Preview: Duke

Submitted by Ace on December 3rd, 2013 at 2:58 PM


WHAT Michigan at Duke
WHERE Cameron Indoor Stadium, Durham, North Carolina
WHEN 9:15 p.m. Eastern, Tuesday
LINE Duke –2 (KenPom)

Right: A book that's every bit as good, if not better, than its cover art.


Dick Vitale is calling a game at Duke. You have been forewarned.


Yes, another section before we get to The Them, because Michigan is dealing with a potential absence of great significance: as of yesterday, John Beilein still wasn't sure if Nik Stauskas (ankle) will play tonight—it all depends on how he looked in practice yesterday, and there hasn't been word about that as of this writing. If Michigan is missing their go-to scorer at Cameron, odds of a victory are pretty slim. If you know of an ancient dance—preferably involving liberal use of three-goggles—that can cure sprained ankles, now is the time to perform it.

Update: ESPN's Dan Shulman, who's calling tonight's game, said Stauskas "looked good to go," after this afternoon's shootaround. [HT: @UMHoops]


While it might not be fun for tonight, Michigan fans should be quite happy that 6'8" freshman forward Jabari Parker (right, via) chose Duke over Michigan State, as the five-star is already living up to prodigious levels of hype. Parker leads the Blue Devils with averages of 23 points and eight rebounds per game while shooting 57% from two and an even 50% from three; he also has a team-high 14 blocks and is second on the squad with 10 steals in eight games. His matchup with Glenn Robinson III is going to get more attention than any other in this game, and for good reason; only Arizona has been able to slow Parker this year—he needed 21 shots to net 19 points and pulled in just three rebounds—and they're one of two teams to beat the Blue Devils this season.

Fellow 6'8" forward Rodney Hood, a sophomore transfer from Mississippi State, is the other Blue Devil to average 20 points per game; while he doesn't rebound or block shots on Parker's level, his shooting stats are actually better (63% from two, 59% from three) and he gets to the line with the same high frequency (6.1 fouls drawn/40 minutes, identical to Parker). Duke should feature plenty of three-guard lineups with these two up front; when they do, it'll be a huge test for Michigan's bigs and their ability to defend the perimeter.

When Duke starts the game, at least, they'll have 6'8" senior Josh Hairston on the floor—he's started the last two games at the five after 6'9" sophomore Amile Jefferson started the first six. I'm assuming Hairston is out there for his defense, as he's a very low-usage player offensively and he rebounds at a low rate for a big man; he's also extremely foul-prone. Jefferson, meanwhile, is the team's second-best rebounder after Parker and finishes well around the basket—he's 19/27 from the field—but his offensive game has been marred by free-throw woes (8/24), an issue compounded by the fact that he draws a ton of fouls. The two combine to play around 28 minutes per game, and this is definitely the weak spot in the Duke rotation.

Point guard Quinn Cook is having a breakout season so far, averaging 13.4 points and six assists per game with improved shooting numbers (56% from two, 38% from three) and a lowered turnover rate. He commands nearly all of Duke's minutes at the point—he's already played 36+ minutes four times this season. 6'2" senior Tyler Thornton and 6'4" sophomore Rasheed Sulaimon platoon at shooting guard. Thornton starts and is the team's perimeter defensive specialist—his 11 steals nearly match his 15 field goal attempts, though he's a capable outside shooter. Sulaimon is mired in a sophomore slump after starting for the Blue Devils as a consensus five-star freshman, connecting on 39% of his twos and 31% of his threes; last year he was at 46% and 37%, respectively, with higher usage numbers, so at some point one would expect he'll get back into the groove and see more time.

The other Blue Devil worth noting is 6'5" shooting specialist Andre Dawkins, who plays around 12 minutes per game and has connected on 12 of his 27 three-point attempts this season.


Both teams carry two losses into this game; Duke's, however, look much better on paper than Michigan's, as both came in neutral-site games against top-ten teams: #8 Kansas (by nine points) and #7 Arizona (six). Their only other game against a top-100 KenPom team was a ten-point win over #55 Alabama in the NIT Preseason Tipoff. Their five other victories were relatively comfortable home triumphs over middling-to-bad teams with the notable exception of a one-point escape against #158 Vermont in which the Catamounts shot a remarkable 31/41 from inside the arc.


