Another day, another OSU recruiting success story

Submitted by Hotel Putingrad on July 5th, 2021 at 11:55 AM

For those of you scoring at home, that's 4 of the top 14 receivers in the class (1,7,8,14).

https://twitter.com/Hayesfawcett3/status/1412063962405883907?s=19

 

Jordan2323

July 5th, 2021 at 12:39 PM ^

Based on recruiting he would be the sixth highest ranked on their team. That assumes none of the others that are already there haven’t established themselves. It’s amazing how they can recruit all 4 and 5 star players and convince them they’ll get playing time. 

R. J. MacReady

July 5th, 2021 at 5:59 PM ^

It honestly should be a tougher sell. These 4/5* recruits will not all have time. They will have to compete - and that is a great thing. But in reality, many will need to transfer to play. If NFL is my goal, I want playing time. Winning is great but if I am not getting the experience - what good does it do me? Sheet. It doesn’t matter. UM not beating OSU anytime soon.

FrozeMangoes

July 5th, 2021 at 7:01 PM ^

If you end up being the starter at OSU you are basically guaranteed to be a draft pick.  Guys can go there for 2 years and see if they're next in line, if they're not they can transfer to pretty much any other school of their choice and have 3 years left.  Guaranteed playing time isn't a better path to the NFL.

wolve1972

July 5th, 2021 at 6:57 PM ^

Exactly. Everyone of these 4 & 5 star kids are confident in their ability and the last thing any of them want to hear is that they might have to sit the bench or wait their turn behind the kids already on the team.  They all think - well, most of them - that they can make an immediate impact

Perkis-Size Me

July 5th, 2021 at 12:23 PM ^

Survey says…..not great, Bob. 

2016 was the chance to close the gap and catch up. That door has been slammed shut, dead-bolted, and sealed up behind a ten foot brick wall. Otherwise the only way to catch up is something terrible has to happen to OSU off the field, or they have to do the exact opposite of what they’ve done for the last twenty years with their next HC search: fuck up the hire.

wolve1972

July 5th, 2021 at 7:46 PM ^

That 2018 game was the one that soured me. The year of the stupid ass "Revenge Tour."  Wearing those Effing shirts in Ohio Stadium before the game just totally pissing off their players and coaches and we all know the results. They just kept their mouths shut  That's totally on our dumbass HC for lack of control

DHughes5218

July 5th, 2021 at 3:53 PM ^

If JT is marked short, Game Over. Michigan wins, makes the Big Ten Title game, and most likely the CFP. You don’t think anything with the program improves because of it? I imagine there’s still a gap between the two schools, but I don’t think it’s as big as it is if Harbaugh starts 1-1 with a Big Ten title and CFP appearance in year two.

MSU-Hater

July 8th, 2021 at 12:41 PM ^

One can’t seriously believe that a single “bad call” near the end of the 2016 ‘Game’ would have altered the current trajectory of UM football.  Besides, that call didn’t end the game; we had another chance to stop them on the next set of downs from the 15, and instead our great D allows Samuel to waltz into the end zone on the very next play - untouched.  Also look at the stats, they had greater total yards, 1st downs, and most importantly T/O margin. I suggest this last stat was the real deciding factor in this game. Also, we had like 5 yards of offense in the 4th quarter?  Just hold onto the ball longer and we win.  Can’t make these type of mistakes against a team with elite talent and coaching and expect to win.  Fast forward to 2017…

We have good if not great on field talent.  The difference is preparation, play calling (both sides of the ball), and execution, and all of this rests with the coaching staff and specifically, the HC.  The only chance we have to win ‘the game’ is to improve in these key areas and that ain’t going to happen with JH calling the shots.  

Few on this entire blog talk like we have even the slightest chance to win against OSU and JH doesn’t believe it either.  We can win 9-10 every year but that won’t be good enough to win a B1G East division much less the elusive conference title.  Let’s see what happens…

Frank Chuck

July 5th, 2021 at 12:33 PM ^

Despite Nick Saban's Alabama being THE Death Star of the modern college football era, Auburn still won games in 2007, 2010, 2013, 2017, 2019. So against Nick Saban's juggernaut Alabama (which is far superior to Ohio State), Auburn is 5-9 despite inferior recruiting and coaching. And if you count games since Bama won its first MNC season (2009), then Auburn is 4-8.

The "Ohio State recruits too well" bullshit has to stop. There are coaches who would CRAWL over miles of broken glass to have as much talent as Michigan does on its roster. Michigan has enough talent to beat Ohio State.

Heck, just protecting home field would get us to 50%.

But Michigan's mostly *very* underwhelming QB play at Michigan has been a major hindrance. It's also a major shock to me especially given Harbaugh's reputation as a QB Whisperer (which frankly seems like bullshit for today's hyper-aggressive, faster-paced offenses).

East German Judge

July 5th, 2021 at 1:38 PM ^

Thank you for a well written and logical post.  Your Auburn point is excellent and this fan base has been numbed into a defeatist mode by the inept coaching over the last 15 years as our talent level is as good as Auburn's, and to say it is not would contradict all the chest thumping people do about all our draft picks.  Clear and simple, our coaching has been underwhelming and antiquated and a huge disservice to the players which are recruited and to this fan base. 

WolverineHistorian

July 5th, 2021 at 1:44 PM ^

I think there was a time or two where Auburn got to play Bama's backup quarterback but your point still stands  Alabama is superior to OSU, so the fact that Auburn has that many wins over them is kind of maddening.   

OSU's backup quarterback would put up 300 yards against our secondary any year, unfortunately. 

If we could just get a good quarterback, maybe we could beat somebody with a pulse on the road.  Then we could start to aim our hopes higher...like the pipe dream of beating OSU. 

Fielding Fan

July 5th, 2021 at 2:20 PM ^

OK...was reading the post about Auburn...and then I thought, well, maybe they recruit much better at Auburn than us since they are in the SEC, and I spent the last hour putting this info together based on star averages per player for the last decade from 247:

Michigan Recruiting (Avg. Rating 247 Composite)

2022---.8882

2021---.8999

2020---.9034

2019---.9078 (Citrus Bowl)

2018---.8875 (Peach Bowl)

2017---.9120 (Outback Bowl)

2016---.8986 (Orange Bowl)

2015---.8781 (Citrus Bowl)

2014---.8990                          

2013---.9095 (BWW Bowl)

Avg. = 89.84

 

Auburn Recruiting (Avg. Rating 247 Composite)---Auburn has beaten Alabama 3 of 8 times in this period of the Iron Bowl

2022---.8880

2021---.8838

2020---.9092 (Citrus Bowl)

2019---.9116 (Outback Bowl)

2018---.9022 (Music City Bowl)

2017---.8934 (Peach Bowl)

2016---.9065 (Sugar Bowl)

2015---.9016 (Birmingham Bowl)

2014---.8878 (Outback Bowl).        

2013---.8912 (BCS NC Game)

AVG. = 89.75

 

Auburn actually recruited WORSE than us during this decade, yet still somehow beat Alabama 3 times in 8 opportunities.

To me, that's coaching and lack of development.  Same level talent throughout the decade, yet we are 0-fer the decade.  There's no excuse....Bama is better than OSU.

AlbanyBlue

July 5th, 2021 at 2:57 PM ^

It's coaching and lack of player development, yes. But it's also players leaving the team, even when slated to start the next year. It's also the difference in scheme -- OSU has adapted to modern, offense-focused football favored by the rules (less offensive holding calls, more defensive holding calls and PI calls, etc) to create an offensive juggernaut. We are stuck focusing on taking our time on O, playing conservatively, and leaning on (a less-and-less able) defense. This is driven by a difference in philosophy -- OSU focuses on scoring points and crushing opponents, while Michigan focuses on a conservative approach with less variance.

If Michigan wants to beat OSU, they need changes in philosophy, scheme, development, AND coaching. Hopefully, that's coming with the staff changes.