[Robert Sabo/NY Post]

Cool Clips: Martindale's Double Mug Pressure Comment Count

Cody Alexander February 20th, 2024 at 9:00 AM

[What this is: Cody Alexander is a mainstay of the community of internet coaches who share x's & o's analysis, host of the Art of X Show and author of six books on defense. But mostly he's the guy behind the substack MatchQuarters, which since 2016 has been an invaluable resource for understanding a lot of defensive concepts we talk about.

The article herein, which gets into Wink Martindale's defensive philosophy, was recently published on his site. If you're a fan of Neck Sharpies and want to take the next step, Cody is offering a one-year, 20% off coupon to MGoBlog readers. Take this link. –Seth]

--------------------

Wink Martindale, the newly appointed Michigan Defensive Coordinator and former Giants and Ravens DC, is an enigma. Known for his pressures, Martindale is one of the best blitz designers in the NFL. He comes from the ‘old’ Ravens tree, which was blitz-centric and utilized a deep bag of pre-snap presentations and pressure paths.

The Giants finished 21st in DVOA this past season, and their defensive struggles led to Martindale and the organization parting ways. It's a similar situation to the one he found himself in after the '21 season, his last with the Ravens. Once deemed one of the b’s best DCs, Martindale’s units have slowly sunk to the bottom of efficiency metrics.

Though Martindale’s performance as a DC has waned, his defenses still rank at the top of the league in 1st and 3rd Down rates. The boom-or-bust system frustrates many. He is a master at attacking protections, especially on 3rd Downs.

Image

Per PFF, the Giants had the second-highest Pass Blitz Rate (PBR) at 54.2%, right behind the Vikings (above). On 3rd Downs, that rate rose to 56.4%, enough to unseat Minnesota from the top spot. On those downs, the Giants were 13th in EPA when blitzing (-.123).

[Hit THE JUMP]

--------------------

Holding the ninth-lowest 3rd Down conversion rate in the NFL (37%), the Giants’ defense consistently found ways to attack offenses and get off the field. Against the Eagles in the final week of the regular season, the Giants held Philly to 5-13 on 3rd Downs en route to a victory. In their second matchup against the Eagles, New York consistently created pressure on both Jalen Hurts and Marcus Mariota. Hurts would finish the day 7-16 for 55 yards and one interception before being pulled.

To pressure the Eagles, Martindale used a ‘Double Mug’ presentation (above) to set up his main blitz, which they used the third most in the NFL. The Giants were also fifth in the league this past year in seven-man pressures, so when New York presents seven defenders near the line of scrimmage, offenses must prepare for an all-out attack. The blitz path Martindale decided to use was a Stride path, which has the Ni insert into the B-gap while the EDGE to that side works a contain rush (COP).

According to PFF, the Giants were 28th in Slot Blitz usage. Since the Eagles game was the last of the year, Philly was probably more concerned with a stunt from the Double Mug presentation than a blitz from the Slot. The Giants ran their Stride five-man pressure four times. The Eagles went 1-4 on those pressures, with one INT and no first downs. Martindale threw them a curveball.

Related Link: Pressure Tape - Baltimore vs Cleveland ('20)

When a defense presents a Double-Mug alignment, the RB and Center usually communicate who they will block in the A-gaps. Everyone else will have the man outside of them. The man-blocking creates opportunities for defenses to use stunts or attack the gaps left open by movement.

Internal pick stunts or ‘games’ by the D-line can create space for defenders to come free. The RB has to block, which can be an adventure for some teams. In the case of the Giants, even if the offense had used a full slide, the pressure simulates two-off-the-edge, which is a ‘beater’ for that protection.

Stride

Martindale used the fact that he rarely blitzes the Ni to set up his main pressure against the Eagles. The Giants’ presentation forced the Eagles into man-blocking, which New York used to create space for their Stride blitz. As the ball is snapped, the two defenders away from the Ni will drop to their respective Hook areas.

Instead of attempting to ‘match’ the first-level defenders on a WR, the Giants opted to run Cover 0 with two ‘rats’ (spies) in the Hooks. This past season, the Giants were 7th in Cover 0 usage at 17.5%. The concept is similar to the infamous Flores blitz that uses the slide of the offense against it, creating a free hitter off one of the edges. In this pressure, Martindale manufactures a lane in the B-gap for his Ni.

The Giants get precisely what they want from the Eagles in the first clip. The RB works to the middle of the box to assist the Center, exposing the edge. As the two D-linemen drop opposite the pressure, the left side of the Philly line collapses on the interior pressure, and the RB has no one to block.

