblue

November 7th, 2022 at 11:47 AM ^

MSU has 12 commits in their class right now; I can't imagine it's a "space" issue especially given how active the portal is every year.  I know they took a decently-ranked kid last year but again, if Moore wants to go to your school you make space.  

If Moore flips to MSU from Oregon then so be it but it'll be because of something beyond roster configuration.

SpartanInA2

November 7th, 2022 at 11:00 AM ^

Neither of those is really accurate. Parting ways with Edmundson wasn't related to Moore. His recovery from his back injury was a concern and they decided to move in a different direction. Now we don't have a QB in this class, so why not make another run at Moore while we evaluate other QB prospects?

willirwin1778

November 7th, 2022 at 10:34 AM ^

Maybe "a Dante Moore soap opera" is just a desperate attempt to slow the attrition of their rapidly sinking recruiting class.  Maybe MSU losing his future teammates is cool?   

Dante's sign to Hell, in the inferno reads "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here"  Hot take clue?

Mich19

November 7th, 2022 at 5:28 PM ^

MSU has nothing but negative news since the ball was kicked off in September. Poor performance on the field, de-commits, suspensions, etc. An MSU insider putting in a CB seems, in my opinion, more like trying to drum up some positive energy in the recruiting world. 
 

ND had crazy momentum, a #1 class and a ‘top 5’ team per the offseason rankings. Moore still turned that down. Seems like he doesn’t have much interest in staying local if ND couldn’t reel him into that class. 
 

Seems unlikely MSU is able to flip him, and hey if they do, good for them. Moore looks like the real deal and it would be cool to watch a local kid without having to stay up until midnight most Saturdays of the season

UMForLife

November 7th, 2022 at 6:33 AM ^

Sure. They should just give him 95 million 4 year contract from their "boosters". He is going to choose MSU over Oregon who is in the mix for CFP and Nike is involved. 

jethro34

November 7th, 2022 at 6:35 AM ^

This recruitment is so puzzling. Everything implies Oregon bought it with a huge NIL Nike deal and UM was close but couldn't close. But then multiple podcasts are like "yeah, UM messed up so bad they were never going to win that one". What do the insiders know that they aren't saying? And if Dante, whose dad loves UM so much, were to possibly flip to MSU AFTER what just happened....I would vomit. Not sure how credible the Spartan Insider is, but man...

WestQuad

November 7th, 2022 at 9:43 AM ^

Every decent HS football player has worked their butt off to compete.  None of them have generated millions of dollars.  If they happen to be good enough to play they might contribute to the millions of dollars that are already being generated whether they play or not.  I'm for paying players to a large extent, but unless it is a Fab 5 situation, where the players are a special talent above the rest, the players aren't actually generating any of the money.

ShadowStorm33

November 7th, 2022 at 10:50 AM ^

The players are necessary, but they're far from sufficient; it's the schools that drive the revenue. Take any top college team's roster, strip away the college affiliation (and thus the built-in fan support that makes up the vast majority of the market for that team), and see how much it's worth. Hint: your new team--effectively a minor league team--will be worth a tiny fraction of what it was when it had its college affiliation, despite having the exact same roster.

So because the vast majority of the value derives from the college affiliation, I don't see a problem with the vast majority of the revenue going to the colleges.

bronxblue

November 7th, 2022 at 11:54 AM ^

This is such a weird argument to me - a significant portion of fan interest in all athletics (both professional as well as amateur) is derived from off-the-field affiliations.  Do you think people would actively watch the Lions, for example, if they didn't have an association with the city of Detroit?  The Yankees have fans in the stands because of the pinstripes and the city's history, not because people are dying to see Gerrit Cole pitch.

And I'd argue that the institutions derive a TON of value from the players who played there; strip away the history of success from Alabama, Michigan, OSU, etc. and few people would spend millions to watch them on the field.  It's a symbiotic relationship and acting like it's all one direction doesn't make much sense.

ShadowStorm33

November 7th, 2022 at 12:43 PM ^

a significant portion of fan interest in all athletics (both professional as well as amateur) is derived from off-the-field affiliations

I agree, which is why I don't give credence when people say pro athletes don't get a big enough share of the revenue vs the franchises. The athletes are already likely getting a larger percentage than they generate. Sure, there are some instances where people are truly fans of the player instead of the team (oftentimes because of that player's college affiliation). I was a Patriots fan, and am now a Tampa Bay fan, solely because of Brady. But for the most part, fandom of players is driven (or at least initiated) by those players playing for the fan's team.

And I'd argue that the institutions derive a TON of value from the players who played there; strip away the history of success from Alabama, Michigan, OSU, etc. and few people would spend millions to watch them on the field. It's a symbiotic relationship and acting like it's all one direction doesn't make much sense.

One, I think you overstate the value of past success. Yes, past success increases value, but there's plenty of baseline value derived from college and geographic association. More people support historically unsuccessful programs than you imply. Also, success isn't solely tied to players. Plenty more goes into it, such as coaching. Just look at A&M; they have one of the best rosters money can (and did) buy, and they're sitting at 3-6. And it's not like the players weren't getting anything. They were getting tuition, room and board, assistance and support, coaching and training, etc. worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. And now they're getting NIL, which is a huge gift given that the vast majority of players receiving NIL deals are doing so because of their college affiliation. Only a tiny fraction would get that based on their athletic talent alone if you took the college connection away, basically the superstars who shoe companies are trying to lock in for when they turn pro.

maquih

November 7th, 2022 at 1:54 PM ^

> The players are necessary, but they're far from sufficient; it's the schools that drive the revenue

 

I mean with that logic everyone in the economy should just get paid room and board the value of the equipment and services their employers provide.  Like, these are adults, some of the players are as old as 25.

These arguments would get called out as straight up communist if you said them about anyone else who isn't a "student-athlete."

crg

November 7th, 2022 at 10:16 AM ^

As opposed to *every other* student athletr that "works their butt off" just as much for their respective sports... plus actually need to care about getting a real & usable degree for after college?  And some of them also need to pay for school as well, since they aren't on scholarship.

This argument that revenue sport athletes get a raw deal is such a red herring.

maquih

November 7th, 2022 at 1:18 PM ^

Come on man, advertisers aren't paying millions of dollars for ads during a swim meet or wrestling match.  At the end of the day, for better or worse, millions of dollars, billions of dollars are being spent to watch college football specifically.  

Same as people paying millions at a pop concert but they wont pay a tenth of that to go to a classical music concert even if those musicians are extremely talented and hardworking.

There's no good reason an 18 year old star shouldnt get paid while a 22 year old star does, whether its football music or rocket science.   

Carpetbagger

November 7th, 2022 at 12:46 PM ^

Poor? Have you taken a close look at most of these kids? Even the football players on most P5 programs are solid middle class. And football players are probably lower in income than most sports given almost every public school does football. Not so much Crew or Fencing, those take $$ investment by Mom and Dad.

The lower class kids are riskier and require more development are playing at EMU. And they aren't getting any $$ there, under the table or not. This isn't 1995. Are they getting useful degrees there? I have no idea.

reshp1

November 7th, 2022 at 9:30 AM ^

what is often laundered money

Because of arbitrary rules and limits on NIL, if it were truly unlimited it would be out in the open and UM could actually compete with the rule benders and outright cheaters. It's not like paying croots didn't happen before NIL, it was even more secretive and under the table.