Three And Out: An Excerpt Comment Count

Brian

imageStrong language contained herein. Three and Out is a book about the short, tumultuous reign of Rich Rodriguez at Michigan.

[star wars text scrolling]

The week after Michigan collapsed against Illinois in 2009, they prepare to take on Purdue.

A weary Rodriguez wearily surveys his weary troops, because he has to or the media will write about other things…

[/star wars text scrolling]

------------------

The Friday night before the Purdue game, Rodriguez dug at his meal like a hungry prisoner who was sick of eating the same gray food every night. When I told him I was surprised that the guys seemed loose, like they were still having fun and staying positive, he stared at his food, paused, and said, “I don’t care.

“I don’t care anymore about trying to analyze the psychology of these guys, especially for the press. I just want them to freakin’ play. I’m sick of it.”

Sick of what?

“Everything. I’m sick of the situation I’m in. I’m sick of the crap I’ve got to deal with every week. I’m sick of people not taking responsibility.” A case could be made that all happiness is feeling like you have possibilities. When someone wins the lottery, he’s happy not because he won the lottery but because he suddenly has dozens of options he didn’t have the day before.

But the corollary is also true: All unhappiness is feeling like your options are shrinking and the world is closing in on you. That you’re trapped. Rich Rodriguez’s options were shrinking. By the time he arrived in Ann Arbor, it was clear he could not go back the way he had come. But after only twenty-one games at Michigan, it had become just as clear there would be only one way he could stay: winning football games. And fast.

--------

Every Friday night, between the dinner and the movie, the offense and defense met separately with their coaches to go over the scouting report one last time. But this week, instead of reviewing the opponent, they reviewed a tape of their practices that week. The message was simple: The Illini didn’t beat the Wolverines. The Wolverines beat the Wolverines.

Job 1: Hold on to the damn ball. There was a reason John Heisman famously showed his players a football and said, “Gentlemen, it is better to have died a small boy than to fumble this football.”

But John Heisman never met Tate Forcier. On one play Rodriguez showed that night, Forcier held the ball like an oversized sponge and swung it around like he was washing his windows with it. Sure enough, the defense soon forced a fumble.

“High and tight, high and tight, high and tight,” Rodriguez said with relative calm. “Anything else is selfish. It shows disrespect for your teammates, and I know you’re not selfish, and I know you don’t want to disrespect your teammates.”

Here he was, going into the tenth game of the season, reviewing something they had covered on the first day of spring ball, the first day of summer practice, and just about every day since. It was pretty clear Rodriguez was tired of that, too.

But he knew it came with coaching young players, and he usually enjoyed the teaching process. But they were repeating the same lessons too often, which became especially aggravating when he had no idea how many lessons they would get.

Job 2: In the spread option offense, the quarterback has to take three steps and throw it. Not four steps. Not five steps. And no hitches, either. Three and throw. Three and throw. The timing was simple but exact—and it was everything. Any freelancing and incompletes, sacks, and interceptions soon followed.

And that’s exactly what Rodriguez saw next on the practice tape: Forcier taking three steps (an improvement), seeing his receiver open— but then hitching, which allowed the linebacker to cover the receiver. Rodriguez was calm but firm. “I’m sure I will not have to see on Monday any tape of any Michigan quarterback taking three steps and a hitch when he should be taking three steps and throwing.”

Next play, same thing, but this time Forcier threw it behind the receiver. The linebacker just missed making the interception.

“That one’s late. Why? Three and hitch instead of three and throw. I’ve been doing this for twenty years! I didn’t just wake up and come up with this thing. We have refined this over time. We know what works. We’re not guessing! Three steps and throw! THROW! You’ve got to trust the timing!”

But it was really more than that. The quarterbacks had to trust the system—and the coaches who had created it.

The flipside was just as simple: The coaches had to remember that Forcier was still a freshman. And even though Rodriguez’s quarterbacks on every team he’d coached eventually won Conference Player of the Year, not one of them did it his first season.