Opposite, the EDGE COPs (can also mean ‘contain on pass’), bringing the RT while the Nose ‘faces’ the RG. The technique of the Nose ensures the RG cannot come off of him to collect the Ni as he careens towards Hurts. Self-sacrifice is critical to getting the blitzer free to the QB in many of these pressures.

Though able to scramble away, the man coverage forced Hurts to throw the ball out of bounds. Internal pressure by the Giants collapsed the blocks and essentially blinded the RB from seeing the Ni coming into the box. The RG couldn’t fan to the blitz because he had to assume the LB pressure in the A-gap occupied the Center. This was classic manipulation by Martindale.

Related Link: Miami's 7-O look is more than just a "cool" pressure.

In the 2nd Quarter, the Eagles leave a TE near the box to assist in the protection along with the RB. The O-line will slide to the RB, and the Giants mug their Weak Safety to hold the RB to that side. The RB will take the first threat outside-in, so the presence of the Safety blinds him from the Ni pressures (which New York doesn’t tip off).

As the ball is snapped, the Eagles slide to the drop-outs, and the RB chips the COP by the LB working from the A-gap. Again, the EDGE to the Ni and the technique by the Nose ‘buy’ the linemen to that side, leaving a runway for the Ni straight to the QB. Hurts, sensing pressure, throws a completion short of the sticks. Unlike the first clip, the Giants run a Fire Zone or 3-Under/3-Deep coverage.

Related Link: Clemson's Red Zone Fire Zones vs. North Carolina in the ACC Championship

The Eagles wised up at the end of the 1st Half, leaving the RB to the side of the Ni and sliding the line to the TE. New York ran a Fire Zone coverage again, and Hurts launched a ball down the field. Though Philly was able to handle the pressure from their adjustment, the Giants were able to intercept the ball, creating the second interception of the game.

Related Link: Troy's 2-Steal five-man pressure

In the final clip, the Giants return to their Double Mug Ni pressure early in the 4th Quarter but make a few design tweaks. Instead of a true four-down Double Mug alignment, New York runs an Under Front with the Nose in the A-gap to the passing strength. The ILB to the Ni’s side now mugs the B-gap. The slight adjustment assists in the manipulation of the protection.

The Eagles go with an Empty formation but leave the TE to check-release, which assists the edge of the protection. Martindale calls the same path, but the Ni can now press the TE pre-snap, getting him in prime position to blitz the box. In Empty protection, the O-line will slide together in one direction. In the clip, Philly slides away from the TE.

When the ball snaps, the TE blocks out on the EDGE, who steps towards him and stops. The LT slides down on the blitzing ILB to the B-gap, which is his responsibility in Slide protection (next man over). The Ni now has a clear path to the QB.

Martindale switches the drop-outs by having the DT and ILB opposite the Ni drop to the Hooks. Like the first clip, the Giants run Cover 0 with two ‘rats’ behind their pressure. The Giants do this because the Ni will hit the pressure fast, and Martindale wants a solid edge opposite the blitz to keep Mariota in the pocket; think of it like a vice.

In the previous clips, the Giants used an internal COP to ‘eat’ the blocks of the O-line as New York’s defenders dropped out. The move kept them occupied and assisted in keeping the Ni clean. Later, the Eagles adjusted to the pressure, so Martindale needed a slight change-up.

When coaches talk about in-game adjustments, they refer to slight tweaks to concepts already in place. The Giants didn’t reinvent the wheel in this last clip; they just moved responsibility and changed the front from which the path was run. The adjustment ensured the path would hit home against the Eagles’ protection adjustments, and Mariota had no escape route.

Related Link: tacking Empty – A Case Study (Indiana vs Tennessee ‘20)

Martindale may lack the luster he once had as a defensive play caller, but his knack for creating pressure must be recognized. The Giants, even while not producing at an efficient level on all downs, were still one of the better third-down teams in the NFL. Marindale’s pressure package stems from the Ravens tree that has, at times, dominated football.

The Stride ‘dog’ (single LB blitz) is an example of Martindale’s overall plan that keeps pressures simple for the defenses but complicated for the offense. The Giant's ability to flip the pressure late in the game exemplifies how Martindale creates pressure by using simple ‘dog tags’ to engage defenders and tell them where to go. These pressures can be amplified by adding defenders, from simulated pressures to six/seven-man blitzes.

Related Link: Using A Simple "DOG" Scheme To Create Sim Pressures

The blitz-centric style has lost favor over the years as a total package. Still, Martindale’s blitz tapes are always a must-watch. If you are looking for 3rd Down ideas or want to learn more about how to attack protections, Martindale’s defenses are always a great place to start. Big Ten QBs are definitely on notice, especially on 3rd Downs.

