[Zoey Holmstrom]

High Arc Comment Count

Brian March 21st, 2022 at 11:41 AM

[Shirt? Shirt!]

3/17/2022 – Michigan 75, Colorado State 63 – 18-14, 11-9 Big Ten, Round of 32.
3/19/2022 – Michigan 76, Tennessee 68 – 19-14, 11-9 Big Ten, Sweet 16.

This year played out like a message board hypothetical. You know, the one where a guy posts something like "would you trade a win over OSU and Big Ten championship in football for a disappointing bubble season from the #4 ranked basketball team?" You're like "ehhhhh… okay" because the universe doesn't work like that. And then maybe the universe does work like that.

Perhaps there is a maximum amount of swag to go around and whatever barrels football tapped as they pumped it up this fall came from Michigan's strategic reserve. Or maybe we've got Zavier Simpson in a basement with tubes sprouting from him like so many spring clovers.

I will walk away from this particular Omelas in three weeks, tops. Promise.

----------------------

As a person who lives in Ann Arbor and gets asked "what do you do for a living" with some frequency, I have a lot of experience with people being weird or dismissive about sports. Ann Arbor is the archetype of a liberal college town, of course, so anyone who doesn't already know who I am is almost certain to fall on the Sportsball Continuum. On the nice end of this continuum are people who apologize to me for not knowing anything about sports; on the not so nice end are people who actually deploy the world "sportsball." I have had many interactions with people who are puzzled or irritated that I am a guy who does the sports liking.

Sometimes I have tried to explain myself, or at least thought about what I would say if anyone seemed interested in an explanation. (For reasons likely related to cultural ubiquity, Sportsball Continuum people evince a profound lack of interest in why anyone would be off the continuum.) What I've come up with is this: sports aren't just numbers adding up over a set period of time. They are story machines.

One of the great delights of college sports is that the timeframes are generally long enough to see a player become what they're going to become and short enough that there is always someone new to see develop. The pros are more static, with colossi (Brady, Lebron, Baseball Man) bestriding the sport for a decade or more. In college whenever someone hits that they're gone and you've got to see what the freshman with dreadlocks might be up to. The stories are more than Who Is The Goatest, Skip?

These stories exist on various levels: players. Seasons. Programs. This game wrote down some history on all of these levels. It provided the definitive Eli Brooks Game for the longest-serving player in program history. It rewrote this disappointing season, at least somewhat. It reinforced the vibe around Michigan basketball—and unfortunately for Tennessee fans, reinforced the vibe around their program as well. This Jonathan Wilson passage I referenced after the USA-Algeria World Cup game always floats up at times like these:

Perhaps some of the Europeans there – certainly the French journalist opposite – were driven by anti-German feeling, perhaps some were instinctive Slavophiles, but when the three locals at the MTN (South Africa-based mobile telecommunications company) desk reacted to the final whistle with a group hug and collective dance, the appeal of Serbia's inner turmoil becomes difficult to deny. Unless they'd had a bet, I suppose, but when asked one said he'd decided to support Serbia because "they seemed to be trying to lose".

This is an intimately familiar feeling for any basketball fan, but it must be completely unintelligible to the Sportsball Continuum people. Explaining is difficult. Maybe it's less difficult now?

Now I can just say "Imagine that a fifth-year player everyone wanted to run off campus because he seemed terrified of basketball appropriated the delightfully weird shot a previous player—one denied a career culmination by covid—had painstakingly developed over the course of a few years; imagine that this one-time wilting flower of a player would uncork an audacious hook shot at a crucial juncture to defeat a heavily favored opponent, thus writing himself into annals of program history. If you were invested in this sort of thing, watching the maturation and development of this young man would not just be a guy hitting a shot, but the climax of a character arc. It's like Game of Thrones except the source material never runs out. Once you have the context that gives the numbers meaning the drama outstrips any planned fiction. Joy and pathos intermingle. We reach down into the vast beating heart of human striving and drink deeply of its nectar.

"Also sometimes Wisconsin shoots 9% from three."

This would not work because the other person would wander away and talk to someone else about organic hummus brands, but I could do it.