--------------

If the Illinois game could be reduced to Michigan’s four tries from the 1-yard line, Michigan’s season likewise boiled down to four great chances to win just one game to secure a bowl bid: Michigan State, which ended in overtime; Iowa, which ended one pass short of a winning field goal attempt; Illinois, which broke on the 1-yard line; and Purdue, which looked like an eminently winnable game. But like the fourth-and- 1 play against Illinois, the pressure mounted with each failed attempt. This was Rodriguez’s last best chance at match point.

Blow it against the Boilermakers, and the odds would only get taller against Wisconsin, and taller still against Ohio State, still in the hunt for a national title. Collars were tight in Ann Arbor.

The quarterbacks didn’t think Purdue would be a pushover, either. “They’re good, they play hard,” Sheridan said later that night in his hotel room. “Much harder than Illinois.” And then, unable to let Illinois go: “I still can’t believe we lost to those guys.”

“Don’t let ’em beat you twice,” Forcier said, as a half- joking warning they’d all heard a hundred times. “Man, we just got to win again. That’s been driving me fucking nuts. We just got to win again.”

Comments

ijohnb

October 28th, 2011 at 1:39 PM ^

there was ever a realistic option other than Hoke.  I actually believe, and I do really believe this, that a lot of that "coaching search" was contrived by Brandon.  I think that he attached Michigan's name to a lot of hot coaches through various channels, Harbaugh, Gruden, Miles, to bolster Michigan's national perception.  Harbaugh and Michigan, Gruden and Michigan, Miles and Michigan.  People heard these sound bites, they assumed that these coaches were giving serious consideration to the position, and it confirmed in their mind that Michigan was still a national player.  Note how there was actually never a formal offer made to anybody besides Hoke.  I think it was Hoke from the beginning.

Hannibal.

October 28th, 2011 at 1:48 PM ^

If it was Hoke from the beginning, then it should have been Hoke on the Monday after the latest OSU debacle.  The near collapse of the recruiting class and the bowl game humiliation were the predictable, inevitable results of Brandon idiotic decision to let the program float rudderless for a month and a half.

jmblue

October 28th, 2011 at 4:08 PM ^

If it was Hoke from the beginning, then it should have been Hoke on the Monday after the latest OSU debacle.
I strongly disagree. If it had been Hoke in November, the diehard Harbaugh guys would have been bitterly disappointed and might never have come around to the Hoke hire, the way the Miles crowd never embraced Rodriguez. Brandon handled the process in a way that threw a bone to everyone - the RR, Harbaugh and Miles factions. RR took himself out of the running with the bowl debacle. Harbaugh said no. Miles had a conversation and then confirmed he was staying at LSU. Then, in came Hoke as a knight in shining armor. At that point we had to embrace him - who else was going to take the job?

yoopergoblue

October 28th, 2011 at 7:27 PM ^

Regardless of the effects of "the process" on the recruiting class wouldn't you say that Hoke & Co. more than made up for it in their pretty good 1 month haul in 2011 and our #1 recruiting class for 2012?  I also don't think that we get Mattison as our DC if Hoke is hired after the OSU game and that's if Hoke would even leave at that time since he had a bowl game to coach.

Section 1

October 28th, 2011 at 1:27 PM ^

Really; the argument about whether Rich Rodriguez got a fair shake in Ann Arbor is over.  He didn't.  There can't be any serious dispute about that any more. 

I think it used to be accepted wisdom that a coach needed four years to get settled and get his system and players in place.  Didn't Bo Schembechler say that?  Haven't others agreed with that?  Is there anything that is the slightest bit controversial about that?

Not only did Rich Rodriguez not get the duration of his contract (6 years) he didn't even get the 4 years that sensible people agreed was necessary to really judge.  And not only that, Rodriguez only got 3 years with constant rear-guard battles that he never should have had to deal with!