Comments

RobSk

February 20th, 2024 at 9:21 AM ^

And now I realize again that after 15 years of reading mgoblog (imo one of the best football blogs out there) I still know about 3% of football.

Heck, I struggled with the terminolo much less visualizing the defensive schemes and variations.

That said, DAMN! That was awesome! 
 

The biggest problem I have is evaluating the “how different is this from Minter” question. Lots of variety in the answers I see out there. 
 

This article obviously is way more about the rush part and zone blitz part than the coverages…some of the zone blitz dropout stuff sounds similar to what we’ve done to my ignorant self..

Thank you for this!

JHumich

February 20th, 2024 at 9:45 AM ^

Not the same D as Don Brown. But it feels like boom or bust is not what we want. Maybe I'm just not smart enough to understand what I just read. But I feel less encouraged about our D after reading it. 

RockinLoud

February 20th, 2024 at 9:57 AM ^

He shouldn't need to blitz near as much with our DL, while still deploying the confusing/disguised coverages on the backend. I think he likely will blitz a bit more than Minter did in general, but Minter did a fair amount of blitzing when the situation called for it - can't remember the name of the post on here, but someone covered the actual blitz rates last year for UM by opponent and there was probably more blitzing than most would recall because everyone just remembers the easy teams where there was relatively low blitzing.

schreibee

February 20th, 2024 at 4:13 PM ^

Too complicated! He described about 10 variations on 1 alignment, with who rushes & who drops back changing each time. 

How the Hell are the players supposed to get all that?! Isn't there an awful great chance of a bust on aby given snap?

As an example look at the Chiefs winning play in OT of the SB. Nick Bosa is chasing the play down from the backside while playside Niner defenders are confused and misaligned. Now obviously Steve Wilks has been fired for this (among other things), but how are we expecting college student players to get all this? 

ca_prophet

February 20th, 2024 at 6:52 PM ^

"The Stride ‘dog’ (single LB blitz) is an example of Martindale’s overall plan that keeps pressures simple for the defenses but complicated for the offense."

The key will be keeping the defense's decision tree simple and clear while forcing the offense to account for multiple branches which require mutually exclusive responses.

And, of course, in making sure that you're not asking your players to do things that only their NFL counterparts can do.  Michigan's D has a tremendous amount of talent, but it's not like everyone out there will be a regular NFL starter; even if that were true, they're not there today.  He doesn't have to face the Mahomes and Hurts of the world any more, but he doesn't have peak Earl Thomas back there either.

Adjusting to the skills and limits of the talent on hand is the true test of any coach, particularly one moving down the talent curve.

 

patrickdolan

February 21st, 2024 at 10:30 AM ^

I think you're underestimating the players. They work hard at this stuff, they've been playing the sport (some year round) for six to eight years before college, and, hey, they're Michigan students. (A little UM alum arrogance there.)

There are UM students in music who can play Lizst, Chopin, Schoenberg, and Scriabin. Heck, there are Michigan football players who get A's in engineering. As a university teacher, I found that we more often underestimate what young folks can do than we need to. (I suspect that Harbaugh is a good coach partly because he believes in the players. I'm hoping for the same from Moore.)

If Michigan continues to recruit kids who will develop and continues to hire coaches who can teach, it'll be fine.

It's still better to have experience, of course, especially if you want to win championships. Look at Michigan's OL the last few years. That's one reason I like the idea of having a former OL coach as HC.

My concern is whether Martindale's defense gets offenses to third down. With the talent on this year's team, I think that's a good bet.

massblue

February 20th, 2024 at 9:54 AM ^

Is it safe to assume that the scheme could be in trouble if the defense faces a mobile QB? Perhaps that is why Wink's defenses have not been as successful in recent years -- there are more mobile QBs in the NFL.  How many mobile QBs are we going to face this year?

jdemille9

February 20th, 2024 at 10:18 AM ^

If you really think about it, a mobile QB (when actually used as such) puts so much pressure on any defense - which can be very problematic for a lot of schemes. 

After reading all this stuff on Wink, I don't his particular style will hinder us at all. His style seems to be most effective when he has elite DB's of which we definitely have 2 (Moore and Johnson) and Paige is no slouch either. Couple that with Graham and Grant up front and if anything, this scheme probably makes our defense less predictable and harder to prepare for next year. 

In 2025 and beyond it's anyone's guess as we will be in full reload mode on defense. 

