Art Briles signs 10-year Extension with Baylor

Submitted by GRFS11 on

I think not OT, as it relates to Michigan's staff:  he and his coordinators have been mentioned (by some on this site) as potential replacements for Borges (and/or Hoke), but it looks like Briles at least isn't going anywhere.  I wonder if his offensive staff will look to make a leap somewhere else, since there is seemingly no way to get promoted now while staying at Baylor.

 

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9972970/baylor-bears-art-briles-agree-new-10-year-deal

Finance-PhD

November 14th, 2013 at 10:06 AM ^

It is a private school so we don't really know anything about it. There may be a buy out clause but most contracts are not such a big deal for the coach if he wants to leave. The new school (say Texas) could come up with the money and hire him. I don't know if Michigan would be willing to come up with the cash. I know they can but I don't know that they have the will.

I think this will help recruiting because he can say he is there long term but unless he just loves the town this is not a destination job.

Don

November 14th, 2013 at 10:08 AM ^

from what Hoke wants to run, the idea that any of Briles's assistants would find a natural fit in Ann Arbor is more than a little far-fetched.

Cromulent

November 14th, 2013 at 10:37 AM ^

I've been beating the drum for Art Briles for a long time. Ain't gonna happen here. Briles is a Texas guy thru and thru.

 

But former Briles' assistant Dino Babers is tearing it up at Eastern Illinois. There are a number of teams in the midwest area that could use a good offense. The Briles' scheme does indeed use Power, and the QB doesn't have to run a lot.

Danwillhor

November 14th, 2013 at 10:50 AM ^

it shows that guys can be hired from non-fbs schools and even HS without it meaning you are hiring a bad coach. Football is football and football is easy. Success, in cases outside of huge talent differences (and such) but true scheme/maximizing player talent generally translates to pretty much all levels outside of the NFL (and sometimes even then). It wasn't too long ago that the spread (not even the hyper systems we see now) was deemed as a fad at lower levels. Now? Few teams have zero spread elements in the playbook. A coach that can out think opponents and better prepare their players generally translates to all levels, regardless of system.

GoBlueInNYC

November 14th, 2013 at 11:17 AM ^

I don't think anyone thinks that all lower division and HS coaches are bad or that there aren't potientially good coaches in those ranks, but it is definitely a riskier option than hiring a known D-I coach. I wouldn't down play the adjustments necessary when making the leap in quality. Running an AQ D-I program is going to be a different animal than running a smaller D-II or HS program. Doesn't mean some people can't do it (obviously Harbaugh did, as did Tressel), but there is an element of the unknown when promoting coaches from smaller ponds.

jmblue

November 14th, 2013 at 10:56 AM ^

This does not necessarily mean Briles isn't going anywhere.  A school that is interested enough will pay his buyout.   All it really guarantees is that he gets a raise.

LSAClassOf2000

November 14th, 2013 at 11:36 AM ^

"We've got a lot of bridges to cross. We feel like we're in the infant stages of our program, without question," said Briles, who turns 58 next month. "That's what makes it exciting."

I have to admit that I sort of admire the attitude that he has about this, taking Baylor on as if it were a project of sorts, because it seems like it was when he got there. If he is the sort of person who enjoys this sort of challenge, then it would take a lot to get him away from there, I would think. Taking underperforming programs and turning them into competitive entities takes a special skillset above and beyond football, and it seems like a lot of those folks like to see their efforts come to fruition somehow. That being said, you don't often see 10-year extensions - that's a big vote of confidence.