[After THE JUMP: Bullets]

----------------------

BULLETS


Big Ten Championship on December 4, 2021.
(Zoey Holmstrom)

[Holmstrom]

A coin flip. Michigan's win was not a fluke but neither did it feel ordained, so this measure of shot quality landing on a knife edge feels about right:

Tennessee should have hit a couple more threes, particularly during that second-half stretch where Michigan hedging was leaving guys wide open in the right corner, but also how many midrange jumpers did the #315 team in other twos hit? From your author's in-game perspective, a billion too many. It felt like about half of Tennessee's three attempts were not good—30 footers or contested shots—and most of the ones that were good were coming from a guy who's a 32% shooter. He hit zero of six.

But yeah where the Colorado State game felt like Michigan catching up and passing a team they were likely to reel in, this one felt like every bucket was the dagger until one actually was.


Big Ten Championship on December 4, 2021.
(Zoey Holmstrom)

[Holmstrom]

Mr. Inside-Outside. Hunter Dickinson had two phases in this game. In the first half he was frequently in pick-and-pop situations and Michigan did not put him on the block much. It looked like Michigan wanted to use Diabate as the main inside threat; this should have worked out better than it actually did, with Diabate bogglingly missing a couple of bunnies and having a couple of Tennessee non-shooting fouls wipe out what would otherwise have been additional (possibly missed) bunnies.

The second half started with a left block Dickinson post-up and it was clear Michigan's focus had changed. Dickinson did have a late clock flash to the elbow and another three, but IIRC all of his other second-half attempts were out of the post. This may have been spurred by Diabate having a bit of an off game, or may have been the plan from the start—unleash Dickinson post ups after halftime, when the opposition doesn't get to have a long break to decide how to best combat them.

Pregame assertions in these parts that John Fulkerson's post defense just could not have been that good turned out to be accurate: Tennessee went with many more Uros Plavsic minutes than usual and Fulkerson got put under the basket a couple times when UT tried him out against Dickinson.


Big Ten Championship on December 4, 2021.
(Zoey Holmstrom)

[Holmstrom]

Frankie does some things. Collins had just two points and two assists in this game to go with two turnovers but that stat line badly understates his performance. He had a Kobe assist to Dickinson on one of his misses and set Caleb Houstan up for three catch and shoot triples, none of which went down. He had another coulda-shoulda assist fail to occur because Tennessee got called for a blocking foul. He broke Tennessee ball pressure to the point where UT largely abandoned it.

Maybe more importantly, Collins was the only Michigan plyer who could consistently stay in front of Chandler and Zeigler. He had an early defensive possession against Vescovi where he nearly stole the ball three times that felt like it rattled him, and Zeigler spent the last five minutes settling for threes, barely testing Frankie's ability to stay in front of him.

He was obviously massive in the Colorado State game, going on a personal 5-0 run after Colorado State pushed it out to 28-13 late in the first half. He finished 5/5 from two and barely turned the ball over.

This weekend points towards Collins being the future at point guard even if his shot is unfathomably broken. The once and future Simpson.

Terrance Williams, junkyard dog. Williams finished this game out, acquiring two massive putback buckets in the closing minutes and calmly hitting a couple free throws. The announce team was accurate when they described him as just kind of a guy who does basketball. He goes out there and good things tend to happen.

Uh… isn't it time to dump more minutes on him? Williams is not high usage but he's shooting 53/39/77 on the season and he doesn't have a clear case of the yips. I'd much rather see him on the floor than Brandon Johns or Road Version Caleb Houstan right now. Maybe keep starting Houstan for appearances and in case he hits a couple early shots but once Houstan's 15 minutes deep into another bagel game maybe Michigan should plan on 25 Williams minutes.

A shirt I enjoyed. As per the title:

tennessee-shirt

Ian Eagle's bizarre proclamations. Perhaps you were, like me, puzzled when Ian Eagle declared that Hunter Dickinson "had a fever" and was "really exploring the space." If so you should remember that Christopher Walken's character in the More Cowbell sketch goes by "The Bruce Dickinson." I had forgotten this.

