Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon
The post title speaks for itself. I am willing to break up the work duties with other folks who are interested. The videos are available on-line.
I am interested in reviewing how well Ryan, Campbell, Clark and others played, as well as how much Molk's injury slowed Michigan's offense during the game. If nothing else, we can put together some executive summaries on the game. Let me know if you'd like to take part.
Out now for 360 and tomorrow for ps3. Not trying to thread jack, just don't have enough points.
since the 2013 recruiting class is expected to fill up by the end of the week. #NotReallyButNotInconceivableEither
| Ln | Dn | Ds | O Form | QB | K | WR | D Form | Type | Play | Player | Yards | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
4 | 3 | Field Goal Option | 1 | 1 | 9 | FG Safe | Pass | FAKE | Glanda | 11 | ||||||||
| Dileo(-100) calls for a Fake FG pass without informing anyone except possibly Gibbons(+10) who makes a block and allows Dileo(+1) to heave the ball downfield. LongSnapper/WR Glanda(+ALL THE POINTS) makes a miraculous catch to keep the drive alive. | |||||||||||||||||||
I might be in the minority, but I do not think that was intended (by anyone) to be a fake. It seemed like Gibbons timing was off the entire game (including the game winner) and Dileo thought best to make something happen vs missing the kick.
No you're wrong. It was a called fake from the sidelines, except only Dileo and a few others got the call, hence the "WTF WAS THAT?!?!?!" execution
That they only practiced it in meeting rooms at the hotel so as to not tip anyone off. Not sure how that got confusing.
Isn't Brian going to do one eventually? It's the offseason people, no reason to rush.
It's f-in' June.
Or was that sarcasm. Me no can tell.
Yeah, it's f-n June, but if he did it now, we wouild still have all of June, July, and August to go.
I don't think we could really glean that much information from it, there will have been about 9 months of time practicing, etc between that game and Bama. Any information we would get would be trumped by any info we get from practices. Besides, it might just be me, but I'd really only be interested in reading it if Brian wrote it.
That sounds hard.
UFRs are exactly what we're not paying Brian to do.
I think that's called blasphemy or something like that . . .
it's a good idea and I would love to read it. I just don't have the time nor the expertise to help in any way. Still, I would love to see it if someone puts it together.
And why the negs to the OP? I mean, I know he can be a bit of a pain as a rule, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with this post. Some people on here take interactions here on a way too personal level. It's the internet!
I took a look at the defense at one point. I didn't grade out the offense.
http://touchthebanner.blogspot.com/2012/02/sugar-bowl-michigan-vs-virginia-tech.html
<UFR>
Brendan Gibbons (+1 bazillion) kicks the ball through the uprights whilst thinking of brunettes
</UFR>
That is the only part of the game (aside for crazy Dileoness) I want to remember
Opportunistic, but lucky
We were opportunistic, we were lucky, Virginia Tech was stupid.
That loss falls heavily on Beamer for not going for the field goal in the type of defensive game we were in. To which I say....thank you for the opportunity :)
Or lining up in a punt formation, calling a timeout, and then deciding to try and run a fake punt when a real punt would given you the ball back at midfield given how our offense was playing
I'll pass, UFR's are demanding enough to read much less put together.
