Hello: Blake Bars Comment Count

Tim

Michigan added to its already-impressive offensive line haul for 2012 today, picking up TN OL Blake Bars.

BlakeBars-mug.jpg

GURU RATINGS

Scout Rivals ESPN 24/7 Sports
3*, #38 OT 4*, 5.8, #34 OT 3*, 79, #56 OT 3*, 86, NR OT

As you can see, the sites are basically in agreement about Blake: he's outside the top couple tiers nationally among offensive line recruits, but it still a solid player. Oddly, Rivals - usually the stingiest site as far as giving out stars - is the only one to give him the fourth star. He started in Scout's top 300, but has since moved out of it.

The sites are unanimous on Blake's height: he's 6-5. There is a bit of disagreement over how much he weighs, with ESPN saying he's all the way down at 260, 24/7 Sports just 5 pounds heavier, and the other two sites going up to 275.

As we so often do, let's kick off the evaluations with ESPN's profile comments:

Bars demonstrates good tough run blocking skills, showing the ability to dominate at his present level of competition. Has the height and athleticism for the offensive tackle position at the BCS level of play; will need to add bulk to his frame over time... Although we see the need for refinement in all areas of pass protection this guy possesses the long arms and nimble feet which should be assets; flashes the ability to handle edge quickness. We like the nasty finishing attitude this athlete plays with; it's what we look for when evaluating offensive linemen.

They seem to be pretty intent on labeling him a tackle, though I had previously assumed (based on the other players Michigan is recruiting, along with his height) that he would probably move inside for college. Long arms tend to negate a lack of ideal height, in certain instances.

He's probably a little behind the curve in terms of technique as well, since he wasn't even a high school starter until last fall. However, his father is a former Notre Dame linebacker, and his older brother Brad plays for Penn State, so he does come from a football family. He talked a little bit about technique with the local paper:

“(Coach Mawae) has been helping us with our footwork,” Bars said. “He’ll come into the weight room and show us technique and introduce new drills to us that I know are going to make us a lot better. It’s such a great opportunity. Kevin is the man, pretty much.”

That's not exactly revealing about Blake's current skill set, but it does speak to a desire for improvement. His strength also seems to draw praise here and there, so when he adds another 30+ pounds of muscle onto his frame, he could be a very powerful player to go along with that nasty attitude.

There's precious little info out there on Blake, but it seems that the evaluations that do exist are more optimistic on his abilities than the 3-star ratings would seem to indicate. As we'll see in a moment, his offer list tells the same story.

OFFERS

Bars's offer list is quite a bit more impressive than you'd expect from a guy who's a generic 3-star to most of the recruiting sites. Clemson, Florida, LSU, Penn State, and South Carolina all have recent success either on the field or in recruiting (or both), and had shot this kid an offer.

In less-impressive offers, Arkansas State joins Boston College, Kentucky, Louisville, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, Ole Miss, Purdue, Vanderbilt, Virginia, and Wake Forest. There are a couple pretty good programs in there, so his whole resume is nothing to sneeze at. He had interest but no offer from his father's alma mater, Notre Dame.

STATS

Blake is an offensive lineman, and therefore doesn't have stats. Montgomery Bell Academy went 9-3 last season, his first as a starter.

FAKE 40 TIME

None of the recruiting sites have listed a 40 time for Blake, so I get to give out my default five FAKEs out of five.

VIDEO

Junior highlights:

PREDICTION BASED ON FLIMSY EVIDENCE

Blake is a prospect that seems to have plenty of upside, but at this time, he's far from a finished product. Seeing as how he's just finished his junior year of high school, that's no surprise. Still, it takes a redshirt year as a true freshman from "extremely likely" to "certain."

Following that redshirt year, he may still have a bit of growing to do. Adding 30-40 pounds or more is a tough thing to do while maintaining flexibility and agility. As a redshirt sophomore then, will be the first time he has the potential to really contribute. Fortunately for him, that season also sees the departure of a few linemen ahead of him.

As an upperclassman, he should get into the starting lineup, and his versatility (he doesn't seem like a left tackle, but almost any other OL position seems possible) will help him see the field.

He looks like the type of guy who will become a solid starter, but maybe not an All-Big Ten caliber guy, unless his physical development is truly impressive. His upside seems to be high, so if he can reach his ceiling, it could mean very good things for his future.