Poor damn Devante'. Devante Jones missed the Colorado State game and played only twelve minutes against Tennessee. He missed the first game because of a concussion sustained in practice; against Tennessee he suffered a cut to his hand and then got his head banged by Diabate. The latter hit looked fairly innocuous, but when you're recovering from a concussion that's relative. He has five days to get healthy, but I wonder if the two head hits in close succession mean he needs to be on the shelf for longer than that to truly recover. I wouldn't be surprised if he's unavailable.

That's a shame dot gif. Carnage Sunday in the Big Ten saw the conference lose four of five games, with only Purdue surviving to join Michigan in the Sweet 16. Aside from seeing Iowa make it—a distant dream indeed—that's a perfect first weekend of the tournament. Brad Davison trudging off the court after Wisconsin lost a virtual home game against Iowa State was a true chef's kiss moment.

Comments

Watching From Afar

March 21st, 2022 at 11:53 AM ^

RE: Houstan

His defense is no longer a massive issue, so you can keep playing him to see if he starts hitting shots. Start him, see if he gets hot, and work in Williams more if he's not providing anything. But, still give him minutes throughout to see if he makes 1 in the 2nd half because that's about all it takes.to get him going.

If this were earlier in the season, yeah get him out if he doesn't hit on his first 2 or 3 shots because he was a sieve on defense. Now, he's at least passable against most teams.

Kilgore Trout

March 21st, 2022 at 1:12 PM ^

I think the defensive end is where the lineup trouble comes with Williams. He doesn't seem like he is quick enough to guard a 3 and may not be big enough to handle a post 4, so it's matchup dependent. As well as Williams played against OSU, he was the one guarding Brunk when OSU went on their run at the end of the first half. I like Williams' shot and energy, but I think fitting him in is a little tricky. 

TrueBlue2003

March 21st, 2022 at 3:48 PM ^

Huh?  Unless that post has been edited, it's saying that Dickinson will likely be a defensive liability against Nova's five out offense, and hence our best defensive lineup would be with Williams in for Dickinson which is probably true.  Dickinson just isn't going to step out and defend threes without being a major blow by risk.

The problem is that you then may have a problem on offense especially if Devante is not available to do what he did against OSU.

It's likely going to be another game where we just have to outscore the opponent or go zone and hope they just miss a bunch of threes again.

goblu330

March 21st, 2022 at 4:01 PM ^

Yeah Hunter is going to play 35 minutes.  It will probably just be competing styles and who does their thing better.

Wow, speaking of Villanova.  Just glanced at their B-ball message boards.  They have Michigan as an absolute W and are talking about how they match up with Zona.  M just may have to smack them around (again) just to remind them.

outsidethebox

March 21st, 2022 at 6:54 PM ^

Michigan's best offense of the year was the OSU game sans Hunter.

But I would have, a long time ago, gone to a 1-3-1 and keep Hunter camped inside around the basket. Here you can maintain very good on-ball pressure and defend the arc very well. Have Moussa play the layer just out from Hunter. It is very difficult to dribble penetrate against this zone due to the 3 layers that follow ball rotation around the perimeter. This is also an outstanding configuration to trap out of. The best teams I have played on and coached have rained hell on opponents out of this defensive set. This protects Hunter from having to play in space as well as Brooks, Jones and Collins from being mismatched inside. 

goblu330

March 21st, 2022 at 1:52 PM ^

The issue is more that we were are running out of guys to do the scoring of the basketball.  The Tennessee game was a bit of a hodgepodge with Hunter being Hunter and then Eli doing some things that are not particularly repeatable.  If Houston isn’t going to score we have Dickinson and then a vast ocean of not-much to make the Sportsball shots.

TrueBlue2003

March 21st, 2022 at 2:04 PM ^

Yes, and Seth nailed it on the pod that we stuck with both Williams and Houstan late (instead of Diabate) for spacing purposes.  Michigan should rarely be playing Diabate and Dickinson together save for certain matchups that make it work (one of those times is if the opponent is giving up Hunter pick and pops because then he's essentially a perimeter player drawing the opponent center away from the basket like in the first half).  And especially not when Frankie is on the floor because that puts too many non shooters out there.