There just can't be an argument any more.  Rich Rodriguez was treated badly, and unfairly, while he was in Ann Arbor.  Period.  End of argument.  And the only way to explain Rodriguez's premature firing is not the result on the field, but David Brandon's feeling that the entire atmosphere surrounding Michigan football was too poisonous to continue.  That conclusion on the part of Brandon might actually have been the correct managerial decsion, but it has nothing to do with Rich Rodriguez's performance.  Rodriguez had to pay the price for Michigan's failings.

And there are real villains in this story.  Rosenberg, and all of Rosenberg's friends an ennablers.  To a lesser degree Carr, and many of Carr's players, alums et cetera.  To an even lesser degree, Bill Martin and Mary Sue Coleman.

And just about all of the villains are still in Ann Arbor, while Rodriguez is gone.

Section 1

October 28th, 2011 at 1:39 PM ^

Michigan went 3-9 with gaping personnel holes.  Then Michigan went 5-7, which really could ahve and should have been 6-6, which would have gotten a bowl bid.  Then Michigan went 7-5 and got to a New Year's Day bowl.  The prospects for 2011 looked good.  Recruiting lloked pretty good, and by all accounts would have looked better if the whole country wasn't tallking about Rodriguez being on the hot seat.  And without Michigan football alums talking about how Michigan's head coach wasn't "BEYOND the hot seat..."

That's steady improvement, with the prospect of more significant improvement following a period in which almost every major obstacle that was imaginable for Rodriguez (press attack, NCAA investigation, crticial injuries, staff issues) had been raised an d put behind him.  IF, that is, Michigan would have gotten behind him 110%.

Kilgore Trout

October 28th, 2011 at 1:46 PM ^

I think it's incomplete to tout steady improvement in record without mentioning steady decline on defense.  I don't see how a reasonable assessment could show that there was any prayer for the defense to ever get any better.  With all that happened, it seems pretty apparent to me that Rodriguez got fired because his defense started bad and became legendarily bad with no sign of improvement on the horizon.

Needs

October 28th, 2011 at 2:06 PM ^

It's also incomplete to tout steady improvement without mentioning that we were some degree of uncompetitive in all of our losses, each of which featured us down by at least 21 at some point in the second half.

And I don't think we ever had the ball with the chance to tie or take the lead in any of the games we lost. We actually won all the close games last year, in contrast to the year before. We easily could have been 4-8 (ND, Illinois, Indiana), it's harder to make a compelling case that we could have been better than 7-6.

M-Wolverine

October 28th, 2011 at 2:44 PM ^

"First year you lose big, then next year you lose close, then 3rd year you win close, and then you win big."  The problem was, in year three, we may have been losing close, but we were still losing BIG.  So the progression wasn't a confidence building thing, necessarily. It was teetering.  It COULD have worked.  But then it's risk assessment...if it does, we're better faster...if it doesn't, well, recruiting and the program are really hit up, and we may be in a hole even longer. No one really knows the answer; we only know which way Brandon came down on that assessment.

Because it wouldn't just be Braylon saying "hot seat"...it'd be all of America, at one of the most prominent programs.  And that would make recruiting really hard unless we were winning 10+ games.  And with that defense, and whatever we cobbled together as a defensive staff, I'm not sure how realistic that was.  In any case, I think the book certainly shows that while Rich's competitive side would want to stick out and prove everyone wrong, I'm not sure for the emotional health of him or his family getting let go wasn't the more merciful thing than having to put up with it all another year on the hope that it got a lot better.

dcmaizeandblue

October 28th, 2011 at 1:34 PM ^

The fact that you didn't mention the colossal failings on the defensive side of the ball through two different coordinators and his stubborness to change his scheme really hurts your point.  You can't say the results on the field didn't contribute because that is ALL that matters in the end.  

Kilgore Trout

October 28th, 2011 at 1:48 PM ^

1.  It's a leap of faith to say that "everything would have been different" with Casteel. 

2.  If you take that leap of faith, it's equally as damning in my mind if Rodriguez's success as a coach is so tied to one particular person as his DC that he's hopeless without him.

