Average OSU starter recruit ratings

Submitted by CityOfKlompton on October 26th, 2019 at 3:57 PM

Cleveland.com published an article (link below) a few days ago comparing OSU and Wisconsin starters by recruiting rankings in an effort to show how their talent matches up.

Here are OSU's average ratings per starting player on offense and defense.

Offense: 0.9361 with 9 starters being a 4-star or higher.

Defense: 0.9305 with 8 starters being 4-star or higher.

Curious how Michigan stacks up. 

Regardless of who the coach is it's going to be tough to compete with a team that is recruiting at a top-5 clip if UM isn't. Recruiting rankings aren't everything, but they do matter, and it is becoming increasingly apparent you need that talent if you want to compete at a championship level in college football.

Linkhttps://www.cleveland.com/osu/2019/10/how-ohio-state-footballs-roster-stacks-up-against-wisconsin-in-recruiting-talent.html

realblue

October 26th, 2019 at 4:01 PM ^

If you're going to pose the question and make the post, why not put the effort in to find out how Michigan stacks up and post that info in the OP? 

Would make for a better post, although now I am curious to know how Michigan stacks up.

Just a thought.

CityOfKlompton

October 26th, 2019 at 4:39 PM ^

Agreed on that first thought! 

Here are a couple links that don't show average rating among starters, but of the overall roster judged by the past five recruiting cycles that put things in perspective a little more.

Link: https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/college-football-recruiting-schools-with-best-class-rankings-on-average-over-the-past-five-years/

Link: https://www.sbnation.com/college-football-recruiting/2019/2/7/18215228/college-football-recruiting-rankings-2019-class

wolve1972

October 26th, 2019 at 5:59 PM ^

I think those ratings are kind of misleading mainly because OSU's ranking of 14 last year drops them quite a bit in the overall long term rankings. They were only able to take 17 players in their 2019 class but still had the 3rd highest average/recruit.  Here's one that looks at the ROSTER composite over the last 5 recruiting classes that looks at overall roster quality based on recruiting rankings and is pretty telling.  Alabama, OSU, and Georgia have separated themselves from everyone else.

https://247sports.com/Season/2019-Football/CollegeTeamTalentComposite/

 

Sopwith

October 26th, 2019 at 5:56 PM ^

While few would doubt that 2019 OSU football is the greatest human endeavor of all time, I caution others to be restrained in assuming that the universe does not contain intelligent life that has itself achieved colossal feats of engineering, medicine, arts, and social progress.

Just trying to tap the brakes ever so slightly by taking a more cosmic and less Earth-chauvinistic view. 

Bluedream

October 26th, 2019 at 7:06 PM ^

A Michigan man is at a cocktail party bragging about being from Michigan, the Harvard of public universities. 
 

A Harvard man chuckles and says, funny I never tell anyone I went to the Michigan of private universities. 
 

Michigan is a fine university but it’s not really all that close to Harvard or Stanford. 

McFate

October 27th, 2019 at 11:15 AM ^

Michigan is about twice as selective as Ohio State (by a quick-and-dirty conversion between median ACT score and percentile), while Caltech is five times as selective as Michigan.

The gap that exists between a good public institution (Ohio State) and a great one (Michigan) is trivial compared to the distance to the real elite schools.

BIGWEENIE

October 26th, 2019 at 4:12 PM ^

It also has a lot to do with missing on high ranked players. Mich has had a lot of high ranked guys that had been no where near the ranking they came with out of high school. Think back also to how many 5 stars we were #2 for and missed. What was Chase ranked out of H.S.? I think he was our best guy last couple years on D.

DHughes5218

October 26th, 2019 at 4:14 PM ^

Be prepared for the star gazer, stars don’t matter speech. We hear this every time we get a lower ranked player, but everyone goes nuts when we land a highly ranked guy. This new OSU staff is getting the best out of its players. I think as Meyer got older, he started hiring his buddies and friends that couldn’t make it anywhere else, but OSU got lucky, crap went down they basically forced Urban out and now they have a young, hungry staff that is developing the talent and playing to their strengths. I was concerned that Harbaugh might do the same, but it’s good to see that he went out and got some younger coaches. You can see the team improving. They are not the same team that got whacked by Wisconsin. Hopefully tonight they can take another step forward and win on the scoreboard.

Red is Blue

October 26th, 2019 at 5:54 PM ^

Higher star average star rankings are better.  But it is possible for an individual player to be underrated or to develop into something much better than their star rating.  The standard deviation for an individual player is greater than the standard deviation for a group of players.  So it is simultaneously possible to think that average class stars are important, but still be excited about a lower rated individual.  Being excited about a lower rated player does not equate to average class ratings dont matter.

Sopwith

October 26th, 2019 at 4:21 PM ^

 it is becoming increasingly apparent you need that talent if you want to compete at a championship level in college football

You don't say. Let me take a shot at some equivalent statements:

"It is becoming increasingly apparent some schools may violate NCAA guidelines on recruiting from time to time."

"It is becoming increasingly apparent that money sometimes corrupts the political process."

"It is becoming increasingly apparent that the tilt of Earth's axis is somehow correlated to winter and summer falling during different periods of the calendar in the northern vs. southern hemisphere."