I do not for the life of my get why these coaches insist on playing two bigs at all times. I mean, I guess I do and it's to get the best five on the floor but it's a mistake because the costs of playing guys out of position is too great.  Purdue doesn't play Edey and Williams together for a reason, even though they're clearly the second and third best players on the team.

When Hunter comes out, don't put in Johns, put in Williams or Bufkin and play Moussa at center (his more natural position - just look how he thrived against OSU).  It's so frustrating because this team could be better with that simple change. And really, they should be playing Moussa and Hunter a bit less and Williams more.

And they'll have to play smaller against Villanova if they want a chance.  Nova is a true five out team.

I also keep saying this, but I don't think you can just assume Williams would do what he has been doing at the four if you play him at the three instead of Houstan, because again, you have Diabate and Dickinson out there.  The put backs that Williams got woudn't be available if he was playing the three and Diabate was out there because Diabate and/or his man would have been down there.

So naturally, I think if Houstan had the benefit of being able to play stretch four (his more natural position), he'd also thrive (at least, relatively) in that spot.  But the only way that can happen is if we're playing Bufkin at the three.  We saw that against Rutgers when Williams and Diabate weren't available and that lineup played great, especially Houstan at the four.

goblu330

March 21st, 2022 at 2:50 PM ^

I think Howard’s playing experience in college factors in.  Michigan started essentially two centers in the Fab Five first two years.  But Webber and Howard were both extraordinary skilled for their age and the game was far different, not to mention that Jalen and Jimmy could essentially just morph into whatever they needed to be from game to game.  But yes, it is becoming a bit frustrating to watch some lineups that really don’t have a chance for some stretches of time.

TrueBlue2003

March 21st, 2022 at 2:56 PM ^

Yeah, I don't disagree that might be factor but he coached at Miami which was one of the smartest, forward thinking teams in the NBA.  It's not the 90s anymore.  You need more shooters on the court to benefit the spacing for everyone, especially your center so he can go to work on the block or have guys to kick to.

nerv

March 21st, 2022 at 2:58 PM ^

The playing multiple bigs I see more as a necessity and a way to get your most talented players on the court. The current roster construction just does not have a playable wing. If Moussa were limited to backing up Hunter one of our most talented players would be getting less than 10 mpg while someone with more holes in their game was picking up the extra minutes. Someone is always going to be out of position with this roster because we simply dont have a 3 man. 

Bufkin has also been abused quite a bit this season and is most definitely more guard than wing. Rolling him out at the 3 is basically the only way to avoid playing 2 bigs and I certainly don't think Bufkin getting minutes over Diabate makes this team better.

goblu330

March 21st, 2022 at 3:34 PM ^

Talent and effectiveness are not the same thing though.  During times this season where either Hunter or Moussa could not play, (SDSU, at Nebraska, home Rutger, at OSU) also happened to be the games where our offense has not bogged down and the games where Williams II has played easily his best basketball.  I think Dickinson and Diabate can play together, and that Moussa should be playing more that 10 minutes per game, but it should not be the default setting and was glad that Howard went with Williams to close the game.

TrueBlue2003

March 21st, 2022 at 3:52 PM ^

But it's not a necessity.  We have a guy in Terrence Williams that is vastly under-utilized.  He is absolutely 100 percent a playable wing.

Arguably, Bufkin is under-utilized as well.  Smallish but also a playable wing against certain lineups.

Tennessee was playing two tiny guards and Vescovi (who is a 6'3 Just A Shooter) at the three for large chunks of this game.  That makes for a pretty easy defensive assignment on the wing that even Bufkin could have handled.

Other teams frequently play three guards and fours that Houstan and Williams can guard.  Those lineups are more difficult for our two bigs to guard.

Villanova will do this as well. 

MGlobules

March 21st, 2022 at 3:21 PM ^

Well, they had a great concept of how to deploy those two bigs but Diabate didn't connect. That doesn't mean it wasn't sound.* And they changed up when it didn't result in buckets. And we won. The thing that people obsessed with the data sometimes may forget is that that's the past. Coaches are trying to defy the stats and get more out of their players. They see them in practice, see the possibilities, and push them to break out. I really think that's why analysts who can impress the hell out of you with their pregame analysis so often get their predictions wrong. A good coach is a visionary, and must have some healthy scorn for the metrics. 