Section 1

October 28th, 2011 at 3:03 PM ^

In fact, what is your position?  Do you even have a position?  Your position might be that, 'Nobody can possibly know; it is speculation.'  And that's fine.  I'd be a fool not to understand that.  But here's somebody who is in a rather good position to know the answer to the question, at least insofar as any person can know the answer to a hypothetical.

And I am not forgetting that as you criticized my speculation on this topic (Casteel), you were tossing out your own theories; that perhaps there was some bad blood or friction between Rodriguez and Casteel.  You, and others, plced me in the Tin Foil Hat Brigade for my writing.  And now, with an insider having written the story, it appears that I was as close to right as was humanly possible.

M-Wolverine

October 28th, 2011 at 3:22 PM ^

So I'll respond. A guy who has worked for Rich saying that "we would have succeed if.." is a list that could be a mile long because, well, he worked for Rich. If he had that much insight into the situation, and was so sure about it, he could have pulled Rich aside and said "hey, forget about the last $500,000 in the weight room, and go get a defensive coordinator because you're clueless there".  But in hindsight, everything is a possible excuse for not succeeding.

You're not right; and I never said there was one reason Casteel didn't come, like you did. $$$$$$$ was your only reason.  And the book doesn't say that (though I'll agree, Bacon tries to paint it like that much as you have). It says he was coming, even for less money, until Stewart got the job. I would think the possibility of coaching for your successful head coach (Rich) with all the guys you've worked with (and who you're probably more confident will succeed than interim boy) in a place that is much more likely to get you a head coaching gig if you're successful (which, as stated, I'm sure they all thought they would be...and should have thought that) is certainly worth a lot more than $10k a year, and some nebulous "guarantee", unless either A. you're totally mercenary, and all about the money, no matter how little (and short-sighted), or B. you like living in WV, and don't want to uproot your family. Considering he was ready to leave and be completely happy with the money Michigan was going to offer him until he knew he could stay comfortably in WV, I like 2 much more than 1.

Which is what I said at the time, and say now: Money may have been a factor, but it wasn't the only one like you said, and Michigan didn't horribly low ball him (it wasn't like he was making Mattison money, and was offered way less...it was $10k!), but probably other factors...tongue in cheek I said maybe he didn't like Rich...because there was as much basis for that as your theory...but more realistically, maybe he liked it there and didn't want to move his family. And his loyalties to that were OBVIOUSLY greater than those to Rich. Because in hindsight it makes sense that he probably made the right choice...but when it was happening, the idea that Rich wasn't headed to amazing things here was non-existent.  So he wouldn't be worried about paltry sums of money...he had to be worried about bigger things.  Like family.  So when he had no choice, he was willing to come to Michigan (because moving is better than being unemployed for his family); and when he could stay where he was at (for yes, a bit more money, but guarantee or not, not more job security, because NO ONE was betting Stewart would outlast Rich in their HC positions) so as to not uproot his family, he took it.

I bet Rich would say it would have made all the difference.  I'm sure a lot of people close to Rich had a lot of woulda, coulda, shoulda stories...I think they get to tell them all in the book, since they're the only ones who would talk to Bacon.  And that's fine. It very well might have made a difference.  But it's still just one man's opinion...one who is tight with Rich and would naturally look to defend him.  But it doesn't explain how that turns into mismanged defensive staff hires, interaction, firings, and the inability to do any of that at the same salary scale that Michigan still managed to win more games than anyone with over 40 years (so obviously it's not impossible to find at least mildly competent guys to do the job for that wage, even if it's not ideal; it must be hard to find utter incompetents at that wage...though it could be said that given a chance without interference, it might have been done right the first time with Shafer). Unfortunately, the book doesn't bother to even try and explain any of that.   Which is curious, because in house politics that we've heard rumors on for years is good for more rumor-mongering....but in staff politics we've hear rumors on for years apparently isn't worth a mention. FWIW.

Section 1

October 28th, 2011 at 3:43 PM ^

And central to your premise is that I had claimed it was just money that prevented Michigan form getting Casteel.

