November 1st, 2015 at 8:58 AM ^
Jack Miller is another perfect example of how a fifth year is not inevitable even if the player would be a starter that year. He may not have been likely to be a pro player, but he also decided he had graduated and did not need to do it any longer.
When Taylor Lewan - who was good enough to go pro - decided to stay around for a fifth year, everyone was surprised at his choice.
There are many reasons to not count on that fifth year. Let's hope that in Newsome's case it's because he is going to be good enough to be a high draft pick.
November 1st, 2015 at 1:53 AM ^
Message board speculation and all that but who knows...maybe Newsome just outperformed every other option and earned it (which IMO sends a pretty clear message to the rest of the team and recruits) or maybe the other options were/are injured. Or maybe Harbaugh screwed this up and is mortgaging the future of the Oline for short-term gain. No way to know from here..but if I had to bet that last one gets the long odds. Everything Harbaugh has done since returning to AA looks like he's building a program for the long haul.
November 1st, 2015 at 3:10 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 3:55 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 3:16 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 3:32 AM ^
it should serve as a notice of what this coaching staff would think of the criticism Hoke has received on this site for his redshirting decisions.
November 1st, 2015 at 4:18 AM ^
If this was Hoke in his 4th year, people would be going nuts after that game and that decision...even if we were still 6-2.
But whatever, we'll see how it plays out. At least I will before I make a decision. Remind me in December to come back to this one.
November 1st, 2015 at 3:55 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 4:20 AM ^
So what ARE the appropriate number of plays?
By the way, he played WAY more than 1-2 in this game. In fact, he was in on almost every non-3 and out drive at some point.
For whatever reason Drevno was obsessed with the 6-man OL tonight, I'm not sure what he saw or thought he saw, but it never really worked in the run game even though we tried over and over.
However, it worked wonders in the pass game and provided plenty of protection.
November 1st, 2015 at 7:34 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 8:14 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 9:35 AM ^
You've been around long enough to know that we have to allow the all knowing staff weigh in before we know what to think.
November 1st, 2015 at 11:56 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 12:37 PM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 7:38 AM ^
redshirt next season?
November 1st, 2015 at 8:17 AM ^
question can he redshirt next year if he doesn't play at all? Anyway, my guess is Cole moves somewhere on the inside next season or Newsome beats out Magnusson.
November 1st, 2015 at 12:49 PM ^
He's obviously making progress and passing up other OL. He could in turn be passed by other players next year, but that would be unexpected. He's burnt his redshirt without winning a starting job, so I don't expect that will determine whether he redshirts next season.
My guess is the same as yours. He'll be tough to keep out of the starting lineup next year.
November 1st, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^
Ignore the "trust the coaches" arguments, because those are lazy. But it is preposterous to me that anyone would find it UNACCEPTABLE to burn a redshirt in efforts to win a game which quite literally came down to inches.
The team wanted to win this game, the one they were playing, the one right in front of them that was back and forth all night with injuries all over, hanging in the balance on a knife edge with one play here or there potentially swinging the game. You can't just throw away games that are winnable.
For all we know winning this game is the difference in perception to a top recruit of "program returning to dominance" vs. "program still in rebuilding".
November 1st, 2015 at 4:22 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 6:42 AM ^
how did you conclude that? He was horrific for his first two drives. Secondly, I remember him running early constantly. Where was the vision there. ANd finally, you saw him only for a few plays.where his arm strength was really never on display
November 1st, 2015 at 6:58 AM ^
Luckily that was all he needed in the end, but I don't Rudock has to worry about his job getting taken away unless he's seriously injured.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 7:36 AM ^
I think 3 passes at the end of the game is a kinda small sample size to be determining that. IF this were the case, I would think Speight would be the starter in the first place. Recently Harbaugh made the statement that Rudock was the best QB on the team that is available to play and it isn't even close.
November 1st, 2015 at 11:35 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 5:55 AM ^
He will probably be a 1st to 2nd round pick by his fourth year in the program. Also I see that Harbaugh does care about RS because I was for sure thinking Morris was coming out but he wouldn't put him out there.
November 1st, 2015 at 6:19 AM ^
Or Speight is better than Morris.
Some people are still in a dream world that Morris is going to be a wunderkid who gives us 2 good years as a starter The Newsome example shows you Morris would be playing if he gave us the best chance to win tonight. Period.
Morris is being rs as a favor IMO so he can immediately transfer and play (if he graduates early) somewhere else in 2016.
If Morris was better than Speight he'd have played tonight. See: Newsome.
November 1st, 2015 at 7:41 AM ^
What is with the "Morris is awesome" people. Did they go to La Salle with him? Are they from his neighborhood. What has he done in football in the last 4 years that indicate he is the second coming of NFL Brady that some people seem to believe he is? He obviously needs work and IS NOT SECOND ON THE DEPTH CHART. I'm not quite sure where the disconnect is here.
November 1st, 2015 at 9:44 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 12:06 PM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 6:08 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 6:39 AM ^
Are you never happy WD? Seriously, we finally have a head coach he can lead us back to the glory days...something that seemed close to impossible after 10 plus years of garbage play, coaching, and player development. Now, you point out flaws in his coaching strategy, in particular the burning of redshirts, with some perverse glee. This is not a big deal so chill
November 1st, 2015 at 9:14 AM ^
You are imputing something to WD he did not argue. The OP reads more like an FYI. It's other posters who are questioning the decision, not WD.
November 1st, 2015 at 6:50 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 6:57 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 7:18 AM ^
You burn it if you play 1 play all year. Kyle Bosch burned his by playing 1 snap.
The 1/3rd rule is if you want to go petition the NCAA if you have a "season ending injury" before 33% of the games are played.
November 1st, 2015 at 6:51 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 6:54 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 7:07 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 9:32 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 10:13 AM ^
So I see your logic is to save all your cash and put it in the bank. A lot of good that will do you if you don't live long enough to enjoy it. The problem is we aren't talking about life and financial security. We are talking about fielding the best team and winning football games. Your insurance policy is Bredeson, Swenson, Onwenu, Hamilton and others. I guess it's a bitch we burned Mason Cole's redshirt too. You play your best players. In most cases that is not true freshman. When they are your best players you play them.
November 1st, 2015 at 12:48 PM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 6:53 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 6:55 AM ^
is based on the premise that the promising player is on the field for only a few snaps during an entire season; a classic example of this is Will Campbell. Including the bowl game, we've got five games left, so we cannot know how much Newsome is going to play. If he sits the rest of the season, then yeah, burning the red shirt seems questionable. If he's the backup and gets substantial snaps, then it doesn't. It's not like our starting OL is some juggernaut that's just mauling people on a consistent basis, so if the staff have concluded that Newsome is good enough to play, it's hardly a stretch to think Newsome will get decent playing time.
November 1st, 2015 at 9:03 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 12:10 PM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 9:37 AM ^
November 1st, 2015 at 6:54 AM ^
This site is obsessed about having a full 22 of RS seniors for a title run. In todays CFB you dont need that and thats not how you get top talent. Its not 1994 anymore. Kids are gonna play and contribute as frosh and soph.
Look at MSU, theyre stacked with upperclassman and probably have their worst team in 3 years.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 6:56 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 6:57 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 1st, 2015 at 7:54 AM ^