I agree about Williams. 

*Just watching some highlights and was reminded, Dickinson out--another feature of the plan--got them a buncha big threes. When he went inside in the second half TN was befuddled. 

TrueBlue2003

March 21st, 2022 at 4:52 PM ^

Obsessed with what data? This has nothing to do with stats and everything to do with the obvious fit of your players and lineups.  We don't have to be fitting square pegs into round holes.

Aside from the Iowa game which was an out of body experience that he's not shown he can repeat at this point, he's not very good in iso situations. He didn't connect because he's just not very efficient in those situations.  He's a great OREB guy but as we saw, Twill is good there too. 

And he's a good rim runner off pick and roll when he's the center setting the pick.  That's why he needs to play center when Dickinson is out.  And they should roll with him there at least 15 min a game.

But yes, they did well to keep Williams in at the end of game.

If you want to talk about wins and losses without considering how they came to be, fine.  We went a pretty poor 17-14 this year and I will bet you that next year if Diabate comes back and plays the majority of his minutes at the five, Michigan will be a better team, despite losing Brooks and Dickinson.

MGlobules

March 22nd, 2022 at 9:20 AM ^

I think that my larger point is pretty obviously true. Yes the spacing has been bad with both of them in; that has been a problem all season. But they had a concept of how to play with both in, and to get Diabate going early. It might well have worked. It might work again.

And my point about fans and analysts saying "he can't do that" because of what they've seen--or stats accrued--to date is, I increasingly believe, important. Both Juwan and John B. have continually gotten more out of their players than the critics believed possible. If a player fails--even on the fifth try--that doesn't mean he can't succeed on the sixth.  

I agree that it will be fun to seen an improved Diabate at the five. His hands. . . 

Blue Vet

March 23rd, 2022 at 6:46 AM ^

Yassssss! If I could, I'd upvote this a bunch of times.

A key thing that sets Beilein and Howard apart from many—most?—other coaches is that they're teachers.

Education at its deepest isn't linear, like simply getting better at the tasks of basketball—footwork, shooting motion, etc. Education is accretion, the gradual accumulation of mind-body-soul understanding, much of it deeper than conscious thought.

Most coaches teach the tasks, but the aim usually seems to get a better basketball player, so the team wins more, so the coach gets paid more, wins more championships for their own reputation. 

By contrast, Beilein and Howard seem to have a dual aim, to encourage, to foster, to create the conditions for better players and better people.

 

SDskyjammer

March 21st, 2022 at 5:58 PM ^

I agree that spacing on offense is better when D&D are not on the floor at the same time. Has been true all year.

Diabate has no ability to space the floor. No outside shot.

Houstan at this point is better defender than Williams.

Williams ability to fly to the bucket for a followup is way ahead of Houstan. CH does not have that kind of fire in his eye like Williams. It’s why TW got in trouble postgame at UW. TW has serious fire in his eyes at moments.

Go back to Brian’s preview of the Tennessee matchup. I think he nailed it.

No comment re Villanova matchup til I see Brian’s preview. He gets this UM 2021-22 edition of this Bball team.

 

 

DonAZ

March 21st, 2022 at 11:58 AM ^

The "32 down to 16" round is, in my opinion, the best two days of sportsball.  There are just some great games there.

Here in Tucson the buzz is all about the Wildcats of U of A, who barely got by TCU. 

jbrandimore

March 21st, 2022 at 12:54 PM ^

That game nearly was ended on the worst non-call in sports history.

For those not watching, the game was tied with 5 seconds left. Out near half court literally tackled the TCU point guard while he was setting up the last shot, sending him to the floor and the ball rolling down towards the Arizona basket.

Arizona picked it up and laid it in just after the buzzer sounded.

As it was, the refs completely fucked TCU who should have been shooting free throws in a tied game with around 4 seconds left - but had that laying by Arizona counted this would have been the worst travesty ever.