Since you are often careful about the things you post, and since you are so critical of the things I have posted, I am doing this; going back into the Board archives to prove absolutely that I did not say what you claim, and indeed I said the opposite.

My own freaking blog, which was rather graciously built for me as a result primarily of personal warring between you and me, has the story:

 

But I do want to return to the issue of Jeff Casteel.

I haven’t really written or done anything very daring. I’ve been aware of the general rumors, which are largely confirmed by circumstantial evidence, although heretofore the sourcing has been a bit spotty. And if my “story” (certainly not any sort of “reporting”) were to be put into Cliff Notes form, it would run something like this:

That Jeff Casteel was all set to come to Ann Arbor with Rich Rodriguez in December of 2007. Casteel was going to join Calvin Magee, Dusty Rutledge, Rod Smith, Bruce Tall, Barwis & Co., etc., etc. in Ann Arbor. But that Casteel essentially changed his mind, when Bill Stewart was hired as Rodriguez’s permanent replacement. Casteel’s decision was based on a couple of things. One was that he was making okay money — good by Big East standards — in West Virginia, and Two was that with the surprising Stewart “permanent” hire, Casteel could stay with some security and perhaps even greater freedom to run his 3-3-5 defense under Stewart who was sort of his equal. Those two professional factors, plus the simple fact of keeping his family secure and settlled in West Virginia (Casteel has two school-aged daughters) were what kept Casteel at WVU. 

http://michiganinthemedia.wordpress.com/2011/10/ 

Now, I don't know what your limits of embarassment are, M-Wolverine.  I'm confused about what sort of direct refutation it takes, to get you to back down and shut up.  But you wrote to me; "$$$$$$$ was your only reason."  And, well, that's just plainly, purely wrong.

Your apology will be accpeted in a reply post.

M-Wolverine

October 28th, 2011 at 4:06 PM ^

I meant you were wrong about the book flat out stating that he didn't come because of money alone. I never said I was right about any theories....just that they were equally valid as yours (which were all "pulled out of our respective asses"). I'm glad you manage to find the one post where you weren't  raving lunatic, and ignored the many, many post not just to me, but jmblue and others, where you would throw out (often in threads that had nothing to do with the topic) that 3 times Casteel didn't come because he was low-balled by the Athletic Department, with no other reason given for it.  I'm not taking the time to look them all up, because I've already proven multiple times that your memory is selective, and you often say two different things when you're in full spittle-flecked mode or not. (Remember "I never said I root for Rich over Michigan" oopsie?). That you like to pick and choose only the fact that suit you, and remember what you like, is your deal. That's fine. I wish you'd actually use the blog, as recommended.

You're right, I am embarrassed that I took the time to be reasonable with you. That was my mistake in thinking it wasn't a waste of time. Bye.

CompleteLunacy

October 28th, 2011 at 2:06 PM ^

I mean, I understand part of that is on Michigan for not opening up the check book enough to get him. But the other part falls on RR for not convincing Casteel to come and, with that, not accepting the Michigan job unless he was for sure able to get Casteel.

But regardless, just because you don't get your #1 option doesn't mean the 3 years of defensive failings aren't your fault. The "what if" game is stupid. He didn't get Casteel,. OK, then get another guy. The guys he got instead of him failed spectacularily because (1) they weren't allowed to run their own defense and  (2) didn't mesh well with RR's assisstants. What part of those two reasons isn't RR's fault? You may add a third option that RR wasn't allowed much money to get the guy he wanted...but I argue the two reasons I mention heavily outweigh the third.

DelhiGoBlue

October 29th, 2011 at 9:39 PM ^

no way of knowing exactly what different means. If one is to believe all the poison that was directed at RR, then what RR needed was a vocal loyal lieutenant in his corner, and he needed that person from day one. Evidently that person was not Calvin Magee, somebody that has been granted a complete pass for the lost years. Maybe Casteel could have been that guy that could or would have taken some heat from RR and who could have allowed RR to remain a bit more insulated and provided some moral support. I find it interesting that little has been said or discussed about that facet of his tenure at Michigan.

