MadMatt

May 1st, 2014 at 6:33 PM ^

I would feel better about her prediction if she had more than a photo caption for each game and said a little more about why she thought one team would win.

MGoStrength

May 1st, 2014 at 8:24 PM ^

Is it just me or would you all feel more comfortable going 8-4 and beating our rivals, or at least 9-3 and splitting with them.  I don't think dropping both of them will sit well with the fan base.

jabberwock

May 1st, 2014 at 8:47 PM ^

I'm saying 7-5 including a loss at Rutgers (but with at least one rivalry win) .
Hoke . . . stays.  (Brian must be restrained from immolating himself outside Schembechler Hall)

aiglick

May 1st, 2014 at 10:06 PM ^

Well this was the point that Hoke stepped in to take over what would have been RichRod's year 4. I don't think any of us expected 11-2 that year. I have no idea what's going to happen. Hopefully it will be a more fun ride than last year's journey.

steve sharik

May 1st, 2014 at 10:52 PM ^

In other accurate predictions from people with similar football knowledge, my 22-month old daughter has predicted that, when counting, five comes after three. (Somewhat supporting evidence came from King Arthur when he threw the Holy Hand Grenade, though he believed five came right after two, despite being warned it was "right out.") Seriously, who gives a rat's ass what Angelique predicts Michigan's football record will be?

phork

May 2nd, 2014 at 8:15 AM ^

I urge you to not fall into the trap of the "Next year is our year" folly.  If Hoke is anything less than 9-3 with this schedule his seat should be pretty toasty.  But you can't fire him without have a valid succession plan.