Make It Take It Comment Count

Brian

1/14/2014 – Michigan 80, Penn State 67 – 12-4, 4-0 Big Ten

11958464256_973afdf752_z[1]11956967673_2b6fac8f5e_b[1]

DUNKS ON DUNKS (or layups I guess) [Bryan Fuller]

What if I told you that Michigan would lose two NBA first-round draft picks and a preseason All-American and this would do essentially nothing to their elite offense? We'll call this one "60 possessions for approximately 70 points" because we're not into the whole brevity thing. It will be directed by John Beilein, with an assist from Nik Stauskas.

A disclaimer, first: IIRC, even though Kenpom's offense and defense rankings are schedule adjusted, high fliers have a tendency to fall back to the pack when they play in tough defensive conferences. That may be simple regression to the mean or an issue with the algorithm. Anyway. I digress for a reason.

The preceding disclaimer is present because hot damn, Michigan's offense has taken the departure of Trey Frickin' Burke and Tim Hardaway Jr. like a champ. Sixteen games into the season, Michigan's offensive efficiency has fallen from a tops-in-the-country 120 points per 100 possessions all the way to 119 points per 100 possessions. This mean's they're fifth instead of first*, but seriously Michigan lost the Naismith winner, another first-round NBA draft pick, and Mitch McGary and maintained literally 99% of their offensive efficiency. Hail Beilein, hail Stauskas, hail GRIII and friends. (Hail rule changes.)

That's quite a thing there.

--------------------------------------

Unfortunately, and as you've probably noticed over the last two games against not-very-good teams, the defense is really hurting. They're currently 77th on Kenpom, down from 48th last year. The eye test confirms this and then some. Michigan just ceded 70 points to Nebraska in a 59-possession game and 67 to Penn State in a 60-possession game, and too many of those were easy drives to the bucket. At one point in the second half of the Penn State game they'd pulled to within two because they scored on six of seven possessions, seemingly without breaking a sweat. Two winless Big Ten teams just combined to shoot 63% from two against Michigan. It's a problem, a large and burgeoning one.

What happened in the stat world?

  • The rules changes have had a real impact. Nationwide offensive efficiency is up just under 4 points per 100 possessions. Michigan's defense has slumped worse than the average, but everyone's having some issues. The extremes don't seem to be particularly impacted—the best offense is still around 120 while the best defense is still around 86—but the distribution of teams inside hypothetical maximums and minimums has shifted.
  • Michigan's free-throw defense is terrible. Opponents are hitting 74%, which is in the 300s. Michigan has to wave its arms around more and stuff. This is where Michigan misses an intimidator like Mitch McGary. Free throw defense is critical.
  • Nothing else, statistically. Seriously, the stats are uncannily similar to last year, with near-identical eFG, TO%, OREB%, and FTA/FGA. The problem there is that last year's stats are after running the brutal Big Ten gauntlet and six NCAA tourney games; this year's are after seven KP100 teams and 9 real bad ones. Thus the hit when Kenpom makes his schedule adjustment.

Eyeballing it, I don't know. Burke was regarded as a middling defender at best. He had his trademark steal but was kind of undersized and tended to marshal his energy so he could do Trey Burke things on offense. Hardaway developed from definite liability to passable over his three years. Neither seemed like an impact player on that side of the ball.

McGary's loss is big, obviously, but at this instant they're only replacing about eight of his minutes per game with Horford/Morgan in the stats (McGary was at just under 20 last year and he's at just under 12 this year, though rapidly dropping.) Something else is just… off.

What that is changes. Against Nebraska the soft hedges provided the Cornhuskers easy lanes to the basket and Spike Albrecht, amongst others, had a tough time closing out in the first half. Penn State pushed it down the floor at every opportunity and was rewarded; Michigan couldn't stop Tim Frazier in transition like, at all.

The see-saw nature of the game was a reflection of the fact that each Michigan possession was essentially four points: Michigan got two if they scored and Penn State got two in transition if they missed. The six-minute lull spanning both sides of the half saw Penn State burst from 25 to 41 points, and another lull after Michigan had pushed it out to 16 saw a quick ten-point burst; in between Penn State struggled to do anything.

What that means for the mightier folk approaching depends on the opponent. Wisconsin isn't likely to push tempo; Iowa sends out waves of players in shifts to facilitate their punishing rate of play. No matter what, Michigan has to get some things figured out right now before they're exposed as paper tigers in the rough and tumble.

*[#1 Creighton($) has some truly astounding numbers, like Doug McDermott taking 37% of Creighton's shots when he's on the court and Ethan Wragge hitting 50%(!) of his 126 three pointers and two of his six(!) twos.]