Section 1

October 28th, 2011 at 1:44 PM ^

And I'll listen, politely and with interest.

But when the inarguable starting point is, "Rodriguez didn't get a fair shake," then I think that I am entirley correct.

I've posted this before, many times, on MGoBlog -- I am not arguing X's and O's with Magnus or with Brian Cook or anyone else.  All that I have argued is that, as a starting point, Rodriguez was treated unfairly.  Badly, and unfairly.  That's on "Michigan," if there is any one such thing as "Michigan."

Go Ugly Early

October 28th, 2011 at 1:59 PM ^

It's remarkable how far Lloyd set back this program with some of his actions (however, a more in control AD would have squashed that so the blame isn't all on him). Trying to block the Miles hire over petty jealously (wasn't Carr famously upset with Miles negative recruiting against him) and then undermining the coach that was hired. It's hard to fathom where we'd be talent wise on year 4 of the Les Miles regime.

HenneGivenSunday

October 28th, 2011 at 1:25 PM ^

We should probably treat Rich Rod like any ex-girlfriend.  Look back fondly at the good times, but always remember that there's a reason we're not together anymore.  That reason is "We can do better."  Rich Rod was the suddenly popular girl that was "It" for the moment, we decided to make him our girlfriend and it turned out that she had an STD that made our defense completely non-existant. 

Caesar

October 28th, 2011 at 1:32 PM ^

Back when I read Stewart Mandel, I came across an SI article comparing the coaching situation at GaTech and Michigan. In it, Mandel argued that the difference wasn't the quality of the coaches, but their ability to get their players to buy into the system.

This doesn't confirm it for me one way or another. I also haven't read the book. But given the lack of support from those at Michigan (some alums, coaches, &c.), I can't help but think that even if Mandel was on to something, it couldn't all be blamed on Rodriguez. It's hard to buy into someone when influential folks around your own program don't support him.

On the other hand: horrible defensive hires.

jg2112

October 28th, 2011 at 1:44 PM ^

My God.

I've been called someone who obsesses over things on occasion, but really, thank God there is a game tomorrow.

I could really do without hearing from or about Rich Rodriguez or Mike Rosenberg ever again.

Section 1

October 28th, 2011 at 1:49 PM ^

I don't think many people suspected that Purdue was capable of an upset win over Illinois.  So yeah it is going to be an interesting game.

And of course we all know that Rodriguez's successor has now gone undefeated-up-to-MSU just like Rodriguez did.  And so this is where it gets interesting.

Because if memory serves me, you are one of those principled guys who has said that if any Michigan coach had Rodriguez's record, you'd expect him to be fired just like Rodriguez.

jg2112

October 28th, 2011 at 1:56 PM ^

My belief is that if 15-30 gets you fired at Minnesota, 15-22 sure as heck gets you fired at MIchigan.

But the comparisons between Hoke and Rodriguez are pointless now unless you're a masochist. The offense needs improvement, the defense is beyond splendid given its inherent deficiencies, and there is a belief around the program again. Recruiting is going well, people are pulling for the team, and there is optimism.

All that's really necessary is for us all to support the team and not fall into these petty arguments that spoiled the last three years of our Michigan fandom. Unfortunately, and I don't blame Bacon or his publisher for this, but this book is the worst thing I could have spent Tuesday and Wednesday reading because I had just gotten used to laughing at the thought of watching Tony Gibson on TV and not being scared to death that he was coaching my favorite team's defensive backs.

Section 1

October 28th, 2011 at 2:15 PM ^

I was going to post a Wendesdy night game(s) Open Thread and comment on how "splendid" the Pitt spread offense looked under Calvin Magee & Co., and what good tackling skills the Pitt d-backs were displaying (under Tony Gibson).  And then I was going to quote from the section of Three and Out in which Scott Schafer had thrown a minor wrench into the recruiting of Denard Robinson by talking to Denard about being a d-back, and how Tony Gibson has straightened things out.

