Phil Steele Pre-Season Rank: Michigan 12th

Submitted by Caesar on

LINK

Is anyone else fine with this? I mean, beyond the whole 'pre-season rankings are meaningless.' Top 15, with Michigan's schedule, is striking distance for top 4 when it counts, especially with the Game to end the season. It'll allow the young guys and QB to get settled in and generally reduce the pressure (though I'm not sure Harbaugh is a fan of that). 

Pepto Bismol

June 27th, 2016 at 11:44 AM ^

Not to be dismissive, but in the new College Football Playoff era, I could not care any less about pre-season rankings.

Iowa would have made the CFP if they hung on against State last December. That's friggin' Iowa, who didn't play Michigan, MSU, OSU or PSU on their regular conference slate.  Whose non-conference was Illinois State, Iowa State, Pitt & North Texas.  Who was ranked #64 by ESPN preseason a year ago.  --- That mediocre team with a junk schedule would have made the f***ing CFP with one more defensive stop.

 

We're in the B1G.  A B1G champ from Ann Arbor, led by media-magnet Jim Harbaugh will go to the playoff every single time - even with a loss.  That's all.  Rankings be damned.  Win the B1G.  Make the playoff.  If they don't do either and they put together another 10-3 season?  What's that end up?  Ranked 10-20?  Somewhere in there?  I don't know, I don't care and it won't matter.

#1, 3, 12, unranked, whatever.  Win the B1G.

bronxblue

June 27th, 2016 at 11:52 AM ^

I don't much care about preseason rankings, but this actually feels a bit low.  UM is probably a top-8 program this year; but putting Tenn and Washington above UM seems a bit optimistic, given UT's yearly hype-to-crash trajectory (and to say nothing of the off-the-field issues), and Washington, while very talented, still has a number of questions about consistency.

 

Iseeyou

June 27th, 2016 at 12:42 PM ^

Because he ranked OSU higher than UM, a team OSU just beat by 4 touchdowns ?? Sounds rather fair to me. In fact considering how little Michigan has proved thus far they are being give a generous benefit of doubt to be in the top 10.

Perkis-Size Me

June 27th, 2016 at 12:59 PM ^

I know some people might lambast my comment and feel I should either "go big or go home." But I don't think this prediction, as the current situation stands, is that far off. Questions about who will be the QB,  very shakey LB play that will likely rely on true freshmen and a guy who, to date, has not played the position in a live game. Decent to good running game, but not anything to write home about yet, along with a good (but not yet great) offensive line. At least not one that's proven it can be great week in and week out. 

Michigan certainly has the potential to crack the top 4, but I would not peg them as one of the four best teams in the country right now. The teams that surprise me in the top 10 are LSU, Washington, and Tennessee. 

Steele is placing a lot of trust in a Washington team that went 7-6 last year. Tennessee is yet to prove that it can actually finish in big games, despite its horde of talent. And LSU has yet to prove under Les Miles that it will ever be more than a one-dimensional offense that looks like its fresh out of 1973. Fournette is a man among boys, sure. But as Alabama proved, he can be bottled up by a good defense. Right now, I'd probably peg Clemson, Alabama, FSU and maybe Oklahoma as my top 4. 

Rodriguesqe

June 27th, 2016 at 12:59 PM ^

preseason polls are stupid but not meaningless. Being ranked high early is like getting a mulligan in golf. Being lower ranked means you have to work harder to get to the top and pollsters are likelier to  knock you for any stumble. Very few  rank based purely from on field results and like to justify their preseason bias.

But #12 seems on the low side of fair to me. And this year the above won't matter mutch. If we drop a game early we deserve to get punished.

rice4114

June 27th, 2016 at 3:52 PM ^

Bama will for ever or unitl Saban effing retires be able to take a loss in the first 8 weeks with no worries whatsoever. The only thing the loss does is put them on the same footing as everyone else. Meaning you cant lose a game now and make the playoffs.

 

Mulligan if ever there was one.

Wolfman

June 27th, 2016 at 8:03 PM ^

I just found your remarks about him (Brown) being a question mark a ltttle strange inasmuch as he took's BC's talent and turned it into no. 1, laying the like of FSU, Carolina, Tech and teams not known for their ease in defending them. It seems logical he would take the upgrade in talent - unquesstionable, at that, and move forward with speed and stength he's never seen before except when watching the pro game or some of the very elite in cfb. 

Would you care to expound a bit? 

Sommy

June 28th, 2016 at 8:52 AM ^

He's a new coach in a new system with new pieces to work with. Will he be good in year one? Possibly. But as Michigan's DC, he is as of yet an unknown commodity.

I remember people being really excited when it was announced that Scott Schafer (another highly aggressive DC with impressive numbers at a smaller college) was coming here to be RR's DC. I'm certainly not predicting that Don Brown will be Scott Schafer, but I'm not predicting he will be wildly successful either. I'm reticent. I need to see results with this team first.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

MGoJeezy

June 28th, 2016 at 6:18 AM ^

Considering he thinks Jeremy Clark is the starting corner opposite of Lewis (Harbaugh has publicity states this will be stribling) and that Deveon Smith "really came on in the 2nd half of the season" I'm taking what he says with a grain of salt.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad