2016 FB Realistic Recruiting Pool via 247 "Warm Interest" V3.0

Submitted by alum96 on

Hello football junkies.  A quiet time of the year so this post should get lost between favorite Leave it to Beaver episodes and Top bands of the 00s soon enough.  But for a moment - some football talk.

This is version 3.0 of a monthly segment I will do of  UM offers that are (as a floor) receiving "modest" interest, utilizing 247's "warm interest" gauge. V2.0 (April 24th) was here and V1.0 (March 26th) was here.

As always this has all the caveats which one should read before complaining about anything from this methodology. We know it's not perfect.  This is just a way to organize the overwhelming amount of offers (eventually headed to 200ish) down to a manageable level (40-50ish).

Aquaman was kind enough to comment on methodology of the "warm interest" on the first thread so I'll copy/paste that here:

The "temps" are usually set by how our analysts agree on where a certain prospect is leaning, but if a prospect reaches out and wants his page a certain way, we always go with their wishes. 

Good example is Jeffrey McCulloch (http://247sports.com/Player/Jeffrey-McCulloch-47648). Michigan is in his top group with Texas, Bama, LSU and probably A&M among others, but he wanted his page to reflect that he's even with everyone, even though we know they're not. 

It's about as good a basic gauge as you'll get on a prospect's interest. We try to avoid situations where it appears the interest is being embellished. In fact, I'd probably move Curtis Robinson and Isaiah Chambers among others to "cool" at this point.

The one group this methodology misses are those committed elsewhere who are strongly considering  UM - so for that I am just going by common knowledge.  I've only put Desmond Fitzpatrick, Tony Butler and Lavert Hill in this group.  If there are any others, just make a comment and I'll adjust.  (I am not including Hayes in this as he still seems like a unicorn.)

Also  it doesn't account for a position filling - i.e. multiple RBs are still "warm" interest for UM even if that position seems full.  I'll continue to include just in case.

------------------------------

If it seems quiet in the last month it is because it has been.  The prior 30 day period saw 4 commits; this 30 days had none.  And very little new movement at all in terms of strong interest - outside of Wr Brad Hawkins moving a bit towards UM and Lavert Hill and Donnie Corley moving away, not much happened.

Changes since V2.0:

  • New commits - 0
  • New Michigan "leaders" in ballz - none
  • New warm interest (Offense) - RB Kiante Enis, RB Vavae Malepeai, WR Jack Jones, WR Austin Mack, TE Michael Irvin Jr, OT Jean Delance, OT Will Fries
  • New warm interest (Defense) - DE Ron Johnson, DE Jimmie Taylor, DE Daniel Joseph, DT Keyshon Camp
  • No longer Warm - RB Robert Washington (Syracuse), #2 TE Devin Asiasi (Uncommited), OT Michael Jordan (OSU), DE Josh King (most think MSU early June)

 

OFFENSE  (24 players, 6 UM is a "leader")

Pos Name State Starz Ntl Rnk Pos Rnk Leader # Pred
RB Rakeem Boyd TX 3 406 23   N/A
RB Kiante Enis IN 3 713 52 UM 50% / Indiana 50% 2
RB Vavae Malepeai HI 3 742 53 100% Oregon 3
RB Toks Akinribade IN 3 799 60 UM 75% / Indiana 25% 4
               
FB N/A            
               
WR Dylan Crawford CA 4 68 8 USC 62% / ASU 25% 8
WR Jack Jones CA 4 70 4 USC 71% / UCLA+UM 14% 7
WR Ahmir Mitchell NJ 4 74 5 OSU 67% / Rutgers 22% 9
WR Donnie Corley MI 4 105 14 MSU 73% / ND 13% 15
WR Austin Mack IN 4 131 20 OSU 90% / UM 5% 20
WR Brad Hawkins NJ 4 142 25 South Car 56% / UM 31% 16
WR Tre Nixon FL 4 231 43 ND 75%  / Duke 25% 4
WR Desmond Fitzpatrick MI 3 328 56 UM 79% - Louisville commit 28
WR Donald Stewart NJ 3 885 130 UM 100% 5
WR Korey Banks GA 3 942 91 UM 100% 4
               
