Report: BC DC DB TO MI Comment Count

Brian

B9318913734Z.1_20150919003320_000_GPTBVLII0.1-0

SI's Thayer Evans is reporting that Michigan will hire Boston College defensive coordinator Don Brown in the same capacity at Michigan:

Sam Webb has an unconfirmed report that Brown told BC's players he would depart today.

This is the first that Brown's name has come up in connection with the Michigan job, which goes to show how much this was on lockdown. I was momentarily disappointed and then I remembered spending much of the year mad at BC for having the audacity to  be above Michigan in the rankings.

This is not because they beat up on Howard and Maine. S&P ignores that stuff. Meanwhile let's play spot the outlier in Dalvin Cook's season:

image

15 for 54 is BC. everyone else got nuked except Georgia Tech, which managed the 17 for 82 above.

BC's defense finished the year third in S&P+ behind only FSU and Michigan despite having nowhere near the talent either of those two teams had *and* having the kind of crippling dysfunction on the other side of the ball that usually leads to late landslide victories. You know, the kind of offense that can do this:

Wake Forest 3, Boston College 0: It's okay to hate something you love sometimes

Football Study Hall's Ian Boyd wrote a feature on Brown's defense not five days ago. Read the whole thing but here's the nutshell version:

With a quick LB corps, safeties that can play multiple roles, and effective DL anchored by highly skilled tackles all of the schematics and skill sets on the Eagles' defense were able to pull together to form a dominant unit. They were hard to move the ball against on normal downs and then pure murder on 3rd and long. Too bad about that offense.

Brown doesn't fit Harbaugh's profile in that he's 60 and presumably not looking to move up, but as far as results go he's a very impressive hire. And he's a college guy, so thumbs up for that.

Comments

Zach Morris

December 20th, 2015 at 5:13 PM ^

The only thing I know is I won't second guess Harbaugh. I did about our QB situation earlier this year and I was wrong. If he feels Brown is the right man, I'm behind it. He did well with BC talent, now he gains UM talent. GoBlue



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Michigan4Harbaugh

December 20th, 2015 at 5:14 PM ^

Why don't we wait to see how the defense performs on the field before making a bunch of negative comments about the guy. Welcome Coach Brown!! We have a freezer full of Dilly Bars waiting for you at Schembechler Hall!!

Farnn

December 20th, 2015 at 5:16 PM ^

Even if the first 2 years at BC weren't great, based on FEI he had top 25 defenses at Maryland in 2010, and then UCONN in 2011 and 2012.  With the talent Michigan has returning on defense, and Brown's agressiveness, I think the defense will be a lot of fun to watch next year and can really dominate.

jace owen

December 20th, 2015 at 5:18 PM ^

I will admit I had no idea who this guy was and alot of the posters here know way more than I do. However, Harbaugh. Also, take a look at some of the comments on twitter from former rivals of BC. These rivals are beyond happy they no longer have to face his defenses. Who knows how it will turn out, but lets hope it turns in to something like Vader having a working Death Star that no one can destroy and all fear.

CoachBP6

December 20th, 2015 at 5:42 PM ^

Fairly underwhelming hire in my opinion. I had really hoped Harbaugh was going after a young, energetic coach, with the ability to recruit important areas...

We ended up with a guy who is 60, that has had pretty mixed results at all his stops.

I trust Jim Harbaugh, but yet again we have been outdone by our main Rival.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Rasmus

December 21st, 2015 at 12:27 PM ^

In that I agree with the sarcasm. The guy is a good coach. The two years after 2016 will be a challenge to coach (no matter how highly-rated the incoming players), as the imbalance in the recruiting numbers comes home to roost. Two consecutive maximum-size classes full of young and talented guys with a lot to learn. There will be a lot of teaching going on. Hiring some guy who can recruit well but doesn't have a lot of teaching experience (or just isn't that good at it) is not what MI (nods to thread title) needs.