Four factors, with obvious sample size caveats applying (national ranks in parentheses):

  eFG% Turnover % Off. Reb. % FTA/FGA
Offense 59.5 (6) 15.2 (38) 28.7 (256) 48.3 (72)
Defense 48.3 (140) 18.0 (201) 31.8 (170) 43.0 (206)

Duke's offense currently ranks fourth in the country in adjusted efficiency; they do everything well except rebound their misses, and misses haven't come too often—as a team, they shoot 57% from two and 43% from three, which is obviously excellent.

Defensively, however, they've experienced a significant dropoff from last season, when Mason Plumlee patrolled the paint. While the Blue Devils are very good at preventing three-point attempts (24.2 3PA/FGA, #17 nationally), which opponents are making at just a 27% clip, they've allowed 50.7% shooting inside the arc, just 207th in the country; their shot-blocking (7.5% of opponent attempts) ranks even worse.


Feed the beast. Given Duke's lack of a true interior presence with size remotely comparable to Mitch McGary, this is a game for Michigan to look to run their offense from the inside out, especially if they have as much trouble as other teams in getting good looks from the outside. McGary should factor in as both a shooting and passing threat in the post while also getting plenty of chances to for putbacks—Duke isn't great at preventing offensive rebounds.

Work for good looks. In games against high-tempo teams—and Duke fits that bill—Michigan's perimeter players have been prone to taking contested shots early in the clock. Simply put, the Wolverines can't afford to waste possessions against a team that's going to put up plenty of points. If Michigan gets impatient, Duke could run away with this one. With Duke's issues defending the paint this season, Stauskas, LeVert, Robinson, et al need to aggressively attack the basket instead of settling for perimeter looks unless they're quite open.

Get a body on Parker. Parker has been quite active on the offensive glass in Duke's wins; in their two losses, however, he's combined for just one offensive rebound. He's going to get his points, even if he's not shooting well—his 19-point output against Arizona was his lowest of the season. If Michigan is allowing him second-chance opportunities, they're going to have a tough time keeping up.


I answered a handful of questions about the game over at Duke Basketball Report, and DBR's JD King was kind enough to return the favor:

Has there been a common thread in Duke's two losses? Looking at the box scores, it seems like cold shooting doomed them against Arizona while rebounding and interior defense were the problem against Kansas. Is that a fair assessment, and is there anything those teams did that you think Michigan can replicate?

Not exactly but close. In both games size hurt Duke. Right now Duke's depth is sort of undeveloped. And Amile Jefferson, of whom much is expected, isn't playing very well. Neither is Rasheed Sulaimon. Duke will be a lot better when they come around.

According to KenPom, the offense has been just as good as it was last year, while the defense has taken a plunge into the mediocre. Is that your sense from watching this team, and what's been the biggest issue defensively?

It's a very young team. It's a gifted group offensively, especially Parker and Hood, but defensive principles take longer to learn. Help defense has been erratic as has communication.

The exception to the defensive issues appears to be on the perimeter—Duke isn't allowing many three-point attempts, and when they do opponents aren't hitting them (27%). This has been a hallmark of Coach K teams going back many years. What makes the Blue Devils so good at defending against the outside shot, and what does Michigan have to do to counter this?

Duke really emphasizes three point D. Michigan, under Beilein, is really good at making Duke commit to either the three or the drive and then taking what's open. It's not much fun to play against.

In your opinion, what's the matchup that you think most favors Duke over Michigan, and vice versa?

Parker and Hood are a load. Cook can be brilliant. I'm honestly not familiar enough with Michigan this year to comment there.

How do you see this game playing out?

Duke is really tough at home but Michigan's offense is brilliant and has given Duke trouble since Beilein got there. Plus the 1-3-1 zone gives Duke fits and Duke has not handled the zone well this year at all.


Duke by 2

In a game at Cameron, just about everything needs to go right for a victory, and the questionable status of Stauskas is quite worrying—even if he plays, it's pretty clear he won't be 100%, and that alone will be difficult to overcome. Michigan can take advantage of Duke's interior defensive issues; they'll need to shoot well from the outside, however, to stay competitive, and Duke's perimeter defense is excellent. The wild card is the aforementioned 1-3-1; if Michigan can deploy it successfully without allowing too many open looks from the outside, they've got a chance to not only slow down Duke's offense, but also get out in transition, where they've been far more effective than in the halfcourt so far this year.


UMHoops preview. Maize n Brew preview. DBR preview.



December 3rd, 2013 at 3:23 PM ^

Why does it ALWAYS seem like we play Duke on THEIR home court or on a neutral site that is not really neutral???   Does it only seem that way or is it a reality?