TE Naseir Upshur PA 4 137 4 Miami 40% / UM 20% 10
TE Michael Irvin Jr FL 3 601 26 Miami 100% 26
               
OT Ben Bredeson WI 5 26 4 Wisc 79% / UM 17% 24
OT Devery Hamilton MD 4 236 25 Maryland 50% / Stanford 50% 3
OT Jean Delance TX 4 94 11 Texas A&M 53% / OU 27% 15
OT Alex Akingbulu CA 3 392 39 UCLA 100% 2
OT Will Fries NJ 3 387 37 PSU 79% / Rutgers 21% 14
               
OG Terrance Davis MD 4 87 2 UM 60% / Maryland 40% 10
OG Michael Onwenu MI 4 183 6 UM 78% / OSU 22% 9
OG Josh Sills OH 3 1595 83   N/A

 

DEFENSE  (27 players, 3 UM is a "leader" - kicker not incl.)

Pos Name State Starz Ntl Rnk Pos Rnk Leader # Pred
DE Xavier Kelly KS 4 180 10 Nebraska 67% / UM 33% 3
DE Erick Fowler TX 4 77 5 Texas 100% 8
DE Ron Johnson NJ 4 201 11 PSU 67% / Rutgers 25% 12
DE Bryson Young CA 4 294 19 USC 100% 2
DE Connor Murphy AZ 3 358 22 UM 67% / ASU 33% 3
DE Jimmie Taylor NC 3 752 45 100% NC 2
DE Khalid Kareem MI 4 187 13 Bama 60% / MSU 20% 5
DE Daniel Joseph IL 4 258 16 UM 50% / MSU 50% 2
               
DT Rashan Gary NJ 5 1 1 Alabama 48% / UM 32% 31
DT Chris Daniels TX 4 114 14 TCU 56% , Texas A&M 33% 9
DT Keyshon Camp FL 4 213 20 Miami 50% / FSU 50% 2
               
LB Dontavious Jackson TX 4 123 5 Texas 55% / OU 27% 12
LB Jaquan Yulee VA 4 151 7 North Carolina 83% 6
LB Caleb Kelly CA 5 18 3 Oklahoma 100% 16
LB Devin Bush Jr FL 4 217 9 FSU 100% 17
LB Camilo Eifler CA 4 265 19 Washington 100% 2
LB Jonathan Jones FL 4 467 33 UM 78% / LSU 11% 9
LB LaMar Winston OR 4 230 16 83% Oregon / 17% UW 6
               
CB David Long CA 4 153 13 Washington 50% / USC 33% 6
CB Wayne Davis VA 3 329 30 OSU 56% / VA Tech 44% 9
CB Lavert Hill MI 4 179 17 UM 56% / MSU 38% - PSU commit 16
CB Lamar Jackson CA 3 473 29   N/A
CB Tony Butler OH 3 598 54 60% OSU / 40% UM - Pitt commit 5
               
S C.J. Pollard CA 4 251 10 100% USC 9
S Andrew Pryts PA 3 372 21 100% Penn State 11
               
ATH Devin White LA 4 86 8 83% LSU 18
K Quinn Nordin MI 3 1100 1 100% UM 11

 

*Bolded dudes who UM is a crystall ballz leader or 50/50.

I have the crystal ballz leader and # of predictions on the far right of the table.  The # of predictions is helpful as a 75%/25% split among 4 people is not as useful as that same split among 20 people.

The part where I over analyze:

  • Not much different then comments from last version.  I am perplexed at the lack of interest by TEs in a Jim Harbaugh offense.  And higher end wide receivers.  There is some mild movement towards UM from South Carolina on Brad Hawkins but that's about it in that department.  And #2 overall TE Devin Asiasi has gone from warm to cold.
  • Still tons of work to do on the defense.  A few new warm interests on the DL but nothing at all in the back 7 -- which was already void of interest.  Lavert Hill seemed to be going UM's way a month ago and now MSU's way if he does flip.  He is a King guy ... as is Corley.  Corley seems to be headed to MSU, and supposedly they want to play together.  Outside of that UM has almost no interest from anyone in the back 7 outside of Jonathan Jones.  Who was the only player in this group of warm interests to fall substantially since the last 247 ranking - he fell 130 spots overall and 11 within his position group.  There does not seem to be another LB in America with 1 crystal ball is in UM's direction - very strange considering all the playing time 2016 LBs could get very quickly at UM with all the losses in veterans UM will have at that position in the next 12 months.   Similar comments for DBs - aside from Hill and Pitt commit Tony Butler (2 guys committed elsewhere) there doesnt seem to be a crystal ball in America for a DB pointing to UM at this point.
  • Almost total lack of OH representation.  1 low rated OL and mid rated Pitt commit Butler...that's it.  Very un-Michigan situation.
  • Yes there is still time - but there are 28 less days then the last time we said there is time.  Aside from DT Gary and DE Murphy ...both guys with personal connections to UM personnel there is not much action out there on the defense.  Hopefully some movement happens around camp time in June.

