February 8th, 2021 at 12:11 AM ^
You can do better than that
February 8th, 2021 at 2:25 AM ^
No shit, at least explain where the reference is, the OP is making people fish for it.
It's under the number of SB Rings tab, FYI.
February 8th, 2021 at 4:24 AM ^
I'm thinking something got changed, because the win goes to Brady, not Wikipedia.
February 8th, 2021 at 5:45 AM ^
Reference? He has his own entry, in case you didn’t know:
February 8th, 2021 at 6:57 AM ^
So does every other well know athlete, entertainer, or billionaire, what's the point?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Montana
February 8th, 2021 at 10:30 AM ^
not to mention some of these folks!:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joy_Behar
February 8th, 2021 at 7:52 AM ^
OP (and many commenters) don't realize that any joke edits made to wiki pages usually get fixed very quickly.
So a screenshot would have been much better than a link.
February 8th, 2021 at 8:02 AM ^
I forgot that Belichick has EIGHT rings. Six with the Pats and two as DC for the Giants.
February 8th, 2021 at 11:17 AM ^
He should have gotten two for Super Bowl LIII against the Rams: one as head coach and another for DC.
That was the single greatest display of defense I've ever seen. And I watched 2006 Michigan/Penn State
February 8th, 2021 at 8:20 AM ^
Not sure why any of this is "FTW," but OK.
I'll tell you who didn't get the win. All those articles, and there are many over the years, with some variation of "Brady is done."
As articles that didn't age well go, this one from 2009 might be my favorite:
MATT CASSEL PROVES TOM BRADY IS A SYSTEM QUARTERBACK
I guess in defense of the author (an unnamed writer for Bleacher Report), much of the article is critical of the notion that being a "system QB" is even a bad thing. And the notion certainly didn't begin with this article. But, yeah. Not the best take ever.