ESNY

March 21st, 2022 at 1:50 PM ^

NCAA, as a whole, has a huge officiating issue and it’s manifested itself very clearly all weekend. Got damn lucky that Zona didn’t win on that play and especially lucky Baylor didn’t win after giving them carte blanche to play rugby on D for the last 10 min and have a protective shield on offense all while having their version of Grayson Allen get away with way too much. The Illinois dunk was icing on the shit cake 

jmblue

March 21st, 2022 at 3:06 PM ^

Out near half court literally tackled the TCU point guard while he was setting up the last shot, 

I wanted TCU to win, for obvious reasons, but this is overstating it.  He was bumped, right at halfcourt, and he sold the contact by falling to the ground while the UA guy quickly backed off in the "I didn't do anything" gesture.

It could have been called, but I can see why it wasn't.  He was 45 feet from the basket and embellished the contact to draw the whistle - which nearly had disastrous consequences for TCU.  That play was going to be controversial either way.

It was not the worst no-call in sports history.  Desmond getting tripped was worse, for one. 

DennisFranklinDaMan

March 21st, 2022 at 3:49 PM ^

Agree. I still believe the physicality of the game has overwhelmed the officials, who have to decide whether to call everything or try to establish some "reasonable level of physical contact that 10 years ago clearly would have been a foul" standard, and try hard not to make a game-deciding call in the last 20 seconds of a game.

That last play was a perfect combination of those two factors. It's unfortunate, but I'm not sure what the solution is.

(By the way, that same combination also led to the Arizona player not getting an obvious an-one call on a dunk with a minute left that would have given them the lead. It works both ways. Not fair to point to a call that hurt one team with 5 seconds left while ignoring a similar one that hurt the other team with 45 seconds left.)

Needs

March 21st, 2022 at 4:39 PM ^

They also missed that the TCU's player's foot was on the mid-court line, which should have been an over and back call, before the bump/tackle/turnover. The refereeing was just bad the whole game, and truly, for most games throughout the weekend.

It's particularly notable when you get announcers used to covering the NBA who aren't used to covering for the subpar officiating in college. I actually have grown to like Reggie Miller's annoucing for this reason, that he'll just straightforwardly call a bad call a bad call instead of covering for the refs.

mp2

March 21st, 2022 at 8:30 PM ^

Normally I’d be about the underdog, but this year I’m in second in my pool and if Arizona wins I’ll probably get a big payout so I need them to keep winning. Not sure what I’ll do if they play UM. I’ll probably still want UM to win. 

UMQuadz05

March 21st, 2022 at 12:05 PM ^

Ian Eagle is so, so good and so underrated.  He can go from silly and fun to dramatic in a heartbeat; it's like if you combined Raftery and Gus into one PBP guy. 

matty blue

March 21st, 2022 at 12:17 PM ^

he's excellent - i'll take him over a shouter all day, every day.

i happened to be listening to the brad nessler / pj carlesimo radio team on westwood one last night, and those guys were absolutely terrific.  nessler is clear about what's happening, and pj tells you why.  those guys belong on TV.

TrueBlue2003

March 21st, 2022 at 2:10 PM ^

What's the Sportsball Continuum?  I'm a fairly regular reader but haven't noticed it explained.

I assumed it's the continuum of varying levels of sports interest with fanatics on one end and disinterested parties (or even staunch opponents) on the other, but it sounds like everyone on the Continuum is not into sports?  I'm a bit confused.

AlbanyBlue

March 21st, 2022 at 3:14 PM ^

As I understand it, "the Sportsball Continuum" consists of the range of non-sports fans that go from:

"pleasant demeanor" in interactions -- i.e. "I'm sorry, but I just don't get/understand/like sports and sports fans"

to

mocking/poking fun in interactions -- i.e. "oh, we sportsed so much better than the other sportsters and that's why we won at sportsing"

to

"outright militant anti-sports" in interactions -- i.e "it's a stupid/ignorant waste of time and you're stupid/ignorant for liking it and I'm going to look down on you for it"

All but the first are totally annoying. It's taking something someone likes and shitting on it because a lot of people think it's okay to do that.