BornSinner

May 23rd, 2015 at 6:42 AM ^

This may be unpopular given our expectations when we hired Harbaugh (and the media's expectations of a top 10 class), but I think it says something that many of Harbaugh's past players don't really go out of their way to speak highly of him unless nudged by the media. I mean Baldwin and Sherman may have been isolated incidents, but it seems to be telling now. 

Harbaugh doesn't seem to be a "player friendly" coach like Hoke was. Shit, even David Shaw was cold as fuck when asked about Harbaugh returning to CFB on CBS. Dude straight up said "I don't wanna talk about/I have nothing to comment on." 

Now this may all not matter if Michigan goes all Stanford circa 2007-2010 regardless of recruiting rankings, but it's still kinda disheartening at the moment. 

swan flu

May 23rd, 2015 at 8:17 AM ^

Can you give examples of players going out of their way (ie. not specifically asked by the media) to speak positively about other coaches? When Saban returned to college were other coaches making comments about how great he is?

BornSinner

May 23rd, 2015 at 8:28 AM ^

It's not a common thing, but neither are former players, co-workers, and employees coming out blatantly going "ehhhh" whenever people ask them about Harbaugh. Your standard PR answer is "good guy, good coach etc." Instead in Harbaugh's case you get 2 former guys speaking ill of him and a former employee going "I don't wanna talk about it." How often does that happen over the former standard response? 

Not saying it's a totally negative thing. I mean everyone loves Michael Jordan, and the dude's a total jerk but also GOAT. Harbaugh's personality could be the same due to his competitive nature as well. 

BornSinner

May 23rd, 2015 at 9:08 AM ^

Data? What data? My original comment was obvious projection from stated opinions from former Harbaugh players (Baldwin and Sherman) and co-worker (Shaw). 

It's just my thoughts on the reason why there "seems" to be a lag in recruiting atm. 

Considering all the other over the top reactions below in this thread, I think mine is fairly level headed. 

swan flu

May 23rd, 2015 at 9:11 AM ^

When you say that you are concerned because players aren't talking positively about harbaugh without considering whether that should actually be concerning, your conclusion is invalid. Your concern is unfounded. The data is how often other players talk about their coach without being prompted.

BornSinner

May 23rd, 2015 at 9:27 AM ^

No, my concern or thoughts are based on actual players and people talking about Harbaugh in an interesting/negative manner. 

Now whether said thoughts are true are completely up in the air. So as I said before, they are just my thoughts on the situation. 

I never stated them as fact, hence the "I think." 

You're trying to invalidate an opinion, which is already admittedly a projection. Kudos to you I guess. 

You should try invalidating the OP's thesis since he's actually providing examples and concrete info vs. my brainstorming. 

Magnus

May 23rd, 2015 at 10:37 PM ^

I think it's just kind of rare that players immediately leave a program and speak positively of their former boss. Regardless of who it is, coaches often rub people the wrong way. And oftentimes, the split is not amicable - it involves the coach getting fired, the player getting traded, the player getting released, etc.

Harbaugh himself said that players will not necessarily realize their coaches' positive traits and impact until years down the road. 

Bb011

May 23rd, 2015 at 12:57 PM ^

Your taking isolated incidents and trying to only use those to create a narrative you have already predetermined in your head. Frank gore publically was raving about him and talking about how he was family. Luck was also saying how great he is and how fortunate it was that he got the opportunity to be coached by him.