UPSHOT FOR THE REST OF THE CLASS

The commitment of Bars could mean a couple things: 1) he's higher in the coaching staff's eyes than we previously believed, 2) the staff doesn't feel good about their chances with some other top prospects, 3) the door is closed for other medium-range prospects, or 4) there are plans to tae more offensive lineman than we realized. The truth is probably some combination of those factors. No matter what the reasoning is, I'm guessing the coaching staff is done pursuing offensive linemen aside from Kyle Kalis, Jordan Diamond, and other elite-level linemen (i.e. Andrus Peat).

That means that, other than those guys, we shouldn't expect any offensive line commits any time soon, unless the staff uncovers a sleeper that they really like. Look for them to focus on defensive tackle and wideout, and once they fill those needs, they'll be able to focus on top prospects, regardless of position. Quarterback and running back are other, lesser needs for the class.

Comments

turtleboy

June 27th, 2011 at 12:16 PM ^

Looking at what these 2012 commits mean for our depth chart and for our 2013 class, if we quit now our Oline depth would be just as bad in 2013 as it is this right now, so in the 2013 class we'd need to bring in at least 4 kids who'd need to not redshirt and play right away. In fewer words: we have a 4 or 5 deep roster everywhere except Oline and DT where we ONLY have a 2 deep. If our Oline was full now for 2012 our 2013 depth chart will look like this:

Lewan(sr)-Posada-Pace-Bryant-Schofield(sr)

Yerden-Stacey-Miller-Bars-Magnuson

plus Banner being the only kids on scholarship.

This means almost our entire depth chart for 2013 will be(rs)sophomores and (rs)freshmen. Either we'll need 4 2013 OLinemen who don't redshirt (plus 2 others to replace Lewan and Schofield who'll be gone once those 2 are done redshirting) or we'll need 2 or 3 more kids in this class. 

One other note is that I can't get around our DT depth, and I belive one of our 2010 freshmen OGs might move to DT. Right now it looks like we'll only have a 2deep at DT for 2011, and we'll only have a 2deep in 2012, and we'll only have a 2deep in 2013. Wilkins projects as a starting DE in 2 years and Talbot is too hurt and too 240+ lbs to play DT so by 2013 (if we take Pipkins) our DT depth will be: 

Washington(sr)-Ash

Godin-Pipkins (with Black and Wilkins being the starting DEs)

which means we'll also need 2 interior DTs from 2013 to again not redshirt, or maybe 2010s Posada or the 6'6" Yerden moves to DT (even for just 2 years) which gives us a 5th guy to play in case of injury for all 3 seasons, but this takes yet another guy out of our OLine. 

The coaches have said they're taking one more interior linemen this year (who I've guessed as Pipkins) so if (fe) Posada moves then 1 OG from 2012 will have to start in 2013, and we'll need maybe 2 others to not redshirt just for the sake of depth. 

We can still use 2 (or hopefully 3) more top OTs in this class. 7 won't be too many.

blueblueblue

June 27th, 2011 at 8:57 AM ^

Welcome Blake - its great to have you aboard! You have the potential to shine under this coaching staff and in this offense! 

And on a side note, this was a nice write-up on Blake - a good condensation of available material and a judicious prediction (not that my opinion really matters, but I don't just want to point out negatives all the time). 

neoavatara

June 27th, 2011 at 9:55 AM ^

That we would leave either Pipkins, O'Brien, or another top DL hanging if they wanted to come.  I simply don't believe it.  In an ideal world, Hoke wants a top RB or QB...if we can't have one of those, would we really choose a 3* borderline QB over Pipkins?

Hoke loves the big uglies up front.  Any top tier guys want to come, I think they will have a spot.  

Don

June 27th, 2011 at 10:01 AM ^

I hope that your assessment of Hoke's preferences is accurate, esp. since he's coached DL so extensively. Others here would probably think I'm crazy, but with DR, DG, Morris, and Bellomy (IMHO a real sleeper) already in the fold, I don't think the need for a QB in 2012 is as pressing as at other positions.

bestgoblue

June 27th, 2011 at 11:54 AM ^

So excited for Hoke and his weigt training staff to take these kids who play angry and have big-time athletic potential and mold them into absolute beasts.  

NOLA Blue

June 27th, 2011 at 12:42 PM ^

Congratulations, and welcome, Mr. Bars!  We are very excited to have you on board.  I have a feeling that your O-line class will be remembered for a long time around these parts... work hard and prove me right!

jls1144

June 27th, 2011 at 8:00 PM ^

Desmond Morgan's video impressed me in a surprising way.  His runs from the QB position looks like he could be a viable Fullback option.  6-1" 225lbs?  A few more lbs.  Kids an athlete.