Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
MGoData
History
- Member for
- 2 years 9 weeks
- Blog
- View recent blog entries
Karma
- Current value
- 4
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 2 weeks 4 hours ago | How has no one suggested Brick House |
1.) Brick sounds pretty close to big. 2.) With the new renovations, the Big House is mostly brick from the outside. |
| 5 weeks 4 hours ago | Here is MIT's Calc 1 final. |
Here is MIT's Calc 1 final. This course combines calc 1 and 2 into a single semester so you can imagine the pace difference. http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-01sc-single-variable-calculus-... |
| 15 weeks 2 days ago | Yeah Kovacks was a huge bust. |
Yeah Kovacks was a huge bust. |
| 16 weeks 5 hours ago | Must. Pet. |
|
| 18 weeks 1 day ago | I understand the sentiment |
I understand the sentiment behind your statement that "Internet piracy is as wrong as stealing," but I just need to point out that the way you phrased it perpetuates a dangerous misunderstanding. Copyright infringment is, by definition, NOT stealing. It is copyright infringment. In most of the cases we are talking about with SOPA, like downloading a song or a movie, the violation is NOT a criminal offense. Copyright infringment at that scale is a civil matter. The equivalence you are suggesting, between stealing a CD and downloading one illegally, is false. If I walk into a store and steal a CD, no one else can buy that CD. If I make a copy of that CD, and leave the original there, the artist can still sell that to someone else. Now, you are right, in some cases there IS a lost sale still. If I can download the CD for free, I am not buying it. However, if the CD cost me any money, I may not buy it in the first place. Every illegal download does NOT represent a lost sale or a stolen one. Of course, in an ideal world, artists are compensated at a level that keeps them making art. |
| 1 year 17 weeks ago | Different kids respond to |
Different kids respond to different types of coaching. Besides that, could it be possible that perhaps, just a little bit, the ESPN cameras were always focused on Rich Rod because his name was constantly being brought up for being on the "hot seat" so while pretty much every coach yells at a couple players every game, you say Rich Rod doing it more? Also, I wouldn't call you a bad parent for understanding what coaching style is best for your kid. At the same time though, you don't really get to be all defensive about someone suggesting you are a bad parent and then, literally in the same sentence, imply that bad parents let their kids be coached by Rich Rod. |
| 1 year 17 weeks ago | Yeah I mean Michigan State's |
Yeah I mean Michigan State's offense was lights out against Alabama and Wisconsin's huge beefcake of an offensive line totally steam rolled TCU...oh wait. |
| 1 year 18 weeks ago | And aren't the Eagles the |
And aren't the Eagles the epitome of the type of team we all got used to under DeBord/Carr? A team that consistently produces above average seasons and playoff wins, but never posseses the innovation required to truly dominate and win a superbowl. |
| 1 year 18 weeks ago | (No subject) |
|
| 1 year 19 weeks ago | I also don't see a sample |
I also don't see a sample size greater than 1... |