Bullets

Gauntlet, ice cream, gauntlet, ice cream. The rest of the season breaks down into chunks neatly:

  • TERRIFYING GAUNTLET #1: @ Wisconsin, Iowa, @ MSU
  • GENERALLY ICE CREAM TYPE SITUATION: Purdue, @ Indiana, Nebraska
  • TERRYIFYING GAUNTLET #2: @ Iowa, @ OSU, Wisconsin, Michigan State
  • GENERALLY ICE CREAM TYPE SITUATION: @ Purdue, Minnesota, @ Illinois, Indiana

Michigan's D is wonky enough that they'll probably lose a couple in the ice cream areas of the schedule—away to Indiana and Illinois are most likely—and then man I don't know what's going on with the other seven games. This offense can beat anyone; it's a little difficult to see Michigan going on the road to any of those top ten outfits and coming away with wins.

Not just a Darius Morris reincarnation. Another game, another set of swooping pick-and-roll assists from Stauskas. Michigan's big men were 7/8 from the field and added 5/6 from the line as Stauskas and Morgan/Horford eviscerated Penn State's pick and roll D. Stauskas had five assists, and no turnovers; his assist rate has broken into the nationally ranked section of Kenpom while his TO rate remains just-a-shooter low. In Big Ten play his A:TO ratio is 20:5.

Oh and he's shooting 71% from inside the arc while doubling his FT rate. Just a fantastic, fantastic offensive player, in all ways.

Stauskas got caught on some bad switches to provide PSU buckets, and while he remains a sneaky-excellent on-ball post defender his issue came before the catch on a couple of PSU buckets; switched on the center he just stood passively waiting for the post feed before doing anything. He's tall enough to front a 6'9" guy effectively enough to dissuade an entry, or at least make it a difficult pass.

11957901023_4a87318e99_z[1]

Fuller

LeVert also creates. Slow night for LeVert scoring, but had five assists to match Stauskas's output. Michigan does not have a Burke but their shot generation comes from so many places that it barely matters. Most of the time they have four guys on the court who can generate something, and even when Irvin's out there it's three. That's tough to deal with. Who do you hide your crappy defender against?

Hello, nurse. The only Michigan player to miss more than one two point bucket was Glenn Robinson, who had an off night inside the arc (3 of 10). The rest of the team: 16 of 18. Good gravy.

As a team, their two point % in the last three games: 63%, 76%, 68%. None of those teams are good, but holy crap. Michigan's been putting on a clinic against the bottom of the Big Ten, and it's been beautiful to watch.

HELLO NURSE. One can forgive Glenn Robinson some misses from two if he's going to put his goddamned shoulder on the backboard.

large[1]

Nurse, please smother this man (WITH PUPPIES, this does not constitute a threat). Oh man, what does it take to get a charge? They broke this rule hardcore with their offseason emphasis.

Walton got run over twice in two minutes by Frazier, taking out-of-control shoulders to the chest. These were not Dukeflops. He got blasted into the end line on both, square to the shooter, and the refs just stared at him. Later, LeVert was stock-still as Newbill (IIRC) plowed into him. A ridiculous blocking call followed.

Charges were broken, but now they're even more broken. Suggestion: go back to previous year's rule, add clarification that simulating a charge is a foul, add some sort of mincing pantomimery refs have to do when they call it.

Comments

hajiblue72

January 15th, 2014 at 9:27 PM ^

That the game is changing. Why wouldn't you take the ball to the hoop? Defenders can't touch and can't draw a charge. I am surprised - we are taking more 3's per game. Thought for sure that # would be lower. Couple of googles leads me to believe all of college hoops is shooting more three's. Never would have guessed.

BlackOps2ForLife

January 15th, 2014 at 4:00 PM ^

Huge win to go 4-0 considering their next three games are going to be extremely difficult. Clearly the best outcome is getting three more wins, but the likely outcome is 1-2 and still possibly 0-3, Iowa being the win simply because it's in Ann Arbor. I have a feeling Wisconsin is going to win comfortably and MSU will likely dominate Michigan.

UMaD

January 15th, 2014 at 5:36 PM ^

The defense of his defense in this space seems rather strained.  Awesome awesome offensive player, improving quickly, fun to watch, likeable, etc. BUT - he's consistently getting beaten off the dribble against good teams and it's a big problem.  Being 6'6 helps a bit (especially in the odd post-up, big-man switch, as mentioned) but it doesn't really compensate for the perimeter issues that are his primary responsibility.

He absolutely CAN'T be taken off the floor, and shouldn't be - but for Michigan to be an elite team he needs better defenders around him.  It's unclear who those are.

The fixes for the defense are fraught with other issues.

1.  Zone-up:  This usually takes experience to be effective and the season is half over.

2.  Go big:  Using Irvin instead of a PG could help some things, but dribble penetration is still going to be a problem.

3.  Get better:  this is basically crossing your fingers.  Most of Michigan's perimeter players have limited ceilings as defenders.  It's possible Caris is being asked to focus on this as his offensive role seems a little smaller in conference play.

Michigan seems to have gone with option 3 together with some "F This, we'll just outscore them".  I'm with others in hoping the zone becomes more utilized.

charblue.

January 15th, 2014 at 6:22 PM ^

give the tie-breaking verdict in order to get a charge call these days. Those were some vicious blocks called instead of charges when both Walton and LeVert caught contact under the basket and were sent flying like some cartoon characters. 