Bb011

May 23rd, 2015 at 12:57 PM ^

Your taking isolated incidents and trying to only use those to create a narrative you have already predetermined in your head. Frank gore publically was raving about him and talking about how he was family. Luck was also saying how great he is and how fortunate it was that he got the opportunity to be coached by him.

LDNfan

May 23rd, 2015 at 4:43 PM ^

Harbaugh brought to UM Co-ordinators that were either employed at P5 programs (USC) or in high demand (TAMU, etc.). They chose to leave those opportunities to work with Harbaugh. And, as has been noted on this board...Harbaugh already has a extensive coaching tree and he gets invited to damn near everything and is doing everything...so someone must like him. 

His former QB is participating in the Air Raid camp. Frank Gore spoke highly of him when he left the niners as did others. Even Boone's 'criticism' was in many ways complementary. 

Basically, the only real criticisms I've seen are that he's a tough perfectionist that sometimes pushes so hard that he get's on peoples nerves....which is probably the type of thing a lot of people say about the vast majority of successful coaches.

Pelini's Cat

May 22nd, 2015 at 11:22 PM ^

Recruiting just makes no sense. Hoke is a fat, unimpressive, bad coach who had no track record of putting players in the draft, and he consistently got top 15 classes, and then we land one of the best coaches in America and we can't even recruit tight ends. Like seriously: "why should you play tight end at Michigan? like 75% you will be drafted."



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Harbeezy

May 22nd, 2015 at 11:31 PM ^

Hoke may have been bad but his players loved him. Even when the ship was sinking the fact that we held on to as many recruits this past cycle as we did shows how huge a coaches personality is to recruits. Everyone knows Harbaugh is a "unique" guy and maybe that's just rubbing recruits the wrong way. Plus I'd be way more concerned if this was the outlook after all of the events this summer.

Lakeyale13

May 23rd, 2015 at 8:41 AM ^

Hoke's players loved him cause he was the "Fun Uncle" that is fantastic to be around but isn't going to hold you accountable or dish out tough love if you are underperforming. A guy like that will get recruits, but perhaps recruits with the desire for a coach like Hoke. Saban and Harbaugh are cut out of similar molds. They will love their players, but in a completely different way. They will expect excellence and demand their players work in such a way to achieve it, not because it is crazy / unrealistic, but because we have quality football players that can obtain such levels of performance. No free passes will be given. Hoke either did t agree with this philosophy, or had absolutely no clue whatsoever how to carry it out. I believe once recruits see how Michigan actually is a quality football team, they will heat up their interest.

Lakeyale13

May 23rd, 2015 at 8:42 AM ^

Hoke's players loved him cause he was the "Fun Uncle" that is fantastic to be around but isn't going to hold you accountable or dish out tough love if you are underperforming. A guy like that will get recruits, but perhaps recruits with the desire for a coach like Hoke. Saban and Harbaugh are cut out of similar molds. They will love their players, but in a completely different way. They will expect excellence and demand their players work in such a way to achieve it, not because it is crazy / unrealistic, but because we have quality football players that can obtain such levels of performance. No free passes will be given. Hoke either did t agree with this philosophy, or had absolutely no clue whatsoever how to carry it out. I believe once recruits see how Michigan actually is a quality football team, they will heat up their interest.