I expect that you and I will be in touch on this Board during the next stretch of Purdue, Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska and Ohio State.  (Sorry, Coach Hoke; it will always be "Ohio State" to me because, like, there really is an Ohio University.)

A2Fan

October 28th, 2011 at 1:47 PM ^

 Hercule Poirot:

"If all these people are not implicated in the crime,

then why have they all told me, under interrogation,

stupid and often unnecessary lies? Why?"


Dr. Constantine:

"Doubtless, Monsieur Poirot, because they

did not expect you to be on the train.

They had no time to concoct their cover story."


Hercule Poirot:

"I was hoping someone other than myself would say that."

dahblue

October 28th, 2011 at 1:54 PM ^

It's hard to believe that RR actually said the following:

I’m sick of people not taking responsibility

Whether he wasn't given a fair shake or not; he still ran the show.  He chose the defense that got worse each year.  If anyone needs to learn to take responsibility, it's Rich.  

JimBobTressel

October 28th, 2011 at 1:58 PM ^

perhaps if rich rod wanted less stress, he should have surronded himself with BETTER COACHES and MORE DEFENSIVE TALENT.. Hi Tony Gibson! Hi Jay Hopson! No, I don't need Casteel really!

GTFO Shafer, go resurrect Syracuse football when i'm not micromanaging you!

Hi Greg Robinson, that stuffed beaver looks cuddly. Want to run a 3-3-5? Here, just watch this YouTube video.

Defense? Important? The only reason we have a defense is for the offense to practice against. I'm sure it's not important for them to be ready on Saturday.

my god, I'm in love with undersized tweeners, raw recruits, and athletic "projects" on defense. More "sleeper" recruits? Pile em on!

BRB, I'm pretty sure Vince Lombardi couldn't fix this defense, so I'm going to trust the task to GREG FREAKIN ROBINSON.

seriously RR, enjoy your temporary retirement.

jg2112

October 28th, 2011 at 2:02 PM ^

It must also be said:

(1) The Greg Robinson hiring process is a glaring omission.

(2) The errors in the book (Cam Gordon, true freshman versus Notre Dame?) indicated a lack of attention to detail.

(3) I don't like what Bacon left the readers to infer about Scott Shafer - in the 2 paragraphs explaining his departure, RR infers that he gets rid of coaches that are not loyal or competent. Then, Shafer resigns in the next paragraph. That's a pretty bad picture to paint, especially when Tony Gibson remained on staff.

AMazinBlue

October 28th, 2011 at 2:12 PM ^

comment on the contents, but a few things are perfectly clear.

RR did himself no favors in the way he left WVU, came to Michigan and announced, "I am here to build a program." (There already was a program, unless I missed something); he tried ridiculously to run the spread & shred with two stiff qbs that had no knowledge or skill to run a spread; he forced a defensive scheme on multiple coaches that they knew nothing about.  He did not endear himself to the fanbase and alumni with his 'aw shucks' and 'can't we just be positive' attitude.

Michigan didn't make the transition well or easy and let things get way out of control early and often: Carr, former players, Martin, Miles, etc.

Rodriguez may have proven over his three years here that he might be a brilliant OC, just not the greatest head coach.  His inability to control the situation in the lockerroom and the meeting rooms suggests he might have been in over his head here.  I think he would make a great OC and let him run his thing in the right place.  Michigan and the B1G is not that place.

I can't wait to read the book, but I am growing more concerned over the questions it will raise moreso than the questions it answers.  The last three years is becoming more and more like the date you went on because it seemed like a great idea at the time, but after drinking too much and waking up the next morning you realize that many bad decisions were made and everyone sees what happened and you can't go back to the person you were before the date started.

The funny thing is, in one sense we are right back where we have been over the last three years:  the best solution to the recent past is to win football games and forget it ever happened.  Beating Purdue with great defense and an unstoppable offense and carrying that thru Iowa and Illinios will go a long way toward putting the mistakes of the last three years behind us all.