Date Duke rank UM rank Site Duke UM OT
December 21, 1963 5 3 Ann Arbor, MI 67 83  
March 20, 1964 3   Kansas City, MO (NCAA Semifinal) 91 80  
December 5, 1964 5 1 Durham, NC 79 86  
December 21, 1965 1 3 Detroit, MI 100 93  
December 3, 1966 4   Durham, NC 96 75  
December 6, 1967     Ann Arbor, MI 93 72  
December 9, 1968 16   Durham, NC 80 90  
December 10, 1969     Ann Arbor, MI 73 68  
December 7, 1970 13   Durham, NC 95 74  
December 9, 1989 6 8 Ann Arbor, MI 108 113 OT
December 8, 1990 5   Durham, NC 75 68  
December 14, 1991 1 18 Ann Arbor, MI 88 85 OT
April 6, 1992 1   Minneapolis, MN* (NCAA Final) 71 51  
December 5, 1992 4 1 Durham, NC* 79 68  
December 11, 1993 4 3 Ann Arbor, MI 73 63  
December 10, 1994 9 23 Durham, NC 69 59  
December 9, 1995 18 22 Ann Arbor, MI* 84 88  
December 8, 1996 10 7 Durham, NC* 61 62  
December 13, 1997 1   Ann Arbor, MI* 73 81  
December 12, 1998 3   Durham, NC* 108 64  
December 11, 1999 14   Ann Arbor, MI 104 97  
December 9, 2000 1   Durham, NC 104 61  
December 8, 2001 1   Ann Arbor, MI 104 83  
December 7, 2002 4   Durham, NC 81 59  
December 8, 2007 6   Durham, NC 95 67  
November 21, 2008 10   New York, NY (Coaches Vs. Cancer Classic) 71 56  
December 6, 2008 4   Ann Arbor, MI 73 81  
March 20, 2011 3   Charlotte, NC (NCAA Third Round) 73 71  
November 22, 2011 6 15 Lahaina, HI (Maui Invitational Semifinal) 82 75  
December 3, 2013 10 22 Durham, NC (ACC–Big Ten Challenge)

Guess it is more than just seeming that way.


December 3rd, 2013 at 10:23 PM ^

Suppose the /s was implied and not readily apparent. Even when we have tourneys or "classics" there is very little ever neutral about them. ACC/B1G Cameron Indoor? Who signed up for that bullshit? Make those blue bitches come to Crisler. Same way we can't get a home and home with an SEC football team - we seemingly can't get much traction for neutral or home site games against the dookie piles.


December 3rd, 2013 at 3:24 PM ^

Stauskas is going to play.  I believe he alluded to this in his presser yesterday, but if it's not going to be Derrick, Big, Nik, GRIII, Caris running the 1-3-1, then it's Derrick, Big, Zak, GRIII, and Caris.  Beilein mentioned that it's easier to run the bottom of the 1-3-1 as a freshman but much harder to run the sides/top.  I'm slightly more optimistic about Nik seeing how he played through the ankle injury against Charlotte, but he obviously won't be 100%.

Also, funny that your questions were longer than his responses in some cases.  Thanks to JJ for the opposing insight.


December 3rd, 2013 at 8:31 PM ^

Not much respect shown to Michigan or to Ace.  Just going through the motions:

In your opinion, what's the matchup that you think most favors Duke over Michigan, and vice versa?

Parker and Hood are a load. Cook can be brilliant. I'm honestly not familiar enough with Michigan this year to comment there.

He should have just declined the interview.


December 3rd, 2013 at 8:16 PM ^

Yea Kenpom only by 2?  Essentially Michigan would be favored by 1 @ home with these guys?  No way.

Hairston I'm waiting to see have some break out game out of no where after he's been quiet.  Parker is Parker is really, really good.  He'll get his.  Will he get his and Moar, though, with GRIII playing him?  I'm a bit pesimistic, Jabari could in my eyes put up 30+ tonight.

Good news that Stauskas is looking well.  Without him there's no chance.  With him, there's a slight,, there's no chance we can beat these guys @ Cameron Indoor.  I'm cynical, sue me.  Prove me wrong Wolverines, and I'll eat those words.  I'd be comfotable coming away with a 10-12 point loss though and seeing some flashes of brilliance, especially if Michigan claws it's way back a few times only to see the last few minutes get away from them.  That woul be admirable for our own young team and a lot will be able to be taken away for more learning purposes (those get old, don't they).


December 3rd, 2013 at 8:41 PM ^

My wife is a Dookie.  That-3-years-in-a-row win streak in '95, '96', 97 when we were dating was SWEEEEEET!!

That's unheard of for a non-conference Duke opponent.