You're right, sorry, I meant to say if we lost to two teams in our division, say Iowa and Northwestern, and say Nebraska lost to us and a team in the other division, making our divisional record 3-2 and theirs 4-1, but our conference records the same, then we should go instead of Nebraska, with head-to-head trumping divisional record.
You just said the same stupid thing in the front page thread, you're wrong, so I'll say the same thing I said there:
So if UM and Nebraska both had the same conference record and we were 4-1 in the division losing to Iowa, and Nebraska was 4-1 in the division losing to us, you think Nebraska should be going to the BTCG?
So if UM and Nebraska both had the same conference record and we were 4-1 in the division losing to Iowa, and Nebraska was 4-1 in the division losing to us, you think Nebraska should be going to the BTCG?
I wasn't saying it works both ways. If someone isn't great at the sport one can still think of it as a real sport. I shoot in the high 90s and have an awful slice but I love and respect the game as much as any other.
Most people who don't think golf is a sport suck ass at it and bitch and moan that it's not a sport cause they can't put the ball in the hole in under 10 shots.
Oh yes, word by word, even reading them aloud as I counted, but refrained from comprehending the material and stuck to just counting. Or just used that convenient word count tool.
Wow, you almost had me. I thought this would be one of your rare posts where you didn't ask some dumb question, but little did I know you just decided to put it in your post instead of having it as the title. You cheeky bastard.
You're Randy Quaid in Major League II. Having the most pessimistic view on each position group. Have fun not looking forward to next season. Why don't you go hibernate in the fall why we all celebrate Michigan's 8-9 wins.
Recent Comments
And don't posbang yourself.
There's dozens of other threads this could have been posted in.
That is exactly what I heard.
Wow this announcer loves the phrase, "with a chance."
Way to go
Wrong thread
I was talking about the tie breaker for when two teams have the same conference records.
You're right, sorry, I meant to say if we lost to two teams in our division, say Iowa and Northwestern, and say Nebraska lost to us and a team in the other division, making our divisional record 3-2 and theirs 4-1, but our conference records the same, then we should go instead of Nebraska, with head-to-head trumping divisional record.
You just said the same stupid thing in the front page thread, you're wrong, so I'll say the same thing I said there:
So if UM and Nebraska both had the same conference record and we were 4-1 in the division losing to Iowa, and Nebraska was 4-1 in the division losing to us, you think Nebraska should be going to the BTCG?
No, head-to-head trumps divisional record.
So if UM and Nebraska both had the same conference record and we were 4-1 in the division losing to Iowa, and Nebraska was 4-1 in the division losing to us, you think Nebraska should be going to the BTCG?
No, head-to-head should trump divisional record.
Um no, 2, don't forget to count yourself.
D-line was given a rating of 4.
Wouldn't Minnesota have the toughest since they would have to play us?
Today is a slow news day?
Not necessarily when he's still just a redshirt freshman.
IUandUofM -- I liked your posts with pictures of the suites and club seats and trying to get us to purchase season tickets much better.
Doesn't bother me at all!!! I love them!!! Don't you!?!?!?!?!? ALL CAPS ARE EVEN BETTER!!!!!!
1 question mark works just fine.
Why do you hate consecutive identical consonants?
Frank stop trying to get hits on your website.
Please stop changing the name of the Big Ten to something 12 related.
Tell that to Bonderman's ego.
Or maybe you forgot about this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp7kUC6C5-c
An oxymoron or irony?
If you're going to correct my spelling, at least use correct grammar when doing so.
Your up-voting of your own post gives you neg-on-site status from me.