Community Sentiments on UM Football Culture Change

Submitted by Bo Harbaugh on December 7th, 2019 at 4:24 PM

I see a lot of Harbaugh bashing here and in the media, but also a realistic defense of his coaching that says "who could do better given the academic and recruiting constraints" UM places upon itself.

That said, curious to see how the community feels about changing the "culture" away from the student-athlete model to more of a football factory.

 

Online Survey Creator

Hotel Putingrad

December 7th, 2019 at 4:31 PM ^

Release the Kraken!

If Michigan wants to play the virtue signaling game, they should just offer intramural football.

You don't build a 110,000 seat stadium (much less, fill it) so people can see Academic All-Americans matriculate down the field.

Mich1993

December 7th, 2019 at 4:51 PM ^

I'm in the 50% voting against.  I don't think there is anyone better, or equal to Harbaugh out there.  I also don't think this is his peak.  Every year, he identifies weaknesses and looks for how to improve.  If we can keep Brown and Gattis for a few years for offensive and defensive consistency, the results will come.  

When will we beat OSU?  Don't know.  If they're the best team in the nation every year, it will obviously be a challenge.  At least Fields and Young will be gone when we play them next year.

Would everyone take one loss to OSU next year and a slot in the playoffs?  Could happen.

My priorities in a coach:

1.  Don't cheat (how soon we forget Martin and M basketball)

2.  Be a leader/role model for the players to produce players that we can cheer for and be proud of.

3.  Win.

I'm not so "get off my lawn" that I don't need a coach that does all 3 of the above.  Harbaugh is doing the first two and working his way to #3.  He's put together what should be a top 10 program hopefully trending toward top 5 from definitively not that.  

It sucks, but we need to be patient and be grateful every day that he stays as our head coach.  If he leaves, it will almost certainly get worse, not better.

Fielding Fan

December 7th, 2019 at 5:35 PM ^

Just a heads up.  Young is gone next year, but Fields is back.  Which absolutely blows, because I don't want to see any more of that kid.

That said, the rest is a good solid post, and I agree with it all...if JH leaves, it would be a disaster.  Back to the drawing board.  No thanks.

Lakeyale13

December 7th, 2019 at 5:50 PM ^

Exactly what "recruiting restraints" do we have?  List them for me please.

Every single elite kid that OSU has gotten would have been accepted by Michigan.  I would venture the exact same thing for Clemson too.  "Recruiting Restraints" at Michigan is a straw man argument.  The elite recruits that couldn't / wouldn't get into Michigan are incredibly slim...like maybe 1 or 2.  

SGBlue

December 7th, 2019 at 7:39 PM ^

To my mind, it's not just admissions. I agree that the vast majority of kids accepted at the football factory schools would have gotten accepted at Michigan if we had been their selection. But I do wonder how many don't come here (and how many we choose not to pursue) because of the relative rigor and academic expectation of a Michigan program compared to those at the football factory schools.

I'm sure that Michigan athletes can take easier programs than the average Michigan student, but when you can stay eligible by taking only online classes (ahem, Justin Fields and Joe Burrows) or by taking an easier program at a much less demanding university, there is additional selection bias at work.

Call me naive (and I'm sure a lot of you will!) but it's not simply admissions criteria at work here.

DHughes5218

December 8th, 2019 at 1:48 AM ^

Did you see Jourdan Lewis’ tweet that said don’t talk to me about a free education because when I arrived at school I was told I could not major in graphic design because it did not fit my “schedule”. - It’s coming directly from a recent former player that UM football players are steered into specific majors that will keep them eligible and fully engaged in football. We just pretend we have a higher standard because it’s a great excuse for when you fail to meet expectations. Same with paying recruits. A financial advisor testified under oath that he paid players at Michigan. Are we supposed to believe he risked federal perjury charges just so he could slander Michigan?