Also, there's the issue of making adjustments. Brown seems like a guy with an approach that can do that. There was criticism of Durkin after Glasgow went down, as it seemed like the whole defense ran through him, and without him Michigan didn't adjust as well as it might have. So, for me, it looks like Harbaugh was really looking for someone who maybe could have done better.

SalvatoreQuattro

December 20th, 2015 at 5:51 PM ^

Meanwhile Don Brown took BC from a lower rung defense to #1 in the country despite having less-than eltie talent.

He also led UMass to a national title game as a head coach.His career record as a HC is 95-45. His Maryland defenses made great improvements in his two years there.

I'd say his track record is a much better than mixed.

CoachBP6

December 20th, 2015 at 6:14 PM ^

He has had mixed results. What the fuck are you talking about? 2 straight below average years at BC, coupled with the rest of his resume = mixed results.

Guy is 60 and has never coached anywhere more prestigious than BC / UConn / Maryland.

Sorry but if rather have schiano, bc he's younger, a better recruiter, has NFL experience, and has connections in New Jersey, which is a very good state in terms of HS FB.

I'm not saying that this can't end well, bc Don Brown could easily prove me wrong. I just found this hire to be underwhelming.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

FreddieMercuryHayes

December 20th, 2015 at 8:03 PM ^

You sound like an NFL guy. 'Has NFL experience' when talking about Schiano as a positive. I could have gotten run out of the NFL as easily as Schiano. This is how people like Schiano keep getting big gigs in coaching. They can put something on their resume and even if they bomb, all of a sudden it's looked as a positive. Schiano is a great recruiter. But when it comes to X's O's and working well with others, I think Brown is clearly a better choice.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

beef supreme

December 21st, 2015 at 7:31 AM ^

Which metric are you clinging to that is telling you that he had mixed results? IIRC, his FEI was around 30 the year before. So he goes from getting his system in, which can be hard depending on personnel, to jumping 50 spots in yr 2, to being in the top 3, depending on where your looking. And keep in mind, his offense got much worse this year, so in effect the jump was even greater. You can be unhappy with the results, but I've gone through his record now and am thrilled. I don't get how you can be on the Schiano train though. That guy is a figure head for osu, hired just so urbz can say, I've got an nfl coach on my staff too!!!! Imo, that Schiano guy is a douche. He turned down a lot of jobs in college (thankfully this one too) and went to the nfl and sucked and has done bupkis since.

LSA Superstar

December 20th, 2015 at 5:47 PM ^

I won't lie; from my vantage point, this seems underwhelming.

I've been basically scouring the internet like a crazy person ever since Durkin left to try and get a bead on who the next DC would be.  In the process, I worked in parellel to guys like Alum96 to build a list of potential candidates based on resume alone.  Without actually knowing any of these people you're working with an incomplete picture, but looking at history and stats can help you identify massive duds like Greg Robinson before they happen.

I don't like Brown's age.  I don't like the fact that Brown's recruiting acumen has never really been mentioned as a strength.  I don't like Brown's track record absent the last year.  And I don't really like the fact that there doesn't appear to be any upward trajectory to his coaching jobs.

I DO like the fact that his defensive coverage schemes are so multiple.  And although I don't give many brownie points for having one spectacular year, he did have one spectacular year with a bunch of players that wouldn't crack our two deep playing opposition roughly as talented as ours.  I also was impressed by his track record at UConn - two consistent years without superstar players in a then-decent Big East is nothing to sneeze at.  His improvement at Maryland was also decent.

I strongly suspect, having read numerous "end of the internet" DC searchbits, that this may have been a "Plan C" move.  I think it's likely that Harbaugh made a run at Anderson first, was either misinformed or misled about Anderson's willingness to accept the job if he wasn't hired by BYU, and recently was forced to backpedal.  I also think Harbaugh may have seriously considered Pruitt as a backup plan, and that Pruitt may have considered Michigan the same way if he'd been unable to iron things out in Tuscaloosa.  Finally, I really do believe that Leavitt was an option but that somebody nixed that idea because of... his event.  This is all conjecture based on my interpretation of (likely hokum but sometimes useful) internet rumormongering.