Danwillhor

May 23rd, 2015 at 4:31 AM ^

Hoke was VERY likeable as a guy & he not only targeted but landed a ton of highly ranked players that wanted a teddy bear as their HC. It wasn't only that but a common thing and his recruits remembered a competitive Michigan. Right now were not even the 3rd strongest program in the B1G. IMO, Harbaugh is not only fighting VERY effective negative recruiting but I can't help but think that the negative recruiting is largely based on his personality - the one thing he is never changing or hiding. I've said before that he isn't for everyone and many kids want to at least believe while being recruited that their HC will be their best buddy. Yet, because of that I know I'd rather have 20 3* kids that Harbaugh likes over 20 4+* kids that Hoke liked. Hoke didn't always miss but he clearly did as much as he hit & those he didn't miss on had a losing attitude instilled in them, admit it or not. Too few seemed to really care when they lost under Hoke, himself included. I don't think this class will be very highly ranked. Winning quickly could certainly help but I think continued success will be what gets kids lining up again. I'll say again that I think this is truly a rebuilding job far greater than most of us fans care to realize right now. It might set in if we get clubbed by Utah or competitively start 2-2 or 1-3 (which is very possible). We have to remember that on top of everything above, these recruits didn't grow up watching Michigan be MICHIGAN. We're just a program with good facilities that has a great history but has spent a decade rarely being competitive. We have to overcome a lot, believe it or not. Finally, for the first time as a HC Harbaugh is not in California. It's easier to pull a Cali/Southern kid to a building program in Cali than Michigan. I'm not even saying this as a pessimistic fan as much as a realistic & logical fan. I love Michigan but I'm no homer. I call it how I see it, whether I like it or not. I don't let what I'd like to happen sway my thoughts. We can't let the Honeymoon quickly turn to a jaded marriage the second we lose or realize every 5* isn't begging to be coached by Jim Harbaugh. We can't sell history anymore. We finally have to build a new one. It's not panic, it's what I think is obvious to anyone with the slightest amount of legitimate objectivity. As before, thanks for the work, Alum96! Go Blue!

team126

May 22nd, 2015 at 11:27 PM ^

He shouted to the crowd 'Buckle Up!" yesterday or the day before yesterday.

While stars do matter I don't think it would be bad to get a bunch of lower ranked recruits who have the stomach to fight.

KyleMullins

May 22nd, 2015 at 11:27 PM ^

Really thought we would have like 10-12 guys right now, with big time players wanting to play here.  

Whats going on ?  Why are things so slow right now?  Seems like everyone is picking up kids right now.  

michiganfanforlife

May 22nd, 2015 at 11:32 PM ^

Then they will sign. All the "experts" think we will suck this year, and I bet that gives some of these kids pause. Just wait until we start showing the nation Michigan is back. Then they will start flooding in. These kids are all about who is good right now, and we're not there in the national perception category just yet

alum96

May 23rd, 2015 at 12:38 AM ^

But a lot of kids will be off the board by the "time we win" i.e. November 2015.  Much harder to flip someone - esp a lot of these guys who will have been committed for many months (half a year+) then get an original committment.  There are only so many top 300 players out there to be had and a lot are going to programs that are expected to be competing for conf championships.  We're not competing with Vanderbilt for most of these guys.

AZBlue

May 23rd, 2015 at 2:46 AM ^

Michigan has only had 2 or 3 10+ win seasons in these kids' ENTIRE lives.... so in the words of Mork "we are selling hope" at least to some extent.

Couple that with the facts that: 1. most of our coaching staff doesn't have recent ties to the HS coaching community   2. Our regional rivals are coming off impressive runs of success   3. We are targeting an unprecedented amount of kids from way out of the region who may wait for official visits   4. Many of the highest kids wait until late in the process to commit and you are faced with a slow start in recruiting. 

Key to 2016 recruiting imo is landing top-quality recruits at Receiver, LB, and DT.  TE would be a bonus but Harbaugh's offense will make most players look better as long as he gets enough numbers.  OL needs numbers too, but if they can add Bredeson they will have 2 top 100-150 tackles which is a pretty good pull.

On the bright side - Sam Webb is hinting that we may have a silent-verbal from a 4-star, one that isn't visiting in June --  and rumblings look good for the receiver from NJ and the LB from Florida who are visiting in June.

alum96

May 23rd, 2015 at 6:10 AM ^

I will do research on that...

No, in all seriousness I meant there are only so many uncommitted top 300s to be had //// and less when you consider those who will leave the south.  Then add those who will seriously consider UM in any scenario on earth.  And its a smaller #.  So its not a huge pool to begin with and we are not in play for too many in any fashion at this point. 

Waiting 6 months for this potential 8 win season to showcase to recruits when they are being recruited by programs projected for 10-11 this year is also notsomething I see as a viable way to win over a ton of recruits.  We are going to have to be selling NFL development more than anything at this stage with the type of coaches we have. 

Victor Hale II

May 23rd, 2015 at 6:15 AM ^

Yeah I figured that's what you meant. Just being a smart-ass. On a more serious note, thanks for putting this together. I do follow recruiting, and would perhaps be a bit more worried if it wasn't (A) Harbaugh and (B) the fact that his strategy seems to be to go nationwide first and see what happens. At least it has been to this point.