The denial here is off the charts. Our problem is to the extent that we do things. - We may not break the rules on the same level OSU does, but what’s the difference? It’s like we are passing bad checks for a few hundred dollars while OSU is embezzling millions from the stock holders. Both are breaking the rules but the little guy gets everything taken away and has the book thrown at him, while the guy who stole millions gets probation and keeps the money. If you’re going to cheat, then cheat. If not, be 8-4 to 10-2 and don’t complain.

DairyQueen

December 7th, 2019 at 9:13 PM ^

Admit into UM = definitely

Stay eligible/not kicked-off the team = no way

I have a hard time believing players like Ezekiel Elliot and Cardale Jones, and the like, would go to class/advisor/tutoring.

Urban Meyer's "inner circle" methods have been well-documented since Florida.

And yes, the players have so much put on their plate, workouts, practice, film-room, socializing, partying, wanting to go to the NFL, and wanting to relax otherwise, the choice to forego having to actually go to class and "get an education", given what their 16-18 year-old minds "know", it is not only not-stupid, it's more rational to go to the program that gives more leeway and give you passing grades regardless.

And when it comes the the south/southwest, wooo boy, we're not even talking illiterate, some of those SEC platers are borderline non-verbal.

crg

December 7th, 2019 at 7:38 PM ^

Probably all of them (or close enough to not make any difference).  That doesn't mean we should do the same.

I would rather see our AD lead the charge against this bs and finally bring it into the light.  It might be a losing battle, but it's the right one - maybe make enough noise to force the NCAA to split the organization into "does school" and "does not do school" leagues.

bluebyyou

December 7th, 2019 at 6:18 PM ^

Indeed!  It would be interesting to see the average SAT/ACT scores of the football team compared to the rest of the student body. A study was done about a decade ago and Michigan had some of the higher scores in the study but they weren't close to the University average.

I would guess that things have changed for the better under Harbaugh but I'd venture a guess there is still a big distinction in admission criteria.

crg

December 7th, 2019 at 7:44 PM ^

Straw man argument.  Why must the student-athletes test scores be equal/better than the university-wide average?  The average is exactly that - a mean value.  There will always be many students in the university with scores lower than that and scores higher.  The important point is that the scores were high enough to be admitted to UM - that is where the academic standards matter.

bronxblue

December 7th, 2019 at 7:44 PM ^

I agree it's dumb to complain about academics.  I'm sure UM cares a tad more about their athletes in school than OSU types but I doubt demonstrably so.  

What I am interested in seeing is what happens when everyone can start putting money out there above-board.  Because while I'm sure UM has some level of bagmen, it's well established that some schools just DGAF about the NCAA's enforcement of that and with NIL rights I think that frees up a bit more money at places like UM.  Not that I suddenly think Alabama or LSU will stop getting elite talent, but Michigan's brand is so ubiquitous nationally that you can get a lot of opportunities to get some value from your likeness.

Lakeyale13

December 7th, 2019 at 6:18 PM ^

I think that's a bad argument.  That's like saying you are less of an adulterer than your neighbor because he has 10 girls on the side and you only have 1.

 

If you want to have integrity...then be 100% pure as white clean.  If not, then stop pretending and do what these other schools are doing and win.  If Alabama really is buying houses for kids and $300,000 payments then it is amazing how efficient they are at cheating.  They've never been caught in over 10 years.

Don

December 7th, 2019 at 7:25 PM ^

The notion that those who didn’t attend U-M donate more to the institution than alumni do is one of the most stupidly asinine things I’ve ever read on MGoBlog, and that goes back well over ten years. Seriously, you’re a delusional dumbass if you really believe that.

21runnin_WILD

December 7th, 2019 at 4:52 PM ^

Last time I checked, this isn’t a secret squirrel alumni only blog or message board.

I didn’t goto college. I joined the service for 12 years and then learned a skilled trade after I ETS’d.

Does this make my opinion on the football team any less important than yours? 

Didn’t think so.