Another way too early CFB 2016 top ten
Dennis Dodd of CBS sports put together his Way too early top 10 list.
http://www.cbssports.com/video/player/collegefootball/599509571551/0/wa…
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. OU
4. LSU
5. osu
6. Michigan
7. Baylor
8. Notre Dame
9. Michigan state
10. Houston
I really think that sparty and bama end up atleast 3-5 spots lower. Clemson returns a good bit of talent, but largely benefit from a weak conference slate which will allow them to sneak into the playoffs. I think the winner of the game this year will be the number one seed in the playoffs. Houston could be the new Boise. The Big 12 is the same ol' Big 12 and will probably be left out. In the ACC, I see the winner of Notre Dame-Clemson making the playoffs with FSU playing spoiler in some way.
So why not throw a prediction at the wall and see if it sticks. Im going with Michigan going 11-1, beating both ohio st. and Sparty on the road and losing to either Iowa or Wisconsin. I would go with 12-0, but I have to be realistic. /s
January 11th, 2016 at 5:41 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 11th, 2016 at 5:55 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 11th, 2016 at 6:06 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 11th, 2016 at 6:20 PM ^
Don't see it anymore? Did your vision get bad?
January 11th, 2016 at 7:38 PM ^
In terms of Supermodels I've always found Upton to be a "meh" but, I mean, she's still a Supermodel. I wouldn't call her ugly by any sense of the term.
January 11th, 2016 at 8:20 PM ^
I don't get why she has such a huge following. She's hot, but she's not "mind-blowing" in any way. Body is okay (top-heavy)... I see better-looking girls in Miami every day. Just one man's opinion.
January 11th, 2016 at 11:34 PM ^
Yeah, maybe, but definitely thick through the middle. Not thick fat, but thick as in lack of definition between waist and hips.
January 11th, 2016 at 9:11 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 10:14 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:36 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 8:00 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 9:30 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 11th, 2016 at 7:30 PM ^
in a Michael Palin voice
January 11th, 2016 at 6:42 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 5:41 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 5:46 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 11:43 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 5:58 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:19 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 10:15 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:02 PM ^
Just as long as you're willing to delete your account, Teddy Blanks style, if you're wrong.
January 11th, 2016 at 6:07 PM ^
If you're not putting anything up for it as a bet then you're just trying to set yourself so say "I called it." So, who cares if you're predicting it? People predict the same thing every year.
January 11th, 2016 at 6:14 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:21 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:27 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 7:49 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 9:29 PM ^
January 12th, 2016 at 1:17 AM ^
So you're staking your internet reputation of predicting college football? Wow. No thanks. We'll all be better off just not giving a fuck instead.
January 11th, 2016 at 6:38 PM ^
This is the first year since 2006 that i can say - you very well may be right. I think Michigan has a hell of a shot this year.
2017 will be a trench rebuilding year.
January 11th, 2016 at 7:39 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 5:46 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:45 PM ^
also, the word six and the word sex are only one letter off. This is telling.
January 11th, 2016 at 5:48 PM ^
Bama I get.. Clemson idk anything about them... OU I get... LSU I get... OSU I don't get... Michigan I don't get... MSU I DEFF DON'T GET...
OSU is replacing everybody... so is MSU... Michigan has no QB... kind of a big deal in preseason rankings especially being ranked that high no?
Bama just gets the Saban pass.
January 11th, 2016 at 5:53 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 11th, 2016 at 5:53 PM ^
So only teams with a returning starter should be ranked???
I think evaluating coaches and their systems should be a pretty big factor when ranking teams.
January 11th, 2016 at 6:00 PM ^
The teams around us (Other than Bama cuz well Bama) have big game changers on offense returning... Michigan on the other hand not really...
OU: Baker Mayfield
LSU: Leonard Fournette
OSU: JT Barrett
ND: Malik Zaire
Baylor: Seth Russell
Clemson: Deshaun Watson
So yeah in a sense having a baller starter returning would be beneficial for these rankings...
January 11th, 2016 at 6:05 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:11 PM ^
Seth Russell returning from a broken neck isn't a question mark. Who's LSU's qb? Maliek Zaire who has started what 3 games in his career?
January 11th, 2016 at 6:42 PM ^
Brandon Harris.
January 11th, 2016 at 7:06 PM ^
Brandon Harris could be a very good QB. He has a good arm, thinks fast and can move the ball with his feet if he has to. He was stuck in Cam Cameron's offense this year. Miles has promised to modernize the offense a bit. I have no idea what that means to him, but I hope it means throwing the ball when other teams just say "fuck it" and put nine men in the box to stop Fournette.
January 11th, 2016 at 6:16 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 11th, 2016 at 7:23 PM ^
Barrett won't be as lethal without all them playmakers around him. They are some damn athletic dudes with a ton of experience that they are losing. Wowzers! I cant see their offense being anywhere close to as good as it has been the past 3 years. Not a chance.
January 11th, 2016 at 6:30 PM ^
ND loses there top RB, WR, LT, and LB and 3 of those 4 are lilkely first round picks. Sparty is losing a ton and will take a big step back.
January 11th, 2016 at 8:20 PM ^
what about the entire offensive line (save glasgow) and the entire receiving core... those are not big game changers... the only question is qb and well ....harbaugh
January 11th, 2016 at 10:20 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 5:55 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
January 11th, 2016 at 5:56 PM ^
I dont agree with this analysis. OSU is 50-4 under urban...you pretty much give them the bama treatment until he shows you they can't replace the talent they lose with their recruits. O'Korn has a documented track record (where he had a better season than Cook/Rudock as a freshman actually), so not sure if he goes in the "no qb" group.
January 11th, 2016 at 6:18 PM ^
January 11th, 2016 at 6:25 PM ^