 

DonAZ

February 20th, 2024 at 10:05 AM ^

My hope is that Martindale, after so many years in the NFL, understands that in the college game he won't have 11 players with NFL talent ... that he'll have some very good players and some good players, and that he has to take that into account.  I've always been impressed with coaches that alter their schemes to the talent they have, rather than expecting the talent to somehow elevate to the scheme.  Martindale may well understand all this ... I don't know ... which is why I say it is my hope.

bighouseinmate

February 20th, 2024 at 12:54 PM ^

On the offensive side for the opposition there are only a couple of teams on the schedule that can boast having 10-11 players with nfl talent. Those are the teams that’ll really test Michigan’s defense, and would have if minter was still DC. 
 

I think that, at least for this year, Martindale will find it a luxury having a front 4-5 players depending on alignment that can get a pass rush without having to go to the nickel blitzes or 7-man rushes as often. Couple that with a very strong trio of DBs in the backend and I think the defense will be fine. Especially if Michigan’s new DC goes over tape of last year’s defense to see what he’s got player-wise that is coming back.

agp

February 20th, 2024 at 3:10 PM ^

The assumption that the talent in the NFL is a homogenous pile of "NFL" is completely false. The Giants rolled out pretty emphatically the worst LB room in the league this last year for example. They also had a extremely high end DT in Lawrence. I'm also pretty confident that a coach with 10ish years in NCAA and 20ish the NFL will understand that his teenagers are not all NFL players. 

DonAZ

February 20th, 2024 at 4:26 PM ^

NFL defenses are -- by definition -- "NFL talent" because every player is in the NFL.  I didn't say every player was top-flight.  But I'm fairly certain it can be said that the worst NFL defense is better than almost any college defense, for two reasons: (1) players in the NFL are the 'best of the best,' or they wouldn't be in the NFL; and (2) the players are more mature and experienced.

Martindale has been around those kinds of players for a long time.  The college game is different because of the disparity of available talent.  I'm not saying Martindale is inflexible, nor am I saying he's a problem, I simply said I hope he's good at working with cases where the talent pieces may not all be there.

Suavdaddy

February 21st, 2024 at 2:17 PM ^

Question for the OP, some mentioning it above and some from the Ravens in the news, how much of the downfall was injuries (Ravens) and talent or lack thereof (NYG - both defensively and the abysmal offensive play)?  Even in the few clips posted looks like some poor defensive plays - one on the nickel blowing by the QB, one where the end lost contain.  Granted that was Hurts, but seemed a little more soundness and that's at least one sack, maybe 2.  

Romeo50

February 20th, 2024 at 10:36 AM ^

I think age makes you less flexible and adaptable typically as a human, where you rely more on life’s experience. That said a guy like JJ as in a mobile quarterback is difficult for any defense but held somewhat in check by talent and experience which we have.

 Hope the team of coaches around him for input to make the decision tree uncomfortable for the good throwing quarterbacks, and let our mobility and pressure make the mobile ones think twice, hopefully

MGoOhNo

February 20th, 2024 at 12:07 PM ^

The blitz-centric style has lost favor over the years as a total package. 

Wait, so we hired an older version of OSU's D-coordinator?  With some Don Brown solve your problems with aggression vibe?

Ummm...

MichiganiaMan

February 20th, 2024 at 12:34 PM ^

Where Minter was a savant w/ coverages, Martindale seems to be on that level w/ the blitz. Ideally, Martindale uses the time at Michigan to evolve his base scheme w/ cues taken from his former protégés. Best for us now. Best for him longterm.

HAIL 2 VICTORS

February 20th, 2024 at 1:52 PM ^

I see no reason not to be confident in the hire.  As in most things for a man of this age will his experience over time be more valuable then any limitations he might have accepting change and adapting.  

At any age success can be found or lost in how we handle pride.

Double-D

February 23rd, 2024 at 10:38 AM ^

Martindale knows how to coach and is going to confuse the hell out of college QBs.

He also knows what he has in a DL and how to take advantage of coverages.

Let’s not think he won’t be able to adapt to his coverage and blitz packages based on personnel and situation.  We watched is somewhat in these clips. 

Caesar

February 20th, 2024 at 2:16 PM ^

After seeing Penn State DC Manny Diaz and former Michigan DC Don Brown flame out when confronted with a well-prepared, equally-talented foe, I'm a little concerned. 

What distinguished Minter wasn't his exotic blitzes, as I understand it. It was his ability to mix up coverages on the back end to a confuse a QB long enough that the DL could make some noise even without a blitz. In particular, he was awesome at pairing a particular coverage with a particular line call. 

That's not the only way to win, of course. But with Wink's efficiency waning, it seems like those top-caliber, on-the-fly playcalls may not be there. Let's see what happens.