Overall, I give this hire a C+.  I would have preferred Pruitt, Aranda, Anderson, and probably Leavitt from the initial names that were linked to interest, but some of those guys turned us down and others may not have jibed with Harbaugh or been feasible candidates.  I do much prefer this hire to other rumored candidates like Pees or Butch Davis, however, so I do give credit for avoiding disaster.

In the end, however, Harbaugh's track record deserves more deference than any Michigan coach probably ever, Bo included.  Even though my eyes can't really see it, I'm assuming that this will work out until I'm forced to conclude to the contrary given actual evidence on the field.

SalvatoreQuattro

December 20th, 2015 at 5:56 PM ^

and has consistently built good-to-great defenses in his time as a DC?

Yeah, his resume isn't perfect, but no one possesses that. MSU's first four defenses were rather pedestrian before they made a dramatic leap. If we go strictly by resume Narduzzi has a mixed resume. Literally it is mixed. Four mediocre seasons and four outstanding seasons.

I also would point out that Brown has not had the level of talent that he will have at Michigan. He never has had access to Top 100-200 talent like he will at Michigan.

LSA Superstar

December 20th, 2015 at 6:23 PM ^

You're not accurately representing the record.  Aranda consistently built good-to-great defenses.  Brown's defenses were sometimes bad, sometimes decent, sometimes good, and superb once.

And you're correct that nobody possesses a "perfect" resume, but that's a straw man.  I want the best candidate; I don't demand perfection.  And other candidates had better records than Brown.  Those candidates told us "no."

SalvatoreQuattro

December 20th, 2015 at 6:58 PM ^

Which is not a surprise. You can only do so much with certain types of athletes. Brown has been coaching relatively mediocre talent in the Northeast for decades. 

I believe that you are being unfair to Brown. He has coached longer than Aranda, had more success as coach(95-45 as a HC in addition to his success as a DC) and has not had the advantage of coaching at a Big Ten school like Aranda.

Aranda's best seasons have been at Wisconsin. Wisconsin is a better and wealthier program than BC.

 

Let's see what Brown can do with a program that has more resources than Wisconsin.

massblue

December 20th, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

Aranda has been a DC for years.  His first two years, his defenses were ranked in 100.  Not really the model of consistency you are talking about.   He has done well the last 2 years at Wisc.  Of course we know how great BIG west offenses are.  Oh, when his defense faced OSU, it was a disaster.

Now, I am not saing Aranda is a bad coach, but he is not even in the same ballpark as Brown.

LSA Superstar

December 20th, 2015 at 5:56 PM ^

One final comment if I may reply to myself -

I do also really like the principles of Brown's defense.  Doing weird, reactive blitz things in an attempt to put the offense back on its heels is the way that great teams beat the spread.  So although I wasn't a passenger on the internet ragetrain that disqualified Aranda for giving up 59 to OSU, I do like the fact that this is the kind of guy that runs a Steve Sharik approved defensive scheme.

Farnn

December 20th, 2015 at 5:58 PM ^

I don't understand the hang up on recruiting ability with Brown.  His predecessor was supposedly a great recruiter and the only big Florida recruit was Bush who didn't commit until after he left.  With Partridge, Mattison and the rest of the resources allocated to recruiting, just a great defense will be enough to attract defensive talent.

LSA Superstar

December 20th, 2015 at 6:29 PM ^

Yes.  I make that explicitly clear.

I am not a coach.  I am not a reporter.  I am not anything more than a fan that likes to research these things best I'm able.

But I do not think that makes me unable to hold an intelligent opinion.  And I do think that this canard of an argument is inappropriate on a sports blog.

Mr. Owl

December 20th, 2015 at 6:20 PM ^

I have to get more into Brown when I get in, but I would be more willing to bet that Harbaugh had a list, checked it more than twice, crossed off the naughty, interviewed the nice, and Brown showed him enough to step outside his comfort zone of coaches he had an association with to kick some ass on D.

Merry Christmas. Go Blue!



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad