MSU Snowflakes Thread: Coaching

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on

This will be your thread for snowflakes and hot takes about the overall coaching for this game against MSU.

BlueCube

October 18th, 2015 at 8:54 AM ^

you would have thought with his experience that  Baxter would have told the gunners to move in to block if they didn't have anyone back. I think Blake knew he would have no margin for error because of the unblocked players and lost his composure when the snap was low. I'm sure the coaches warned him to fall on it but sometimes the mind does strange things under pressure.

PIJER

October 18th, 2015 at 6:05 AM ^

Doesn't help if you don't catch the ball! Plus, what was Dantonio supposed to say? That was their only play. If we catch and kick the game was over. For all of our deficiencies, we should have won that game! I just wish I could blame it on something like the luck of the Irish. I'm hurting!

Yeoman

October 17th, 2015 at 8:09 PM ^

...there is not.

 

If a player elects to drag the ball underneath himself or dive on the ball, he is then required to immediately knock the ball clear of his possession (a player is no longer in possession if he is not laying on the ball or the ball is not within his grasp) or correctly dispose of the ball.

Reader71

October 17th, 2015 at 7:59 PM ^

I know that statistics and logic and common sense are against me, but I never want to see a shield punt again. First Boccher, now this. Bad associations, man.

Yeoman

October 17th, 2015 at 8:47 PM ^

At the very least--and I'm trying very hard not to second-guess such an unlikely happening--it might be nice to have the old-fashioned protection available for situations where there isn't much advantage to getting everybody off the LOS and into coverage quickly. We didn't need the big roll-out kick; all we needed was foot-meets-ball.

I had a flashback to the rivalry game at my HS a few years back. Drove the ball to the goal line in the final minute, down 4. (To fully appreciate this, we'd lost the rivalry game 45 straight years.) Had four downs to punch it across from a foot away.

On first down the center tore his ACL and had to come out.

On second down the backup center, who hadn't played there all year, snapped the ball about 20 yards over the QB's head and the other team picked it up and ran it the length of the field as time ran out.

Other team's coordinator came running down out of the press box behind me and through our fans yelling 46! 46! (It's still a rivalry, apparently.)

I asked somebody later why they didn't just line up under center and QB sneak for those last few inches, especially once the regular center was out. And was told it was because in an entire season and pre-season of practices they had never, not once!, put the QB under center, even just to practice snapping it that way. Quarterback wouldn't have known where to put his hands. Center wouldn't have known how to get the ball there.

There's something to be said for being multiple. Or at least preserving necessary fundamental skills.

Stuck in Lansing

October 17th, 2015 at 8:24 PM ^

You cannot put an average QB in 3rd and 7 all day. We were beating our heads against a wall running the ball what seemed like 75% of 1st and 2nd down plays. Big fail on the play calling. Harbaugh is the right guy, but 3rd and 7 isn't our down.

newtopos

October 17th, 2015 at 9:02 PM ^

Baxter is 1,000 times better than his predecessor, but on the final play, we had a gunner wide left, even though there was no one back to return and no MSU player playing that gunner.  Look at the overhead shot available now on ESPN.  Seems to me the right coaching call is to have your punt team in max protect formation if MSU is going for the block with no returner.

markusr2007

October 17th, 2015 at 8:56 PM ^

Fact is Michigan could have iced the game with a 1st down, but failed when it mattered most. Punting with 00:10 left against the luckiest goddamned 7th ranked team in the land is just asking for it. History repeats. Yesterday another UM coach loses his first game vs Sparty. But I feel sorry for the remaining bastards on UMs schedule.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

MGoBlue96

October 17th, 2015 at 9:05 PM ^

Why even send anybody to cover when MSU wasn't going to bother returning it?  Could have a full on max protect on, and even assuming the worst still happens you have guys back who can possible recover the fumble/bring down the MSU player.

Yeoman

October 17th, 2015 at 10:32 PM ^

...it's right as a general principle, but you're only allowed four in the backfield and the guys at the LOS aren't available to recover a fumble 15 yards behind the line.

It was a gaffe; I'm not sure it was decisive. Once the punter drops the snap, we've got a problem. Actually I think Reader71's on the right track here--in an old-fashioned protection the interior of the line is holding their blocks until the ball's kicked. In the new protections they're letting the rushers go at some point, trusting the shield to hold, and releasing downfield. There's no point to that here, and MSU sure did have a lot more guys around the fumbled snap than you ever see near the punter in a pro-style protection.

 

schreibee

October 17th, 2015 at 10:51 PM ^

Ok 65+ comments in the Coaching snowflakes and no one has mentioned Harbaugh calling 2 TO in last minute, so my criticism must be off base - but WHY do we stop the clock when the only thing in the world we need (aside from a 1st down) is for time to expire?
Shouldn't we snap the ball with 1 or 2 seconds left on the play clock rather than stop it at 1 second? Those couple seconds were the difference between msu having no time to run even 1 play after a change of possession, and the worst possible scenario we saw play out...right? What am I missing strategically?
Also, what about some slower developing plays (sweeps, draw play, etc)? I mean, if we're not even TRYING to gain 1st down yardage, why not use more clock?
Can some coachy types explain why Harbaugh did or did not use the clock correctly on our last possession please?

Yeoman

October 17th, 2015 at 11:22 PM ^

Since the clock starts on the snap after the TO, the only time you could possibly gain by not calling timeout is the time between the moment you didn't call timeout and the snap. Since the timeouts came with 1 on the play clock, that's a fraction of a second at most. And the closer you press that "at most" to get that fraction of a second, the more you've signaled to the defense precisely when the snap's going to come.

Doing it this way means you can snap the ball at your leisure with no risk of the defense jumping the snap. That, in exchange for maybe half a second of clock time, seems a good trade to me.

schreibee

October 17th, 2015 at 11:34 PM ^

Ok, I AM missing something then... I just don't recall a lot of coaches calling TO with the lead and time running down except maybe to kick a FG.
Then there was my 2nd point about slower developing plays rather than dives up the middle if you're not seriously trying to get a 1st down... aren't there plays that would cause more time to elapse while getting the same basic result - which was virtually no gain?

Yeoman

October 18th, 2015 at 11:01 AM ^

I had never really thought that part of it through before last night, but I realized as it was happening that maybe it made sense to do it this way, at least against MSU who's been successfully timing our snaps and shooting the A gap for almost a decade. I was more worried they'd blow up a play in our backfield and cause a fumble than I was worried about the couple of seconds. I couldn't see any way to fully run out the clock in any event--it was just a question of whether you're punting with 8 on the clock or 4.

ford_428cj

October 17th, 2015 at 9:57 PM ^

Play calling on O was blah. Ruddock is why I guess. D didn't blitz enough IMO. The punter was slow at getting kicks off all day. Regular style punt at the end is all we needed.

samdrussBLUE

October 17th, 2015 at 10:25 PM ^

We couldn't pick up a first down when it mattered. Fact is, the offense is mediocre (at best) and the defense overall is above average. Need to keep working



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

mackbru

October 17th, 2015 at 10:56 PM ^

This was harbaugh's first bad coaching job. And I'd say this if we'd lost. The offense was uncreative and played scared. Kept wasting the first two downs by trying to bull the ball up the middle. Very Lloyd Carr-ish.

schreibee

October 17th, 2015 at 11:27 PM ^

I do not know how to break this to you, but actually we did lose.
But I agree on the coaching. Aside from getting Jabrill his 1st snaps on O, very little was "saved" for msu. Nothing really creative, nothing "punishing" them for being overly aggressive. I'm guessing we got badly out-RPS'd in this one.
And Cook was fantastic, constantly challenging Jourdan and successfully fitting it in verry small windows. THAT'S playing with confidence.
Oh well, playoff talk in year one was probably getting ahead of ourselves...

HollywoodHokeHogan

October 17th, 2015 at 11:07 PM ^

                The coaches can only work with what they have, and they don't have a very good quarterback.  People can point to his zero turn-overs, but I'd argue that's a function of the play calling.  They don't trust Rudock to throw down the field and to be honest, they have no reason to.  There are only so many play calls that work when the entire defense is 5 yards off the line of scrimmage.  I think people expect way too much from the play-calling and the OL.  When you can't threaten down the field, and you aren't a running QB option team, it's goddamn hard to get an effective running game going.  I thought the OL looked fairly good in pass protection, but often Rudock holds the ball too long.  When he doesn't, he looks to throw short, which plays into the defense's strategy.  When he does throw long... well, it ain't really pretty.  I'm impressed that the offense looks at all functional when even shitty secondaries are able to stack the box.

Gob Wilson

October 17th, 2015 at 11:40 PM ^

I pity the Gophers in 2 weeks. For those folks upset at our coaches I will have to disagree. This was probably the worst loss in Michigan Stadium history. We are all hurting. I get it but I stand by our coaches. Harbaugh and his staff are the best in the land.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Mannix

October 17th, 2015 at 11:46 PM ^

2 gunners on a 11am front? 8 guys got through on a 5 man front.

Go out on 4th down w the offense and at least make Sparty think about defending instead of pinning ears back and flying. Jake could have easily pooch kicked it. Also, get the first down.

.2% chance to win



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

mbee1

October 18th, 2015 at 12:40 AM ^

Surprised nobody has brought up clock mismanagement. Each play Michigan ran only took 5 seconds. Run a stretch play, toss, qb boot that's going to draw things out. Take delays instead of calling TO with one second left. Add up those few extra seconds and that last play is run with 3-4 seconds left. That opens up a lot of possibilities to kill those last few seconds.

samdrussBLUE

October 18th, 2015 at 12:41 AM ^

We have a mediocre offense and an above average defense. No one can dispute that. Have fun. Try to live through the weekend.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ford_428cj

October 18th, 2015 at 9:04 AM ^

Like somebody above said -we should have run plays that burned more time.

We also should have saved a TO for the 4th down play, to make sure we were prepared. Tell Rudock after the first TO - to snap the ball with a couple sec left on play clock every time

Our party group was saying "you know there coming to try & block the punt". I guess our special teams coach didnt think of that. Major fail with what he sent out - when you see our formation screen shot above. .

cbs650

October 18th, 2015 at 9:13 AM ^

Can anyone explain why Higdon was in on the first play on the last drive? Where was Smith, Johnson, Isaac? Even the announcers couldn't believe it. There were some major coaching blunders on that last drive and Blake is just the easy scapegoat.