It's as if you only get the call if you are square to the offensive player willing to absorb any momentous contact and are still for at least three seconds beforehand. And by the way, what's the point of the arc under the basket. That seems to have no bearing whatsoever on whether a block-charge is called. 

If you get to the spot first, and the offensive player tries to avoid full straight-on contact but wipes you out at the shoulder instead of at the belly button, you've still established your position. The idea that a charge must be scored like a skating routine in order to get the call seems ridiculous. It used to be, you know, like last year when the defender could even move laterrally and have his feet still moving, and that qualified for the charge call. 

Having said all that, and knowing this call is so iffy, you can see on replay how they could be called either way. Still, the fact that the middle is now open explains why Indiana sort of ran to the rim against the Badgers with little resistance last night. It was like a layup and backdoor cutting exhibition. Indiana can't shoot beyond 15 feet with any accuracy or efficiency, but time and again they drove around the Wisconsin defense like they were Nebraska. 

I assume this was an off-night experience for the Badgers, and they will have changed their ways by Saturday afternoon, resurrecting their shooting touch and going to the line 20 more times than Michigan. Still, offensive efficiency of this team is remarkable, a sign that this team loves to share the ball and believes everyone on the floor can score, which, as it turns out, they can. Hopefully, they keep it up Saturday. 

slblue

January 15th, 2014 at 9:23 PM ^

Watching the '89 team last night made me think of this team's similarities. Very tough conference, other teams favored, but a Michigan team with great passion and leadership. GRIII seems to be the key. Ever since Mitch went down he seems to be on an absolute mission. Probably an unfair comparison but he reminds me of Rice - someone who can dominate any game when he puts his mind to it. I would not be at all surprised if they had a tough go in conference and then went on another run in the tourney.

AlwaysBlue

January 15th, 2014 at 9:46 PM ^

those already inking in so many losses. The Wolverines are young and led by a coach with a reputation of improving his teams through the course of a season. Beilein has talked about how the point is to be peaking in March.

ehatch

January 16th, 2014 at 8:54 AM ^

I think everything is related.  Michigan can't stay in front of their man on the perimeter.  Last year, our help defense would come over and draw a charge.  This year our help defense is getting the block called on them, thanks to the crappy new rules.  Now we have fouled a guard which is generally a good foul shooter, thus the crappy FT% defense.  

 

New rules leads to Increased 2PT%, Increased FT% leads to the drop in the Defensive Efficiency ranking.  Michigan has to have better on the ball defense.  Not sure that is going to happen quickly, if it all.  

freejs

January 16th, 2014 at 11:29 AM ^

with the algorithm."

I appreciate the stats work, and think the point about the distribution within the extremes changing is a keen identification and shows a real change to the game, but I'm not so much for a breezy "things seem to revert to the mean, or maybe there's something wrong with the algorithm."

I'll believe our ability to be offensively efficient is actually the same - as in, do you do the same in the games that show whether you are a mediocre team or a team that can play with the contenders - when I see it. I have a bit of a fear that this is a Rich Rod situation where the offense is still the same against bad teams and very good teams, but it does not work the same.

I worry about this team's ability to be offensively efficient against teams that put five athletic, sound defenders on the floor - we lost our one athletic mismatch when Mitch went down (Glenn is obviously a super plus athlete, but he's not a super plus offensive player and is shut down-able in a way that Mitch was not).

That's a really long way of saying that I think there is definitely a problem with the algorithm, and that I think overreliance on KenPom, particularly until you've reached about the 3/4 point (this is a guess, but seems like a reasonable one) of a season, is a mistake. I hope the team suprises me in a positive direction - maybe they will continue to find their opportunities even against the more aggressive, smothering defenses - but I worry that when comparing playing offense against Nebraska versus playing offense against a Wisky/OSU/MSU, you're really looking at a different species of basketball game. Even Indiana and Purdue play very challenging, thorough defense all game long.

I'm just hoping the offensive side isn't fools gold.

The D, too much to say in an already long post, but Stauskus' other issue is that he has flat out lapses of losing his man, leaving a shooter that really hurt on that end. I think those are his biggest defensive issues - not just slight, but total loss of concentration on multiple possessions throughout a game. And I'm a huge fan - he's fucking Nik Stauskus. I'm just saying it's an issue it would be really great if he could correct.

mgoclayton

January 16th, 2014 at 3:11 PM ^

Michigan going to Madison, Wisc. on Saturday. This is a huge game for us especially because we are entering a crucial 3 game stretch. (road vs wisc, home vs iowa, road vs msu). I think a realistic goal entering this stretch would be to win 2 out of 3. We all know it would be much easier to do that if you win the first game. Go Blue!

willaimjawad

February 5th, 2014 at 3:43 AM ^

Getting CompTIA A+ certification indicates that a candidate has a broad base of knowledge and capability in hardware and operating system technologies including installation, configuration, diagnosing, preventive maintenance and elementary networking.This site provides  http://theexamcollection.com/    A+ certification gives you an opportunity to stronger and strengthen you professional career as this certification exam is known as the industries standard in terms of judging technicians hardware and software knowledge.